SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Not a bad roster to start

Created by: dimeohs
Team: 2024-25 Ottawa Senators
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 18, 2024
Published: Jun. 18, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
All contract estimates were made using AFPAnalytics 2024-2025 Contract Projections with an 88M cap hit.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$874,000
3$3,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$5,000,000
1$1,650,000
2$2,250,000
2$2,500,000
Trades
1.
OTT
  1. Ullmark, Linus
Additional Details:
Bolsters top 4 into one of the best in the league, gets more center depth on top of that and also a 6th to sweeten the pot. They get Anton Forsberg at $2M to be Swaymans backup for the year.
BOS
  1. Chychrun, Jakob
  2. Forsberg, Anton ($750,000 retained)
  3. Kastelic, Mark
  4. 2025 6th round pick (OTT)
2.
OTT
  1. 2026 3rd round pick (PHI)
3.
OTT
  1. 2024 4th round pick (VAN)
  2. 2026 6th round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
Vancouver recieves another puck mover for the lower pairing who has a lot of potential in the right system.
VAN
  1. Brännström, Erik [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Ottawa moves on from Brannstrom. He wasn't a fit here but for sure could be somewhere else in the right system.
4.
OTT
  1. Pageau, Jean-Gabriel ($2,500,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Islanders get Pageau off their books. $2.5M for 2 years instead of $2.75, $2.25, $1.25, $1.25 over 4years
NYI
  1. 2024 5th round pick (OTT)
Additional Details:
Ottawa gets their hometown kid back. Can put up 30+ points a season and a proven playoff player here. Would be very interested to see him on a line with Ridly Greig.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the DET
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the VAN
2025
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
2026
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the OTT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$88,000,000$85,049,047$850,000$682,500$2,950,953
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,205,714$8,205,714
LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,350,000$8,350,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$7,950,000$7,950,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,975,000$4,975,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$775,000$775,000
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$825,000$825,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$775,000$775,000
LW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,050,000$8,050,000
LD
UFA - 8
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,000,000$8,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,600,000$4,600,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$2,250,000$2,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$600,000$600K)
LD
RFA - 1
$1,650,000$1,650,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$805,000$805,000
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 18 at 2:57 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 39
Likes: 9
Don't think the Islanders are interested in retaining any $ on guys they move out. Even if it means giving up extra draft picks Lou will want all $5 million of JGP's cap hit off the books
Jun. 18 at 2:58 p.m.
#2
alwaysnextyear
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 1,650
Question on Brannstrom; is he as effective on the right side as he is on the left? If so I could see VAN having some interest.
Jun. 18 at 3:08 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
Question on Brannstrom; is he as effective on the right side as he is on the left? If so I could see VAN having some interest.


Brannstrom is a RHD through and through. Yes he is left handed but he has played the right side his entire life and is more comfortable there/plays his best hockey there. The reason he hasn't adapted well is that Dorion traded Mark Stone for him, so Dorion (realizing how ****ing dumb he is) decided to rush Brannstrom into the NHL on the left side, but as we know, he is most comfortable on the right. Since then his confidence has been shot, and was even played at LW this year. GIve him a good system and he can provide Hughes with some relief as a depth puck mover, taking the strain off of Hughes.
Jun. 18 at 3:17 p.m.
#4
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 22,924
Likes: 7,466
unfortunately a pass from boston. they're moving ullmark to shed cap, not take more on.
Jun. 18 at 3:18 p.m.
#5
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 22,924
Likes: 7,466
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
Question on Brannstrom; is he as effective on the right side as he is on the left? If so I could see VAN having some interest.


he just kinda sucks wherever he plays.
Jun. 18 at 3:20 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 1,872
Don’t think Boston takes Forsberg without more retention and Kastelic doesn’t make the Bruins roster. That’s a negative in value and a 6th round pick doesn’t make it better. I believe that the Bruins would need a much higher pick if those are included.
Crotalus7294 liked this.
Jun. 18 at 3:30 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
Quoting: Bcarlo25
he just kinda sucks wherever he plays.


He really doesn't suck. He is still young with a lot of potential and has showed flashes of greatness many times over the past few years, he just needs the right system to thrive in. I wouldn't talk about players when you don't watch the team religiously, because you have no idea what happens every night when they play.
Jun. 18 at 3:32 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
Quoting: Celtics21
Don’t think Boston takes Forsberg without more retention and Kastelic doesn’t make the Bruins roster. That’s a negative in value and a 6th round pick doesn’t make it better. I believe that the Bruins would need a much higher pick if those are included.


I think theres a chance he makes the roster. He has a great track record in faceoffs and can play the PK pretty well, can also block shots. He adds more value than Geekie imo. Forsberg was more of an expiramental thing, just thinking how it goes. Ottawa could retain some more and probably throw another pick in but I do believe Ullmark's value is being inflated.
Jun. 18 at 3:33 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
Quoting: Bagofdonutz3113
Don't think the Islanders are interested in retaining any $ on guys they move out. Even if it means giving up extra draft picks Lou will want all $5 million of JGP's cap hit off the books


That is going to be a tough move. You guys would probably have to give up a 2nd rounder to make that happen
Jun. 18 at 3:36 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 39
Likes: 9
Quoting: dimeohs
That is going to be a tough move. You guys would probably have to give up a 2nd rounder to make that happen


Agreed the Isles just really need a shot in the arm, probably a RHD like Walker or Roy if they do an Ehlers/Pulock swap
Jun. 18 at 3:57 p.m.
#11
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 22,924
Likes: 7,466
Quoting: dimeohs
He really doesn't suck. He is still young with a lot of potential and has showed flashes of greatness many times over the past few years, he just needs the right system to thrive in. I wouldn't talk about players when you don't watch the team religiously, because you have no idea what happens every night when they play.


he'll be 25 before he skates another shift, and his been in the league since before covid. we know what he is. my favorite team is a divisional opponent, i've seen him plenty. when he's noticable, nothing impresses.
Jun. 18 at 4:06 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 646
Likes: 309
Flyers ain't trading for Joseph unless they trade couple forwards first.
Jun. 18 at 6:05 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 79
Likes: 31
Quoting: Celtics21
Don’t think Boston takes Forsberg without more retention and Kastelic doesn’t make the Bruins roster. That’s a negative in value and a 6th round pick doesn’t make it better. I believe that the Bruins would need a much higher pick if those are included.


Completely agree. With this in mind though I don't think it's impossible that this is close if those pick/prospect changes happen. Sens need to move goaltending out and change their room. Bruins could try and flip him or make him a serviceable backup for swayman if the retention is higher. But that would mean that sens are completely moving on from both goalies and I feel it's more likely that they move/buyout korpisalo and keep forsburg as their backup.
Jun. 18 at 7:34 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 1,872
Quoting: dimeohs
I think theres a chance he makes the roster. He has a great track record in faceoffs and can play the PK pretty well, can also block shots. He adds more value than Geekie imo. Forsberg was more of an expiramental thing, just thinking how it goes. Ottawa could retain some more and probably throw another pick in but I do believe Ullmark's value is being inflated.


Don’t even see him in the same league even though you might be able to extrapolate advanced stats despite the significant difference in points to come to your position.

I wouldn’t value Kastelic at all and it sounds like you may like him. Those are generally not players that are traded.

Either way, this is probably Chychrun plus some good (not great) asset for Ullmark.
Jun. 21 at 12:13 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 2,789
Likes: 1,260
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
Question on Brannstrom; is he as effective on the right side as he is on the left? If so I could see VAN having some interest.


He can be effective in the right role if he's sheltered properly. Can definitely play the right and as mentioned by others he has preferred it in the past.

If he was being deployed properly I'd much rather Ottawa keep him but Dorion is gone so hopefully the Stone debacle can finally be put behind us because Branny deserves a fresh start.
alwaysnextyear liked this.
Jun. 25 at 12:29 a.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
Quoting: Celtics21
Don’t think Boston takes Forsberg without more retention and Kastelic doesn’t make the Bruins roster. That’s a negative in value and a 6th round pick doesn’t make it better. I believe that the Bruins would need a much higher pick if those are included.


thoughts after the trade now? kastelic made the cut!
Jun. 25 at 4:41 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 1,872
Quoting: dimeohs
thoughts after the trade now? kastelic made the cut!


It was a stupid trade by Sweeney who has been an elite GM. He tends to focus on his teams evaluation skills and they are taking a risk that Korpisalo’s one outlier year can be built upon.

Totally unnecessary. They would have been better off just keeping Ullmark for a year and letting him walk outright.

Kastelik is a 4th line guy who can fight. I’m glad we effectively replaced Pat Marron with an AHL type.

If I could give Sweeney an F-, I would. He got limited cap room and a pick in a draft where there is a significant drop off. Hope someone good drops, but my guess is that player will be taken at 24 and the guy he acquired will not be worth this risk.
Jun. 25 at 10:58 a.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
Quoting: Celtics21
It was a stupid trade by Sweeney who has been an elite GM. He tends to focus on his teams evaluation skills and they are taking a risk that Korpisalo’s one outlier year can be built upon.

Totally unnecessary. They would have been better off just keeping Ullmark for a year and letting him walk outright.

Kastelik is a 4th line guy who can fight. I’m glad we effectively replaced Pat Marron with an AHL type.

If I could give Sweeney an F-, I would. He got limited cap room and a pick in a draft where there is a significant drop off. Hope someone good drops, but my guess is that player will be taken at 24 and the guy he acquired will not be worth this risk.


Maybe he has a master plan in trading Korpisalo? IDK what he was thinking but the valuation for the trade was close to what I was expecting. With Markstrom and Kuemper off the market, it was only going to drive the price down.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll