DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Canucks33
Member Since
Dec. 15, 2017
Favourite Team
Vancouver Canucks
Forum Posts
3217
Posts per Day
1.4
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 minutes ago
Thread:
Dream Team
This team is worse I think.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 minutes ago
Thread:
Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wqrrior</b></div><div>we move out a lot of assets and dont clear cap or get better. smith isnt vgk misfit smith anymore</div></div>
Take the bet that Smith coming back to the Western conference improves his game along with playing with Pettersson or Miller. Should show better than Mikheyev has in that spot and being an expiring deal gives more flexibility moving forward.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 30 at 2:11 p.m.
Thread:
Hughes is our RD1
Playing LD has more benefits on defense and allows him to spin off hits more easily and avoid vulnerable positions. Offensively he does whatever he wants anyway.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 30 at 2:08 p.m.
Thread:
Michkov coming over next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Renegade_H</b></div><div>What you offering? I will personally driving from Florida to Philly to take him to the airport.</div></div>
I think a Couturier trade would be tough for any team to figure. He's still a very good two-way C with size and leadership which drives his value up, but he's also a disgruntled, injury riddled expensive long term 30+ contract which would hamper a team's willingness to pay premium assets for him. The Hertl trade is probably the best comparable. The Canucks still probably have OEL PTSD and would only be interested if its dirt cheap or there's retention.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 30 at 1:28 p.m.
Thread:
Michkov coming over next year
Couturier also switched agents, given what happened this year could he be moved?
Swapping him for Michkov would be a clear signal to the new generation.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 27 at 11:45 p.m.
Thread:
Could they be moved
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>FoxYou727</b></div><div>Pulock is an interesting trade idea. I see a lot of Jets fans proposing an Ehlers for Pulock swap so that gives you a base for value. Hoglander would be the main piece I'd want personally, I'd be fine taking a contract back too + 1st. Maybe I am overvaluing him but RD are apparently the hardest position to find which I find strange considering 80% of the world is right handed</div></div>
Directly matching Ehlers-Pulock for the Canucks would probably be Boeser-Pulock, but the Canucks can't afford to give up their only true scoring winger.
I'd consider something around Hoglander but I'm not sure it would be worth it move a young, effective, cost controlled player for a 30+ player. It would be a big hit to move him along with a 1st. For a contract going back it would likely be Mikheyev. For it to be appealing for the Canucks the structure of the deal would be something like Mikheyev + Podkolzin + 1st 2025 + 2nd 2025. You could choose any prospect other than Lekkerimaki or Wallinder.
You could probably get Marner for him though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 27 at 11:25 p.m.
Thread:
Changes needed
Interesting to read your assessment of the team.
From the outside the team just doesn't have the depth to hang with the best team in the East, nothing to be ashamed of but not something that can be easily fixed.
Sergachev playing is absolutely insane and one of the most impressive things I've seen in the NHL this year.
Do you think Jeannot could be moved for cap? I think the Canucks would be interested in his style of play and he could fit better in our system.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 27 at 8:24 p.m.
Thread:
Could they be moved
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>FoxYou727</b></div><div>Doubt Lou moves him, but I feel like we must
I'd want a 50%:
First
roster player for cap
A good prospect</div></div>
Any chance Pulock would shake loose if the team looks to make big changes? With Dobson ahead of him at RHD maybe look to move a long term contract for a 30+ player?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 25 at 2:25 a.m.
Thread:
Keeping Core Together
It's not worth it to attach a 2nd to move Mikheyev.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 25 at 2:23 a.m.
Thread:
TAM VCR
I love Cirelli and would love to have him on the team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 18 at 3:41 p.m.
Thread:
Utah
That is not enough for Hronek
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 17 at 5:11 p.m.
Thread:
Another Canes Trade
Intriguing idea if the Canucks believe Kotkaniemi can be an effective 3C. I think he'd fit our system well and although I'm not sold on his overall ceiling, getting a player signed through his 20s could be better than signing a UFA for that spot.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 13 at 12:33 a.m.
Thread:
Thanks09 Guy
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Batherson probably has more value than Boeser though because he has 3 more years on his contract at a cheap cap hit while Boeser is a UFA after next season</div></div>
I believe that Boeser will take a long term deal at low cap hit to stay in VAN similar to RNH. Something like 8 years at 6M-7M, which would be a bargain deal and below market value. Independent of that I don't like sending out that many assets for a non-impact player at a non-premium position.
One of the characteristics of Rutherford teams is the defense is pretty inexpensive and doesn't require super high end players all over to be effective. We got our stud #1 and they are content to fill holes around that with different types of players like Zadorov and Soucy. Hronek might push it but I don't think they'd be looking at burning assets on another defenseman, more likely a forward. Simply re-signing Zadorov would be a much better move for the organization in my eyes.
I think this team is very solid though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 12 at 11:17 p.m.
Thread:
Thanks09 Guy
I think Batherson - Boeser is a downgrade. That makes the rest way too much for 1 year of Chychrun.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 12 at 11:15 p.m.
Thread:
Hshshhd
I think Mikheyev would be a good fit for you guys and could play with either one of McDrai, but his value is in a weird spot because his knee injury has hampered his entire tenure with the Canucks,
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10 at 5:55 p.m.
Thread:
1724
Losing Blueger hurts this team a lot.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10 at 2:55 a.m.
Thread:
Another
I don't understand why Hagel's cap hit had to be that high on a max term extension. At the time of signing he didn't have an extensive NHL resume and his production didn't warrant that cap hit. I understand the value of locking him up in his prime years, I just think they could have gotten him at like 5M instead.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 9 at 11:38 p.m.
Thread:
Big Move
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>StutzlesNumber1Fan</b></div><div>Brady is worth more than just Willander lol. Everyone will always over value their own players on here so it's pretty impossible to get realistic trades. Like I would want Lekkerimaki + Willander for Brady + JBD but Sens fans will say its not enough and Canucks fans will say its way to much.</div></div>
When's the last time two A prospects were packaged together? I understand that would be your ask but you have to understand that its not happening.
As good as Brady is he's a winger, teams pay premiums for C's and RHDs. Brady is a top tier player and a unicorn style wise but his cap hit isn't small either. Hronek is a top tier asset being a RHD, balances the cap and fills an organizational need for you. I'm not sure there's going to be a much better single asset out there. Throw in an A prospect a 1st and the deal is already overflowing with value you. I'd be surprised if two of them were included in a deal let alone three.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 9 at 10:30 p.m.
Thread:
Big Move
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>StutzlesNumber1Fan</b></div><div>I'd rather have Willander over Hronek if I'm being honest.</div></div>
If you want Willander it would be him and something small, that's it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 6 at 8:31 p.m.
Thread:
Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xqb15a</b></div><div>Why would COL do that?</div></div>
Forgot to mention it but this assumes Landeskog is back and they need to clear cap.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 6 at 12:21 a.m.
Thread:
Better figure something out
What if Rantanen is out?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 5 at 11:14 p.m.
Thread:
Treliving Puts His Stamp On The Team
Canucks decline
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 5 at 5:17 p.m.
Thread:
Marner
I wanna report this
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 5 at 4:04 p.m.
Thread:
Just hear me out before you trash this
I agree that Graves could be good for us but I don't see any reason to take on the risk the term on his deal. We don't need LHD and if we did we could find other ones. I'd rather keep Zadorov.
Kotkaniemi is interesting and has some upside but again the risk is in the term of his deal. Being buyout friendly is a bonus though. For that price I wouldn't mind but I'd like some assurance that he'll be put in a good spot with good linemates to succeed. Your suggestion of putting him with Joshua and Garland could work as they can energize anyone it seems. It would be worth letting Pettersson know about it as well.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 5 at 2:20 p.m.
Thread:
Couple different offseason acquisitions
I think Graves could be decent for us but the term is a problem in the cap world.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com