SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Year

Created by: Bsellar
Team: 2024-25 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: May 4, 2024
Published: May 4, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$6,250,000
2$3,150,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,750,000
1$900,000
3$3,250,000
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. Mercer, Dawson [RFA Rights]
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (NJD)
  3. 2025 2nd round pick (WPG)
2.
CGY
  1. Lauko, Jakub
  2. 2024 4th round pick (BOS)
  3. 2025 2nd round pick (WPG)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2026
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,500,000$85,303,334$50,000$330,000$2,196,666

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$11,250,000$11,250,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RW, C
RFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$870,000$870,000 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,250,000$6,250,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000$250K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$3,250,000$3,250,000
G
UFA
$900,000$900,000
LD/RD
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 4 at 12:07 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 586
Even if Calgarys goal was to blow up the team, that package isn't close.
MoxNix liked this.
May 4 at 12:08 p.m.
#2
Dekesaladekes
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 3,064
Likes: 1,107
NJ won’t be adding Boston would be.

More like Mercer+ conditional 25 or 26 3rd for Ullmark+ 25 or 26 1st depending on what 3rd NJ gives us.

Even then idk if they would be willing to move mercer for Ullmark with an extension.
May 4 at 12:19 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 6,998
Likes: 2,022
Pass
Wrong G going to Jesey in this trade
May 4 at 12:26 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 1,541
Quoting: Smitty426
Pass
Wrong G going to Jesey in this trade


Can Boston fans stop pretending that Ullmark has the same value as Mercer?

Can Jersey fans stop pretending that Mercer has the same value as Swayman?

I’d offer Ullmark and our 2025 first for Mercer, but would fully expect Jersey to say no and counter. There are probably half a dozen possible trades that could work for Ullmark.

I don’t believe Sweeney even engages in discussions for Swayman especially now. Unless the objective is to stop discussions and have them focus on other teams, the continued mention of Swayman likely isn’t going to create a positive outcome
dgibb10, Smitty426 and Schuyler liked this.
May 4 at 12:32 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 6,998
Likes: 2,022
Quoting: Celtics21
Can Boston fans stop pretending that Ullmark has the same value as Mercer?

Can Jersey fans stop pretending that Mercer has the same value as Swayman?

I’d offer Ullmark and our 2025 first for Mercer, but would fully expect Jersey to say no and counter. There are probably half a dozen possible trades that could work for Ullmark.

I don’t believe Sweeney even engages in discussions for Swayman especially now. Unless the objective is to stop discussions and have them focus on other teams, the continued mention of Swayman likely isn’t going to create a positive outcome


Most of us over here agree with the above
dgibb10, Celtics21, Schuyler and 1 other person liked this.
May 4 at 1:27 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 20,040
Likes: 8,958
Quoting: Celtics21
Can Boston fans stop pretending that Ullmark has the same value as Mercer?

Can Jersey fans stop pretending that Mercer has the same value as Swayman?

I’d offer Ullmark and our 2025 first for Mercer, but would fully expect Jersey to say no and counter. There are probably half a dozen possible trades that could work for Ullmark.

I don’t believe Sweeney even engages in discussions for Swayman especially now. Unless the objective is to stop discussions and have them focus on other teams, the continued mention of Swayman likely isn’t going to create a positive outcome



An Oilers fan made this post. Was not a Bruins fan. Very few B’s fans make Ullmark for Mercer posts.
Celtics21 liked this.
May 4 at 3:13 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,859
Likes: 18,999
Quoting: Celtics21
Can Boston fans stop pretending that Ullmark has the same value as Mercer?

Can Jersey fans stop pretending that Mercer has the same value as Swayman?

I’d offer Ullmark and our 2025 first for Mercer, but would fully expect Jersey to say no and counter. There are probably half a dozen possible trades that could work for Ullmark.

I don’t believe Sweeney even engages in discussions for Swayman especially now. Unless the objective is to stop discussions and have them focus on other teams, the continued mention of Swayman likely isn’t going to create a positive outcome


At deadline, Sweeney (or third team) tried pulling NJD into three-way deal with Ullmark. Fitzy instead asked about Swayman and was told to pound sand. I'm glad he asked.

For me, as a fan, I think an unsigned Swayman for an unsigned Mercer is a reasonable price....considering one of those guys went through arbitration last year, was expected to extend in January, and has spoken publicly about how hurtful a process that was. The other is expected to entertain team-friendly deal.

Quoting: Smitty426
Most of us over here agree with the above


Only me.

Once Swayman extends, I don't think Mercer-for-Swayman would be much of an option. Until then, probably fair game...

Quoting: Gofnut999
An Oilers fan made this post. Was not a Bruins fan. Very few B’s fans make Ullmark for Mercer posts.


Been a few...
...also been Ullmark for Hischier.

The most realistic is probably 2025 pick for Ullmark (done after July 1st).
Tintin, Gofnut999, Schuyler and 1 other person liked this.
May 4 at 3:29 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 1,541
If Swayman was in Jersey and Mercer were in Boston, no Jersey fan would be calling it a “reasonable price”. One has statistically shown to be one of the best goalies in the league and upped his game in the playoffs. The other is coming off a disappointing year.
May 4 at 3:45 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,859
Likes: 18,999
Quoting: Celtics21
If Swayman was in Jersey and Mercer were in Boston, no Jersey fan would be calling it a “reasonable price”. One has statistically shown to be one of the best goalies in the league and upped his game in the playoffs. The other is coming off a disappointing year.


A top-10 goalie would not return a top-10 forward though...goalies are rarely traded for forwards directly. And do not get as much in return when they are dealt.
May 4 at 4:33 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 1,541
Quoting: NHLfan10506
A top-10 goalie would not return a top-10 forward though...goalies are rarely traded for forwards directly. And do not get as much in return when they are dealt.


Can we stop pretending that Mercer is a top 10 forward or even has that type of potential? I like him and would pay a premium to get his talent (Ullmark and a 2025 first), but he is not anywhere near Swayman in terms of relative position even if you go to percentiles.

I’m tired of the goalie value discussion. There has never been a goaltender like Swayman traded without the team being under immense cap pressure (which eliminates your Schneider comp).

If you want to low ball for goalies, go ahead and maintain last year’s strategy. It worked really well for the balance of the division.
May 4 at 4:39 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,859
Likes: 18,999
Quoting: Celtics21
Can we stop pretending that Mercer is a top 10 forward or even has that type of potential?

I’m tired of the goalie value discussion. There has never been a goaltender like Swayman traded without the team being under immense cap pressure (which eliminates your Schneider comp).

If you want to low ball for goalies, go ahead and maintain last years strategy.


Cory Schneider works because they knew they were trading one of the two goalies…everyone just expected it to be Luongo.

Freddy Andersen?
Semyon Varlamov?

Goalies are more likely traded (1) when they at RFA; (2) when there is a viable alternative on roster
May 4 at 6:22 p.m.
#12
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,887
Likes: 1,878
On another note, Flames easily Decline that Kadri offer
MoxNix liked this.
May 4 at 10:43 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 3,358
Calgary declines. Yet another left shot winger is just about the last thing Calgary would be interested in.
KingofRnR liked this.
May 4 at 10:45 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 3,358
Quoting: Dekes
NJ won’t be adding Boston would be.

More like Mercer+ conditional 25 or 26 3rd for Ullmark+ 25 or 26 1st depending on what 3rd NJ gives us.

Even then idk if they would be willing to move mercer for Ullmark with an extension.


Devils fans will have to get used to never being able to acquire a decent goalie if your GM thinks the same way you all do.
May 4 at 10:50 p.m.
#15
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 13,090
Likes: 3,523
Quoting: MoxNix
Devils fans will have to get used to never being able to acquire a decent goalie if your GM thinks the same way you all do.


Just want to make clear the 2 goalies we're talking about (Markstrom and Ullmark) were acquired for free via UFA.

"It's impossible to acquire goalies like this without paying massive assets"

Meanwhile these exact goalies were literally acquired for free at a younger age closer to their primes
May 5 at 8:36 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 1,541
Quoting: dgibb10
Just want to make clear the 2 goalies we're talking about (Markstrom and Ullmark) were acquired for free via UFA.

"It's impossible to acquire goalies like this without paying massive assets"

Meanwhile these exact goalies were literally acquired for free at a younger age closer to their primes


There is a reasonable chance that Ullmark makes it to free agency in a year and NJ is in a position to sign him for free just like I think Boston is going to do with Elias Lindholm.

After this year, I think NJ shouldn’t wait and there is a deal to be made to ensure he gets there. It won’t cost them Mercer or the 10th pick unless Boston is adding a 2025 first. Even then, I think the more like deal is a 2025 first and a 2024 third or a prospect.

I don’t believe Sweeney trades Swayman. He had one test needed before locking him into a long term deal and he literally just passed it with flying colors. Kid is a literal folk hero in Boston after this series. I believe the Schneider deal as a comparable is wishful thinking for NJ fan. Just like I don’t think we are acquiring Draisaitl even though I’d love him (not the same level of player I get it)
May 5 at 8:41 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 1,541
Quoting: KingofRnR
On another note, Flames easily Decline that Kadri offer


It’s OK because Boston likely never makes it. My guess is they sign Elias Lindholm outright on July 1st.
May 5 at 12:06 p.m.
#18
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 13,090
Likes: 3,523
Quoting: Celtics21
There is a reasonable chance that Ullmark makes it to free agency in a year and NJ is in a position to sign him for free just like I think Boston is going to do with Elias Lindholm.

After this year, I think NJ shouldn’t wait and there is a deal to be made to ensure he gets there. It won’t cost them Mercer or the 10th pick unless Boston is adding a 2025 first. Even then, I think the more like deal is a 2025 first and a 2024 third or a prospect.

I don’t believe Sweeney trades Swayman. He had one test needed before locking him into a long term deal and he literally just passed it with flying colors. Kid is a literal folk hero in Boston after this series. I believe the Schneider deal as a comparable is wishful thinking for NJ fan. Just like I don’t think we are acquiring Draisaitl even though I’d love him (not the same level of player I get it)


Agree

Agree

Agree

I am more than happy to make a deal for a fair price.

There is one individual tho who is convinced NJD will have to pay extortion level prices for a goalie, and that there is no other possible way to get a goalie.

Swayman is always fun to think about but he's always been a pipe dream. But that dream will remain until an extension is signed for me
May 5 at 12:23 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 1,541
Quoting: dgibb10
Swayman is always fun to think about but he's always been a pipe dream. But that dream will remain until an extension is signed for me


The dream ended with a 10.8 GSaX in 6 games. That’s a historical performance against a good offensive team. That’s the only thing that was left to be answered and it was answered emphatically
dgibb10 liked this.
May 5 at 12:30 p.m.
#20
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 13,090
Likes: 3,523
Quoting: Celtics21
The dream ended with a 10.8 GSaX in 6 games. That’s a historical performance against a good offensive team. That’s the only thing that was left to be answered and it was answered emphatically


He's been an absolute stud in these playoffs 100%
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll