DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Utah
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Utah
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
DopeGM
Serious armchairGM:)
Member Since
Jun. 8, 2021
Forum Posts
314
Posts per Day
0.3
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 hours ago
Thread:
Markstrom Mang
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Neither of Dickinson or Catton are falling to 15th OA</div></div>
Stranger things have happened than Catton falling to 15th. Probability is low but definitely not impossible. I was looking at 13/14 and I don’t think MIN and SJS take him in all draft scenarios so if he gets past 12 he could definitely fall to 15.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 hours ago
Thread:
Markstrom Mang
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DanielSan92</b></div><div>Yzerman trading a first for a 34 year old mediocre goalie makes sense?</div></div>
I think it makes sense for the Wings. Unless I’m missing something they have all three centre slots and four dmen all drafted and developing. What do you get at 15th overall that is a big enough piece to move the needle on what you’ve built?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 9:50 a.m.
Thread:
Flip Ullmark Land Carlo
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>I think there 11th pick is around the point in most drafts where you get into hit and miss territory. Your likelihood of selecting Wahlstrom is probably just as high as Villardi.
I don’t believe Boston is in a stage where decreasing their defensive effectiveness fits with their identify. I think the probability that the 11th pick is better than Carlo over the next 4 years is probably in the 25th percentile (since you chose a random one, I might as well).</div></div>
I like random numbers :)
I disagree just simply based on reading and thinking about this draft. It’s possible it’s the usual homer pre draft hype that’s got me. But I’m usually pretty solid on what high floors look like.
If they took Senecke for example, that’s a much lower floor. Bust potential. But Iginla and Catton look very projectable. Silayev has bust potential and I’ve only seen highlights. But a floor of Tyler Myers is not all that shabby.
I’m trying to say that the pick is very projectable for the Bs if they were to move Carlo it would have to be for a premium asset. Better the pick than Rossi for example.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 9:33 a.m.
Thread:
Flip Ullmark Land Carlo
I would say there’s a 75% chance that the pick at 11 is as impactful to the team as Carlo in a different role. Massive difference in pick value is our difference of opinion.
Carlo gets a really nice third contract most likely. So if I’m Bs management, the question is “is three years of Carlo compared to Clifton worth sacrificing in order to land 10+ years of a young, impactful player”
Catton / Iginla for forwards
Yakemchuk / Silayev on D
Those are really projectable, nice pieces to add.
Tough to move Carlo but the value is around correct in ACGM land :)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 9:15 a.m.
Thread:
Flip Ullmark Land Carlo
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>We have invested quite heavily in our blue line.
I'd rather trade it for a middle 6 center</div></div>
An elite winger or a shutdown third line centre. On the third line centre, that’s interesting. Worth noodling. Playoff style centres are really hard to land in trade. Seems more likely that Kulich becomes that piece to me. I like the thinking but can’t think of a target
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 9:12 a.m.
Thread:
Flip Ullmark Land Carlo
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>Boston is not trading Carlo. Period.
If Canes want Ullmark B’s just trade him to them themselves. Doubt they do. Freddy, OK, and Martin all signed for next year. They’d have to make other moves to make room for him.</div></div>
I was brainstorming a properly aged RHS dman and only Carlo and Cernak popped through. Both way more valuable to their teams than in trades.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 8:52 a.m.
Thread:
Flip Ullmark Land Carlo
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>And how would we have acquired ohgren?</div></div>
Would you move the pick for a veteran but not too old RHS shutdown defenceman?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 8:51 a.m.
Thread:
Flip Ullmark Land Carlo
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>And how would we have acquired ohgren?</div></div>
:) Ostlund apologies
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 8:30 a.m.
Thread:
Flip Ullmark Land Carlo
Kulich or Ohgren instead of Rosen results in a “no” from the BUF side I would think.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 8:28 a.m.
Thread:
Flip Ullmark Land Carlo
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BsInOttawa</b></div><div>I don't think I'd even think about that package for just Carlo, forget Ullmark.
And why would Boston not trade Ullmark to Carolina themselves?</div></div>
Not enough in the deal for BUF to accept without him in there.
Rosen and 11OA isn’t enough for Carlo in your mind? Interesting
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 2:02 p.m.
Thread:
Huge trade Dubois to Habs flipping LHS and RHS Dmen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Robinho3799</b></div><div>You mean cancer by zodiac sign ? :D
Well, I personally think PLD can work out with the Kings if he has some decent wingers on his line. He was mostly centering the third line with Laferriere on RW (rookie season), Anderson-Dolan on LW, who is not NHL-level, guys like Kaliyev who is not working out with the team and partly Grundstrom or a few games Lizotte, who are also not known as top 6 wingers.
That being said, his role was not clear all season long and guys were shuffled around on his line.
He surely produced way below expectations and surely has to improve, but in the end of the day, the Kings need to provide him also with the chance to show, what they'd expect out of him.
Actually, the Kings shouldn't have kept Blake as a GM and would be probably in a better position, if they replaced him. But the discussion about Blake is a very different one...</div></div>
By zodiak sign exactly ;)
Blake is the wrong guy to make the PLD call. I personally don’t like holding PLD long term and this summer is the only chance at the 1/3 buyout. So it’s a unique short timeline issue.
But assuming a new GM would also hold, I think you’re right that building a real like around him and calling it L2 internally would make a big difference for PLD.
But again, cancer, he should have been able to work hard regardless of his minutes and role. He’s not that guy. I’d rather buyout than hold given the 1/3 cost. And more than both I’d rather do a deal like this one and just make the salary retention the cost.
I tried to design it so they won the Spence for cheap young depth side of the deal, which I think they did. And then threw in PLD and retained for Anderson part.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 9:51 a.m.
Thread:
Huge trade Dubois to Habs flipping LHS and RHS Dmen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Robinho3799</b></div><div>Well, if that is the type of deal, the Kings easily pass on that and Rob Blake already ruled out a possible buy-out of his contract... That said, the Kings better build a good line with him</div></div>
He said no buyout? Wild. I would never enter the next season with a roster that good and a cancer that obvious
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 9:43 a.m.
Thread:
Huge trade Dubois to Habs flipping LHS and RHS Dmen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Robinho3799</b></div><div>The Kings easily decline</div></div>
It’s a MTL deal or a buyout so I guess you’re saying LA chooses buyout! I totally agree. But this is the type of deal I could see working for both sides.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 9:42 a.m.
Thread:
Huge trade Dubois to Habs flipping LHS and RHS Dmen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jfkst1</b></div><div>This is pushing into borderline HOF worthy territory. I mean HOF of delusion.</div></div>
I’m a disinterested third party! lol. Just dopey not delusional :)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 9:41 a.m.
Thread:
Huge trade Dubois to Habs flipping LHS and RHS Dmen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Borocop</b></div><div>It would make way more sense without retention IMO. The incentive for them to trade Dubois would be to rid themselves of his 8.5M$ cap hit, but in this case theyre only saving 1M with you sending Anderson back, and are getting significantly worse</div></div>
I think LA’s motivations extend beyond year 1 cap.
Only motivation for MTL is to rid one of Anderson or Gallagher in the deal. And they won’t bring in PLD at a cap hit above Suzuki for everyone’s sake.
So a big part of the motivation for LA is avoiding the long term cap hit, however minimal those will be, in exchange for getting something for PLD.
To be honest, if Spence is outpriced, I wouldn’t mind the idea of trading all those assets they gave up for PLD for Struble a great young G and a cheap RHS #6Dman. They slot really well
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 9:41 p.m.
Thread:
SJS overpays for 7
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>StutzlesNumber1Fan</b></div><div>Staios will buy out Korpi before he gives away #7. We NEED this prospect at #7 and the difference in players between 7 and 14 is big unless Eiserman falls to 14.</div></div>
I’m not sure the fall off all that big actually. Especially if you want a winger. The only RHS D I would love for OTT is Levshunov.
But at 14 I like Eiserman Catton (if he falls) Senecke and Yakemchuk. So there is lots to like around the amount as Dickinson
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 9:38 p.m.
Thread:
SJS overpays for 7
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lancebmx</b></div><div>Where is the overpay?</div></div>
SJ wouldn’t take on Korpisalo for a first plus in terms of draft capital. But they might to move to seven key spots.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 3:34 p.m.
Thread:
Adding Mang cheap D and a pick for the first
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Fitzy has every right to be upset. But NJD will worry about their own.
Aren’t CGY fans upset at Conroy? He could have had a top young prospect in the fold. Asked Markstrom to waive, even to announce the trade to locker room. But he tried to press for more and backfired. Within days, Markstrom was calling him out publicly. Now, even the most friendly beat reporters are calling for “splitsville”…and Conroy has zero leverage to make any deals. He will be lucky to get 50 cents on the dollar. Where is outrage, CGY fans?</div></div>
The outrage is there. Now bordering apathy. But it’s with ownership. The rumour feels very legit that ownership vetoed the trade blaming the salary retention as requiring more return.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 12:58 p.m.
Thread:
Adding Mang cheap D and a pick for the first
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Move the retention from Mangiapane to Markstrom…replace Hanley, 4th and Mangiapane with the best single piece they can muster.
That was my thinking.</div></div>
We don’t have a lot of single pieces besides picks but maybe a 26 second or something where the Flames get some time value of draft capital and NJ gets an asset easy to flip at future trade deadlines.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 11:19 a.m.
Thread:
Adding Mang cheap D and a pick for the first
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>I think #10 is certainly in play…in some combination with Calgary…but I don’t think Mangiapane would be it. It may be as simple as Marky and Vancouvers pick for NJD 1st.
That said, I would honestly be very surprised if Fitzy dealt with Conroy anytime soon. He was still pissed at end of season and said Conroy was trying to extort him at deadline.</div></div>
Yeah I’d look anywhere for tending (Gustavsson) first but a two year bet on a goalie this good. I dunno. It’s the kind of deal GMs do make.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 8 at 6:04 p.m.
Thread:
RHS Dman worth overpaying for
Can’t say with certainty that Iggy and Catton are both top ten. Too even a shelf all the way to like 14. Senecke my favourite of that group. His balance and shiftiness post growth spurt. RHS. And high danger scoring plays are amazing.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 8 at 11:43 a.m.
Thread:
Demidov or Levshunov
Oh and also, that TB pick is just close enough to some super intriguing middle six right wingers. Nygard. Senecke. Parascek. Greentree. It doesn’t move you off Demidov in particular but if you leave this first round with winger winger you’ve got to be a little disappointed!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 8 at 11:41 a.m.
Thread:
Demidov or Levshunov
I just get to thinking about how good that D core is, which is the biggest key to playoff success besides top 2 centres, and I just risk finding the best winger complements for Bedard.
On the flip side, you develop Demidov perfectly, you just might not get a strong enough D corps, and you’re paying Demidov up the wazzoooo in your contender window. He’s going to put up insane points at his peak if he’s playing with Bedard.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 8 at 11:38 a.m.
Thread:
Demidov or Levshunov
I’m a ***little*** worried the Hawks are building too small to win the Cup but that doesn’t stop me from loving Demidov’s game and fit.
Bedard being small is irrelevant. Hes the person being matched up against. And a big opposing centre or small, that centre is scared. It’s moreso that Moore is clearly a small style centre and none of Reichel Kurashev and Nazar are physically intimidating (but Nazar looks built for playoff success so he’s not the issue for sure)
You add Demidov to that group and you start to look and feel like a team that doesn’t scare you physically in a seven game series. It’s definitely a factor. But it’s moreso a factor in, once you draft Demidov and lock in Nazar, you are reallly careful about the physical nature and willpower of the rest of your top 9.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 8 at 9:48 a.m.
Thread:
Trade back then really back
If you don’t like Markstrom I get the hate! Can you imagine doing this deal without the Van first and trade back (early second) at the deadline?!
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com