DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Blueman96
Member Since
Apr. 28, 2020
Favourite Team
St. Louis Blues
Forum Posts
289
Posts per Day
0.2
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 1:33 p.m.
Thread:
I have a trade to announce
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AC14</b></div><div>By what standard?
Parayko had probably his best season of his career last season. Binnington as well. Are we excluding that?
It doesn't matter regardless. Blues don't have the structure to sign Marner to one of those mega deals and fix their issues. That doesn't even factor in trading away the only good defensively defenseman on our roster and our starting goalie.</div></div>
Mostly agreed. On its face I scream "ACCEPT! NO TAKE BACKS!" but then when you dig into it...
Yea, we'd then need to find another goalie and there's a very real chance Marner doesn't re-sign in St. Louis. We can't do the mega bonus money and NMC deal (because, you know, we can't have a player who has more power than the owner. Amiright?!)
Plus I don't know that Marner is the type of player Army wants. Shoot, we had Blues fans up in arms at various points the last couple seasons about Kyrou. Now you bring in another one? (albeit more talented)?
I just don't see it happening. I don't see the Blues being in the mix for Marner at all, if for no other reason the contract and fit issues. Much less what the Blues would be giving up.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 1:26 p.m.
Thread:
Boring offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GM_MZ_WSH</b></div><div>Totally fine! I just would like MacLellan to acquire a top 6 winger or two. That's my biggest thing, we can't run it back with this offense and just hope we get a bit more out of a few guys. Didn't mean to be condescending, it's just that if BMac didn't do any substantive changes, I think I might finally start to question his decisions more</div></div>
Well now with news coming out with Oshie and his back issues he might not even play next year, that winger spot looking even more necessary. I just wonder if you don't just bring in some cheap short term vet's to prop up the team so they're not awful until Ovie breaks the record then you blow it all up. Would be my thought.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 1:24 p.m.
Thread:
The New Core
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BDHockey</b></div><div>Its like any time a team has two good goalies they instantly start to look to sell and then a few years down the road are looking to desparately buy another goalie when they overworked their starter. I agree just hold onto binnington unless we get an insane offer.</div></div>
I don't think I'd pick up the phone unless we're talking at LEAST two 1sts (or their equivalent).
Not saying I'd do it. Saying that would be a price I would start to listen.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 2:45 p.m.
Thread:
The New Core
Blues decline.
Binner had his best season since 2019. His contract is now looking like a bargain when compared to the rest of the league. With Binner and Hofer we are actually set and secure in net. No reason to disrupt that, and especially not for only a late 1st round pick. It'd have to be a deal the Blues can't refuse.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 2:39 p.m.
Thread:
Cant get any worse
Blues do that move in a heartbeat
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 30 at 10:11 a.m.
Thread:
Boring offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GM_MZ_WSH</b></div><div>This would be absolute worst-case scenario for me</div></div>
What would you like to see MacLellan do? Genuinely asking :)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 12:49 p.m.
Thread:
I ll try to be realistic
I don't see how Army can get out of the Hayes contract. We may just be stuck with it.
Agreed we will need a 2C sooner rather than later but Monahan is going to get the full 7 years from someone and I'm sure it'll be at a stupid AAV. Don't think the Blues would be in play at the term and # that some other team will recklessly throw at him.
Pass on Ghost. We need fewer contracts with 3+ years back there to expire, not bring in new ones.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
Apr. 23 at 12:49 p.m.
Thread:
Campbell cap dump Blues can help
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>What you've proposed is rather a fleece for the Blues, but we're not chasing deferred picks right now. Easy pass.</div></div>
A few stories I've read online have quotes saying it would take "multiple firsts" for Edmonton to rid themselves of Campbell's contract scott-free so that's where the idea came from.
I agree I don't think Edmonton does it but Blues could theoretically stand to benefit.
Army has wrecked this team. As far as "pressing needs" there are none. Dump assets, weaponize cap space, get more picks and prospects. That should be the only plan IMO.
Ownership can't and Army won't weaponize any cap space we have anyway so this is something that'll never happen but, again IMO, should.
I'd buy out Krug and Hayes if ownership could afford it and Army wasn't steadfastly against such things. I look forward to another mediocre finish next season!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 16 at 9:31 a.m.
Thread:
Boring offseason commence
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HolyJumpin81</b></div><div>I'm ok with a boring offseason. This likely is the last season that the krug and faulk contracts are unmovable, as the full NTC's end after this coming season. Stillman has never been fond of retaining bad contracts, so that seems unlikely. Keep in mind the blues are a rather small market team so retaining salary via buyout or long term contracts is rather unusual. An in house development focused offseason is for the best. It's nice to hear they have a plan and are sticking to it. I'd personally love to see if the can snag DP57 for a year or two as well. I think once these prospects start to produce, this team will see even more improvement. Realistically the only thing thats gonna hold this team back going forward are those awful deals given to krug, faulk, and schenn</div></div>
It might be as simple as incorporating kids as the older/longer term bad deals drop off one by one. This offseason Scandella/Kapanen/Vrana. Next summer Buchnevich (I love him but c'mon, we need to get assets and trade him at the deadline) and then 1 year left for Saad and Leddy, with their contracts switching from full NTC's to partials. Also 2 years left for Krug and Faulk and their contracts switch over to partials as well.
It's going to take time. This sucks. There's no 2 ways around it. I hope we stockpile enough picks and prospects that the team will be more than average once the kids get up and in.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10 at 1:31 p.m.
Thread:
Becoming a little better
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>He would have to sign them to their qualifying offers or lose them. Kunins is 3 million. He also will turn 27 this year. He isn't young.
Zadinas QO is over a million dollars and he's now flamed out on 2 teams.</div></div>
Kapanen was 26 at $3.2 AAV and had "flamed out" on two teams. Vrana was 27 at $2.625 AAV and had "flamed out" on two teams as well. Young*ish. It's the age range Army is targeting for immediate-injection type players.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 9 at 12:51 p.m.
Thread:
Becoming a little better
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>You can't sign reinhart for 8 years.
Why would he sign in SJ?
Why would he sign for less to play in SJ?
Why are any of these other teams making these trades?</div></div>
I could maybe see the Blues doing it. Army has shown in the past a willingness to take flyers on young, underachieving players (see, e.g. Kapanen, Vrana) for low acquisition costs. I don't know enough about how Kunin and Zadina have played this year to know if a 3rd and a 7th are too much or good, or not enough (I think it's a little rich but that's just me). But this is the kind of moves Army has been making lately with the forward group. Just depends what he thinks of Kunin & Zadina.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
Feb. 22 at 2:38 p.m.
Thread:
Reunited and It Feels So Good
I think Army is going to try to get two 1sts out of him if he can. That failing, this is probably as good as any deal he'd have on the table. I get the suspicion that Army could get more for a retained, bargain deal on a high impact 29 year old winger in high demand.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 2, 2023 at 9:47 a.m.
Thread:
Keeping the D-men
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>"wouldn't it be nice"</div></div>
It would... very much.
Hindsight is easy, anyone can do it... but there were criticisms, at the time, of every trade Army made on that blueline. Unforced errors.
Even if we assume Seattle still yanks Dunn in the expansion draft this defense would STILL be better, IMO, with Edmundson still on there with Walman and Mikkola than it is now. At least we'd be younger with less cap restraints, if absolutely nothing else.
Forum:
NHL Trades
Jun. 27, 2023 at 1:51 p.m.
Thread:
(PHI/STL) - Hayes for 2024 6th (STL)
For the Blues: Actually I think I really like it. Hayes and Schenn can rotate in the 2C / 3C spots depending on who's playing better/chemistry at any given point in time. It's like signing him to a 3 year deal at $3.5 AAV, which I would do all day every day.
For the Flyers: They're rebuilding, it didn't matter if it was a "loss" trade. They gained: (1) cap flexibility for other moves or salary retentions that could return them even MORE draft/prospect capital, (2) a 6th round draft pick. It is a massive return? No. Did Briere at least get SOMETHING? Yes he did. There's one more asset in the rebuild pipeline for a player who was not part of the future. It's SOMEthing; and infinitely better than a buyout.
Forum:
NHL Trades
Jun. 19, 2023 at 11:56 a.m.
Thread:
(ARI/VAN) - Ekman-Larsson, Garland for Beagle, Eriksson, Roussel, 1st, 2nd, 7th
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sensonfire</b></div><div>I don't evaluate trades 2 years after they happen based on hindsight.
And Jim Benning wasn't fired as Canucks GM until months later. I stand by what I said. </div></div>
It's all good. For some at the time it was a close trade. I thought OEL was a diminishing asset and I couldn't believe the price Vancouver paid even if you thought he could bounce back considering he had a full NMC and Vancouver was rumored to be just about the only destination he would accept a trade to. Even if you thought OEL had something left to give, Arizona had zero leverage in the trade negotiations.
Credit to Benning for swinging hard I guess.
Forum:
NHL Trades
Jun. 19, 2023 at 11:54 a.m.
Thread:
(ARI/VAN) - Ekman-Larsson, Garland for Beagle, Eriksson, Roussel, 1st, 2nd, 7th
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jr400</b></div><div>This has to go down as one of the worst trades ever. Of course, hindsight is 20/20, but looking back, it seems that they should have known better. When I broke down the trade in 2021, I figured it made sense for Vancouver only if OEL at 12% retained was a neutral or positive asset, but if you look at the comments made at the time of the trade, most people thought he was a negative asset even then. Even if Vancouver thought he might return to form with a change of scenery, they should have realized that it was a huge gamble to take at his age and cap hit. I know they were desperate to get rid of the $12M 1-year cap hit, but they actually would have been better off just buying those three guys out.</div></div>
I certainly was one of the "negative asset" people. I certainly also could not fathom the price Vancouver paid. If the internet chatter was to be believed at the time, Vancouver was one of the very very few destinations that OEL would accept a trade to. Arizona had zero leverage and they walked away from this trade with the 9th overall pick? Insanity. Utter insanity, even then without the benefit of hindsight and it's even worse now.
Teams constantly letting other teams off the hook for their horrendous deals. We just saw a team lift the cup where other teams let them out of their cap dilemmas by trading with them for cap dumps, not making Vegas pay nearly enough to do so.
I was one of the ones who thought the trade was insane the moment I heard about it, I did not think OEL had much of anything left. Jim Benning was the worst.
Forum:
NHL Trades
Jun. 19, 2023 at 11:47 a.m.
Thread:
(ARI/VAN) - Ekman-Larsson, Garland for Beagle, Eriksson, Roussel, 1st, 2nd, 7th
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sensonfire</b></div><div>If there was a trade that would save Jim Benning his job, this is it.
I voted for the Vancouver Canucks :)</div></div>
Woof.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 19, 2023 at 10:54 a.m.
Thread:
What needs to be done
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>Yes. Everyday. Here is but one from yesterday.
https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/725304?post_id=4179973
Trash offers are trash offers, man, it's not my fault they are begging to be told an obvious no.</div></div>
I was mostly teasing, it was a light-hearted comment. Hence the winky face and the "Haha"
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 16, 2023 at 8:52 a.m.
Thread:
What needs to be done
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>You could remove Parayko from the deal and the Blues still pass.</div></div>
Do you ever say "Blues accept" to deals?
;)
haha
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 14, 2023 at 11:25 a.m.
Thread:
Simply draft Michkov
Why do NHL fans consistently seem to think that quantity equals quality in these draft pick trades?
They don't. Not even close. You could have three late 1st round picks and Flyers probably don't do it. They'd rather have the one stud than three "maybe's" (at best).
There's a reason we haven't seen a team deal a top 10 pick in, what, decades? They're just way, way too valuable. Teams aren't doing it, much less for crappy "quantity" returns.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 14, 2023 at 11:22 a.m.
Thread:
What needs to be done
Something's gotta give. I agree the Pens might be a trade partner for our defensive woes, as Parayko, Krug, Leddy and/or Scandella would probably waive their NTC's to go there. The issue is going to be the structure of the deal and what's coming back.
Both teams want to shake things up, a Pens/Blues trade could definitely happen. Not sure if this is it (haha) but it's a good trade partner.
Forum:
NHL Signings
Jun. 14, 2023 at 10:06 a.m.
Thread:
Edmonton Oilers signed Derek Ryan (2 Years / $900,000 AAV)
I voted "No" not a good signing.
Regardless of value this team should be endeavoring to stay youthful, not older. The playoffs are only getting faster and faster and whatever effectiveness Ryan had last year could fall off a cliff at a moment's notice. For a team counting every cap dollar I don't know about this one.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 7, 2023 at 11:02 a.m.
Thread:
Creative moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>Blues obviously pass</div></div>
Shoot, I'd be tempted. It depends how much of a rebound you think Krug has or what other moves Army would do after this but the trade DOES get them out of Krug's contract. Just depends how badly Army wants to do that I guess.
There'd have to be another move after this. Petry dumped for someone else or other moves made to create room for a younger D-man... something. It wouldn't be JUST this, no way.
Not saying I'd do it, saying I don't think it's an immediately obvious "NO." For me.
I'm also extraordinarily pessimistic on Krug's future in this league too, so...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 7, 2023 at 10:59 a.m.
Thread:
Hart Trade
Never in a million years.
Forum:
NHL Trades
Jun. 7, 2023 at 10:34 a.m.
Thread:
(CBJ/LAK/PHI) - 2023 1st (LAK), 2024 2nd (CBJ) for Petersen, Walker, Grans, 2024 2nd (LAK) for Provorov, Hodgson, Connauton
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aadoyle</b></div><div>LA gets cap space to extend Vilardi and Gavrikov and potentially add Hart or Hellybuyck in another trade
CBJ get a Dman who in a lesser role may do much better
Philly kickstarts the rebuild</div></div>
This could end up as "fair trade." But man oh man, look at you Philly. A 1st, two 2nd's, two reclamation projects and a prospect for a guy who'd stagnated on your blueline anyway?
"Kick start the rebuild" indeed. What a direct injection of prospect capital!
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com