SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

ducks need a sniper

Created by: AlexPena7711
Team: 2023-24 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 27, 2024
Published: Jan. 27, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
PIT
  1. Henrique, Adam
  2. Lyubushkin, Ilya
  3. 2024 1st round pick (ANA)
  4. 2024 2nd round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2025
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2026
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$71,139,167$0$7,307,500$12,360,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,650,000$3,650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,250,000$3M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$425,000$425,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$775,000$775,000
C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$812,500$812,500
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$844,167$844,167 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,295,000$1,295,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$550,000$550K)
LD
RFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 27 at 3:37 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Yeah, you're gonna have to add a top prospect to this. If the Pens are trading Jake it's because we're not heading to the playoffs. Henrique does nothing for us, nor does Lybushkin.
AlexPena7711 liked this.
Jan. 27 at 3:37 p.m.
#2
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,469
Likes: 7,270
And you think we're giving up a top 5 pick for a 29 year old, let alone plus?

We just got Gauthier, he's our next sniper, not a guy pushing 30.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jan. 27 at 3:38 p.m.
#3
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,469
Likes: 7,270
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Yeah, you're gonna have to add a top prospect to this. If the Pens are trading Jake it's because we're not heading to the playoffs. Henrique does nothing for us, nor does Lybushkin.


You are completely out to lunch if you think this is anything less than a gross overpayment.
OldNYIfan, Shaquille_Oatmeal, Jded and 1 other person liked this.
Jan. 27 at 3:39 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 2,026
LOL!!😂
Jan. 27 at 3:43 p.m.
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,293
Likes: 26,030
That 2024 first is guaranteed to be a top-5 selection, and is our ticket to the Celebrini sweepstakes.

I would trade that pick for a trio of guys whose name begins with an "M," or maybe Connor Bedard, but not Jake Guentzel.
Jan. 27 at 3:44 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
You are completely out to lunch if you think this is anything less than a gross overpayment.


If jake gets moved. A consistent 30 to 40 goal scorer, any team is sending a 1st + top prospect. Anything less and you're the one who's out to lunch. You're sending us two players who are of absolutely no use to us if we're not making a playoff push which is the only reason we'd be moving Jake.

You should probably delete your account.
Jan. 27 at 3:45 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: OldNYIfan
That 2024 first is guaranteed to be a top-5 selection, and is our ticket to the Celebrini sweepstakes.

I would trade that pick for a trio of guys whose name begins with an "M," or maybe Connor Bedard, but not Jake Guentzel.


I'm not sure when you stopped actually being reasonable. In what world does Henrique and Lybushkin do the Pens any good if they're not going to the playoffs?
Jan. 27 at 3:49 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 368
Likes: 218
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Yeah, you're gonna have to add a top prospect to this. If the Pens are trading Jake it's because we're not heading to the playoffs. Henrique does nothing for us, nor does Lybushkin.


Lol, like you won't get a Top Prospect with the 1st?
nutrition1223 liked this.
Jan. 27 at 3:49 p.m.
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,293
Likes: 26,030
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
I'm not sure when you stopped actually being reasonable. In what world does Henrique and Lybushkin do the Pens any good if they're not going to the playoffs?

Hunh?

You won't care if the Pens go to the playoffs this season if you get Macklin Celebrini as the reward.

I was merely approaching this proposal from the Ducks point of view.

But you're right -- this is too risky for BOTH teams. That pick turns out to be #5 instead of #1, #2 or #3 and you will have traded Guentzel for it and a late second.
GiggywithGibby and Victor24 liked this.
Jan. 27 at 3:50 p.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: Shaquille_Oatmeal
Lol, like you won't get a Top Prospect with the 1st?


Are you new here?
Jan. 27 at 3:52 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 368
Likes: 218
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Are you new here?


No? Trolling?
Jan. 27 at 3:52 p.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Hunh?

You won't care if the Pens go to the playoffs this season if you get Macklin Celebrini as the reward.

I was merely approaching this proposal from the Ducks point of view.

But you're right -- this is too risky for BOTH teams. That pick turns out to be #5 instead of #1, #2 or #3 and you will have traded Guentzel for it and a late second.


I just love how everyone on this board wants to trade for top NHL players, but then argue how they're worth top dollar while sending them things they don't need.

Personally, I don't see why ANA would trade for a rental, so this trade is silly to begin with. If this is on his 12 teams, there's no way he's going to waive.

But to think one of the most consistent goal-scorers in the NHL isn't worth a 1st plus top prospect is absolutely insane.
Jan. 27 at 3:52 p.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: Shaquille_Oatmeal
No? Trolling?


No, that's clearly your job.
Jan. 27 at 3:54 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 368
Likes: 218
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
No, that's clearly your job.


When was the last time a pending UFA was worth a Top 3 pick? You are just biased.
GiggywithGibby liked this.
Jan. 27 at 4:05 p.m.
#15
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,293
Likes: 26,030
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
I just love how everyone on this board wants to trade for top NHL players, but then argue how they're worth top dollar while sending them things they don't need.

Personally, I don't see why ANA would trade for a rental, so this trade is silly to begin with. If this is on his 12 teams, there's no way he's going to waive.

But to think one of the most consistent goal-scorers in the NHL isn't worth a 1st plus top prospect is absolutely insane.

Nobody, least of all me, ever said Guentzel isn't worth a 1st and a top prospect, so I don't know why you're putting false words in my mouth. What I said -- twice -- is that Macklin Celebrini is worth a #### of a lot more than pick 30 and a top prospect, so you have to exercise some judgment here. Anaheim isn't going to risk trading that pick for Jake Guentzel straight up. And to go on the record and be crystal clear, any team that can persuade Kyle Dubas to part with Jake Guentzel for a second-half 2024 first rounder and an A prospect should do so.

You owe me an apology.
Jan. 27 at 4:13 p.m.
#16
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,469
Likes: 7,270
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
I'm not sure when you stopped actually being reasonable. In what world does Henrique and Lybushkin do the Pens any good if they're not going to the playoffs?


In what fantasy land are you getting a top 5 pick for a pending UFA? You understand the massive value difference between pick 5 and pick 25 right? And more importantly, why would we give up the pick when we can chase him with money in a few months?
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jan. 27 at 4:19 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 2,026
Guys, you’re all talking past each other, I don’t even think we disagree

Guentzel would totally return a 1st + prospect, and a darn good prospect especially in a sign and trade scenario.

ANA would pay nowhere near asking price, would not be in the running for him, and are irrelevant because he likely wouldn’t waive for us. It was a bad trade idea, we can all move on in agreement there I think
Jan. 27 at 4:34 p.m.
#18
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,469
Likes: 7,270
Quoting: Jded
Guys, you’re all talking past each other, I don’t even think we disagree

Guentzel would totally return a 1st + prospect, and a darn good prospect especially in a sign and trade scenario.

ANA would pay nowhere near asking price, would not be in the running for him, and are irrelevant because he likely wouldn’t waive for us. It was a bad trade idea, we can all move on in agreement there I think


Yeah, no, F*** that, there is one person clearly in the wrong in this thread, and it's @Mr_Gardoki for assuming that the Penguins have the kind of leverage to even ask for a top 5 pick for Guentzels UFA rights, let alone a top prospect on top of that. Sure, Guentzel could probably get pick 28 and a Kylington level prospect with full retention, but that is a LONG way off from a top 5 pick in value. Duvas would fall out of his freaking chair if he heard that pick 5 was available for Guentzel.

And he has the cheek to tell me I'm the one who should delete my account. What an absolute clown show.
Jan. 27 at 4:57 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 2,026
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Yeah, no, F*** that, there is one person clearly in the wrong in this thread, and it's Mr_Gardoki for assuming that the Penguins have the kind of leverage to even ask for a top 5 pick for Guentzels UFA rights, let alone a top prospect on top of that. Sure, Guentzel could probably get pick 28 and a Kylington level prospect with full retention, but that is a LONG way off from a top 5 pick in value. Duvas would fall out of his freaking chair if he heard that pick 5 was available for Guentzel.

And he has the cheek to tell me I'm the one who should delete my account. What an absolute clown show.


lol you’re correct that he won’t net a top 5 pick. And while that’s where our pick is, I’m not convinced Gardoski really factored that in. He said he’s worth a first and prospect, and I agree with that, but it’d be for the late first since it’d likely be a contender trading for him

Was his tone condescending and generally dickish? Absolutely. Some people just aren’t good at communicating when they don’t see the person on the other side
Jan. 27 at 5:09 p.m.
#20
LosPatos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 3,454
Likes: 1,980
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Yeah, you're gonna have to add a top prospect to this. If the Pens are trading Jake it's because we're not heading to the playoffs. Henrique does nothing for us, nor does Lybushkin.


What’s in the water in Pittsburgh? Lmao
GiggywithGibby and OldNYIfan liked this.
Jan. 27 at 5:33 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,663
Likes: 557
Quoting: Shaquille_Oatmeal
When was the last time a pending UFA was worth a Top 3 pick? You are just biased.


Well cause typically only playoff teams trade for pending UFAs. And a lot of pending UFAs go for a late 1st plus. The value isn’t the problem. The problem is that it makes no sense for a bottom feeder to take on a pending UFA when they can just wait til free agency.
Jan. 27 at 6:31 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 2,813
Likes: 956
Quoting: Jded
lol you’re correct that he won’t net a top 5 pick. And while that’s where our pick is, I’m not convinced Gardoski really factored that in. He said he’s worth a first and prospect, and I agree with that, but it’d be for the late first since it’d likely be a contender trading for him

Was his tone condescending and generally dickish? Absolutely. Some people just aren’t good at communicating when they don’t see the person on the other side


Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Yeah, no, F*** that, there is one person clearly in the wrong in this thread, and it's Mr_Gardoki for assuming that the Penguins have the kind of leverage to even ask for a top 5 pick for Guentzels UFA rights, let alone a top prospect on top of that. Sure, Guentzel could probably get pick 28 and a Kylington level prospect with full retention, but that is a LONG way off from a top 5 pick in value. Duvas would fall out of his freaking chair if he heard that pick 5 was available for Guentzel.

And he has the cheek to tell me I'm the one who should delete my account. What an absolute clown show.


Ana currently has the best odds for #4 overall which is worth about 3 low 1sts.

Marty St. Louis went for a top 6 guy and 2 low 1sts.

Marian Hossa went for 2 middle 6 guys, a top 30 prospect and a low 1st

Guentzel is better than both of those guys statistically. I am 100% not interested as a partial Ducks fan but the value isn't far off if the Pens had deals already in place for the vets.

The biggest negative for the Pens is it places all the risk on one piece. At best you get a Guentzel replacement in the draft pick. That is where Mr_Gardoki is coming from. A 1st, A prospect and NHL top 6 guy (the rumored ask) breaks the risk into smaller parts for the Pens.
Jan. 27 at 7:15 p.m.
#23
OhYeahHockeyMeUp
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 2
Likes: 2
Why would ducks do this when Guentzal is gonna be a UFA at the end of the season
Jan. 27 at 7:21 p.m.
#24
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,469
Likes: 7,270
Quoting: Victor24
Ana currently has the best odds for #4 overall which is worth about 3 low 1sts.

Marty St. Louis went for a top 6 guy and 2 low 1sts.

Marian Hossa went for 2 middle 6 guys, a top 30 prospect and a low 1st

Guentzel is better than both of those guys statistically. I am 100% not interested as a partial Ducks fan but the value isn't far off if the Pens had deals already in place for the vets.

The biggest negative for the Pens is it places all the risk on one piece. At best you get a Guentzel replacement in the draft pick. That is where Mr_Gardoki is coming from. A 1st, A prospect and NHL top 6 guy (the rumored ask) breaks the risk into smaller parts for the Pens.


No, Mr_Gardoki specifically said Anaheim would have to add a top prospect ON TOP OF Anaheims unprotected 2024 1st round pick, a 2nd, and two roster players. There was no mention of spreading out the risk, it was a blatant statement that the original offer wasn't enough, and that is complete and utter bulls***. No nuance, no detailed explanation, just a statement that Guentzel is apparently worth well in excess of three firsts and a second, as a soon to be 30 year old UFA, with no retention.

Guentzel can probably fetch pick 28 and a Poulin level prospect, none of the Anaheim fans here have insinuated, let alone said that's unreasonable or a reach, and maybe a decent 2nd line player with a bit of term left on a not terrible contract in lieu of retention. We're taking exception to Mr_Gardoki being off his freaking rocker.
Jan. 27 at 7:26 p.m.
#25
we miss leo k
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 6,020
Likes: 5,132
Quoting: OldNYIfan
That 2024 first is guaranteed to be a top-5 selection, and is our ticket to the Celebrini sweepstakes.

I would trade that pick for a trio of guys whose name begins with an "M," or maybe Connor Bedard, but not Jake Guentzel.


Isles happily offer Matt Martin, Matthew Maggio, and Scott Mayfield for the Ducks' 2024 1st.
Jded and OldNYIfan liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll