SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

MNBassman

MNBassman
Member Since
May 14, 2015
Favourite Team
Minnesota Wild
Forum Posts
8355
Posts per Day
2.5
Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 8:17 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 5:52 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WhoCares_ItsAFantasyGame</b></div><div>I sincerely don't see why MTL would move back and give up Caufiled, then send a third for a fourth for a guy who basically put up the same points in a few less games? I mean Boldy is a great player, but to add Caufield to the 5th overall and move back 8 spots would not be worth it.

To move Boldy to Habs I think it would most likely be another player outside of Caufield, Slaf, Guhle, Reinbacher, Suzuki, and Engström if they want the 5th overall...

To get the 5th vs 8th, I think Habs could potentially put up Barron, Mailloux, Harris, Beck or Mesar of the Prospect pool, plus either Anderson or Armia (Which MIN would turn down), or Dach (But that's a big gamble since I don't know if Hugues still wants to gamble on him with the medical issues he faced and if MIN would want him).

Maybe something like:
Boldy+MIN 1st VS Mailloux, Beck+HABS 1st+CAL 2025 1st
OR
Boldy+MIN 1st VS Mailloux, Beck+HABS 1st+AVS's 2024 2nd

I just don't see MTL moving out of the Caufield train for a player who puts up the same amounts of points at this time. Even if he's bigger.</div></div>

I don’t see any way the Wild would consider anything around Caufield for Boldy. We are tiny enough as it is.

If I was a GM and you called asking for Boldy and then listed Caufield (lol), Slafkovsky, Guhle (lol), Reinbacher (lol), Suzuki, and Engstrom (lmfao) as untouchable pieces, you are getting blocked.

*Edit: just realized you said on top of the 5th overall pick. So that at least makes a little more sense to me. I wouldn’t target the 5th overall pick though. The Wild need scoring help on top of Boldy. Not to detract from the already mediocre offense.

Both of your offers are a “no, and don’t call again.” The difference between 5 and 13 in this draft is less than the difference between Boldy and Caufield. Caufield is a one dimensional winger that isn’t good at anything other than offense, and he is still worse than Boldy at it. The Wild could literally just take a bigger Caufield at 13 in Cole Eiserman and not trade their 1st line player locked in at a lower rate than Caufield.
Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 4:10 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 10:02 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMSun. at 2:10 p.m.
Thread: Now and Then