SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bigger

Created by: Joblow
Team: 2024-25 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 25, 2024
Published: Apr. 26, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Sharangovich sign 6 years 42millions extension
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$1,750,000
1$900,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Greentree, Liam
3$925,000
Beaudoin, Cole
3$925,000
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. Sharangovich, Yegor
  2. Vladar, Daniel
Additional Details:
Sharangovich tell Conroy that he won’t resign scenario
CGY
  1. Beck, Owen
  2. Dvorak, Christian
  3. Harris, Jordan
  4. 2024 1st round pick (WPG)
  5. 2025 3rd round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
Dvorak could be flip with Retention for another asset. Stop with the cap dump shit, Dvorak make to much money we all know but he still a NHL caliber player who can play center and win some faceoff.
Beck ceiling might not be that high but is floor is 3rd line defensive center.
Harris is a reliable 5th-6th defenseman already.
2.
MTL
  1. 2024 1st round pick (FLA)
  2. 2024 1st round pick (PHI)
Additional Details:
12th pick
30th pick
PHI
  1. 2024 1st round pick (MTL)
Additional Details:
7th pick
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the WSH
2025
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2026
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,500,000$70,796,250$1,022,500$4,670,000$16,703,750
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,875,000$7,875,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,362,500$3,362,500
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$835,000$835,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,900,000$2,900,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,875,000$4,875,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$900,000$900,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,150,000$3,150,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$750,000$750K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$420,000$420K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$890,000$890,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD/RD
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$812,500$812,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$766,667$766,667
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 27 at 8:58 p.m.
#26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 7,799
Likes: 3,288
Edited Apr. 27 at 9:23 p.m.
Quoting: Bast
How did you come up with "Vladar was worth a 2nd"? I guess the same logic can apply to Huberdeau since he brought back Tkachuk. Yet somehow I wish we could trade him for FC now. If there was an offer of a 3rd for Vladar this summer Conroy would've traded him.

Vladar had some of the worst analytics out of the entire NHL over the last 2 years. IMO, he's worth a league min contract, since he was playing at a replacement level, despite showing occasional Flashes of brilliance.


That's a horrible take. Calgary wasn't moving Vlader for a 3rd last summer if they'd been willing to accept that he'd be long gone already.

When Vladar got to start more than the odd game every once in a while he was just fine. He's quicker than Marky with better reflexes and glove too. He'll be fine after getting surgery and with more practice as a starter / tandem goalie instead of getting thrown in on short notice most of the time.

You need to stop believing trash talk from the homers around here. When the worst trash talking homers like a trade involving their team it's because they're robbing the other team blind. The simple fact is most trade proposals that are good value for both teams and meet both teams' needs/wants are hated by the majority of both teams' fans.

For all the others who will undoubtedly feel the need to comment on this. I don't bull**** and I don't fall for your bull**** either. I tell it like I see it. If someone doesn't like it that's his problem. I don't expect everyone to agree with me but I don't respond to people who repeatedly resort to ad hominin attacks or post walls of text full of lies and logical fallacies trying to rationalize why bad trades are actually good trades for anyone but their own favorite team(s).
Apr. 27 at 10:43 p.m.
#27
OldSLIMEfan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 224
Likes: 78
Quoting: MoxNix
Dvorak is overpaid by about half or 2.25 mil which isn't much more than 2 mil. Vladar on the other hand isn't overpaid, he's a good goalie as will be proven when he comes back after surgery next year. Selling low on Vladar while he's out would be poor asset management. Vladar was worth a 2nd before the injury which according to Markstrom Vladar has been playing with for more than a year.

Exactly Calgary has no need for Harris. If Calgary trades for a defenseman it'll be for a top 4 or a big mean hard hitting guy similar to Zadorov or Gudbranson both of whom have been missed for the physical presence they bring.

Owen Beck is worth a mid 2nd and that's it. With 50% rentention that makes it Sharky + Vladar for a late 1st + late 3rd a B/B+ prospect + 2 players who add no value for Calgary. In fact one of them is a 2.25 mil cap dump (negative value) and as Flames fans know very well Murray Edwards would frown on that.

Sharky is a bit of a wildcard. The smart thing for Conroy to do is wait until well into next season to see how he performs before deciding if the team should extend Sharky again and for how much. Unless of course he gets an offer so good it just can't be refused.


Delusional but cute. Vladar worth a 2nd. How adorable.

Quoting: MoxNix

For all the others who will undoubtedly feel the need to comment on this. I don't bull**** and I don't fall for your bull**** either. I tell it like I see it. If someone doesn't like it that's his problem. I don't expect everyone to agree with me but I don't respond to people who repeatedly resort to ad hominin attacks or post walls of text full of lies and logical fallacies trying to rationalize why bad trades are actually good trades for anyone but their own favorite team(s).


Chill. You are going to have a stroke.
Joblow liked this.
Apr. 28 at 12:00 a.m.
#28
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 716
Quoting: Bast
I just think that there's a good chance the Flames re-sign him. As I said, I won't be too upset with that trade, and a lot of it has to do with me being unfamiliar with Beck as a prospect, obviously the scouting staff of the Flames would have a much better opinion than me.


Owen Beck have a Nhl game already. Great 2 way centerman, who excel on faceoff. Great skater, good shot. Is playmaking ability aren’t that high but is overall positioning is exceptional so he might have more success playing with professional player. I would say is ceiling is Anthony Cirelli and is floor Phillip Danault. He won’t be a highlight real player but he is a dream players for coaches.
He would instantly become Flames best centerprospect even if your fellow man who think Vladar isn’t overpaid portraits him as a marginal b prospect who doesn’t hold any value. Considering Flames situation at the centerposition, is Sharangovixh would want out. Beck would be a solid consolation prize.
Bast and FarhanLuigi liked this.
Apr. 28 at 12:02 a.m.
#29
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 716
Quoting: MoxNix
That's a horrible take. Calgary wasn't moving Vlader for a 3rd last summer if they'd been willing to accept that he'd be long gone already.

When Vladar got to start more than the odd game every once in a while he was just fine. He's quicker than Marky with better reflexes and glove too. He'll be fine after getting surgery and with more practice as a starter / tandem goalie instead of getting thrown in on short notice most of the time.

You need to stop believing trash talk from the homers around here. When the worst trash talking homers like a trade involving their team it's because they're robbing the other team blind. The simple fact is most trade proposals that are good value for both teams and meet both teams' needs/wants are hated by the majority of both teams' fans.

For all the others who will undoubtedly feel the need to comment on this. I don't bull**** and I don't fall for your bull**** either. I tell it like I see it. If someone doesn't like it that's his problem. I don't expect everyone to agree with me but I don't respond to people who repeatedly resort to ad hominin attacks or post walls of text full of lies and logical fallacies trying to rationalize why bad trades are actually good trades for anyone but their own favorite team(s).


Even Calgary fan had enough of your bull****.
Apr. 28 at 4:25 a.m.
#30
First round bust
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 936
Likes: 401
Quoting: MoxNix
That's a horrible take. Calgary wasn't moving Vlader for a 3rd last summer if they'd been willing to accept that he'd be long gone already.

When Vladar got to start more than the odd game every once in a while he was just fine. He's quicker than Marky with better reflexes and glove too. He'll be fine after getting surgery and with more practice as a starter / tandem goalie instead of getting thrown in on short notice most of the time.

You need to stop believing trash talk from the homers around here. When the worst trash talking homers like a trade involving their team it's because they're robbing the other team blind. The simple fact is most trade proposals that are good value for both teams and meet both teams' needs/wants are hated by the majority of both teams' fans.

For all the others who will undoubtedly feel the need to comment on this. I don't bull**** and I don't fall for your bull**** either. I tell it like I see it. If someone doesn't like it that's his problem. I don't expect everyone to agree with me but I don't respond to people who repeatedly resort to ad hominin attacks or post walls of text full of lies and logical fallacies trying to rationalize why bad trades are actually good trades for anyone but their own favorite team(s).


Let's agree to disagree here then.

Here's how I see it - every team knew that CGY was looking to move a goalie in the offseason. CGY had the best goalie in the AHL for 2 years running, and both Markstrom and Vladar were bad under Sutter. Conroy even said as much. At some point he even commented(fan960) on only being offered a 5th or a 6th for Vladar.

I agree that Vladar looked better than "I just suck at hockey right now" Markstrom in spurts. Vladar would have 2 great games followed by 2 stinkers. That lacking consistency is why I don't value Vladar as highly as you do, especially at a $2M caphit.

PS: I base about 70% of my player evaluation of a Flames player on watching a player play. 20% on analytics to show me things I'm missing, and 10% on talking to oposing fans that don't watch that player as consistently as I do.

I would defer to analytics and other fans a lot more when talking about players I don't watch as much (like in the eastern Conference).
MoxNix and Joblow liked this.
Apr. 28 at 8:25 a.m.
#31
OldSLIMEfan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 224
Likes: 78
Quoting: MoxNix
Dvorak is overpaid by about half or 2.25 mil which isn't much more than 2 mil. Vladar on the other hand isn't overpaid, he's a good goalie as will be proven when he comes back after surgery next year. Selling low on Vladar while he's out would be poor asset management. Vladar was worth a 2nd before the injury which according to Markstrom Vladar has been playing with for more than a year.

Exactly Calgary has no need for Harris. If Calgary trades for a defenseman it'll be for a top 4 or a big mean hard hitting guy similar to Zadorov or Gudbranson both of whom have been missed for the physical presence they bring.

Owen Beck is worth a mid 2nd and that's it. With 50% rentention that makes it Sharky + Vladar for a late 1st + late 3rd a B/B+ prospect + 2 players who add no value for Calgary. In fact one of them is a 2.25 mil cap dump (negative value) and as Flames fans know very well Murray Edwards would frown on that.

Sharky is a bit of a wildcard. The smart thing for Conroy to do is wait until well into next season to see how he performs before deciding if the team should extend Sharky again and for how much. Unless of course he gets an offer so good it just can't be refused.


Delusional but cute. Vladar worth a 2nd. How adorable.


Quoting: Bast
Let's agree to disagree here then.

Here's how I see it - every team knew that CGY was looking to move a goalie in the offseason. CGY had the best goalie in the AHL for 2 years running, and both Markstrom and Vladar were bad under Sutter. Conroy even said as much. At some point he even commented(fan960) on only being offered a 5th or a 6th for Vladar.

I agree that Vladar looked better than "I just suck at hockey right now" Markstrom in spurts. Vladar would have 2 great games followed by 2 stinkers. That lacking consistency is why I don't value Vladar as highly as you do, especially at a $2M caphit.

PS: I base about 70% of my player evaluation of a Flames player on watching a player play. 20% on analytics to show me things I'm missing, and 10% on talking to oposing fans that don't watch that player as consistently as I do.

I would defer to analytics and other fans a lot more when talking about players I don't watch as much (like in the eastern Conference).


The problem with goalies is consistency. Every year the stats, and the metrics will change. "GOALIES ARE VOODOO"
Teams will simply treat the position as a luxury.
There is no better example than Vegas giving away that year's incumbent Vezina winner for FREE to Chicago and they will probably have to give away the current SC winner, Adin Hil, away for FREE, if they wish to keep Marchy and Stephenson as well. And this isn't a new phenomenon. Nashville is another with Lankinen and Saros as Askarov will be in the lineup almost certainly next year. When you have goalies like Adin Hill and Kevin Lankinen available whom both are better by every metric stat than Vladar and only a few chairs to seat at goalie, the scarcity dynamic cant be ignored. The offseason also is tougher to move bad money than the Trade Deadline when you dont know the true makeup of your team and player/goalie retention is more to swallow instead of the cap hit being pro rated at the deadline.
Vladar going for anything more than the TDL and Jake Allen at retention would be shocking when you consider ALL THOSE circumstances.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll