SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Shibbal18

Shibbal18
Member Since
Jan. 2, 2016
Favourite Team
Buffalo Sabres
Forum Posts
25250
Posts per Day
8.3
Forum: Armchair-GM21 hours ago
Forum: Armchair-GM22 hours ago
Thread: Well
Well, no
Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 12:10 p.m.
Thread: Move up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>FarhanLuigi</b></div><div>What an easy block list. Imagine thinking Jack Quinn is better than Celebrini and Demidov LMAO
while outright denying their own questions at RHD and need to move a forward.

DELUSIONAL FAN BASE
They don’t even realize this kind of commentary while makes it easy to feel tall then you will simply be blocked by everyone and just circle jerking each other. I hope they have a good time in their Buffalo black holes.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>FarhanLuigi</b></div><div>NOT CORRECT AT ALL. An easy excuse for GMS to do nothing and say <em>trading is hard </em>

Calgary and Vancouver have made a number of trades and why Kuzmenko is still trending during the playoffs</div></div>

Wut?..... wth did I just read? lol A bunch of incoherent nonsense.

What does Calgary and Vancouver trades have to do with a proposed top 10 draft trade?!


The irony of your comments of being blocked by everyone is hilarious...see ya!
Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 12:50 p.m.
Thread: Move up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Joblow</b></div><div>I personally think if Buffalo would want to jump to 5if Levshunov is available it will take one of Quinn Or Peterka. No mather how piss off buffalo fan are this would be the cost. Value wise this trade is pin point i would say. Quinn haven’t established himself already but might have a higher ceiling then Peterka. Buffalo prospect pool are deep but they don’t have any Blue chip defender, so this make sense no mather what. Been over 10 seasons of missing playoff, maybe keeping all their prospect and developing is not the way to do thing. But i guess everyone won’t ever agree on trade proposition around here. I think you did a good job with understanding value and need for both team. Buffalo fan can continue to believe they have a good defender group but a team that ain’t the case.</div></div>

Quinn is not a prospect. Why would the Sabres trade top six forwards for more prospects???????
Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 12:02 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 11:27 a.m.
Thread: Move up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>FarhanLuigi</b></div><div>The fact, both of you, answered so matter of fact in a matter of moments of creating this ACGM shows how thoughtless and absolutely biased you are. This isnt close to an easy to adequate trade especially without the lottery even performed.

LMAO I'm a Canucks fan, calling someone a troll because you cant think critically isn't my fault. Look inwards.</div></div>

You failed to quote my actual comment about this trade idea but I'm assuming that was a mistake.

You answered shibbal with a stupid comment and then edited it. You are the one that isn't thinking critically.

The Sabres have no use for trading a player who is already in their top 6 for futures. You say they have a lot of prospects, why not target them, although I still don't think moving up from 11 to 6 will make that much of a difference in this draft.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 23 at 11:09 p.m.
Thread: Ruff is back
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Fjordy</b></div><div>And where do you see him in the lineup? Ruff will kill him.

I mean, Zach Benson is a hard player to play against because he eats at you. Jeff Skinner is the complete opposite, he's a lazy ass with no motivation and 9 million a year, he'll be in Ruff's doghouse or disappear</div></div>

Skinner will play in the top9
And if that means he gets yelled at by Ruff a little bit,
that’s not the end of the world
Not the first time a tough coach yelled at Skinner
And not the first time Ruff has yelled at someone

You’re really overthinking this A LOT imo
Ruff has coached plenty of guys before who didn’t play defense, or were “lazy” and they still were plenty productive on good teams

Satan, Vanek &amp; Afinogenov all immediately come to mind
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 8 at 10:58 p.m.
Thread: Offseason Rossi Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Danny_MrGM_Briere</b></div><div>Is he that good? Will he be better than a middle 6 player? Laughton can play up and down the lineup and I think the sabres might want the leadership and mentality that he brings for all of the young players. A 4th rounder on top of that too. But again I could be ignorant to how good Ostlund really is because I don't know much about him.</div></div>

the only lineup versatility laughton has had this year is being able to play all 3 forward positions. he hasn't been able to play above a 3rd line level for an extended period of time other than the week before the deadline. since then he's been a 4th liner at best

ostlund has top 6 potential - low end 1st line, good 2nd liner more than likely