SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

sharcuda22

sharcuda22
Member Since
Apr. 18, 2022
Favourite Team
San Jose Sharks
2nd Favourite Team
Seattle Kraken
Forum Posts
1825
Posts per Day
2.4
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 10 at 9:49 a.m.
Thread: donuts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>habitantlecolon</b></div><div>We put Barron in the minor so he can gain the extra second in the d-zone. He's a great first passer but in a bit of stress sometimes when under pressure. He's a good 200ft two way to become, we just have too much skilled younger d at the moment. He's way better than Addison and can offer you some time to develop your young D crew</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>habitantlecolon</b></div><div>Andy won't be a problem when you will need to sign your new core. Anyway salary cap won't be a mess for at least 4 years.</div></div>

But at the moment he would need a spot we already have filled. We dont have any top pairing D-Men but I dont think Barron is a huge improvement, if any, on any of Ferraro Thrun Mukhamadulin or Emberson, which doesnt take into account Ruuta Vlasic Benning or Burroughs. So centering him as the main value for a cap dump doesnt make much sense to me
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 10 at 9:07 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 9 at 6:07 a.m.
Thread: Would San Jose Consider
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wqrrior</b></div><div>ya i dont think you are wrong for seeing that upside, and there's definitely promise there, but the same could be said about the sharks. moving on from a guy they took at 4 this early is something that just about never happens. i just believe the degree of upside in smith is far more likely and has a much higher ceiling, to the point where not just this trade, but any trade, would be rejected.</div></div>

This and Hutson isnt a type of player Grier seems to value that highly. He likes the big boys, and trading Smith for Hutson doesn’t make a lot of sense. I dont see Hutson as a MUCH better player than Mukhamadulin, although definitely better. If Hutson is a 3A defender 2B Muk is a true 3rd best d man. Would rather have smith and Celebrini
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 4:03 p.m.
Thread: Who Needs Sleep
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Burnzie8_88_4Cup</b></div><div>It would be nice and allow Sturm to play 4 C, and give us 4 solid Cs, whomever it is?</div></div>
My thinking exactly

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>matthias893</b></div><div>I haven't heard anything yet about Edstrom staying in Sweden for another year, maybe I missed it? That is what Bystedt did for his D+2, but I think Edstrom might have the more pro-ready game. Lower ceiling, but higher floor. It wouldn't surprise me to see them as the 2C/3C on the Barracuda this year.</div></div>

I could see that, and to clarify there has been no news surrounding edstrom either way. I think he is gonna be back in Sweden, he had a good SHL playoffs but there is no need to rush him.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 6:03 a.m.
Thread: Dreamy
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RecycleShark</b></div><div>Don't really want Pageau on the Sharks, too small.
Smart Askarov trade. I'm down. Hadn't thought of that before. Alternatively, how about the #14 pick for Gilroy's Wolf?
Celebrini opens up so many posibilities.</div></div>

I dont mind spending one of our future firsts to get a guy that is good or more developed now tbh, was just going through trades that could happen<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DenisPotvin</b></div><div>No interest in Askarov at this stage of the rebuild. I'd also hope for more for taking Pageau's contract.</div></div>

Why would we want a young incredible goalie who is waiting behind saros for a shot? He makes perfect sense but I think Nash would have to come down on their price again. I think pageau would be a good ish fit, he’s just slightly overpaid.