SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hawks Fans or we feeling about taking Levshunov over Demidov

Created by: batman
Team: 2024-25 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 27, 2024
Published: Jun. 27, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,100,000
2$1,100,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$5,500,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Levshunov, Artryom
3$950,000
Trades
CHI
  1. 2025 3rd round pick (BUF)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2026
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$88,000,000$66,389,167$0$6,757,500$21,610,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$900,000$900K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$825,000$825,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,037,500$4,037,500
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,600,000$4,600,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
LD
RFA - 2
Levshunov, Artryom
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$962,500$962,500
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
RFA
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,100,000$1,100,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Thu. at 12:42 p.m.
#1
RIP Garth Snow
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 585
Likes: 148
Just saying I think Levshunov needs one year in the AHL before he can play in the NHL. Also I think the Hawks take him over Demidov but I'm not a Hawks fan so I don't know what they are really needing right now
Thu. at 12:45 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 1,189
The potential downside on Lev is that he turns into like, Erik Gudbranson or Erik Johnson, and is always "pretty good but not great."

Demidov seems like a boom-or-bust guy who will either be an electrifying offensive talent or Nail Yakupov. It's significant that (to my knowledge!) none of the Hawks front office have even seen this guy play in person.

To me, CHI has done a great job of restocking the pipeline with quantity and quality prospects over the past 2 offesasons and now is the time to roll the dice on a potential star rather than take a "sure thing" (nobody really is lol) with a ceiling below Star.

Demidov it is.
PaulKorea, newman23, Bedsy_Burner and 2 others liked this.
Thu. at 12:50 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 756
Quoting: ginandtacos
The potential downside on Lev is that he turns into like, Erik Gudbranson or Erik Johnson, and is always "pretty good but not great."

Demidov seems like a boom-or-bust guy who will either be an electrifying offensive talent or Nail Yakupov. It's significant that (to my knowledge!) none of the Hawks front office have even seen this guy play in person.

To me, CHI has done a great job of restocking the pipeline with quantity and quality prospects over the past 2 offesasons and now is the time to roll the dice on a potential star rather than take a "sure thing" (nobody really is lol) with a ceiling below Star.

Demidov it is.


Agree with this, except I believe the hawks FO probably have seen him in person. Chicago is one of the few teams with a Russian national scout based in Europe (anatoli semenov)
ginandtacos, OldNYIfan, Bedsy_Burner and 1 other person liked this.
Thu. at 12:53 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 1,189
Quoting: newman23
Agree with this, except I believe the hawks FO probably have seen him in person. Chicago is one of the few teams with a Russian national scout based in Europe (anatoli semenov)


You are right, but I meant like the coaching staff, GM, etc. I know they have a scout in Russia who has signed off on the guy, but that to me seems like pretty thin in terms of scouting.

That said, scouts from other teams and in Russia have given similar assessments about him: he could be great.
OldNYIfan and Bedsy_Burner liked this.
Thu. at 12:55 p.m.
#5
OldSLIMEfan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 502
Likes: 246
Watch them go Lindstrom or Sennecke at 2 lol

They are small up front. Bedard as amazing as he is needs someone to help other than 37 yr old Foligno
Bedsy_Burner and LivingAnew liked this.
Thu. at 12:59 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
fromtherivertothesea
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 968
Quoting: FarhanLuigi
Watch them go Lindstrom or Sennecke at 2 lol

They are small up front. Bedard as amazing as he is needs someone to help other than 37 yr old Foligno


Won't happen. It's 99% Levshunov.
Thu. at 1:06 p.m.
#7
uWu Garak
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2024
Posts: 873
Likes: 1,248
I see Levshunov's ceiling is as an adequate first pairing RD, IF everything goes right. Not a #1 D, not a star D, and not a top 20 in the NHL D. I went into the season thinking he was "it" if we didn't win the 1st overall pick. I buckled down, got myself a big10+ subscription, and watch a ton of his games. His overall performance was just fine, but his performance against the best teams and players in the NCAA left a lot to be desired. Well rounded doesn't make you worth the 2nd overall pick, it makes you a safe pick in the 8 to 15 range. And I don't even believe he is as "well rounded" as people make him seem. Picking at 2nd overall, we should be looking for the best player available, and I don't believe Levshunov even belongs in that discussion.

Demidov has real potential to be a superstar. The next Pasta, Panarin, Kane, Kucherov, Marner, Kaprizov, etc. And he is defensively responsible, and he is a leader. What is so maddening about this debate isn't whether or not Levshunov is a good young RD, because he is, it's that there is even a debate to begin with. Yes, we need more depth at RD... So, go get Emery, Elick, Badinka, Kleber, Brunicke, etc., in the late 1st or 2nd round. Or even Hensler, next year.

Rinzel already seems like a strong candidate for a top 4 RD, too. Rinzel is JUST BARELY a year older than Levshunov, and he was also a freshman this year, and he was also a #1D for one of the best teams in the NCAA, and he looked more dominant, confident, engaged, and competitive, than Levshunov, and we got him at 25th overall... Yes, we need good defensemen, but we don't need to blow a 2nd overall pick on one when there is a someone available who is clearly the better player by such a wide margin.

I think there is way too much hype around Levshunov, and a lot of it is just people seeing what they want to see.

I'm team Demidov, and I believe that every team who passes on him is going to regret it. Quite possibly even San Jose.
OldNYIfan, newman23, LivingAnew and 1 other person liked this.
Thu. at 1:12 p.m.
#8
Ducks and Kings Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 42,095
Likes: 26,674
Quoting: Bedsy_Burner
I see Levshunov's ceiling is as an adequate first pairing RD, IF everything goes right. Not a #1 D, not a star D, and not a top 20 in the NHL D. I went into the season thinking he was "it" if we didn't win the 1st overall pick. I buckled down, got myself a big10+ subscription, and watch a ton of his games. His overall performance was just fine, but his performance against the best teams and players in the NCAA left a lot to be desired. Well rounded doesn't make you worth the 2nd overall pick, it makes you a safe pick in the 8 to 15 range. Picking at 2nd overall, we should be looking for the best player available, and I don't believe Levshunov even belongs in that discussion.

Demidov has real potential to be a superstar. The next Pasta, Panarin, Kane, Kucherov, Marner, Kaprizov, etc. And he is defensively responsible, and he is a leader. What is so maddening about this debate isn't whether or not Levshunov is a good young RD, because he is, it's that there is even a debate to begin with. Yes, we need more depth at RD... So, go get Emery, Elick, Badinka, Kleber, Brunicke, etc., in the late 1st or 2nd round. Or even Hensler, next year.

Rinzel already seems like a strong candidate for a top 4 RD, too. Rinzel is JUST BARELY a year older than Levshunov, and he was also a freshman this year, and he was also a #1D for one of the best teams in the NCAA, and he looked more dominant, confident, engaged, and competitive, than Levshunov, and we got him at 25th overall... Yes, we need good defensemen, but we don't need to blow a 2nd overall pick on one when there is a someone available who is clearly the better player by such a wide margin.

I think there is way too much hype around Levshunov, and a lot of it is just people seeing what they want to see.

I'm team Demidov, and I believe that every team who passes on him is going to regret it. Quite possibly even San Jose.

Ya gotta love a guy who's willing to get out there with a contrarian viewpoint and back it up with argument. My hat's off to you. applaud
Thu. at 1:20 p.m.
#9
uWu Garak
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2024
Posts: 873
Likes: 1,248
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Ya gotta love a guy who's willing to get out there with a contrarian viewpoint and back it up with argument. My hat's off to you. applaud


I have been making this argument since January. So, I have my $hit together. haha. BUT, If you are insinuating that I am Bedards_Burner from twitter, I am not. Although I do agree with them on many things, that is a bit much for me. lol
PaulKorea liked this.
Thu. at 1:36 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 468
Likes: 610
Edited Thu. at 1:48 p.m.
Quoting: Bedsy_Burner
I see Levshunov's ceiling is as an adequate first pairing RD, IF everything goes right. Not a #1 D, not a star D, and not a top 20 in the NHL D. I went into the season thinking he was "it" if we didn't win the 1st overall pick. I buckled down, got myself a big10+ subscription, and watch a ton of his games. His overall performance was just fine, but his performance against the best teams and players in the NCAA left a lot to be desired. Well rounded doesn't make you worth the 2nd overall pick, it makes you a safe pick in the 8 to 15 range. And I don't even believe he is as "well rounded" as people make him seem. Picking at 2nd overall, we should be looking for the best player available, and I don't believe Levshunov even belongs in that discussion.

Demidov has real potential to be a superstar. The next Pasta, Panarin, Kane, Kucherov, Marner, Kaprizov, etc. And he is defensively responsible, and he is a leader. What is so maddening about this debate isn't whether or not Levshunov is a good young RD, because he is, it's that there is even a debate to begin with. Yes, we need more depth at RD... So, go get Emery, Elick, Badinka, Kleber, Brunicke, etc., in the late 1st or 2nd round. Or even Hensler, next year.

Rinzel already seems like a strong candidate for a top 4 RD, too. Rinzel is JUST BARELY a year older than Levshunov, and he was also a freshman this year, and he was also a #1D for one of the best teams in the NCAA, and he looked more dominant, confident, engaged, and competitive, than Levshunov, and we got him at 25th overall... Yes, we need good defensemen, but we don't need to blow a 2nd overall pick on one when there is a someone available who is clearly the better player by such a wide margin.

I think there is way too much hype around Levshunov, and a lot of it is just people seeing what they want to see.

I'm team Demidov, and I believe that every team who passes on him is going to regret it. Quite possibly even San Jose.


Outstanding post, Bedsy/Garak; thank you. You and I have discussed this; I also am not WOWed by Levshunov and think Rinzel is better. Lev is good; just don't see him as a #1 defenseman.

Frankly, I don't think he's the best defenseman in the draft, either... If I had to pick one D at this draft, it'd be Buium. IMHO, U of Denver doesn't win the national championship this year without him. Even though we're stacked (relatively so, anyway) with good LD prospects in the system, I'd be okay with Buium as our pick. Or Silayev, too, if they want to really roll the dice. Can always trade from strength, too, to get a good RD. Perhaps, too, our future #1 won't even come from this draft.

I just don't know about Demidov's skating style and how it may or may not lead to injuries. If all that commentary is wrong, Demidov is the one for me, too. I just gotta trust the Hawks on that.

Crazy as it sounds, I wouldn't mind Sennecke as the #2 OA pick. The only thing that folks seem hesitant about with him is that he lacks top-end speed. But if that can be improved, he could become elite... Again, IMO. Even Bedard isn't a speed burner (not that he's slow; just not elite in that way)...

If a dramatic draft trade or two comes from the Hawks, too, I trust the brain trust of Hawks to put the odds in the best long-term favor of the pipeline. They've done well in the last couple drafts; I expect they'll do well in this one. I'm gonna be glued to my TV on draft night (tomorrow!)

GLTA!
batman and Bedsy_Burner liked this.
Thu. at 1:51 p.m.
#11
uWu Garak
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2024
Posts: 873
Likes: 1,248
Quoting: LivingAnew
Outstanding post, Bedsy/Garak; thank you. You and I have discussed this; I also am not WOWed by Levshunov and think Rinzel is better. Lev is good; just don't see him as a #1 defenseman.

Frankly, I don't think he's the best defenseman in the draft, either... If I had to pick one D at this draft, it'd be Buium. IMHO, U of Denver doesn't win the national championship this year without him. Even though we're stacked (relatively so, anyway) with good LD prospects in the system, I'd be okay with Buium as our pick. Or Silayev, too, if they want to really roll the dice. Can always trade from strength, too, to get a good RD. Perhaps, too, our future #1 won't even come from this draft.

I just don't know about Demidov's skating style and how it may or may not lead to injuries. If all that commentary is wrong, Demidov is the one for me, too. I just gotta trust the Hawks on that.

Crazy as it sounds, I wouldn't mind Sennecke as the #2 OA pick, either. The only thing that folks seem hesitant about with him is that he lacks top-end speed. But if that can be improved, he could become elite... Again, IMO. Even Bedard isn't a speed burner (not that he's slow; just not elite in that way)...

If a dramatic draft trade or two comes from the Hawks, too, I trust the brain trust of Hawks to put the odds in the best long-term favor of the pipeline. They've done well in the last couple drafts; I expect they'll do well in this one, too. I'm gonna be glued to my TV on draft night (tomorrow!)

GLTA!


Mind you, Buium plays the Right Side almost exclusively for Denver.

I'd roll the dice on Parekh before Levshunov, if it were up to me. But yeah, I have Buium over both. Silayev is fine, not super impressed with anything about him outside of his size and skating.

Demidov's skating is fine. I watched at least 10 of his games this year. The knocks shouldn't be knocks. I think people see the way he uses his feet to maneuver around the O zone and get confused by it, it's unconventional and different from most "by the book" skaters. But it is effective and allows him to pull off the magic that he is able to pull off. I don't foresee any problems coming from it.
PaulKorea and LivingAnew liked this.
Thu. at 2:05 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 2,372
So, who the BPA is; is purely opinion. Sure, there could be some underlying facts used to base the opinion on but at the end of the day these are 17 year old kids playing in different leagues, in different countries, with different teammates & coaches, playing against different opponents.
I am more unsure who they should pick than I have been in the last 18 years . Way too much input now to clog up my brain. Or maybe I just killed too many brain cells……
LivingAnew and Bedsy_Burner liked this.
Thu. at 2:26 p.m.
#13
Ducks and Kings Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 42,095
Likes: 26,674
Quoting: Bedsy_Burner
I have been making this argument since January. So, I have my $hit together. haha. BUT, If you are insinuating that I am Bedards_Burner from twitter, I am not. Although I do agree with them on many things, that is a bit much for me. lol

?

I'm 76 years old. I don't do Tweeter or FaceSchnook.
LivingAnew and Bedsy_Burner liked this.
Thu. at 2:31 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 468
Likes: 610
Quoting: OldNYIfan
?

I'm 76 years old. I don't do Tweeter or FaceSchnook.


I'm 68, OldNYIfan, and also have declined to use social media. Not because I don't see some usefulness to them; I just don't like the censorship that seems to run amok with people and ideas being banned. Cheers
OldNYIfan and Bedsy_Burner liked this.
Thu. at 2:43 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 468
Likes: 610
Quoting: YeahRighttt
So, who the BPA is; is purely opinion. Sure, there could be some underlying facts used to base the opinion on but at the end of the day these are 17 year old kids playing in different leagues, in different countries, with different teammates & coaches, playing against different opponents.
I am more unsure who they should pick than I have been in the last 18 years . Way too much input now to clog up my brain. Or maybe I just killed too many brain cells……


Same here, YeahRighttt, same here... Every time I think I've settled into whom I think the Hawks should take, something comes up that makes me re-think it.

I'll say this, though. If Demidov's skating style is NOT "a knee injury waiting to happen," then I'm all for taking him at #2 OA. If the Hawks determine that it will be a problem, then I think they should take Buium. (Thank you, Bedsy; I didn't know that he has played RD almost exclusively for U of Denver.)

Cheers
YeahRighttt and Bedsy_Burner liked this.
Thu. at 3:37 p.m.
#16
uWu Garak
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2024
Posts: 873
Likes: 1,248
Quoting: OldNYIfan
?

I'm 76 years old. I don't do Tweeter or FaceSchnook.


lol. Fair enough. You got 40 years on me. I am only on twitter to keep up with hockey news/buzz and some world news. I left facebook years ago. Social media is a cesspool.

But there is someone on Twitter with the username Bedards_Burner who is going nuts with the pro-Demidov/anti-levshunov posts. He isn't wrong, imho, but it is very much overboard. Stressing about this stuff is only gonna give us heart attacks and it isn't going to change Kyle Davidson's mind. haha

Like me, he or she doesn't hate Levshunov, they just don't think he belongs anywhere near the conversation.
LivingAnew, batman and OldNYIfan liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll