SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

oneX

Member Since
Mar. 3, 2019
Forum Posts
2827
Posts per Day
1.5
Forum: Toronto Maple Leafs9 hours ago
Forum: Toronto Maple Leafs10 hours ago
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>The three stooges (liars) at the press conference today.
How can Shanahan who has been Leaf president for 10 years.....blame Keefe and others. He's been behind the coaching hires (especially Babcock,) all the GM hirings. He's allowed the Leafs to trade away so many picks, including up to 2026...three drafts away, for what ONE playoff round win. Just shameful on Shanahan's part blaming others as he collects his large cheque....for what.

Trevling another bozo. Last summer he said the Leafs are going to change their defence. Well his one change last summer was signing Klingberg.
Kinda funny how the core four was "criticized" but Trevling signed Nylander to an eight year extension at 11.5m. Now Nylander may be worth it, though I don't think any other team would have offered more
Seems like Nylander got a "hometown premium" which was so prevalent in the Dubas and Shanahan era.

I'll cut Pelley a little slack since he new to his position. But I wouldn't trust Shanahan and Trevling in matters of hockey personnel evaluations.

Leafs will probably be no better in 24/25....but let's a competent GM can spend the cap with the departure Tavares and Marner wisely in the summer of 2025</div></div>

What bothers me about Shanahan is...when Dubas was still here and supposedly wanted to make a big change in the core 4, Shanahan didn't let him but a year later he's maybe ready for a big change to the core 4? Was the last 3-4 years not enough to come to that conclusion?

As for Treliving, I'm cutting him some slack because I feel the GM change happened so late that by the time Treliving took over he was already behind on contract talks with Leafs players and also evaluating and going after players in free agency. In order for Treliving to have had a fair shot at even a decent off season (nevermind a good off season), he needed to be in place by the TDL.

I'm still not convinced that the core guys (Matthews and Nylander) have or will figure out how to adapt to playoff hockey. Marner is the guy of the 3 that has and probably will struggle the most because of how officiating standards change from regular season to playoffs.
Forum: Toronto Maple Leafs22 hours ago
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsYesterday at 11:17 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsWed. at 9:53 a.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsWed. at 1:23 a.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsTue. at 11:06 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsTue. at 10:57 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsTue. at 10:46 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsTue. at 12:04 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsTue. at 11:59 a.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsMon. at 11:45 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsMon. at 6:32 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RipNasty</b></div><div>Oh I will, when he is the one that made the mistake. But that play is not on him. Rielly and Samsonov shoulder the blame there. Not Marner.

Other things he did definitely deserve scrutiny but certainly not that. It's the same as blaming him for a goal against after a line change when everyone was in good position but mistakes by those players resulted in a goal. The guy wasn't even on the ice.

For the OT winner, had Marner chased pasta, pasta could have back handed it to the point where no one was now defending and the leafs would have been out of position and chasing the play. Who knows what could have happened but in that instance, a dump in from centre to that corner is the defencemans responsibility. Rielly hesitated for a second and changed directions. (Hence why I think he expected the puck to go behind the net). It hits the stanchion and bounces to Pasta who Rielly should have been closer too by then. Samsonov drops to his knees and hugs the post and didn't move until pasta was nearly at the far post.

Samsonov lost focus on that play. He should have stopped it.

It's the picture perfect play as to why he never should have been given the number 1 role. The guy makes saves he has no business making sometimes and that excites people. But then goal 1 and 2 happen. The first goal he was just out of position and the puck went in. If he was square to the shooter it hits him. Woll would have stopped that. Woll would have challenged pasta and either poke checked or slid over in time.

Samsonov I would say cost us more than anyone else apart from Keefe.

And really, anyone expecting high scoring games was ridiculous. Boston doesn't let in much. They defend better than almost every other team. To beat them you have to do exactly what Florida did. Pressure them and force some odd man rushes. Which TO did rarely but look at their goals, most of which were transition plays. Off the cycle they had nothing. But Keefe stuck to that system. Take it up ice, get it into their zone and then maintain possession and cycle until they make a mistake. Well Boston just didn't make any. And their goalie was awesome. Boston didn't make it easy and we Keefe made it easier on them by not adjusting to what they were doing.

As I keep saying, I am not opposed to trading Marner if you get good value. I say this because while it can't be denied he's a world class player, I am not sure he has the mental fortitude to handle TO. So would I trade him? Yes, if I got fair value for him.

If the best we can do is Parayko or some other 2nd pair defenceman who's already 30 years old and signed for another 6 years, then it's stupid to trade him. And you can't let him walk. So if no good trade comes to fruition then you keep him and hope a new coach can employ a better system that provides some offence in the playoffs.</div></div>

Look,you can explain all you want whether Marner had responsibility for Pasta or not but Keefe admitted (I think it was after game 1, not sure) about having Marner out on the ice when Pasta is out there and basically needing Marner to make sure Pasta doesn't get grade A chances.

Thinking of that reminds me how poor a playoff series Marner actually had because Pasta still managed to be a difference maker while our guys couldn't figure it out.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsMon. at 6:23 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsMon. at 2:42 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aadoyle</b></div><div>Of the big 4 im giving a pass to Willy but a slight one as man the body language he gave floating in for OT not good. Like watch the Pasta winner. Hustle a bit your not a slow guy lul you skated in the fastest skater comp

Matthews doesnt get a full pass but im not gonna go after him due to health issues. Guy looked sick in the interview. That said game 1,3, and 4 not good enough and should have never played game 7 sorry. Agreed only dominant performance up to standard game 2. Game 1 man was that ugly high stick penalty that leads to a bruin goal


Marner and JT yea not good enough

Tavares had 1 PP goal and 1 5 on 5 point for 11m not good enough. I know he's past his prime but come on

Marner had 1 goal 2 assists, had some moments but again not good enough

Knies had the same goals as both combined and is on an ELC


Berube or whoever comes in first things first should sit them down and go this is what I expect you dont play this way you sit got it</div></div>

Tried to nultiquote but whatever..the next page thing messed it <a href="/users/Leafsfan98" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@Leafsfan98</a>

Matthews should have just not played if he didn't have the energy to bring the dominant performance we saw in game 2. Probably would have been better off because the rest of players would know they really have to up their game knowing he wouldn't be in the lineup.

You guys don't want to give Willy a pass? Fine with me because aside from scoring goals this year and past years, Willy's attention to defensive details have lacked badly in playoff games.

I did see both of you just ignore all the past playoff performances. As if ONLY THIS YEAR matters. It's whole playoff performances issue I was bringing up, not just a single game.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsMon. at 1:41 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsSun. at 9:54 p.m.