SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Messing about

Created by: Barryblock
Team: 2024-25 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 16, 2024
Published: May 2, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,000,000
2$850,000
2$2,850,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$3,125,000
2$2,550,000
3$2,500,000
2$4,250,000
6$3,925,000
7$5,950,000
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. Greenway, Jordan
  2. Jokiharju, Henri [RFA Rights]
  3. 2025 2nd round pick (BUF)
  4. 2025 3rd round pick (BUF)
BUF
  1. Åman, Nils
  2. Hronek, Filip [RFA Rights]
  3. 2024 6th round pick (SJS)
2.
3.
VAN
  1. Jeannot, Tanner
  2. 2025 7th round pick (MIN)
TBL
  1. Bloom, Josh
  2. 2025 3rd round pick (BUF)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2025
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the MIN
2026
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,500,000$87,261,667$0$0$238,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,600,000$1,600,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C, LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,125,000$3,125,000
LW
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,950,000$5,950,000
C, RW
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$11,600,000$11,600,000
C, LW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, LW
UFA
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$2,665,000$2,665,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 3
$4,250,000$4,250,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,550,000$2,550,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,925,000$3,925,000
LD/RD
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 2 at 12:13 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 6,921
Likes: 2,603
Yeah no TB passes
May 2 at 12:22 p.m.
#2
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,448
Likes: 9,129
The Sabres would trade Jokiharju only if they cant afford him, trading him for a dman that will cost more doesnt make much sense. They also traded for Byram and are pretty full up at d. Also also they said they want more physicality in their bottom 6 so trading Greenway is another step backwards. Trade doesnt make sense at all for Buffalo
May 2 at 12:27 p.m.
#3
alwaysnextyear
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 1,600
That BUF trade is bad for the Canucks. They'll be able to get a better package for Hronek if they do decide to trade him.
mv21227 liked this.
May 2 at 12:29 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,553
Likes: 9,647
That’s an awful return for Hronek

Canucks aren’t paying for Jeannot either
May 2 at 12:37 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 3,816
Quoting: Shibbal18
The Sabres would trade Jokiharju only if they cant afford him, trading him for a dman that will cost more doesnt make much sense. They also traded for Byram and are pretty full up at d. Also also they said they want more physicality in their bottom 6 so trading Greenway is another step backwards. Trade doesnt make sense at all for Buffalo


Idk about that- Hronek would be an upgrade for our top4

Can’t say we’d be interested in Hronek for sure, bc we are all assuming we’d be looking for more of a shutdown type guy,
but he does make us better on defense
And the $4.4mil Cap for this year isn’t expensive for what he provides

The problem would be when we have to pay him after next year- which could be another reason we’d pass on a deal like this

But again, he’d be an improvement over Jokiharju (who i don’t dislike)
And although Greenway played well for us last year,
Granato is gone now & he’s in the last year of his deal,
so i don’t think he’s untouchable anymore


And another thing about bringing in Hronek
If Byram takes a step back, or if Hronek just ends up being a better fit, then we could choose to pay Hronek & move on from Byram
Of course it would be ideal if they both worked out & we signed them both, but bringing him in does cover us a bit, and it just gives us more options moving forward


Idk that a trade like this is likely,
but i do think it’s possible
May 2 at 12:51 p.m.
#6
Phase 3 Profit
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 164
Likes: 53
Assuming Mikheyev waives his 12 team M-NTC, which the Sharks are surely on, the Sharks will expect a pick going the their way for your cap dump, not your way.
FunMustBeAlways liked this.
May 2 at 7:35 p.m.
#7
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,448
Likes: 9,129
Edited May 2 at 8:08 p.m.
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Idk about that- Hronek would be an upgrade for our top4

Can’t say we’d be interested in Hronek for sure, bc we are all assuming we’d be looking for more of a shutdown type guy,
but he does make us better on defense
And the $4.4mil Cap for this year isn’t expensive for what he provides

The problem would be when we have to pay him after next year- which could be another reason we’d pass on a deal like this

But again, he’d be an improvement over Jokiharju (who i don’t dislike)
And although Greenway played well for us last year,
Granato is gone now & he’s in the last year of his deal,
so i don’t think he’s untouchable anymore


And another thing about bringing in Hronek
If Byram takes a step back, or if Hronek just ends up being a better fit, then we could choose to pay Hronek & move on from Byram
Of course it would be ideal if they both worked out & we signed them both, but bringing him in does cover us a bit, and it just gives us more options moving forward


Idk that a trade like this is likely,
but i do think it’s possible


You of all people think its likely? Why would they over pay for a 6 ft offensive dman that wouldnt have top pair minutes or PP time. Especially when they can get Jokiharju cheaper and he is just as effective in the Dzone. Hronek has also been invisible thus far in the playoffs
May 3 at 1:54 a.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 3,816
Quoting: Shibbal18
You of all people think its likely? Why would they over pay for a 6 ft offensive dman that wouldnt have top pair minutes or PP time. Especially when they can get Jokiharju cheaper and he is just as effective in the Dzone. Hronek has also been invisible thus far in the playoffs


I think u misunderstood me
I literally said, “idk that it’s likely”
Meaning, i don’t think it is (likely)

But i do think Hronek is better defensively than Jokiharju
And (obviously) offensively as well
Hronek isn’t the “shutdown” type we probably need,
but he is a good all around defenseman

Again though- to be clear- i do not think it’s likely
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll