SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

in on every goalie apparently

Created by: Borocop
Team: 2024-25 Ottawa Senators
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 9, 2024
Published: Jun. 9, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,750,000
2$950,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$4,250,000
1$2,000,000
Trades
1.
OTT
CGY
  1. Forsberg, Anton
  2. Joseph, Mathieu
  3. 2024 1st round pick (BOS)
  4. 2025 2nd round pick (OTT)
2.
OTT
  1. Cates, Noah
  2. 2024 1st round pick (FLA)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the DET
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
2026
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$88,000,000$84,967,381$850,000$682,500$3,032,619
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,205,714$8,205,714
LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,350,000$8,350,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,975,000$4,975,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$7,950,000$7,950,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$3,750,000$3,750,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,625,000$2,625,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$950,000$950,000
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$825,000$825,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$835,000$835,000
C, RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,050,000$8,050,000
LD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,600,000$4,600,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,000,000$8,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$4,250,000$4,250,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$600,000$600K)
LD
RFA - 1
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$805,000$805,000
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 9 at 2:34 p.m.
#1
Dredd
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 17
Likes: 4
lol, Cgy says no.
KingofRnR liked this.
Jun. 9 at 2:41 p.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 4,685
Likes: 1,500
How is Chychrun worth a 1st + young roster player on elc? Dude is a mid 2nd pairing LHD (most plentiful position in league) and a pending UFA.
Jun. 9 at 2:43 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,075
Likes: 3,324
Quoting: MitchJr
How is Chychrun worth a 1st + young roster player on elc? Dude is a mid 2nd pairing LHD (most plentiful position in league) and a pending UFA.


i mean the 1st is either pick 31 or 32. Could flip it to one of the top 50 seconds if you felt that strongly about it but the quality of prospect is pretty similar at those ranges
MitchJr liked this.
Jun. 9 at 2:48 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 96
Likes: 40
Markstrom is a Vezina-level goalie w/ term. Deal starts w/ 7OA.
KingofRnR liked this.
Jun. 9 at 2:50 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,075
Likes: 3,324
Quoting: Johnny03
Markstrom is a Vezina-level goalie w/ term. Deal starts w/ 7OA.


he’s 34 with 2 years left and is coming off an .895 season and a .905 season. It absolutely does not start with 7th OA
Jun. 9 at 2:54 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 96
Likes: 40
Considering you're also adding Mang who is a consistent 40 pt guy, OTT is adding substantially.
KingofRnR liked this.
Jun. 9 at 2:55 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 96
Likes: 40
Quoting: Borocop
he’s 34 with 2 years left and is coming off an .895 season and a .905 season. It absolutely does not start with 7th OA


13.7 GSAx this year (7th in the league among goalies w/ at least 30 GP). He's a top tier starter in the league.
Last year was a down year but he has been otherwise consistently a top tier starter.
The 905 SV% is irrelevant considering the Flames had one of the worst post-TDL defensive cores.
Jun. 9 at 2:56 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,075
Likes: 3,324
Quoting: Johnny03
13.7 GSAx this year (7th in the league among goalies w/ at least 30 GP). He's a top tier starter in the league.
Last year was a down year but he has been otherwise consistently a top tier starter.
The 905 SV% is irrelevant considering the Flames had one of the worst post-TDL defensive cores.


that’s all fine and dandy and you’re totally allowed to not like my proposed package for him, but you’re not getting a top 10 pick for him. Too much year over year variance for anyone to gamble that much on a goalie
Jun. 9 at 2:58 p.m.
#9
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 7,632
Likes: 2,123
Flames Pass. Take out Mangiapane, Forsberg and Joseph and then add a decent Waivers Exempt Prospect + Sokolov or Kastelic and that might get the conversation started

If you want us to take Joseph, remove the retention on Markstrom
Borocop and Johnny03 liked this.
Jun. 9 at 3:01 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 96
Likes: 40
Quoting: Borocop
that’s all fine and dandy and you’re totally allowed to not like my proposed package for him, but you’re not getting a top 10 pick for him. Too much year over year variance for anyone to gamble that much on a goalie


If you're not willing to give up that pick though then don't expect any retention on Markstrom or the addition of Mangiapane.
A top-tier starter at 3M x 2 plus a fringe top-six winger is equivalent to a blue-chip prospect in my mind. CGY has no interest in a late first, a second, a bottom six F and a mid goalie in exchange for a large part of their core.
Borocop and KingofRnR liked this.
Jun. 9 at 3:02 p.m.
#11
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 7,632
Likes: 2,123
Quoting: Borocop
that’s all fine and dandy and you’re totally allowed to not like my proposed package for him, but you’re not getting a top 10 pick for him. Too much year over year variance for anyone to gamble that much on a goalie

I’d hate to miss out on a 90-1A Elite Goalie at 1/2 his Cap Hit Value and Draft another Daigle. It’s just a pick dude and CGY would retain and add something to make it happen, it wouldn’t be straight up
Jun. 9 at 3:04 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 96
Likes: 40
Quoting: KingofRnR
I’d hate to miss out on a 90-1A Elite Goalie at 1/2 his Cap Hit Value and Draft another Daigle. It’s just a pick dude and CGY would retain and add something to make it happen, it wouldn’t be straight up


I would argue that a legitimate #1G is worth more to OTT than a top-10 pick at this point in their trajectory. Another losing season in OTT and things will start to get ugly. Obviously a 7OA is massive but Markstrom could be the difference between a wild-card and a bottom-ten finish.
KingofRnR liked this.
Jun. 9 at 3:06 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,075
Likes: 3,324
Quoting: KingofRnR
I’d hate to miss out on a 90-1A Elite Goalie at 1/2 his Cap Hit Value and Draft another Daigle. It’s just a pick dude and CGY would retain and add something to make it happen, it wouldn’t be straight up


it’s not really ‘just a pick though’, tough to justify trading a full career of a blue chip prospect for 2 years of goaltending. We’re chasing wins sure but i would sure hope they’re a lot smarter about it than that, as much as we could “draft another daigle” we could also just be trading for another alex debrincat
Jun. 9 at 3:07 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,075
Likes: 3,324
Quoting: Johnny03
I would argue that a legitimate #1G is worth more to OTT than a top-10 pick at this point in their trajectory. Another losing season in OTT and things will start to get ugly. Obviously a 7OA is massive but Markstrom could be the difference between a wild-card and a bottom-ten finish.


if we’re trading a top 10 pick for markstrom while we have the worst prospect pool in the league we better be chasing for a whole lot better than a wild card finish
Jun. 9 at 3:09 p.m.
#15
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 7,632
Likes: 2,123
Quoting: Johnny03
I would argue that a legitimate #1G is worth more to OTT than a top-10 pick at this point in their trajectory. Another losing season in OTT and things will start to get ugly. Obviously a 7OA is massive but Markstrom could be the difference between a wild-card and a bottom-ten finish.

Agreed, I just don’t think Marky returns that without major retention + another piece, possibly even VAN’s 28OA or our 2nd OR we need to take a bad contract back

Everybody on here goes on about his age, but he’s still considered elite around the league and plenty of older goalies have excelled in their late-30’s including Hasek, Tim Thomas and more recently Bobrovsky, so it’s not a good reason to me to downgrade his value, especially when he’s an $8mil/yr goalie they can acquire with retention for $3-4.5mil/yr, which allows Cap Space to re-sign or bring in other needs
Jun. 9 at 3:15 p.m.
#16
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 7,632
Likes: 2,123
Quoting: Borocop
it’s not really ‘just a pick though’, tough to justify trading a full career of a blue chip prospect for 2 years of goaltending. We’re chasing wins sure but i would sure hope they’re a lot smarter about it than that, as much as we could “draft another daigle” we could also just be trading for another alex debrincat

The probability of actually getting an NHL player after the Top-5 plummets significantly, so who know what you’ll get, if anything, and It’ll take years to find out

Getting an Established Elite NHL Goaltender (=sure thing) for 2 years at 1/2 his Cap Hit and the opportunity to extend him next off-season is very valuable. We would send you a pick in return as well, so you would still have another ticket to the lottery
Jun. 9 at 3:21 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,075
Likes: 3,324
Edited Jun. 9 at 3:31 p.m.
Quoting: KingofRnR
The probability of actually getting an NHL player after the Top-5 plummets significantly, so who know what you’ll get, if anything, and It’ll take years to find out

Getting an Established Elite NHL Goaltender (=sure thing) for 2 years at 1/2 his Cap Hit and the opportunity to extend him next off-season is very valuable. We would send you a pick in return as well, so you would still have another ticket to the lottery


i mean respectfully that’s just not true at all. Picks 5-7 average about 600 NHL games played (will probably be higher given modern player development). I’d rather play the odds of that than hope i get 80-90 good games out of markstrom (which isint even a guarantee) I like Markstrom, there is nothing that justifies trading a top 10 pick for him. You could add a late first and a roster player and i’m still not doing it
Jun. 9 at 3:22 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 96
Likes: 40
Quoting: KingofRnR
Agreed, I just don’t think Marky returns that without major retention + another piece, possibly even VAN’s 28OA or our 2nd OR we need to take a bad contract back

Everybody on here goes on about his age, but he’s still considered elite around the league and plenty of older goalies have excelled in their late-30’s including Hasek, Tim Thomas and more recently Bobrovsky, so it’s not a good reason to me to downgrade his value, especially when he’s an $8mil/yr goalie they can acquire with retention for $3-4.5mil/yr, which allows Cap Space to re-sign or bring in other needs


I agree, I would take Markstrom + 28OA for 7OA in a heartbeat.

Quoting: KingofRnR
Agreed, I just don’t think Marky returns that without major retention + another piece, possibly even VAN’s 28OA or our 2nd OR we need to take a bad contract back

Everybody on here goes on about his age, but he’s still considered elite around the league and plenty of older goalies have excelled in their late-30’s including Hasek, Tim Thomas and more recently Bobrovsky, so it’s not a good reason to me to downgrade his value, especially when he’s an $8mil/yr goalie they can acquire with retention for $3-4.5mil/yr, which allows Cap Space to re-sign or bring in other needs
KingofRnR liked this.
Jun. 9 at 3:30 p.m.
#19
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 7,632
Likes: 2,123
Quoting: Borocop
i mean respectfully that’s just not true at all. Picks 5-7 average about 600 NHL games played. I’d rather play the odds of that than hope i get 80-90 good games out of markstrom (which isint even a guarantee) I like Markstrom, there is nothing that justifies trading a top 10 pick for him. You could add a late first and a roster player and i’m still not doing it

That’s fine. Dobbersports research shows picks 6-15 have a 65-75% chance of producing an NHL Player who will have played 100+ Games compared to 99.9% of Top-5 Picks. That’s a fairly significant drop and how many of those end up being elite is likely pretty low as well, but I’m sure there’s cheaper options out there depending whether you care about winning or not
Jun. 9 at 3:31 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,075
Likes: 3,324
Quoting: KingofRnR
That’s fine. Dobbersports research shows picks 6-15 have a 65-75% chance of producing an NHL Player who will have played 100+ Games compared to 99.9% of Top-5 Picks. That’s a fairly significant drop and how many of those end up being elite is likely pretty low as well, but I’m sure there’s cheaper options out there depending whether you care about winning or not


could just sign broasoit or stolarz for free
Jun. 9 at 3:34 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,075
Likes: 3,324
Quoting: KingofRnR
That’s fine. Dobbersports research shows picks 6-15 have a 65-75% chance of producing an NHL Player who will have played 100+ Games compared to 99.9% of Top-5 Picks. That’s a fairly significant drop and how many of those end up being elite is likely pretty low as well, but I’m sure there’s cheaper options out there depending whether you care about winning or not


the study you looked at was also only 2000-2009. So only 9 picks. The odds skew way further towards hits and nhl games over general history
Jun. 9 at 3:35 p.m.
#22
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 7,632
Likes: 2,123
Quoting: Borocop
could just sign broasoit or stolarz for free

Sure 2 Backups typically used against weaker opponents and who have never carried a workload over 30GP in a season

You should definitely do that, but you’ll probably want to sign them both, whereas Markstrom will easily play 60+ Games in a season for you by himself
Jun. 9 at 3:37 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,075
Likes: 3,324
Quoting: KingofRnR
Sure 2 Backups typically used against weaker opponents and who have never carried a workload over 30GP in a season

You should definitely do that, but you’ll probably want to sign them both, whereas Markstrom will easily play 60+ Games in a season for you by himself


he’s played more than 50 games twice over the past 6 years
Jun. 9 at 5:43 p.m.
#24
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 7,632
Likes: 2,123
Quoting: Borocop
he’s played more than 50 games twice over the past 6 years

Oh lord 🙄

He was dealing with a groin injury in 2020
His first season with the Flames in 2020-21 was a 56 Game Season
He took time off last season to be with his Wife and their 1st Baby/Child
And this season he was dealing with a nagging lower body and/or hand injury + we were trying to get Vladar in to build his value back up and Wolf in to get him NHL experience

He typically plays 75% of the games in a season barring injury or family matters. He’s super competitive and wants to be in every game. Doesn’t need much rest. Perfect for the Playoffs and part of the reason he’s considered Elite
Borocop liked this.
Jun. 9 at 6:05 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 8,461
Likes: 3,505
Quoting: Bravo28
lol, Cgy says no.


Naw, Calgary simply hangs up.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll