SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Brady Tradechuck

Created by: NHLfan10506
Team: 2024-25 New Jersey Devils
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 12, 2024
Published: Apr. 12, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Another Brady trade (first being the Cole Brady blockbuster)



2025-26:
- Under contract…………..$77.80m (17 players)
- Luke gets Quinn deal…+$7.85m
- Bahl gets 50% raise……+$1.60m
- Lazar replacement…….+$1.00m
- Bastian replacement….+$0.78m
- MacDermid / goon……..+$0.78m
- Goalie…………………………+$3.00m

TOTAL…………………………….$92.75m
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
3$950,000
3$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,000,000
2$1,000,000
2$1,000,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$5,000,000
2$3,000,000
2$1,300,000
2$1,100,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Dickinson, Sam
3$950,000
Overage, Bonus
1$1,550,000
Trades
1.
OTT
  1. Holtz, Alexander
  2. Marino, John
  3. 2025 1st round pick (NJD)
  4. 2026 2nd round pick (NJD)
2.
NJD
    Would this work as an Eichel comp?
    OTT
      Eichel=Brady
      3rd=(injury risk)

      Tuch=Marino
      Krebs=Holtz
      1st=1st
      2nd=2nd
      Recapture Fees
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2024
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the WPG
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the COL
      Logo of the NJD
      2025
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the WPG
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      2026
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the DAL
      Logo of the WPG
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      23$87,500,000$88,162,944$1,538,897$5,100,000-$662,944
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Ottawa Senators
      $8,205,714$8,205,714
      LW
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $8,000,000$8,000,000
      C
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $7,875,000$7,875,000
      RW, LW
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $8,800,000$8,800,000
      LW, RW
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $7,250,000$7,250,000
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      RW, C
      RFA
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $6,000,000$6,000,000
      LW, RW
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $3,150,000$3,150,000
      C, LW
      NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      RW, C
      UFA - 1
      $1,300,000$1,300,000
      RW, LW
      UFA
      $1,100,000$1,100,000
      C, RW
      UFA
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $1,350,000$1,350,000
      RW
      UFA - 1
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $3,400,000$3,400,000
      LD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $9,000,000$9,000,000
      RD
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $1,925,000$1,925,000
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$1,850,000$2M)
      LD/RD
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$3,250,000$3M)
      RD
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      G
      RFA
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      LD
      UFA
      $5,000,000$5,000,000
      RD
      UFA
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $1,050,000$1,050,000
      LD
      RFA - 1
      Overage, Bonus
      $1,550,000$1,550,000
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $800,000$800,000
      LW
      RFA
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $775,000$775,000
      LD/RD, LW
      UFA - 3

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Apr. 12 at 2:00 p.m.
      #51
      KFTW
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 44,022
      Likes: 24,687
      Quoting: Borocop
      Yeah like if the devils would be willing to include Nemec then its a totally different conversation as to what the other pieces are, but there needs to be something (somethings) we need/can use down the line in a significant role


      Yeah Marino, Holtz and a 1st next year is just a sell low package for Brady.

      The starting piece needs to be equivalent to a top 5-6 pick or similar player. Maybe not on the level of Stutzle/Sanderson but not worse than 1 step below

      This offer is equivalent to like Chytil, Kakko and a late 1st which the Sens never consider.

      Marino isn’t good at all
      Apr. 12 at 2:00 p.m.
      #52
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2019
      Posts: 41,461
      Likes: 18,838
      Quoting: Borocop
      I think for me if the sens are trading Tkachuk, they need to get 2 pieces who can make up for his impact on the aggregate and then some. It would be a lot more enticing if it was Mercer instead of Holtz, and the 2024 1st instead of 2025, but it has to be worth setting the sens timeline back a few years. If they are trading Tkachuk they are probably also committed to trading Batherson, Giroux and guys like Jospeh as well, which is doable, but if we move our best player there needs to be an avenue to elevate the ceiling of the team down the line and I dont think this does that as is


      Mercer + 2024 1st seems plausible. Or if NJD win lottery, I suppose that pick could be too (Celebrini for Brady)

      The real wild card would be sending Dougie to Ottawa. Was hurt this year, so probably not optimal time to trade him. But with Nemec’s arrival, Casey on his way…I wonder how much it would be considered (for either side). Would probably have to be some salary offsets too.
      Apr. 12 at 2:02 p.m.
      #53
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2023
      Posts: 12,728
      Likes: 3,392
      Quoting: Borocop
      Yeah like if the devils would be willing to include Nemec then its a totally different conversation as to what the other pieces are, but there needs to be something (somethings) we need/can use down the line in a significant role


      Nemec was offered 1 for 1 for 8 years of Matthew Tkachuk at 9.5 million dollars.

      NJD will offer jesper bratt for Jake Sanderson, and we can have a discussion on what the other pieces are from ottawa. That's what we're talking about here with nemec, except Nemec still has 2 more years at 900k while Sanderson is at 8+ mill now
      Apr. 12 at 2:04 p.m.
      #54
      Au-revoir Dorion
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2019
      Posts: 4,722
      Likes: 3,100
      Quoting: NHLfan10506
      Mercer + 2024 1st seems plausible. Or if NJD win lottery, I suppose that pick could be too (Celebrini for Brady)

      The real wild card would be sending Dougie to Ottawa. Was hurt this year, so probably not optimal time to trade him. But with Nemec’s arrival, Casey on his way…I wonder how much it would be considered (for either side). Would probably have to be some salary offsets too.


      There wouldnt be any interest in Hamilton imo. The only way we trade Tkachuk is if the futures package gives us an avenue to elevate the team around Sanderson/Stutzle/Pinto in 3 years(ish). Dougies a really good player but if were trading tkachuk for him, we may as well just keep Tkachuk because it doesnt change the timeline or our ceiling.
      csick liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 2:04 p.m.
      #55
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2019
      Posts: 41,461
      Likes: 18,838
      Quoting: csick
      I’d rather get a piece to build around . Like it has to start with a Nemec or top 6 pick imo for me to consider


      I would imagine any picks would be available. We have all our firsts. Holtz, Casey, Hameenaho, etc available. Mercer maybe. Pretty much anyone not named Hughes, Bratt, Hischier, Nemec.
      Apr. 12 at 2:07 p.m.
      #56
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2023
      Posts: 12,728
      Likes: 3,392
      Quoting: NHLfan10506
      I would imagine any picks would be available. We have all our firsts. Holtz, Casey, Hameenaho, etc available. Mercer maybe. Pretty much anyone not named Hughes, Bratt, Hischier, Nemec.


      No, I think since ottawa apparently values #POWERFORWARD so much, we should offer Timo Meier for Jake Sanderson. Clearly Sanderson doesn't throw enough #HITZ for ottawa's liking.
      Apr. 12 at 2:07 p.m.
      #57
      KFTW
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 44,022
      Likes: 24,687
      Quoting: NHLfan10506
      I would imagine any picks would be available. We have all our firsts. Holtz, Casey, Hameenaho, etc available. Mercer maybe. Pretty much anyone not named Hughes, Bratt, Hischier, Nemec.


      There will be better starting piece offers than Mercer imo.

      If Casey was over 6 foot , I would be interested but I’m not.

      I wish I could attach a picture because Holtz and Marino have brutal analytics . I will pass. Mercer won’t be able to get to 40pts this year


      I like Hameenaho but not as more than the 3rd or 4th best piece in a Tkachuk trade
      Apr. 12 at 2:08 p.m.
      #58
      KFTW
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 44,022
      Likes: 24,687
      Quoting: dgibb10
      No, I think since ottawa apparently values #POWERFORWARD so much, we should offer Timo Meier for Jake Sanderson. Clearly Sanderson doesn't throw enough #HITZ for ottawa's liking.


      Sanderson is a #1 2 way Dman who posts strong results at both ends at 21 years old while facing top lines every game and is not sheltered yeah good luck with that.

      The only player Sanderson would be available for is Jack Hughes
      Borocop liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 2:08 p.m.
      #59
      Au-revoir Dorion
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2019
      Posts: 4,722
      Likes: 3,100
      Quoting: dgibb10
      Nemec was offered 1 for 1 for 8 years of Matthew Tkachuk at 9.5 million dollars.

      NJD will offer jesper bratt for Jake Sanderson, and we can have a discussion on what the other pieces are from ottawa. That's what we're talking about here with nemec, except Nemec still has 2 more years at 900k while Sanderson is at 8+ mill now


      Yeah but Calgary didnt take that deal so its a moot point.
      csick liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 2:09 p.m.
      #60
      alwaysnextyear
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 5,569
      Likes: 1,595
      Quoting: csick
      The Sens are not trading a 6’4 power forward for a 5’10 small soft winger no matter how skilled he is. Brady would never be traded for Marner, Bratt, Necas , Kyrou or any of these guys.

      The Sens will never get softer like that


      Fair enough. Again, I'm not saying this particular deal is the one the Sens would be interested in; just that if they're considering trading Tkachuk they're going to want a top-line player back.
      csick liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 2:09 p.m.
      #61
      KFTW
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 44,022
      Likes: 24,687
      Quoting: Borocop
      There wouldnt be any interest in Hamilton imo. The only way we trade Tkachuk is if the futures package gives us an avenue to elevate the team around Sanderson/Stutzle/Pinto in 3 years(ish). Dougies a really good player but if were trading tkachuk for him, we may as well just keep Tkachuk because it doesnt change the timeline or our ceiling.


      Yup exactly . Has to be pieces between 18-22 years old
      Apr. 12 at 2:09 p.m.
      #62
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2019
      Posts: 41,461
      Likes: 18,838
      Quoting: Borocop
      There wouldnt be any interest in Hamilton imo. The only way we trade Tkachuk is if the futures package gives us an avenue to elevate the team around Sanderson/Stutzle/Pinto in 3 years(ish). Dougies a really good player but if were trading tkachuk for him, we may as well just keep Tkachuk because it doesnt change the timeline or our ceiling.


      I was going off of @alwaysnextyear comment (below).

      This is a team that desperately wants to make the jump to being a playoff contender. They have good young pieces and players entering their prime that should keep them relevant for a while if they can level up. If they do consider trading Brady (and I'm not sure why they would unless he's asking out), I think it will definitely be for a comparable player or package of players that will help the Sens win-now.
      Borocop liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 2:10 p.m.
      #63
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2023
      Posts: 12,728
      Likes: 3,392
      Quoting: csick
      There will be better starting piece offers than Mercer imo.

      If Casey was over 6 foot , I would be interested but I’m not.

      I wish I could attach a picture because Holtz and Marino have brutal analytics . I will pass. Mercer won’t be able to get to 40pts this year


      I like Hameenaho but not as more than the 3rd or 4th best piece in a Tkachuk trade


      Marino's analytics remain better than Chychrun's.

      I'd also recommend you take a look at his metrics last year.
      Apr. 12 at 2:11 p.m.
      #64
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2020
      Posts: 10,454
      Likes: 9,571
      Quoting: csick
      Again you’re undervaluing Brady. I didn’t see you had the 2025 pick instead of the 2024 pick . Not a chance Sens ever ever consider that.

      Not a single piece is good in that deal.

      Marino is a scrub not even close to what Tuch was worth

      That deal gets u laughed at for our captain.

      The Sens aren’t doing a deal without a young STUD piece to build around


      Marino is definitely similar value to what Tuch was at the time of the trade. Yes he’s struggled this year but he’s still a good top 4 dman. Pretty comparable to Zub

      Holtz is probably worth a bit less than Krebs was at the time of the trade but is still a solid piece

      1st and 2nd = 1st and 2nd

      Maybe it doesn’t get it done but it’s not the worst offer for a good but not elite 1st line winger
      Apr. 12 at 2:11 p.m.
      #65
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2023
      Posts: 12,728
      Likes: 3,392
      Quoting: csick
      Sanderson is a #1 2 way Dman who posts strong results at both ends at 21 years old while facing top lines every game and is not sheltered yeah good luck with that.

      The only player Sanderson would be available for is Jack Hughes


      Nemec is providing quality top pairing hockey at RIGHT DEFENSE at age 19 for 900k a year.

      I wouldn't trade Nemec for Sanderson.
      Apr. 12 at 2:12 p.m.
      #66
      KFTW
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 44,022
      Likes: 24,687
      Quoting: dgibb10
      Nemec is providing quality top pairing hockey at RIGHT DEFENSE at age 19 for 900k a year.

      I wouldn't trade Nemec for Sanderson.


      And I wouldn’t trade Sanderson for Nemec. Sanderson is better and will remain better due to his elite defence
      Apr. 12 at 2:15 p.m.
      #67
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2019
      Posts: 41,461
      Likes: 18,838
      Quoting: csick
      There will be better starting piece offers than Mercer imo.

      If Casey was over 6 foot , I would be interested but I’m not.

      I wish I could attach a picture because Holtz and Marino have brutal analytics . I will pass. Mercer won’t be able to get to 40pts this year


      I like Hameenaho but not as more than the 3rd or 4th best piece in a Tkachuk trade


      Marino got the rough match-ups and slumped early in the season. He’ll be fine. Mercer was mostly just unlucky (and was put in more of defensive role under Lindy). He too will be fine. Holtz is a puzzle. Not sure what he becomes.
      Apr. 12 at 2:15 p.m.
      #68
      KFTW
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 44,022
      Likes: 24,687
      Quoting: mv21227
      Marino is definitely similar value to what Tuch was at the time of the trade. Yes he’s struggled this year but he’s still a good top 4 dman. Pretty comparable to Zub

      Holtz is probably worth a bit less than Krebs was at the time of the trade but is still a solid piece

      1st and 2nd = 1st and 2nd

      Maybe it doesn’t get it done but it’s not the worst offer for a good but not elite 1st line winger


      It’s not even this years first so no.

      None of these pieces are worth anything in the long run .

      Holtz is not what he was when he got drafted, not even close. Marino this year is an overpaid 3rd pair. Last year he was a solid #4 D. So now he’s hovering between a 4 and a 5th Dman.

      The 1st next year is bound to be in the 20s.

      It’s a brutal offer .


      Starting piece need to be a top 7 pick or an equivalent prospect
      Apr. 12 at 2:17 p.m.
      #69
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2023
      Posts: 12,728
      Likes: 3,392
      Quoting: csick
      And I wouldn’t trade Sanderson for Nemec. Sanderson is better and will remain better due to his elite defence


      Sanderson was an AHLer in his D+2 year. Nemec is a top pairing dman.

      Marino analytics

      Marino has had a down year, but if you think you can find a quality RD that's younger, cheaper, better, and willing to play in ottawa, go for it.

      I wouldn't offer marino up at all. If he gets to anything close to what he did last year, it is the bargain of the century
      Apr. 12 at 2:17 p.m.
      #70
      KFTW
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 44,022
      Likes: 24,687
      Quoting: NHLfan10506
      Marino got the rough match-ups and slumped early in the season. He’ll be fine. Mercer was mostly just unlucky (and was put in more of defensive role under Lindy). He too will be fine. Holtz is a puzzle. Not sure what he becomes.


      You don’t trade Brady Tkachuk and accept that the other team has 5+ untouchables
      Apr. 12 at 2:17 p.m.
      #71
      KFTW
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 44,022
      Likes: 24,687
      Quoting: dgibb10
      Sanderson was an AHLer in his D+2 year. Nemec is a top pairing dman.

      Marino analytics

      Marino has had a down year, but if you think you can find a quality RD that's younger, cheaper, better, and willing to play in ottawa, go for it.

      I wouldn't offer marino up at all. If he gets to anything close to what he did last year, it is the bargain of the century


      Sanderson at 20 last year was less sheltered than Nemec is now
      Apr. 12 at 2:20 p.m.
      #72
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2020
      Posts: 10,454
      Likes: 9,571
      Quoting: csick
      It’s not even this years first so no.

      None of these pieces are worth anything in the long run .

      Holtz is not what he was when he got drafted, not even close. Marino this year is an overpaid 3rd pair. Last year he was a solid #4 D. So now he’s hovering between a 4 and a 5th Dman.

      The 1st next year is bound to be in the 20s.

      It’s a brutal offer .


      Starting piece need to be a top 7 pick or an equivalent prospect


      Marino is a good #3 dman who’s great defensively and could play top pair if he’s paired with an offensive guy (Quinn Hughes for example). Yes he’s had a down year this year but is still a good player

      The 1st next year matches the Vegas 1st they traded (which ended up being earlier than expected at the time of the trade because they missed the playoffs)

      Holtz could be upgraded to a better piece but it’s not far off the Eichel return. And Eichel is a better player as well as a center, which cancels out most if not all of the negative value his neck injury added into the deal
      dgibb10 liked this.
      Apr. 12 at 2:20 p.m.
      #73
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2023
      Posts: 12,728
      Likes: 3,392
      Quoting: csick
      Sanderson at 20 last year was less sheltered than Nemec is now


      So his D+3 year?

      in his D+2 year sanderson was sheltered in college, putting up significantly worse results than Casey btw
      Apr. 12 at 2:21 p.m.
      #74
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2023
      Posts: 12,728
      Likes: 3,392
      Quoting: csick
      You don’t trade Brady Tkachuk and accept that the other team has 5+ untouchables


      When those 5 untouchables all have more value than Brady Tkachuk you do.
      Apr. 12 at 2:22 p.m.
      #75
      KFTW
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 44,022
      Likes: 24,687
      Quoting: dgibb10
      So his D+3 year?

      in his D+2 year sanderson was sheltered in college, putting up significantly worse results than Casey btw


      Casey is ass . He’s a 5’9 offensive D. Good luck with that at the nhl level
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll