SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Staying Competitive While Selling at the Deadline

Created by: hockeybadger
Team: 2021-22 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 17, 2022
Published: Jan. 18, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Defensive restructuring is very important to get the Canucks to a Stanley Cup contention level. The trade deadline is a great spot to start the movement for this.

Per Frank Seravalli, the Rangers have been all over the Miller talks. NYR has a huge surplus of RHD and apparently value Schneider more than Lundkvist. If this is true, the Canucks NEED to have him as part of a package for Miller. He is the exact type of defenseman the right side of the Canucks defense desperately needs and Bruce Boudreau has been clamoring for.

Continuing on the theme of the tire-fire right side of the Canucks defense, if there is any possibility to trade one of Poolman or Hamonic, it needs to be done. Even if at worst case scenario it's a swap of either of those two for a forward or another defenseman with a bad contract it has to be explored. If they can't be traded then, as Elliotte Freidman said on Donnie and Dhali, a guy like Luke Schenn could garner some interest with a late round pick. You have to do that if there's interest and you still have Poolman and Hamonic on the team.

Motte is another piece that should be moved and teams that have seen what he can do in the playoffs (and could be interested) are St. Louis, Minnesota, and Vegas. I'm not sure the exact return he could salvage, but a 3rd Round Pick, or if a bidding war happens, a 2nd Round Pick would be adequate.

Lastly, we saw teams like San Jose and Columbus use their remaining cap space to broker three way deals where they retain 25% of salary for players in exchange for a mid round pick. Canucks should 100% be in on this. Look at candidates like Joe Pavelski, Claude Giroux, Marc-Andre Fleury (not if he's going to EDM), or Giordano.

I'd love to hear your opinions on these moves or see other potential ways the Canucks could acquire assets while staying competitive!
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. Lundkvist, Nils
  2. 2022 1st round pick (NYR)
  3. 2022 2nd round pick (STL)
NYR
  1. Miller, J.T. ($2,625,000 retained)
2.
VAN
  1. Walker, Nathan
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (STL)
3.
VAN
  1. Pavelski, Joe ($3,500,000 retained)
DAL
    Three-Way Trade
    4.
    VAN
    1. 2022 3rd round pick (CGY)
    BOS
    1. Pavelski, Joe ($1,250,000 retained)
    Additional Details:
    Three-Way Trade Pt. 2
    5.
    VAN
    1. 2024 7th round pick (ANA)
    ANA
    1. Poolman, Tucker
    Additional Details:
    Send him or Hamonic to a Hockey Man TM (Not Anaheim, just using as a placeholder)
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    Recapture Fees
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2022
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the STL
    Logo of the WPG
    Logo of the STL
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    2023
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    2024
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the ANA
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$81,500,000$74,503,159$648,780$4,332,500$6,996,841

    Roster

    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,250,000$3,250,000
    LW
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $4,125,000$4,125,000
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $4,950,000$4,950,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RW, LW
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $7,350,000$7,350,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,875,000$5,875,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $725,000$725,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $2,650,000$2,650,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
    LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the St. Louis Blues
    $750,000$750,000
    LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $750,000$750,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $7,260,000$7,260,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    RD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    G
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $7,850,000$7,850,000
    LD
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RD
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $1,500,000$1,500,000 (Performance Bonus$1,500,000$2M)
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    LD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $850,000$850,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $750,000$750,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $750,000$750,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $750,000$750,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $750,000$750,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $1,125,000$1,125,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $762,500$762,500
    RD
    UFA - 2

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jan. 18, 2022 at 12:24 a.m.
    #1
    Xercuses
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 13,506
    Likes: 3,616
    Blues don’t have enough cap space I’m pretty sure
    Jan. 18, 2022 at 12:27 a.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    hockeybadger
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2018
    Posts: 311
    Likes: 83
    Quoting: xercuses
    Blues don’t have enough cap space I’m pretty sure


    I haven't done the move from a Blues standpoint yet, but that could be the case. I put Walker in there to try to balance the salary a bit, but yeah STL is very close to the Cap.
    xercuses liked this.
    Jan. 18, 2022 at 12:28 a.m.
    #3
    mokumboi
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2019
    Posts: 30,542
    Likes: 11,732
    Hard pass from the Blues. No cap, no need and Motte is hardly better than Walker, if at all.
    Jan. 18, 2022 at 12:31 a.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    hockeybadger
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2018
    Posts: 311
    Likes: 83
    Quoting: mokumboi
    Hard pass from the Blues. No cap, no need and Motte is hardly better than Walker, if at all.


    Look I was just speculating off of teams who saw what he could do in the playoffs, so it's all good lol

    I wouldn't down play Motte that much though
    Jan. 18, 2022 at 1:08 a.m.
    #5
    mokumboi
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2019
    Posts: 30,542
    Likes: 11,732
    Quoting: telmax
    Look I was just speculating off of teams who saw what he could do in the playoffs, so it's all good lol

    I wouldn't down play Motte that much though


    Why? At best, he's an average 4th liner. Probably not even that, as he seems to have stopped hitting people.
    Jan. 18, 2022 at 1:11 a.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2016
    Posts: 1,631
    Likes: 1,228
    I think Lundkvist is the wrong defenseman to go after and would not make a good partner for Hughes, IMO. Hughes needs a younger Tanev or Schenn to cover the defense while he does his thing. Lundkvist looks to be more of an offence type defenseman.
    Nighthawk liked this.
    Jan. 18, 2022 at 1:17 a.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 3,266
    Likes: 1,101
    I'm not convinced that Lundkvist is what we need. Hughes and OEL are the puckmovers that this blue line is built around and if he's going to make it into the top-4 eventually it's going to be with one of them. I don't think he's a fit there and it's why Schneider makes more sense.

    I agree with your take on RD; move someone for an equivalent contract that can hopefully bounce back like we did with Gudbranson for Pearson. I don't think Poolman has been as bad as people say and I would prefer Hamonic moves, but I'll take what we can get. We should keep Schenn though. He's a guy who wanted to come here and he actually brings some toughness to the team. He keeps his game simple when playing higher in the lineup and is very cheap. No need to move him considering the return will be a late pick.

    I would move Motte but only if we can't re-sign him. If he signs for under 2M for 2-3 years then we should keep him. If he wants to test the market then recoup an asset. I wouldn't be surprised if we got a pick as high as a 2nd for him.

    If we have the space then we should absolutely buy a pick with our cap space.
    Jan. 18, 2022 at 2:55 a.m.
    #8
    2018 Canucks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 2,200
    Likes: 756
    Quoting: audiodave
    I think Lundkvist is the wrong defenseman to go after and would not make a good partner for Hughes, IMO. Hughes needs a younger Tanev or Schenn to cover the defense while he does his thing. Lundkvist looks to be more of an offence type defenseman.

    Besides retaining for Miller it’s not enough.
    Jan. 18, 2022 at 4:44 a.m.
    #9
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2021
    Posts: 12,418
    Likes: 2,631
    Quoting: mokumboi
    Hard pass from the Blues. No cap, no need and Motte is hardly better than Walker, if at all.


    I'll admit I don't know much about walker, but Motte is recognized around the league as a premiere bottom six role player, Walker hasn't built up that kind of reputation to garner comparable value yet if he ever does
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll