SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Brady Tradechuck

Created by: NHLfan10506
Team: 2024-25 New Jersey Devils
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 12, 2024
Published: Apr. 12, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Another Brady trade (first being the Cole Brady blockbuster)



2025-26:
- Under contract…………..$77.80m (17 players)
- Luke gets Quinn deal…+$7.85m
- Bahl gets 50% raise……+$1.60m
- Lazar replacement…….+$1.00m
- Bastian replacement….+$0.78m
- MacDermid / goon……..+$0.78m
- Goalie…………………………+$3.00m

TOTAL…………………………….$92.75m
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
3$950,000
3$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,000,000
2$1,000,000
2$1,000,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$5,000,000
2$3,000,000
2$1,300,000
2$1,100,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Dickinson, Sam
3$950,000
Overage, Bonus
1$1,550,000
Trades
1.
OTT
  1. Holtz, Alexander
  2. Marino, John
  3. 2025 1st round pick (NJD)
  4. 2026 2nd round pick (NJD)
2.
NJD
    Would this work as an Eichel comp?
    OTT
      Eichel=Brady
      3rd=(injury risk)

      Tuch=Marino
      Krebs=Holtz
      1st=1st
      2nd=2nd
      Recapture Fees
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2024
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the WPG
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the COL
      Logo of the NJD
      2025
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the WPG
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      2026
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the DAL
      Logo of the WPG
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      23$87,500,000$88,162,944$1,538,897$5,100,000-$662,944
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Ottawa Senators
      $8,205,714$8,205,714
      LW
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $8,000,000$8,000,000
      C
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $7,875,000$7,875,000
      RW, LW
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $8,800,000$8,800,000
      LW, RW
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $7,250,000$7,250,000
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      RW, C
      RFA
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $6,000,000$6,000,000
      LW, RW
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $3,150,000$3,150,000
      C, LW
      NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      RW, C
      UFA - 1
      $1,300,000$1,300,000
      RW, LW
      UFA
      $1,100,000$1,100,000
      C, RW
      UFA
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $1,350,000$1,350,000
      RW
      UFA - 1
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $3,400,000$3,400,000
      LD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $9,000,000$9,000,000
      RD
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $1,925,000$1,925,000
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$1,850,000$2M)
      LD/RD
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$3,250,000$3M)
      RD
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      G
      RFA
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      LD
      UFA
      $5,000,000$5,000,000
      RD
      UFA
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $1,050,000$1,050,000
      LD
      RFA - 1
      Overage, Bonus
      $1,550,000$1,550,000
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $800,000$800,000
      LW
      RFA
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $775,000$775,000
      LD/RD, LW
      UFA

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Apr. 12 at 12:35 p.m.
      #1
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2017
      Posts: 5,846
      Likes: 1,520
      rofl that dont get brady OTT declines
      Apr. 12 at 12:37 p.m.
      #2
      Future Ducks legend
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2022
      Posts: 9,930
      Likes: 6,721
      There was a LOT more than a 3rd round picks worth of risk in the Eichel trade, it was an outright gamble by Vegas, and Eichel wanted out, it should not be used as a comp.
      dh91 and squashmaple liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 12:43 p.m.
      #3
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2019
      Posts: 40,295
      Likes: 18,390
      Quoting: GiggywithGibby
      There was a LOT more than a 3rd round picks worth of risk in the Eichel trade, it was an outright gamble by Vegas, and Eichel wanted out, it should not be used as a comp.


      The Eichel trade is a benchmark for value. It included a 3rd round pick going to Vegas, which I omitted here.

      All the contextual pieces can make any comp impossible (injury, center vs wing, etc). But for straight up value, I think it serves as useful comp. Both 25-year old captains, both with 4+ years on deal. Both 30-goal forwards. Eichel played a premiere position and produced more, but had higher AAV and injury risk.
      Apr. 12 at 12:46 p.m.
      #4
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2019
      Posts: 40,295
      Likes: 18,390
      Quoting: athrin
      rofl that dont get brady OTT declines


      I think it’s a fair comp to Eichel deal.

      (And certainly more realistic than Bratt Nemec Bahl and top-10 pick)
      SadSensFan14 liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 12:46 p.m.
      #5
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Nov. 2023
      Posts: 998
      Likes: 421
      Seems like a fair trade to me.
      NHLfan10506 liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 12:48 p.m.
      #6
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2017
      Posts: 5,846
      Likes: 1,520
      Quoting: NHLfan10506
      I think it’s a fair comp to Eichel deal.

      (And certainly more realistic than Bratt Nemec Bahl and top-10 pick)


      Bradys comp is his brother not eichel
      GiggywithGibby liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 12:48 p.m.
      #7
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2022
      Posts: 1,863
      Likes: 879
      I'm not sure I see Eichel trade as a comparable. I know that Eichel and Tkachuk are both locked into long-term deals, but I mean, Eichel as a trade was a very long saga. the divorce between player and team was a foregone conclusion for a long time, so it was more along the lines of Buffalo actively taking offers and then choosing the best one (obviously with some negotiation but you know what I mean). This is trying to pry the captain, star, and cornerstone piece of a 7-year long rebuild on a long-term and reasonable contract away from a team that has no desire or reason to trade him. If the Devils were really deadset on getting him, then it would take significantly more than fair value
      athrin, NHLfan10506, GiggywithGibby and 1 other person liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 12:50 p.m.
      #8
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2020
      Posts: 10,118
      Likes: 9,363
      Quoting: athrin
      Bradys comp is his brother not eichel


      Brady’s comp is not his brother. His brother is a much better player than he is
      Schuyler, SadSensFan14, squashmaple and 1 other person liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 12:56 p.m.
      #9
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2023
      Posts: 11,953
      Likes: 3,157
      Quoting: emoprettyboy
      I'm not sure I see Eichel trade as a comparable. I know that Eichel and Tkachuk are both locked into long-term deals, but I mean, Eichel as a trade was a very long saga. the divorce between player and team was a foregone conclusion for a long time, so it was more along the lines of Buffalo actively taking offers and then choosing the best one (obviously with some negotiation but you know what I mean). This is trying to pry the captain, star, and cornerstone piece of a 7-year long rebuild on a long-term and reasonable contract away from a team that has no desire or reason to trade him. If the Devils were really deadset on getting him, then it would take significantly more than fair value


      Trades like this only occur when the player wants out or the team is trying to shop them.

      If Tkachuk is on the market, the price will be the price.

      If Tkachuk is not on the market, he will not be traded.

      There is no magical super price that GMs are going to offer to get Tkachuk when he's allegedly not available.

      Because it will always be better to simply target the players who are actually available at reasonable prices.
      squashmaple liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 12:57 p.m.
      #10
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2022
      Posts: 1,863
      Likes: 879
      Quoting: dgibb10
      Trades like this only occur when the player wants out or the team is trying to shop them.

      If Tkachuk is on the market, the price will be the price.

      If Tkachuk is not on the market, he will not be traded.

      There is no magical super price that GMs are going to offer to get Tkachuk when he's allegedly not available.

      Because it will always be better to simply target the players who are actually available at reasonable prices.


      great, NJD fans can stop trying to trade for tkachuk then
      Who_is_Jimmy_Stu liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 12:58 p.m.
      #11
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2023
      Posts: 11,953
      Likes: 3,157
      Quoting: emoprettyboy
      great, NJD fans can stop trying to trade for tkachuk then


      I would very much enjoy that.
      Apr. 12 at 12:58 p.m.
      #12
      KFTW
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 43,055
      Likes: 24,026
      Quoting: GiggywithGibby
      There was a LOT more than a 3rd round picks worth of risk in the Eichel trade, it was an outright gamble by Vegas, and Eichel wanted out, it should not be used as a comp.


      And Eichel was gonna have a major surgery which brought down his value tremendously
      GiggywithGibby liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 12:59 p.m.
      #13
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2023
      Posts: 11,953
      Likes: 3,157
      Quoting: csick
      And Eichel was gonna have a major surgery which brought down his value tremendously


      And he was a significantly better player which brought his value up tremendously.
      Apr. 12 at 1:00 p.m.
      #14
      KFTW
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 43,055
      Likes: 24,026
      I’m not a fan of Marino he’s an overpaid 3RD
      Apr. 12 at 1:00 p.m.
      #15
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2021
      Posts: 2,670
      Likes: 1,916
      Comps are fine to establish a reference point, but idk how any objective person looks at this and thinks it's anywhere near a winning offer.
      csick liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 1:01 p.m.
      #16
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2023
      Posts: 11,953
      Likes: 3,157
      Quoting: MNCountryClub
      Comps are fine to establish a reference point, but idk how any objective person looks at this and thinks it's anywhere near a winning offer.


      And if you suggested the eichel deal to Buffalo fans back then you'd have heard the same thing
      Apr. 12 at 1:03 p.m.
      #17
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2017
      Posts: 5,846
      Likes: 1,520
      also, why the hell are you/NJD trading for Brady when your Gs cant even stop a beach ball, NJD problems are not scoring hell they scored more goals than OTT this year, NJD problem is between the pipes
      Apr. 12 at 1:05 p.m.
      #18
      KFTW
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 43,055
      Likes: 24,026
      Quoting: MNCountryClub
      Comps are fine to establish a reference point, but idk how any objective person looks at this and thinks it's anywhere near a winning offer.


      Exactly . And it’s a joke trying to trade fair offer for Brady when he’s 24 , has term , has no injury concerns , is a captain, brings way more than just production to the table and can’t pick which team he gets traded to.
      MNCountryClub liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 1:07 p.m.
      #19
      KFTW
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 43,055
      Likes: 24,026
      Quoting: dgibb10
      And if you suggested the eichel deal to Buffalo fans back then you'd have heard the same thing


      You’re missing the context buddy. It got very ugly between Eichel and the Sabres . He wanted to pick a surgery that Buffalo did not want him to have . A lot of teams were worried about that surgery and if he’d ever be the same player again and how long his recovery time would be .

      Only Vegas was okay with it . That surgery brought his value down like 80% .

      No way Tuch would’ve been a centerpiece had he been healthy. You’d probably have been looking at a top 30-40 player ++
      GiggywithGibby liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 1:10 p.m.
      #20
      alwaysnextyear
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 5,527
      Likes: 1,567
      Trying to look at it from OTT's perspective;

      This is a team that desperately wants to make the jump to being a playoff contender. They have good young pieces and players entering their prime that should keep them relevant for a while if they can level up. If they do consider trading Brady (and I'm not sure why they would unless he's asking out), I think it will definitely be for a comparable player or package of players that will help the Sens win-now. I don't think Holtz + 2025 1st will be the type of significant pieces they're looking for.

      IMO the centrepiece from NJD would be Bratt.
      SadSensFan14 and squashmaple liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 1:15 p.m.
      #21
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2023
      Posts: 11,953
      Likes: 3,157
      Quoting: csick
      You’re missing the context buddy. It got very ugly between Eichel and the Sabres . He wanted to pick a surgery that Buffalo did not want him to have . A lot of teams were worried about that surgery and if he’d ever be the same player again and how long his recovery time would be .

      Only Vegas was okay with it . That surgery brought his value down like 80% .

      No way Tuch would’ve been a centerpiece had he been healthy. You’d probably have been looking at a top 30-40 player ++


      That surgery did not bring his value down 80% lmao.

      I am asking you to find 1 example in the salary cap era of these massive packages of these superstars you suggest.

      If you want to discount eichel because of injury, we can go to a power forward winger with the EXACT same PPG as tkachuk in the 2 years before he was traded.


      Timo Meier:
      In timo's favour:
      -better goal scorer
      -better defensive metrics
      -cheaper 1st year
      -overall more term if signed (9 years)
      -did it with significantly worse linemates

      In Tkachuk's favour
      -certainty of term
      -younger
      -more of a goon

      But of course there's some magical fairy dust that Tkachuk has that apparently makes him vastly more valuable.

      It hasn't actually led to on ice success, or team success, or success of any kind. But apparently it skyrockets his value.
      mv21227 liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 1:15 p.m.
      #22
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2021
      Posts: 2,670
      Likes: 1,916
      Quoting: csick
      Exactly . And it’s a joke trying to trade fair offer for Brady when he’s 24 , has term , has no injury concerns , is a captain, brings way more than just production to the table and can’t pick which team he gets traded to.


      100%. Brady is a very unique player. There's just obviously a huge disconnect between using basic critical thinking skills and having tunnel vision over comps in this thread.
      Apr. 12 at 1:15 p.m.
      #23
      KFTW
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 43,055
      Likes: 24,026
      Quoting: alwaysnextyear
      Trying to look at it from OTT's perspective;

      This is a team that desperately wants to make the jump to being a playoff contender. They have good young pieces and players entering their prime that should keep them relevant for a while if they can level up. If they do consider trading Brady (and I'm not sure why they would unless he's asking out), I think it will definitely be for a comparable player or package of players that will help the Sens win-now. I don't think Holtz + 2025 1st will be the type of significant pieces they're looking for.

      IMO the centrepiece from NJD would be Bratt.


      I looked at John Marino’s analytics and they’re goddamn awful. I legit wouldn’t trade a 2nd for him.

      Holtz has generally struggled with the pace of the game , he can still be a decent to great player but he’s a risk.

      The pick is good but it falls right outside the high tier of players. So you’d be picking between like Greentree, Nygard those type of players
      Apr. 12 at 1:15 p.m.
      #24
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2023
      Posts: 11,953
      Likes: 3,157
      Quoting: alwaysnextyear
      Trying to look at it from OTT's perspective;

      This is a team that desperately wants to make the jump to being a playoff contender. They have good young pieces and players entering their prime that should keep them relevant for a while if they can level up. If they do consider trading Brady (and I'm not sure why they would unless he's asking out), I think it will definitely be for a comparable player or package of players that will help the Sens win-now. I don't think Holtz + 2025 1st will be the type of significant pieces they're looking for.

      IMO the centrepiece from NJD would be Bratt.


      If by centerpiece you mean 1 for 1 maybe
      Apr. 12 at 1:16 p.m.
      #25
      KFTW
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 43,055
      Likes: 24,026
      Quoting: dgibb10
      That surgery did not bring his value down 80% lmao.

      I am asking you to find 1 example in the salary cap era of these massive packages of these superstars you suggest.

      If you want to discount eichel because of injury, we can go to a power forward winger with the EXACT same PPG as tkachuk in the 2 years before he was traded.


      Timo Meier:
      In timo's favour:
      -better goal scorer
      -better defensive metrics
      -cheaper 1st year
      -overall more term if signed (9 years)
      -did it with significantly worse linemates

      In Tkachuk's favour
      -certainty of term
      -younger
      -more of a goon

      But of course there's some magical fairy dust that Tkachuk has that apparently makes him vastly more valuable.

      It hasn't actually led to on ice success, or team success, or success of any kind. But apparently it skyrockets his value.


      Again Meier legit was gonna be a ufa and no acquiring team was gonna trade for him without an extension. So again Meier chose where he was willing to sign

      It’s really not the same as a guy with term left lmao
      athrin liked this.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll