DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
8
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
kohnsharkosz
Member Since
Mar. 24, 2023
Favourite Team
San Jose Sharks
2nd Favourite Team
Seattle Kraken
Forum Posts
36
Posts per Day
0.1
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 hours ago
Thread:
Bunch of Jerks
I guess you are just trying to let Addison and Ruuta walk. Personally I would keep Ruuta and buyout MEV. If you don't think Addison will yield a late round pick just don't QO if you want him gone.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 1:57 p.m.
Thread:
Next Habs
Come on, man. I provided you with the value chart that came right off of Montreal's HockeyNow page and pointed out that #42 is valued 4-5x higher (that constitutes a huge gap) than the Van 3rd will likely end up and the Dvorak dump (let's call it what it is) plus Kovacevic don't make up that difference. You literally quoted that last part but apparently didn't read it. Not to mention that Van pick is a 2025. SJ is not going to just keep kicking the can down the road.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 12:58 p.m.
Thread:
Realistic Rebuild 4
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Why would the Canucks pay to dump one of our best forwards? If we move Garland (which is unlikely) he has positive value. But if we move a forward Mikheyev is the likely option</div></div>
Mikheyev will be a super hard sell to anyone not on his 12 team NTL. Retention will help. Garland can just be moved. But to your point, I think he returns an asset.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 12:45 p.m.
Thread:
Revamp
Sharks are at the "quality over quantity" stage of the rebuild. They are more likely looking for a trade partner to move up than move down.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 12:15 p.m.
Thread:
Next Habs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WhoCares_ItsAFantasyGame</b></div><div>I'd do the 2nd rounder with the condition is was the last of the two picks. Or even 2025, or 2026's pick..
Wonder why you're thinking SJS would be on his no trade list. Because he scores against them? I don't think players go by those rules.. San Jose is a good place to play, sunny, beaches close by etc..</div></div>
Hockey players want to win. That is not going to happen in SJ until at least the 26-27 season, at which point Dvorak will not be part of the Sharks plans. And if he is all about sun and beaches, the NTC becomes a limiting factor when the Sharks want to flip him. And regardless, the pick options and deferring down the road does not hold much value. A #42 vs a 60-64 is about twice the trade value. VS a #82-90, where that Van pick is likely to land, its 4 -5x the value. This becomes extremely important to a team that may very well be looking to use that draft value to package with 14 and 33 to trade into a spot to draft a Buium or Paracek. Dovarak and Kovacevic just don't provide that kind of value.
<img class="for_img" src="https://montreal.nationalhockeynow.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2023/06/Canadiens-trade-up-cost-Curtis.png" alt="Canadiens-trade-up-cost-Curtis.png">
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WhoCares_ItsAFantasyGame</b></div><div>And there they are.. Two comments with absolutely no understanding of the game and player worth.
At 4M$+ Dvorak is an expensive player, but under 3M$ he becomes a better asset for the team since he is able to win faceoffs when it counts and that is something teams want on their rosters. So for San Jose to get a player like that up until TDL where they can trade him and get another return on him is a good asset to have especially at that time where they can probably get back that 2nd round pick considering they would hold another % of his salary for the remainder of the year to a team who'll need a player like that in their series. Until then he helps their younger guys develop in their skills on faceoffs.
Then you have a young defenseman in Kovacevic who is a responsible defensive player, which by all means SJS would need at some point, but yeah you guys have no clue what that means unless a player has sparkling numbers and looks good scoring. He can move the puck and play the blue line even with a team like the Habs who were not good this year but have more RHD than needed.
And SJS gets a 3rd round pick so don't lose that much overall.. So there is no overpayment for a deal like Dvorak, Kovacevic and a 3rd round for a 2nd round..</div></div>
Jedi mind tricks.
Kovacevic is NOT young. He will be 27 at the start of the 24-25 season. That is a player that is somewhere in the vicinity of their ceiling. There are other options for much less draft capital.
Then there is Dvorak. Same story but older. Look through the pending UFA's. Guys like him are all over that list and cost no assets. And the salary retention means nothing to the Sharks who will be closer to the floor than the cap.
We will take Dvorak and Kovacevic, but for Montreal prodigal son Marc-Eduard Vlasic.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 1:55 a.m.
Thread:
Next Year
Also as a Sharks fan, you might want to hit us up for some further cap dump because there is no way, even for a homer deal, even at his age, that Stamkos stays at that price. Somebody on the up trend will offer him silly money to walk. Either that or its a nix on 1 or 2 of those UFA's you are trying to sign. Which of course you can fill with one of the many...many options in your prospect pool. ^^
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 1:46 a.m.
Thread:
concerns
Sharks already have a Givani Smith. No reason for another. Just send a draft pick.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 1:41 a.m.
Thread:
Trying something
Hell, with the current condition of our D I would say doing both of those deals would be just fine.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 6:57 p.m.
Thread:
Sharks
Wait! Hoffman signed for $5M? :tearsofjoy :squinty :tearsofjoy
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 6:34 p.m.
Thread:
Thoughts
Even the Shark homer in me doesn't see Peg giving up a 1st in that deal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 5:26 p.m.
Thread:
Ovechkin
How sweet. A farewell golf tour.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 5:24 p.m.
Thread:
Realistic Rebuild 1
Sharks say sure. Schmidt says, "I signed a NTC so you wouldn't send me there".
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 4:08 p.m.
Thread:
Canes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rob32sjsharks</b></div><div>I’ll give you if you buy him out we might give him a one to $1.5 million one or two year deal to see if a change of scenery is better but we ain’t taking on that contract in full. No one is.</div></div>
I wouldn't go so far as to say "no one is" . With the cap going up to projected 92m by 2025 a 4.8m hit would make someone look pure genius if he figures things out and becomes a compitent mid-6. If he doesn't, his buyout cost is quite reasonable. Someone, including his current team will see that as a worthwhile risk.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 3:28 p.m.
Thread:
Crazy idea to really upset CGY
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ste_Catherine_Street</b></div><div>Ok, then no thank you</div></div>
If the Sharks are trading that Pit #14 OA, it will be to move up for a Buium or Parekh. Barron doesn't move the needle enough for the rebuild time line.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 3:15 p.m.
Thread:
Cup Contenders v8
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Logicalicesports</b></div><div>80 games over two seasons or 80 games in a season (because that would never happen)</div></div>
Can't be 2 seasons because its a '25 pick.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 3:12 p.m.
Thread:
Sharks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Letsgosharks</b></div><div>jgp is a cap dump, lol and ferraro costs a first</div></div>
If you can get a first for Ferraro you should be trading in commodities much more valuable than hockey players.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 3:06 p.m.
Thread:
Crazy idea to really upset CGY
Sharks will take Barron for NJD 2nd (#42 OA). Final offer.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 2:58 p.m.
Thread:
Sharks Acquire Talent and Veteran Leadership
The first problem I see is the 2 guys you are bringing in via trade have NTC's. Players get those to avoid ending up with teams like SJ.
I am fairly certain that the thing Will Smith is waiting for before making a decision whether or not to turn pro this season is the draft lotto. If SJ lands Celibrini, I think Smith joins this year (24-25).
I think you are right about Addison, but Zadina probably gets a QO to see if he at least blossoms into something that will gain a TDL asset.
The type of D you are looking at and the level of overpay is probably spot on. We could maybe push even harder and shoot for a Montour.
I'm not a fan of Wennberg. I'd look elsewhere.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 2:29 p.m.
Thread:
Sharks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Letsgosharks</b></div><div>does Lou Lamorello have info that Grier has ties with Isis or something?</div></div>
I don't think it's that bad. I think the Sharks might actually be looking to move on from Ferraro. But given Pageau's age and cap, I think the pick grade should be higher. But it's all a moot point since with Pageau's NTC.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 2:17 p.m.
Thread:
Oh baby this is a just for fun look into my crytal balls
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>New Coach...Quenneville?</div></div>
I just realized this was a 25-26 roster and saw all the UFA's. Based on that I'm going to say Scotty Bowman.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 2:04 p.m.
Thread:
Lou has awoken
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Letsgosharks</b></div><div>I’d be willing to listen on him as a cap dump, would provide leadership but I’d want at least a 2nd tbh because it is for 14m</div></div>
We can listen all we want. Won't matter with Lee's NTC.
I seriously don't get it. Every proposed cap dump to the Sharks I see involves a no-trade clause of some type. Players aren't waiving their NTC's to go to bad teams.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 1:54 p.m.
Thread:
Oh baby this is a just for fun look into my crytal balls
So, 2 guys with M-NTC's to a team they won't want to go to? A team that gains nothing toward their rebuild by taking them?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 1:49 p.m.
Thread:
Game 7 or this happens
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GM_SZK</b></div><div>Granlund is a decent option but I don't see the Leafs giving up anything to get a guy of that quality when they can just go the UFA route and/or slide Domi over to 2C...also as mentioned above SJS have used their 3 retention spots so leafs would need to pay more to a 3rd team...at the TDL 2025...maybe a deal like this could happen if needed
EDIT sorry forgot about your NYI trade...I won't argue over the weight of the deal either way but I actually think its a good deal for the Leafs! Could be its a 3 team deal and Marner goes elsewhere as I feel like NYI already have a guy in Marner's spot (Barzal)</div></div>
The reason they go that route for a Granlund, if we ignore all the reasons it can't work, is the UFA route results in a more expensive player that expects a long-term contract. Especially now that the cap is finally going up, everyone wants a piece of the pie. If they can find someone in the Granlund mold, they get to kick the tires before making a commitment.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 12:51 p.m.
Thread:
Messing about
Assuming Mikheyev waives his 12 team M-NTC, which the Sharks are surely on, the Sharks will expect a pick going the their way for your cap dump, not your way.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 12:40 p.m.
Thread:
Next Year Sharks
That's a lot of moving parts for only marginal D improvement. Especially when I think 'peg holds out for TDL with Schmidt as rent bait.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com