SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

NMU1986

Member Since
Jan. 17, 2017
Favourite Team
Detroit Red Wings
2nd Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
Forum Posts
156
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 30, 2017 at 10:56 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 29, 2017 at 10:54 a.m.
Thread: a few moves that need to happen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Larkinisking</b></div><div>

Green is 31 years old still a lot of hockey left in him, Injuries are a major concern i give you that much. With retained salary no reason not to believe that Holland can't get for Green what Arizona got for Yandle while i agree that Yandle was much younger then Green is i still feel that we can get something decent for Green only time will tell. I don't see Holland moving Green until next year if we're out of the playoffs.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>redw1n9s</b></div><div>Green isn't young, there's your first problem. I doubt Holland is intelligent enough to realize he can trade Green, and still obtain Vatanen or Barrie via another trade. Lastly, who is giving up that kind of package for Green, regardless of retained salary, when he has one year left on his deal? Not happening.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Larkinisking</b></div><div>

Green is 31 years old still a lot of hockey left in him, Injuries are a major concern i give you that much. With retained salary no reason not to believe that Holland can't get for Green what Arizona got for Yandle while i agree that Yandle was much younger then Green is i still feel that we can get something decent for Green only time will tell. I don't see Holland moving Green until next year if we're out of the playoffs.</div></div>

Green will only bring a good package back from a team that is going to be a Stanley cup contender, that is partially why I chose San Jose, you bring him in on the second pairing and your second power play unit, I don't see a first that is why I went with 2 second round picks as far as a prospect it could be any defensive prospect they are willing to give up, and green will finish in the top 30 scoring defensemen in the league on a bad red wings team this season.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 15, 2017 at 11:32 a.m.
Thread: TO START A REBUILD
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mytduxfan</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lenny7</b></div><div>If the Ducks are moving a d-man (A big IF), it's not going to be Theodore. He doesn't need to be protected in the expansion draft. They get Tatar, and that's just one more person they need to worry about losing. Plus, a draft pick? No thanks.

Does Jurco only get you a 5th?

Not a bad deal with Carolina, they take on Nyquist's contract and get a prospect in return for a better prospect.

The Brendan Smith one makes me laugh, only because last night he was essentially the centerpiece in a deal to get the Wings Cam Fowler. It was funny. Not a bad idea to get whatever you can for him.

The Edmonton deal is messy. I know Chiarelli has a history of being a moron, but are you really giving up on a 23 year old (Former first overall pick) center, plus throwing in TWO first round pick for an offensive d-man and 2 months of Vanek? Yikes. Probably not...</div></div>

Also from a Ducks POV, we also can't move Theodore for Tatar because of cap space.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NMU1986</b></div><div>Tatar would not have to be protected as long as they do not resign him before the season is over because he will be a restricted free agent, at least I think that is how the rules would go and it would probably take and added pick or prospect to that deal, but I am not completely sure, as for the Edmonton deal it would probably work if I took out RNH, because of taking the 2 older players that are not playing for them, As for jurco that was a spit ball guess he has potential if placed in the right situation, as for Brendan smith miller and ott it is to get what ever we can get for them</div></div>

That's not how it works. LV can still draft the rights of players, even if a contract is not in place. Otherwise, what are TB worried about? Neither one of Palat, Johnson or Drouin need to be protected because they're all pending RFAs. Lol... yeah, Yzerman wishes that were the case. It's not.</div></div>
Yes I see what you mean, what I was actually thinking is only for unrestricted free agents for a team.