SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

scarchelli

scarchelli
Member Since
Jun. 21, 2015
Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
Forum Posts
51
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 8, 2015 at 7:42 p.m.
Thread: No Kane
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lari</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>scarchelli</b></div><div><i>This roster is absurd. You have almost 5 mil to spend yet rundblad is your 7th dman? And TWO rookies on the third line? What in gods name...</i></div></div>
Who says you have to spend to the cap? Nothing wrong with a little wiggle room. And I doubt those are the actual lines anyway.

I see nothing inherently wrong with this. A little tweeking and it's fine.

Not to mention, I like a roster where the bonuses can all fit under the cap. That means no more bonus overage penalties!</i></div></div>

5 mil is "a little wiggle room"??

2 rookies as forwards is dumb no matter what lines theyre on considering the cap space.

And if you have 4 mil in bonuses then you have a problem right there.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 4, 2015 at 6:14 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 30, 2015 at 5:44 p.m.
Thread: Finish the Trimming
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>cmyles</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>scarchelli</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NickC1988</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>scarchelli</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DontTradeNash</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>scarchelli</b></div><div><i>I dont get why you would recall schilling instead of having 1.6 mil for a better defenseman?</i></div></div>

If he gets a d-man for 1.6 mil then there is no cap space to call up depth...</i></div></div>

1.1 now, drop schilling that's 1.6. Acquire dman with the 1.6. Rundblad then moves to 7th. Not a difficult concept to grasp.</i></div></div>

Pokka or Gustafsson.</i></div></div>

...are both rookies and wont be on the team. A young guy in tvr and daley is a new hawk. Not a chance q plays a rookie for d.</i></div></div>

You realize that good young D have to have a rookie season in order to be a regular in the NHL, right? If you find an established D that'll cost 1.6 mill, he's probably garbage. I'd rather pay a young D half that who has lots of potential. And who cares that TVR is young and Daley is new...</i></div></div>

You realize hawks won 2 cups and almost 3 with "established garbage"? And q cares, you know, the person who actually matters.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 29, 2015 at 9:45 p.m.
Thread: Finish the Trimming
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NickC1988</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>scarchelli</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DontTradeNash</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>scarchelli</b></div><div><i>I dont get why you would recall schilling instead of having 1.6 mil for a better defenseman?</i></div></div>

If he gets a d-man for 1.6 mil then there is no cap space to call up depth...</i></div></div>

1.1 now, drop schilling that's 1.6. Acquire dman with the 1.6. Rundblad then moves to 7th. Not a difficult concept to grasp.</i></div></div>

Pokka or Gustafsson.</i></div></div>

...are both rookies and wont be on the team. A young guy in tvr and daley is a new hawk. Not a chance q plays a rookie for d.