SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

sharcuda22

sharcuda22
Member Since
Apr. 18, 2022
Favourite Team
San Jose Sharks
2nd Favourite Team
Seattle Kraken
Forum Posts
1766
Posts per Day
2.4
Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 8:11 p.m.
Thread: Thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Windjammer</b></div><div>Yeah, they both are. Granlund was brought in as a cap dump. A fluke year doesn't change what he is. Why did you think no one was interested at the tdl?

Benning is paid too much for a 6/7D.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lancebmx</b></div><div>Winnipeg doesn't need more forwards. They have enough as it is. Pionk isn't a cap dump. He was outmatched against Colorado but he's still an effective second pairing defenseman. This trade doesn't make sense for Winnipeg.
I would be surprised if Fabbri cost that much to dump. Could probably retain and get positive value for him.</div></div>

The fluke year for granny was in Pittsburgh. There was plenty of reported interest but the sharks chose to take the hertl contract off their books with their last retention slot. Figuring out 1.5 years with third party retention is tricky at the deadline. I would imagine he gets moved this year unless he displays real leadership for the kids and we keep him around. Idk if fabbri is the type of player the sharks want i just see the trade a lot on here.

Lance thank you for filling me in. I spaced on the Monahan deal so if youre set for forwards then for sure this doesnt make sense.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 26 at 1:41 p.m.
Thread: Fin Alley
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RecycleShark</b></div><div>First saw the Kostin for Ceci trade idea in a post from an Oiler's fan. It had the Sharks retaining on Kostin, which they can't do as they have no retention spots left. I read a lot of Oiler fans complaining about Ceci. He'd still be an upgrade for the Sharks. Thought I could get him on the cheap since Edmonton fans seem to love Kostin and hate Ceci, but maybe that was a real Klim Shady deal. How about Ceci for a 3rd?</div></div>

I mean Ceci has pretty regular numbers, he’s marginally positive on the ice on a stacked team. He would probably be one or two best dman on the sharks but he’s like marginal improvement on Ruuta IMO. I think there is a good chance Emberson would do as good in the role if he stays healthy. He’s not someone that really moves the needle and is paid appropriately. Kostin if we can mold him into a depth scorer / real middle six player is more valuable.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25 at 6:04 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 24 at 6:09 a.m.
Thread: Draft to ONL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoSeider53</b></div><div>Dude obviously isn't a true Red Wins fan, because we're not giving up assets for Fabbri and Holl. Not sure how many times we need to mention that Holl is a cheap buyout candidate.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DanielSan92</b></div><div>Holl's not really much of a negative asset when his buyout is peanuts.

Yeah nobody's giving **** for him or even taking him for free... But Detroit ain't paying a premium to dump him either.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lancebmx</b></div><div>Rather buyout Holl and give Fabbri and maybe a third for Sturm.</div></div>

I get that. IMO Sturm is worth a third, so if we took out Fabbri (who i also thought was neutral asset at best but wings could better spend the cap my b) and the fourth. Would you do holl and second for Sturm?

Then the instead of holl being an expensive dump he is essentially trading up 1 round to dump him and then Sturm for the “third”
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 24 at 6:06 a.m.
Thread: Draft to ONL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aedoran</b></div><div>Holl's buyout is cheap Detroit buys him out before paying to move him.

Fabbri had 18g - 14a - 32p in 68 games while averaging just under 13 minutes a game.

Only Zetterlund had more goals with 24g. He played 82 games and averaged just under 19 minutes a game.

Along with Zetterlund, Eklund and Granlund had more points but they had a lot more ice time.

He is probably borderline neutral to some teams but SJS isn't one of them. Fabbri would make SJS a better team without a doubt.

I'm not saying SJS should take this deal but Fabbri is quite easily better than Sturm.</div></div>

I will only say that Sturm is a more important player for the sharks than fabbri would ever be. Why does fabbri only get 13 minutes a night? Are there just other players ahead of him?
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 23 at 6:41 p.m.
Thread: Trade Down Pricing
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>glarson17</b></div><div>I think I’d rather San Jose just stay at 14. You’re getting a very similar player at 10 and 14. I think they want those mid draft picks to take a shot at a goalie which they didn’t get last draft</div></div>

I’d be in favor of trading up for an organizational need. Like if we got Celebrini and Buium or Parekh were still on the board as opposed to drafting whoever is still available even if they have similar skill levels until from like 5-12/13/14. From what I’ve read there isnt really a standout goalie this year and not one that would be in range of any of the sharks picks in the first two rounds. We can get fourths from just about anywhere with any combination of Zadina, Addison, Burroughs, Benning, Ruuta, Romanov etc.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 18 at 10:02 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 18 at 1:35 p.m.
Thread: NHL GMs should offer sheet
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div>Lundell has to be willing to accept the OS also. This offer is like pretty much what he'll get from the Panthers when you factor taxes into it. So its an easy no for him. (Logically speaking)

Going to SJ to be a bottom dweller for the foreseeable future making slightly more money but more taxes OR stay on a perennial cup contender and make a little less money now maybe but more in the long term.... Can't even say the weather is better as a main factor either.

That's why if you do OS someone, the money has to be sooooo much more than the player deserves for them to realistically accept. Just like UFA's, you have to overpay.

Want Lundell? Offer minimum 6.5-7M. Panthers couldn't match and Its a significant overpay that would make any player think twice about. Problem is you better be confident Lundell is a top end player because everyone thought KK was going to be amazing in Carolina and we all know how that is turning out.</div></div>

I dont see how they can afford Lundell unless the plan is to let Reinhardt walk