klassic Profile - CapFriendly

Forum: Armchair-GMFri. at 5:32 p.m.

Honestly just send Ceci and the 3rd to Hawks. Easy peasy

Forum: Armchair-GMFri. at 3:35 p.m.

Thread: Would you Opinions from both sides please

Forum: Armchair-GMFri. at 1:55 p.m.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dan_the_Man</b></div><div>Dudes a hawk fan</div></div>

Hawks still decline. This makes no sense.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 2:49 p.m.

Thread: balance

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>soysauce08</b></div><div>would add i changed the draft pick to tampas didnt mean to put the hawks one this take of marner has been quoted by fredman so... and marner wants 11.5 and you have the cap space</div></div>

HAWKS NOT RETAINING ON JONES

HAWKS NOT TRADING FOR MARNER

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 2:48 p.m.

Thread: Trade Down

Hawks need to be using picks to trade up if they see a player they like. Not acquiring more picks. We have enough and are gonna run out of contract space.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 2:46 p.m.

Thread: Utah should push for the playoffs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SociallyHawkward</b></div><div>If a couple 5ths are so valuable, the hawks will give Toronto a couple 5ths for Robertson. Zero chance they give up a 2nd</div></div>

We only have 2 5ths in the next 3 years. Can we just make it the Rangers 2025 4th for Robertson?

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 2:42 p.m.

Thread: An article said this for Marner

Is Marner coming with Matthews?

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 2:40 p.m.

Thread: Gjiilol

Why is Chicago trading a pick for a UFA?

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 1:58 p.m.

Thread: Pajama boy returns with retention

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>Right? I have half a mind to just create a text document full of talking points so I can just copy and paste them. I bears repeating, but it is definitely getting old.</div></div>

100%. Basically an outline of why we are not trading for bum X, Y, or Z. Plus all the other non-sense.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 1:57 p.m.

Thread: RUS of MTL

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>habitantlecolon</b></div><div>it's all my fault. I've been doing AGM about undervalued players that fit our system for years because I really like those kinds of hardworking players.</div></div>

Either you have posted 20 ACGMs in the past few months (and I never noticed it was the same person) or others are posting too.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 9:56 a.m.

Thread: RUS of MTL

Why are Habs fans so insistent on trading for Dach?

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 9:45 a.m.

Thread: 2024-25 Mixup With Cap Increase

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>If I'm CHI's GM, I might be interested in Robertson for a 4th. On average, a guy who has already played NHL games is closer to a sure thing than a 4th round pick. At that price, he is probably worth taking a flyer on. I think the best TOR could hope for in a Robo trade is a 3rd round pick. So, something like this is certainly in the realm of possibility.</div></div>

At the cost of a 4th round pick, worst case scenario is he is part of the Rockford-Chicago shuffle.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 9:43 a.m.

Thread: Forget About Drai - NOT SERIOUS

So Hawks get 2 1sts for taking on Campbell and retaining 4.25M on Draisaitl. I guess as long as this happens before the buyout window I can see it. Then the Hawks can just find a cheap 1B free agent goalie.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 9:36 a.m.

Thread: Pajama boy returns with retention

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CosmicC</b></div><div>Yea, just checked that too. You're right as far as I can tell. Can't buy retention for yourself. Oh well.

As far as the folks saying Chicago never retains.. yea its tough. I mention that in the description. Chicago is kind of screwed either way though. If they keep him he's the biggest albatross contract in the league. If they deal him with retention yea, it compromises your capsheet through your window but so does his presence - atleast in this scenario you get a topline winger in his prime. *shrug* </div></div>

OMG how many times does this have to be explained. A top line RD is harder to find than a top line scoring winger. Jones is a top line RD. I think you would be hard pressed to say he is not in the top 30 of RD. Yes the contract is larger than production, but he has been better lately. And the Hawks still need to reach the cap floor. Plus the cap is going up an so are salaries for D. Jones plays a position where there are few prospects in the system. Maybe in 3, 4, 5 years they think about trading Jones with retention. But retaining on Jones and trading him in this dumpster fire of a deal is cutting of your nose to spite your face.

It makes ZERO sense for the Hawks.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 3:38 p.m.

Thread: J marrchessault and t konecny at MTL

Wow! I am impressed by your delusion.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 2:13 p.m.

Thread: new core

Hawks would take Tavares as a cap dump AFTER his bonus is paid July 1st. Best you can get for the 11M in cap space is Future Considerations and a Signed Bedard bobblehead.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 2:11 p.m.

Thread: Wings 2024-2025

Petry says no, Hawks say no to Fabbri unless that 3rd is coming with him to Chicago

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 2:03 p.m.

Thread: Pittsburgh penguins

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>fil97</b></div><div>not saying you do. but all the hawks fans saying 'you'll have to pay much more' are just wrong.</div></div>

You will have to pay more to trade him to the Hawks. That is a fact. They don't need Rakell so it is a cap dump from Hawks perspective.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 1:53 p.m.

Thread: Pittsburgh penguins

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>fil97</b></div><div>it's not my post lol. and yeah Chicago is in a better spot cuz of bedard, but still 3 to 4 years before being competitive.</div></div>

And we don't need 4 years of Rakell.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 1:48 p.m.

Thread: Pittsburgh penguins

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>fil97</b></div><div>yes it is more than enough. it is actually crazy to think pit will have to pay to get rid of him at all. I can easily see the sharks paying a 4th or 5th to have a veteran to play with their kids through the 3 to 4 years of rebuild... 3/4 years being generous. .</div></div>

Great send him to SJ. Hawks are closer to coming out of their rebuild than SJ. Hawks are looking at new contracts for Bedard and KK in 2 years.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 14 at 9:50 a.m.

Thread: Always trade down

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>holtzer</b></div><div>Chicago probably wouldn't trade all that capital just to move up. They need to build their farm.</div></div>

Hawks already have a lot of prospects and a lot of picks. They can't make them all. If there is a move to be made to package picks up to get a player they like now is the time to do it. There is a contract limit and now is the time to start looking for quality over quantity.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 14 at 9:37 a.m.

Thread: Who is the best young LHD we could get for 10th overall pick

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>I’m aware. I am using him as example….just borrowing him for sake of post.</div></div>

He would get more than the #10 pick

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 13 at 9:57 a.m.

Thread: Realistic yet disappointing offseason

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lbh1000</b></div><div>Obviously that is a placeholder trade, more about moving Jarnkrok than getting a 4th. More realistically it would be a 7th and would be to a team that could use him. For a 7th, Jarnkrok would be a good investment for the Hawks, give them a little depth and experience.</div></div>

The obvious way to signal a placeholder trade is to put it in the trade notes.

Hawks don't need more bottom 6 players

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 13 at 9:50 a.m.

Thread: Realistic yet disappointing offseason

Prepare to be even more disappointed. Hawks not spending draft picks for more bottom 6 players. They have enough.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 11 at 2:02 p.m.

Thread: Leafs Off-Season Scenario 1

Remove the 2024 2nd and trade Tavares AFTER his bonus is paid with no retention for FC. Hawks agree to that.

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

klassic

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day