DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
10
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Utah
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Utah
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
EvanW711
Member Since
Dec. 4, 2023
Favourite Team
Calgary Flames
Forum Posts
40
Posts per Day
0.2
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 11:10 p.m.
Thread:
Markstrom trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>I have seen the #10 for Markstrom/Van pick scenario posted here before. It wouldn’t be my preferred route as NJD fan, but I think it’s plausible.</div></div>
yeah I'd imagine it only happens if NJ cant get a deal done for Ullmark or Saros
Forum:
Mock-Draft
Wed. at 11:52 a.m.
Thread:
Corey Pronman's Top 16 Mock with a Trade
As a flames fan, I hate the trade if thats the pick
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 8 at 11:16 p.m.
Thread:
Any chance Calgary would do this
nope
Forum:
Mock-Draft
May 7 at 3:57 p.m.
Thread:
Final mock before lottery with a trade
If thats what it took to get Tij, then so be it
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 5 at 9:27 p.m.
Thread:
24-25
Weegar is probably our next Captain and basically untouchably
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 3 at 5:12 p.m.
Thread:
Pulling a Vegas
Flames wont be interested in more bottom 6 wingers, they'd just take opportunity away from some young guys coming up. If we trade Kuzy I think the minimum they'd take is a 2nd + a decent Center or Defense prospect. It'll depend on how good he plays in the first half of next season
Forum:
Mock-Draft
May 2 at 10:41 a.m.
Thread:
Surprises and Trades
The Flames getting both Tij and Dickinson would be perfect. I expect they might have to trade up that Vancouver pick to get the 10th tho. If they didnt they'd probably pick a center, Hage if hes still available, or Beaudoin or Luchanko would be great. Hopiing Conroy Makes it happen
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 1 at 11:44 a.m.
Thread:
Trading up with Marky
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaun80</b></div><div>I think Lindstrom will be available for them at 5th. Who do you want to draft there to make this trade?</div></div>
I'd take Lindstrom at 5th but I Doubt He'd be available so I'd take either Dickinson or Parekh. I think its likely MTL takes Iginla at 5th and I'd want us to take him at 9.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 1 at 11:35 a.m.
Thread:
Trading up with Marky
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Burnout</b></div><div>People thought Montreal would take a center with their 2022 1st and a forward with their 2023 1st. No one knows exactly who Montreal will use that pick for.
They're obviously not going to even consider moving that pick for a rental winger with big question marks and an undersized prospect/young NHLer that hasn't done much yet and doesn't address a need for Montreal. Realistically, the only thing Calgary could offer for Montreal's 2024 1st is their own plus future(s) that would address a need for Montreal and the quality of which would be painful to give up.</div></div>
I was under the impression from Habs fans online that their biggest need was Wingers. But youre right they could do anything with that pick
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 1 at 12:46 a.m.
Thread:
Trading up with Marky
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Black61</b></div><div>Not remotely close on the habs trade.</div></div>
What do you think MTL would want for their 1st? They'd be using that pick to get a winger and would be getting 2 in this trade, Kuzy is a top 6 winger right now and coronato has the potential to become one as well.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 1 at 12:41 a.m.
Thread:
Trading up with Marky
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>They want Allen to be backup next year and Flames want Wolf to play so remove Allen</div></div>
I'd rather trade Vladar and keep allen as a mentor. I think NJ would be fine with Schmid as backup if they had Makrstrom
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 10:24 p.m.
Thread:
Offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Brolekb2b</b></div><div>I don't think Perbix is going to fetch us two picks</div></div>
Definitely not from the flames. We should be hoarding picks, not spending them on bottom pair/#7 guys, we have enough of those already
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 6 at 12:41 p.m.
Thread:
Continuation Hanifin Prediction
Cant see any offer without your 2026 1st not getting beat by another team. swap the 2nd for the 1st and its close to what might actually happen, imo
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 3 at 1:29 a.m.
Thread:
Hanifin-Panthers
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SlashHammer</b></div><div>No Mackie Samoskevich, no deal</div></div>
I'd hope so but if Boston and Tampa's offers are **** then Panthers might get away with swapping Mackie out for a lower prospect like Sawchyn
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 1 at 2:19 p.m.
Thread:
Is Poitras untouchable
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NorthernLeafsFan05</b></div><div>Yes, especially in a trade for a pending UFA</div></div>
I'd assume it would be a sign and trade, I shouldve included that
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 28 at 4:19 p.m.
Thread:
Flames Deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>The Pagnotta run-down I think is the most clear.
<em>"Separate sources confirmed the Devils would send forward Alexander Holtz back in a trade with between $2 million and $3 million of Markstrom’s of annual cap hit retained"</em>
I am sure there are other lesser pieces involved, but if there was a 1st round pick....or a Dawson Mercer....or a Famous Seamus Casey...or even a Kevin Bahl...it would have likely said as such. But they were omitted since those pieces weren't included (or may be tied to non-agreed to portions of the deal).</div></div>
I’m not saying an unretained markstrom would’ve fetched any of those pieces in addition to holtz. But something like a 3rd and holtz is a big difference from a 1 for 1, even if an article would omit the 3rd. It’s possible something like that could’ve been the agreed upon portion of the trade, but with retention maybe Connie was asking to turn that 3rd into a piece like a 1st or bahl or Casey. Mercer was probably never on the table. I don’t deny Im biased and could be wrong. flames probably higher on holtz than I am.
Either way I’m rooting for devils to get back to form and make a push for playoffs, it only benefits Calgary for the devils to be buyers at DL even if it’s just for hanafin. Hopefully y’all can get a W Streak going
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 28 at 12:26 p.m.
Thread:
Flames Deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>
My take…..
I believe Fitzy wanted package deal, was willing to put Holtz on table to get both…figuring he can overpay on Markstrom and make it make up on Hanifin. Conroy said we will take the first half for Markstrom, but have to wait for market to mature on Hanifin. So now we wait…if no one beats NJD offer on Hanifin piece, both are sent to NJD. If a team beats NJD offer on Hanifin piece, that team gets Hanifin and Markstrom isn’t traded.
</div></div>
I'd agree something like this is probably what happened. I wouldn't be surprised if a package like Holtz, 1st + mid picks and/or prospects for hanafin, retained markstrom is what ends up happening.
I appreciate the links, I'd still argue the first doesn't specify whether or not it was 1 for 1. and the second is referencing their own mock trade, not a source to what the reported deal was.
It mightve been markstorm = holtz straight up but no sources have actually stated the 1 for 1 as fact
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 28 at 11:02 a.m.
Thread:
Flames Deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Devils deal for Markstrom was Holtz for Markstrom with TBD retention. So if you add to Holtz…gotta retain Markstrom. And if it’s a 1st…probably means another piece is coming to NJ.</div></div>
Nothing I've seen stated the deal was specially a 1 for 1, please link a source for that if there is cause I havent found it. I think both flames and devils fans are making assumptions about what the deal was based off their own biased values of Markstron and Holtz. I'd think that Conroy wouldn't trade our best player for just one guy whos only getting 11:38 TOI on a struggling team. Devils fans disagree. We'll probably never know unless they do actually end up making the deal
"The Devils were reportedly ready to <strong>at least</strong> make Swedish sniper Alexander Holtz as part of the transaction." https://newjerseyhockeynow.com/2024/02/13/jacob-markstrom-waived-to-join-devils-tom-fitzgerald-flames/
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 21 at 2:11 p.m.
Thread:
Next
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>The return on Hanifin will be better than Mercer + 1st?</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Smitty426</b></div><div>We're bleeding out on the left side so we're interested. As noted not as a rental, but I'd be OK with Hughes/Hanifin/Siegenthaler. Money has been discussed. We'd be at the max but doable. Not saying everyone would be happy with it.
There's no way you're getting better than a middle of the round 1st (currently), and Dawson Mercer.</div></div>
I'm saying NJD wouldnt give Mercer + 1st for Hanafin and whatever they would be willing to give wouldn't be better than what Flames could get elsewhere
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 21 at 12:45 p.m.
Thread:
Next
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Westerner69</b></div><div>What would NJ trade for Hanafin then?</div></div>
I doubt NJ is that interested in hanafin, they wouldnt give him the contract he wants and they definitely dont want a rental. Flames will get a better return from somewhere else
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 21 at 11:57 a.m.
Thread:
Go For It
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>No they wouldn't.</div></div>
lol OP edited, took out a 1st and 4th
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 20 at 5:18 p.m.
Thread:
Go For It
Flames would probably accept
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 20 at 5:09 p.m.
Thread:
Two Trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>Not sure I’d do Lysell and a 1st for Lindholm. I’d rather offer Merk, a first, and a second for Lindholm personally.[/quote
That would be a little disappointing but not an unrealistic return</div></div>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 20 at 1:46 p.m.
Thread:
Whats the cost of
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bc44</b></div><div>I think Calgary would be looking for a little more than what they got for Zadorov (3rd and cond5th) in a possible Tanev trade. Reports are Calgary would want 2nd to start with. Which seems about right. The Leafs dont have a 2nd so maybe a prospect Calgary covets to start.</div></div>
I'd be happy with Niemela + 5th and hopefully Abruzzese or 3rd
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 20 at 1:32 p.m.
Thread:
Two Trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KennyBoi</b></div><div>I personally don't agree with Boston's big TDL move being for a top4 dman. Their priority should be a top6 C, if they can't get that, then a top6 fwd.
The current dman core (-grz) is pretty good, which helps having 2 elite goalies.
If they can explore a trade involving Grz that would bring back depth, that would be nice too.</div></div>
Would you do Lysell + Merkulov + 1st for Lindholm?
Grz for Dube? thats more a shot in the dark since idk what grz value is but I want dube moved and he could be a good depth guy for bruins
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com