PuckLuck_77 Profile - CapFriendly

Forum: Armchair-GM8 hours ago

Nope from LA. Byfields just getting going.

Forum: Armchair-GM9 hours ago

It's too early to be this deep in a bottle, my friend.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 12:54 p.m.

In a vacuumn, if the Kings were interesting in moving Kempe, I'm sure there'd be discussions on this. (They don't want to move Kempe, their most consistent regular season AND playoff performer the past few years. So it's a no there regardless.)

However, this is not a vacuum and the Kings can't afford to take on a player that costs 5.5mil more and then add another 1.1mil player onto it. That's changing their cap by 6.6mil in the wrong direction when they need to sign Byfield and others this season.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 11:44 a.m.

Thread: The Gambler

My heart says hard and fast yes from LA. But I don't think the extra 2.5mil would let the Kings sign the players they need to sign over the summer.

Hard and fast no from Ottawa.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 11:02 p.m.

Thread: City of Gods

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>boltsfan71</b></div><div>dont think kings want Marner that bad</div></div>

Kings don't want Marner at all. So you're not wrong.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 1:27 p.m.

Thread: Holtz Spence

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tryger</b></div><div>If Roy is gone, Spence moves into the top-4, Clarke needs time to develop.</div></div>

Gotta disagree here.

If someone is offering a 1st for Spence you take it. If Roy leaves, you can still sign a vet 3RD sometime this summer.

I 100% take this deal if I'm LA.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 10:53 p.m.

Thread: Is this realistic If not what would make it

Maybe if you take out the 1st round pick and add PLD.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 4:09 p.m.

Thread: Another Monday

I can't wait until Leafs fans are crushed by the lack of return for Marner. This is a guy you are all actively complaining about and essentially FORCING out of Toronto due to lack of performance. Why would teams want to pay for that?

As a related aside, remember how Ottawa fans were convinced Tarasenko would bring them a 1st round pick++ without retention? They retained half his contract and might get two third round picks (if Florida wins the Cup). That's because he held complete control over where he went. Now, Marner is a better player than Tarasenko, sure. But you're gonna need to come to terms with the fact that you aren't going to get a team's best prospect. It just. Ain't. Happening.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 12:12 p.m.

Thread: Total Retool

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Texas416_er</b></div><div>Right, and yet you brought up cap space as if the issue was in getting the number to work...</div></div>

You asked why PLD was included. <strong><em>IF </em></strong>this trade were to go through, in the vacuum of common sense, it would be because cap needed to be going out of LA as well.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 11:59 a.m.

Thread: Total Retool

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Texas416_er</b></div><div>Thanks so much for getting me caught up on the basics. So why would Toronto downgrade from Nylander to PLD?</div></div>

They wouldn't. Trade isn't realistic for either side.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 11:10 a.m.

Thread: Total Retool

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Texas416_er</b></div><div>Why add PLD?</div></div>

Well you see, there's this thing called a "cap" and it is in place for teams other than Toronto, too.

Also, the Kings aren't moving Brandt Clarke to move PLD. That's laughable.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 1:59 a.m.

Thread: Productive thoughts

I wouldn't trade either Mikey or Kempe 1-for-1, much less both.

Forum: Armchair-GMSun. at 6:00 p.m.

Thread: Leafs Trade

Lol absolutely not.

Forum: Armchair-GMFri. at 3:41 p.m.

Thread: Punishing PLD

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>????? You're not punishing the PLD by trading him to the Hawks....you're punishing the Hawks. Hawks have no interest and certainly have no problem reaching the cap floor.</div></div>

I mean it's possible that it punishes both PLD and the Hawks.

I wouldn't lose any sleep over punishing Chicago lol

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 1 at 11:08 a.m.

Thread: Isles

Lol the Kings can't just take on 5mil in cap hit and be expected to send a 1st round pick for a 33 and 36 year old. That's highly optimistic thinking.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 4:23 p.m.

Thread: next chapter

Take out Nic Dowd and replace the 2nd rounder with a 3rd rounder, and I think LA is very interested.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 11:18 a.m.

Thread: Could Marner Work

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kyle_Okposo_Lover</b></div><div> although it is a fun idea</div></div>

Maybe for Toronto fans. It's more than a minor annoyance for us Kings fans.

I appreciate you trying to stem the tide of Leafs fans living in fantasy land where every team thinks their players are the best so we give up our best players for them.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 11:17 a.m.

Thread: Marner working for LA

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dh91</b></div><div>we'll take doughty</div></div>

Read the description again, please. Specifically the following line:

"Here's the ONLY way."

We're not trading you our franchise #1RD either. Clarke isn't there yet.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 10:55 a.m.

Thread: Could Marner Work

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HollywoodHudon</b></div><div>A. You are over the cap.
B. Where is Marner?</div></div>

Lol read the description.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 10:48 a.m.

Thread: Rebuilt

Mitch Marner is not the wanted commodity that you Leafs fans think he is.

Take out our #1LD and still the Kings say no.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 10:44 a.m.

Thread: winning

Clarke is not available.

Kings don't want Marner, period.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 2:00 a.m.

Thread: Marner Maybe

Wouldn't trade Kempe 1-for-1. Contract, years left under control, playoff performance, size are all reasons why.

LA doesn't want Marner, unless it's a swap of disappointing players. You guys take Dubois, we'll take Marner.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 1:58 a.m.

Thread: Toronto - 2024-25 - Major Off Season

Is this going to be the summer where Kings fans have to constantly tell Leafs fans they LA doesn't want to add another smaller forward that can't perform in the playoffs, while also not having nearly enough space for his upcoming ridiculous contract?

Also, I wouldn't trade either of Byfield or Kempe 1-for-1 for Marner.

Ya'll are delusional.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 1:55 a.m.

Thread: Optimistic offseason

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>I can see <strong>adding</strong> Nick Perbix, but not replacing Jordan Spence with him.</div></div>

I beg to disagree. If Roy walks, I think management would probably be pretty happy letting Clarke play 2D and adding a huge rugged 3RD and another 2nd rounder in place of their redundant puck-mover in Spence.

I like Spence a lot and wouldn't like to see him go. But our team needs to get larger throughout the lineup, back-end included.

Doughty, Clarke, Perbix would be a fine RD set, I think.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 29 at 6:41 p.m.

Thread: as per Shanny everyone stays

A trade needs both sides to be willing to accept it.

LA laughs you off the phone and tells you we wouldn't trade Kempe for Marner, one for one.

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

PuckLuck_77

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day