TMLBRIAN

Member Since

May 27, 2018

Favourite Team

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forum Posts

9532

Posts per Day

4.4

Forum: Armchair-GM3 hours ago

Thread: Upgrade D and Goal

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Claesson4Norris</b></div><div>Nothing Kampf does is special enough to warrant his cap hit or term. You can find a 4C for way cheaper.</div></div>

He is more of a 13-14 minute a night, defensive C. Over the past few years, the bigger the moments, the more minutes he gets. He is more a #3-#4C tweener. A very high end #4C or a lower end #3.

Ottawa needs some help on the defensive side of the puck. Kampf would be a great addition for them.

Forum: Armchair-GM4 hours ago

Thread: Upgrade D and Goal

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Doubt if the Leafs can pencil in Minten, Webber and Grebyokin as NHL ready in October....maybe not even in 24/25.
Looks like the Leafs can really only resign one of Domi and Bertuzzi.</div></div>

I agree - Can be vets also. I decided to go with the lower possible young guns group with this one.

Forum: Armchair-GM4 hours ago

Thread: Next yr without trading a core piece

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Here's the thing. Leafs fans are so determined in their thought that Jarnkrok and Kampf are bad cap value. Virtually all teams don't have cap....certainly more than 21 teams, why would value these so called non value players? I'm not nit picking, so many Leafs are so "homers" thinking they are only team that can rid themselves of non value cap players. No, it's bad take by so many Leafs fans trading. Kampf/Jarnkrok to "anywhere"
And really, how much cap do the Leafs trade by trading Jarnkrok? It's not 2.1m as they have to find a competent replacement.</div></div>

I personally believe Kampf and Jarnkrok have value. I don't think they are cap dumps. Trading those 2 frees up enough cap to keep a guy like Bert.

Forum: Armchair-GM4 hours ago

Thread: Upgrade D and Goal

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AlTintin1122</b></div><div>No one wants Kampf</div></div>

I would be shocked if this were true.

Forum: Armchair-GM4 hours ago

Thread: Next yr without trading a core piece

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>C'mon. 20 man roster??? Reaves on LTIR., M NTC Jarnkrok and Kampf can't be traded anywhere.
Leafs NMC core four aren't going to be traded, though it seems a popular thought on CF</div></div>

Both players can still be traded to 21 teams each. Do you want the author to be that specific and say "traded to one the 21 teams that are not on their NTC?" - You are nitpicking in a bad way with this one.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 1:33 a.m.

Thread: Next Year

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tupty</b></div><div>LA gave up so much to get PLD. I can't imagine that they'd give up on him after just 1 year. That seems to be what I've heard from most Kings fans as well.

I don't think Boston needs to send out the 3rd round pick along with Ullmark to get a 1st round pick back in general (NJD fans seem fine with a 2025 1st for Ullmark swap), although the fact that it is a 2024 pick is probably appealing to the Boston FA. I imagine they'd consider sending something more to bump the pick to 2024, but a 3rd rounder is a bit steep.</div></div>

Maybe Bostons 2024 4th?

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 1:23 a.m.

Thread: Utah Goes Man City On the Roster

Guenther has 35 pts in 45 games this year. I doubt he would be AHL bound.

But this would all be fun. This team could be very dangerous next year!

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 7:25 p.m.

Thread: What would he cost

Leafs would be silly to trade Matthews,. He should be the one true untouchable.

Forum: Armchair-GMSat. at 11:41 p.m.

Thread: My line up for next game

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LuckyMoneyPuck</b></div><div>is Matthews even gonna play?</div></div>

who knows. Let's hope it was just his illness acting up and he had the poops.

Forum: Armchair-GMSat. at 11:13 p.m.

Thread: My line up for next game

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CameronSquires</b></div><div>Nope to Timmins, I'd have Webber in before Timmins</div></div>

We need to score more. At least Timmins brings that element. We can't keep getting 1-2 goals a game and expect to win. But I understand!

Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsSat. at 9:57 p.m.

Thread: Leafs 2023 2024 Season Discussion Part 6 - Nearly Playoffs

I would start Woll for period 3. Shakeup the team.

Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsSat. at 9:37 p.m.

Thread: Leafs 2023 2024 Season Discussion Part 6 - Nearly Playoffs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CameronSquires</b></div><div>I just think with what's been let go by the refs on Boston, that's soft</div></div>

I don't think it was soft. He cross checked him pretty hard there. He didn't love tap him.

Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsSat. at 9:29 p.m.

Thread: Leafs 2023 2024 Season Discussion Part 6 - Nearly Playoffs

Should we tell Domi that crosschecking someone pretty hard, from behind, is absolutely a penalty?

Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsSat. at 8:55 p.m.

Thread: Leafs 2023 2024 Season Discussion Part 6 - Nearly Playoffs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aadoyle</b></div><div>Heck would have went 11-7 then keep Reaves in</div></div>

We need more offense. If this continues and we lose I would do:

Dewar in - Reaves Out

I would put Lily and Timmins in and take Edmonson and Benoit out for next game.

We can't keep getting 2 goals or less a game.

Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsSat. at 8:46 p.m.

Thread: Leafs 2023 2024 Season Discussion Part 6 - Nearly Playoffs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aadoyle</b></div><div>U just had to take Dewar out and not Reaves huh Keefe

And of course JVR scores lul</div></div>

Yea Reaves has to get the scratch after that one. Dewar should have stayed in, instead of Reaves.

Forum: Armchair-GMSat. at 3:58 p.m.

Thread: What if

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WN88</b></div><div>Can we PLEASE stop with the Marner trades. They'll never happen.</div></div>

This is a fantasy site. You will have a lot more fun here if you see it like that.

Forum: Armchair-GMSat. at 3:58 p.m.

Thread: What if

Our defence clearly needs an upgrade. Standing pat in that regard wouldn't be wise.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25 at 6:09 p.m.

Thread: The players Im for sure keeping

Seems right to me. We will see if Norris gets moved this offseason. That will be interesting.

This team has the pieces to contend. Just need so fine tuning in my mind. ALOT more depth also. And a less weird, random scandals, taking out some decent young players. haha

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25 at 5:40 p.m.

Thread: DRAFT EISERMAN PLUS TRADE UP FOR IGINLA

Flyers hit accept on that trade so fast. Why does Montreal do it though? They already have a ton of LD prospects. Why trade for another low end LD prospect to help Philly with that much cap?

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25 at 5:35 p.m.

Thread: The next step

There are very few Nick Robertson trades that I like or would accept. I really hope the Leafs keep him.

In saying that, this is one of the rare circumstances that I would accept.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25 at 5:16 p.m.

Thread: Kaiden Guhle

This is a juicy trade.

As an outsider of both teams.

Well Done!

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25 at 4:30 p.m.

Thread: Next year with Big Changes

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>I can’t see ottawa trading any of their top 3 picks when the 20-50 range is loaded with good Dmen especially RD</div></div>

Picks drafted this year in that range will be ready in 3-5 years. I think we all believe that Ottawa can potentially contend as of next year. But fair enough if they don't want Lily and/or Kampf.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25 at 4:29 p.m.

Thread: Next year with Big Changes

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aadoyle</b></div><div>JT aint waiving and you know as well as I do its gonna cost assets to move him

No thanks</div></div>

It is very unlikely that JT waives. But if he does, a team like Chicago would take him for FC or a late pick, quite easily. It matches what they are building in Chicago very perfectly.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25 at 4:28 p.m.

Thread: Realistic Off Season Adjustments

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>Every leaf fan says over and over again that liljegren is a top 4 d (when trading him), but then never pays him or plays him like one when they keep him</div></div>

I view him as a solid number 5, who can slot into the top 4 if needed. I view his value as an early 2nd.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25 at 4:12 p.m.

Thread: Next year with Big Changes

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheBoyDuddus</b></div><div>If you think the value is a 2nd and a 3rd then make the trade for a 2nd and a 3rd...?

Either way I dont actually think the Sens would be interested</div></div>

That works also. Ottawa 2nd is early and a 3rd the following year. Both options work. The Boston 1st vs the Ottawa 2nd aren't a huge difference. Usually teams pay a 3rd ish to move that many spots.

Fair on them not wanting to do it though. I know their RD need is more of a defensive dman type.

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

TMLBRIAN

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day