DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Utah
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Utah
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Gofnut999
Member Since
Jan. 6, 2017
Forum Posts
20096
Posts per Day
7.4
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 hours ago
Thread:
keeping 44
Well, there is one for the ignore list. 🙄
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 hours ago
Thread:
Ullmark Necas GeekieFrederic
Imagine thinking Necas is worth Ullmark/Frederic/Lysell. 🤦🏻
Or that he’s a center. 🤦🏻🤦🏻
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 hours ago
Thread:
maximizing returns
No thanks
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 hours ago
Thread:
pre season
Ullmark declines and that is a horrible trade for Seattle anyway.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 hours ago
Thread:
Pay JD
They made JD the biggest offer they are going to make him, he turned it down, they are prepared to move on. If he comes back to them before then, maybe there is a chance but they are not going higher.
Moving Geekie is dumb, giving him away is stupid.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 hours ago
Thread:
On the hypothesis of a Boston Carolina Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>Not when you look at the salary it will take to sign Necas. Carlo does a lot more for roster building.
I’m comfortable, I can find a FA F who can produce close to Necas for 7.5M
I’m comfortable, I can’t find a FA D who can produce close to Carlo for 4.1M</div></div>
True, but i was talking player attribute wise, 1 for 1 is fair. But Boston is not doing it, for exactly the reasons you stated.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 hours ago
Thread:
On the hypothesis of a Boston Carolina Trade
Carlo for Necas 1 for 1 is fair. Not happening, but fair.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 hours ago
Thread:
This could work
B’s pass
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 hours ago
Thread:
faster tougher better
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bruins_Guy613</b></div><div>I like coyle personally just sometimes some money has to give and Zacha is the younger of the two.</div></div>
If you are moving Ullmark and Coyle out to use that and the existing cap to get Elias, Stephenson, Guentzel….i’m in.
To get Debrusk, Dillon, Trenin. Nope.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 hours ago
Thread:
faster tougher better
Anyone who watched Coyle play this year and thought: we should trade him for a pair of picks that likely amount to nothing to replace him with a 3rd pair d man and 4th liner, neither of which are needed, so we are better off…well….i just don’t know what to say 🤷🏻♂️
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
17 hours ago
Thread:
BRUINS Necas want to be a C he will be a C
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsJoe</b></div><div>If he cant, the backup is Chandler, Coyle as a 2C and Necas as RW</div></div>
They are not bumping Coyle to wing for Necas to begin with so there is that, and now you are back to square one with him pouting and sulking and wanting out for the same reasons he wants out of Carolina.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
17 hours ago
Thread:
BRUINS Necas want to be a C he will be a C
He’s not center because he can’t win a faceoff and his defense is not good enough.
The league is full of wings that were drafted as centers but did not have enough ability to do it at the NHL level.
I’m not against trying it, but you better have a backup plan when it fails.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 hours ago
Thread:
a different approach
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>The single biggest risk to his long term earning potential is him ending up on a bad team. Same as last year.
Unlike last year, that question can be answered with an extension and I believe that is a bigger part of the equation than some are laying out.
1. They are in the right time zone
2. They are an easier city to get home to than many options
Sure, they have the tax disadvantage compared to other markets, but that’s like a 5% premium in salary
The real question is whether he believes the team can be competitive. To me, they are undifferentiated from the Buffalo’s, New Jersey’s of the world. Good young talent, but haven’t shown they can win consistently.
Maybe it’s a full stop. Maybe he’s willing to retire and go to the Swedish league / not play for a generational wealth contract. I doubt that, but nothing would surprise me here.</div></div>
Not really, the single biggest risk to his long term earning potential is injury.
If he ends up on bad team/porous D this year than goes UFA will that be held against him or do teams understand the situation. 🤷🏻♂️
However he only has one big contract left, and it is not going to be 6+ year deal. I doubt teams are going to go beyond 4 years on extension or in UFA.
He likely has 3 or 4 years left of his prime and max $. After that it will be year to year for backup $.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 hours ago
Thread:
a different approach
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kscoop</b></div><div>Easier to make a move after the season as opposed to the deadline.</div></div>
That is true, but Ottawa tried last offseason, guess why it didn’t happen.
Sens desperately needed a goalie. B’s wanted that cap space. Sens were really the only team in market for a goalie that could take his entire cap hit, had plenty of pieces to make it work. Just one problem…
He has stated his preference is to stay in Boston and, quote, “the teams on the list are on there for a reason”
Does that sound like someone who waives?
It will take a significant incentive, or they go to him with a trade in place with a team not on his list, and say here are the other teams still interested, are you willing to waive for any of them now that a trade is inevitable.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 hours ago
Thread:
Unrealistic next year
Boston can’t find room in their top 9 for a 23 year old that scored 30 goals in AHL. They are not trading for middle 6 wings.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 hours ago
Thread:
a different approach
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>Ottawa with an extension (5% premium to accommodate tax differences) and NMC rights could be just as appealing as NJD without an extension. Both teams struggled badly, but have some premium young talent on it, I’d argue that Ottawa’s defensive structure could be better suited to a strong defensive option.
I would think Boston would prefer to trade him out of the Atlantic all things equal which is why I focused on Jersey to begin with. As long as teams don’t over inflate their leverage, a deal should and could be done there</div></div>
For all we know he plays out the year and goes back to Sweden to play. 🤷🏻♂️.
He was considering it when he was in Buffalo.
Depending on what happens politically here it might even be the preferred option, lol.
Better quality of life and being close to family is no longer a concern.
I don’t believe an extension where he does not want to be is the solution.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 hours ago
Thread:
a different approach
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SensFan40</b></div><div>Ottawa being bad was due to Melnyk and his cost cutting - that's already being worked on and lots of progress made. It may not be the most attractive, but since we know he wants to be in the east part of the country it's not a stretch that he would rather go there and sign an extension over going to LA. He just may not have many options and staying in Boston is probably less attractive than going to Ottawa.</div></div>
He has already stated his preference is to stay in Boston.
And no, when it comes to least desirable places to play, it’s location, location, location,
Take the best run org in the world and put them in Winnipeg, nobody wants to play there still. Take the worst run org and put them in Miami or Vegas, everyone wants to play there still.
That is just reality. There are always going to be cities no matter how good the org is, are just not desired destinations.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 hours ago
Thread:
a different approach
A bad approach.
Rather have Carlo and Lysell than Trouba and Stillman.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 hours ago
Thread:
Hronek in the bay
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>That is the path that Columbus used on Severson.
I’d be fine with a swap of rights with Lindholm and DeBrusk to get a few weeks to try and get it done, but the risk is he asks for the 8th year to cement it</div></div>
That’s the point. They trade for exclusive rights and offer 5/6 years at 6.5/7.5m, he just waits to see the other offers and you wasted your assets.
If not offering him 8, and hell no, there is no point. Other options .
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 hours ago
Thread:
a different approach
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>I doubt it takes a “ridiculous” extension. If it is around market for good years and has an NMC, I can easily see him taking it. Ullmark craves stability and Boston is going to be the least stable of his options.
The rumor was a three way deal between Ottawa, Detroit, and Boston involving the 17th pick. Boston was targeting Oliver Moore, but Detroit decided to wait on acquiring DeBrincat once they saw the draft board.
The Ottawa deal seems pretty simple in terms of contract and players, getting Ullmark to waive will be the difficult thing. If it’s a player involved, I believe it is Chychrun</div></div>
Between Ottawa being one of the least desirable places to play according to player polls year in and year out. The tax structure. The compete level. It’s going to take some serious incentive for him to waive.
I was hoping like hell to make a draft day move to get Moore. But it was just that, hope.
Hawks have some interesting secondary pieces, a couple of them for Ully would work, but Ullmark surely does not fit their window. Mrazek is signed to be the placeholder til Commesso/Gajan ready. I don’t see a fit there even for a non-Moore deal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 hours ago
Thread:
Hronek in the bay
The only real reason for Boston to do that would be able to sign him for 8 years. As there is zero interest in signing him for that long there is no point.
Having exclusive rights means nothing if he waits to see what other offers there are.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 hours ago
Thread:
a different approach
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kscoop</b></div><div>Unless you are his pal, there is no way you know for certain. Bruce Garrioch has reported that the Sens will circle back which means that Ullmark will accept a trade to Ottawa.</div></div>
Lol, that means absolutely nothing. 🙄. They can try all they want, does not mean he will waive. LA tried, did he waive?
It’s also the same idiot that said it would take Chychrun 1st/3rd. LMAO
It’s just his opinion same way Jimmy Murphy has opinions lol
Same reason there was an opinion early in the year of Ullmark for RNH.
Same way in Edmonton a writer insisted after DeBrusk and Björk for Nurse/Chiasson fell through the trade could still happen without Debrusk /Nurse, and this site was inundated by Edmonton fans offering Chiasson for Bjork despite Boston not having any interest, they only wanted Nurse.
Writers have space to fill.
I want him to waive, Ottawa has the best pieces to make a trade work. I’m just realistic.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 hours ago
Thread:
a different approach
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kscoop</b></div><div>Doubt Ullmark blocks. Sens probably decline though. You do realize that Ullmark will be eligible to be traded to half the teams in the league. You assume Ottawa isn't on his preferred destination but most reports indicate that the Sens are indeed on his approved list.</div></div>
Nope, they are on his NTC. He is not going there. He would have been there last year otherwise, rumor is he blocked last offseason. Now if they offer him a ridiculous extension….🤷🏻♂️. But considering his age, i’d imagine if he waives for a team it would be a team that is competitive already.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 hours ago
Thread:
a different approach
Sens decline, Ullmark blocks.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 12:33 a.m.
Thread:
Youth Movment
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>StutzlesNumber1Fan</b></div><div>Sens already asked about Ullmark too. I’m assuming he wouldve been a Sen by now if he wanted to waive.</div></div>
Exactly.
We can all wish it, it’s a great match, but it’s not happening
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com