Quoting: MattyMadden28
Thanks for the thoughtful reply.
About Jankowski. Honestly he might not be a top 9 C but honestly from what I see and heard he is likely to be a solid nhl C. Still a risk but he’s one I’d take. He took a while to develop but he was drafted knowing that it would take time for him to get into the NHL. He also put up a point a game in the A and I saw that he was one of the better centers in the league. At 6’5 220-230 with loads of skill. He also got sent down due to a numbers game like Kapanen. Kapanen is great but where does he play. Same with Bracco. We need a C now (or next year anyway) and Marner is not an nhl C and although Nylander CAN play C if still keep him with Matthews on W and get a better stronger player that you want mucking it up down low.
The Pitt trade is fair. Maybe it’s just Bozak for gusto and a first but it’s fair either way. I know it won’t happen for all of the reasons I mentioned in the description. But I would do it.
And Myers trade was just another idea. Your right Carrick is a 5’10 young depth D. But he’s only a Depth guy. The leafs have better options already so who cares. Leivo is the guy we will probably lose for nothing anyway but he has value so that’s why he’s included too. Myers ‘could’ be a solid top 4 guy soon. He looked great with team Canada, probably there best D, who were filled with first round D prospects. He’s another big guy at 6’5 can skate and has some decent offensive upside. He’s a gamble I’d take.
If you prefer sure things then why don’t we trade all of our picks for proven players? Why not? Because you need top talent (potentially) that is cheap. And you shouldn’t be afraid to make moves and trade expendable (but still valuable obviously) assets to improve the team LT when this teams window is probably for the next 10 years.
Despite what many think, I think the leafs don't really need many more moves for the next 10 years. Develop within, a limit trades as much as possible unless the player is a pending UFA and unaffordable.
With Matthews, Nylander, Marner, Brown, Kapanen, Kadri, Bracco as guys who are imo for sure roster players for the next 5-10 years. Then guys like Aaltonen, Brooks, Soshnikov, Grundstrom, Johnsson all adding depth, with of course future draft picks and free agent signings providing more depth.
On the back end the Leafs will have Reilly, Zaitsev, Liljegren, Dermott, Nielsen, Carrick, Borgman and Rosen. Dermott and Liljegren have the ceiling of a #1D, its unlikely they become one but they have the potential, Reilly and Zaitsev have proven their top pairing D, although not a #1, Nielsen and Borgman have potential to be 2nd pairing guys and Carrick and Rosen are depth guys who have an off chance of sliding into the top 4.
Andersen, Pickard and Kaskisuo in net is also no issue.
I used to think like you, I didn't want to trade to win right now, I wanted to trade what we have for picks to develop more. I think the thing I disagree with for you is aside from the Pittsburgh trade the leafs have no clear cut benefit. The leafs lose players with extremely high potentials for players that are "risk's".
Jankowski could probably be acquired for a 3rd rounder or even a player like Komarov who can help their winger depth instead of giving up our 3rd and 5th most valuable prospects. Myers also looks promising, but that puts a big hole in the leafs lineup for the next 2-3 seasons until Myers can step in an be an every day contributor.