SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Canes - 2425

Created by: ChelPenguins
Team: 2024-25 Carolina Hurricanes
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 23, 2024
Published: Jun. 23, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,220,768
7$7,725,500
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,144,444
3$4,257,577
3$3,775,200
Trades
1.
CAR
  1. Ullmark, Linus
Additional Details:
Linus Ullmark signs 5 x 7,000,000 extension
BOS
  1. Necas, Martin [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Martin Necas signs 7 x 7,521,066 extension
2.
CAR
    Future considerations
    CGY
    1. Andersen, Frederik
    2. 2024 4th round pick (CAR)
    3.
    CAR
    1. 2024 3rd round pick (CHI)
    CHI
      Jake Guentzel's UFA rights

      Immediately signs to a 7 x 9,310,400 million dollar contract
      4.
      WPG
      1. Martin, Spencer
      2. Suzuki, Ryan
      3. 2024 1st round pick (CAR)
      4. 2024 3rd round pick (CHI)
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2024
      Logo of the CAR
      Logo of the CAR
      Logo of the CAR
      Logo of the CAR
      Logo of the OTT
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the CAR
      2025
      Logo of the CAR
      Logo of the CAR
      Logo of the CAR
      Logo of the CAR
      Logo of the CAR
      2026
      Logo of the CAR
      Logo of the CAR
      Logo of the CAR
      Logo of the CAR
      Logo of the CAR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the CAR
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      20$88,000,000$87,795,989$0$350,000$204,011
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $7,750,000$7,750,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $9,750,000$9,750,000
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 8
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $7,725,500$7,725,500
      RW
      RFA
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $4,257,577$4,257,577
      LW, RW
      UFA
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $2,900,000$2,900,000
      C, LW
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
      $6,000,000$6,000,000
      RW, LW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $2,144,444$2,144,444
      LW, RW
      UFA
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $2,220,768$2,220,768
      C
      RFA
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $905,833$905,833
      RW
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $4,820,000$4,820,000
      C
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $3,900,000$3,900,000
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $2,400,000$2,400,000
      RW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $5,300,000$5,300,000
      LD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $5,280,000$5,280,000
      RD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $5,000,000$5,000,000
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $7,750,000$7,750,000
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      RD
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $2,000,000$2,000,000
      G
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$350,000$350K)
      RD
      RFA - 2
      $3,775,200$3,775,200
      RD
      UFA

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Sun. at 6:01 p.m.
      #1
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2022
      Posts: 4,392
      Likes: 1,554
      Jets obviously decline pulock for ehlers is a way better trade that the jets could pursue
      ChelPenguins liked this.
      Sun. at 6:04 p.m.
      #2
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 39,904
      Likes: 20,525
      Quoting: Howie
      Jets obviously decline pulock for ehlers is a way better trade that the jets could pursue


      You aren't getting 7 years of Pulock for 1 year of Ehlers. That's not at all realistic
      Sun. at 6:04 p.m.
      #3
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2022
      Posts: 4,392
      Likes: 1,554
      Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
      You aren't getting 7 years of Pulock for 1 year of Ehlers. That's not at all realistic


      Ehlers would come with an extension obviously doesn't need to be a draft trade but a July 1st trade
      Sun. at 6:05 p.m.
      #4
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2017
      Posts: 19,510
      Likes: 10,161
      UFA rights aren't worth a very early 3rd round pick (almost late 2nd)
      Bedsy_Burner liked this.
      Sun. at 6:06 p.m.
      #5
      Bcarlo25
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2018
      Posts: 22,895
      Likes: 7,465
      this team isn't cap complaint.

      Quoting: Howie
      Ehlers would come with an extension obviously doesn't need to be a draft trade but a July 1st trade


      that doesnt impact trade value much.
      Sun. at 6:06 p.m.
      #6
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 39,904
      Likes: 20,525
      Quoting: Howie
      Ehlers would come with an extension obviously doesn't need to be a draft trade but a July 1st trade


      An extension is negotiated by the acquiring team after a trade is made, it has no direct effect on trade value.
      Sun. at 6:07 p.m.
      #7
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2022
      Posts: 4,392
      Likes: 1,554
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      UFA rights aren't worth a very early 3rd round pick (almost late 2nd)


      Yeah Chicago can probably trade a 4th-5th depending on the year
      Bedsy_Burner liked this.
      Sun. at 6:08 p.m.
      #8
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2022
      Posts: 4,392
      Likes: 1,554
      Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
      An extension is negotiated by the acquiring team after a trade is made, it has no direct effect on trade value.


      Yeah and lou has done it in the past for horvat definitely not an issue as he'll get more playing time
      Sun. at 6:10 p.m.
      #9
      Sign chatty or riot
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2024
      Posts: 50
      Likes: 4
      Dont think any of those trades would happen, but I like your thought process. I really like ehlers and carrier. I also like the idea of a goalie upgrade. Only other change would probably be to trade/buyout KK or Kuzy to get a legit 2c like Stephenson or Monahan.
      ChelPenguins liked this.
      Sun. at 6:11 p.m.
      #10
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 39,904
      Likes: 20,525
      Quoting: Howie
      Yeah and lou has done it in the past for horvat definitely not an issue as he'll get more playing time


      He traded a core player locked up long term for Horvat? Did I miss something in the trade conditions?
      Sun. at 6:12 p.m.
      #11
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2020
      Posts: 9,931
      Likes: 3,096
      Canes don’t do these trades. Ullmark isn’t it for necas.

      Ehlers will get an 8 x 8.5+ extension, we aren’t doing that without playing first. No chance we give that much for a guy we are renting

      0 reason to dump Freddie
      Sun. at 6:13 p.m.
      #12
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2022
      Posts: 4,392
      Likes: 1,554
      Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
      He traded a core player locked up long term for Horvat? Did I miss something in the trade conditions?


      He traded for a player he wanted and extended him not impossible to trade for ehlers for pulock to change up the team. Rather trade ehlers to a team that will give him the first line time he deserves which you don't have here.
      Sun. at 6:15 p.m.
      #13
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2017
      Posts: 20,237
      Likes: 9,042
      Edited Sun. at 6:31 p.m.
      Much as I would like that to happen.

      1- it would not be 1 for 1

      2 - Canes have a pair of more than capable goalies with a combined cap hit of 5.4. PK is set to take over the #1 at some point, if not this year, next.

      3 - Canes have way too many other holes to fill and cap constraints that moving Necas for an uneeded goalie makes little sense, they need to get a replacement for him in the trade if anything.
      Canesfan21_ liked this.
      Sun. at 6:15 p.m.
      #14
      Colby
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2024
      Posts: 659
      Likes: 161
      not sure if u canes fans are suddenly viewing ullmark as a savoir or if necas is worthless to u guys? had canes fans tell me like 3 weeks ago lysell + 2nd/1st + ullmark for necas isnt good enough.
      tera is gonna get more then that for sure. someone is going to offer him 5m(probably the bruins if Jake DB leaves if they get necas). Freddy should get u guys at least a late second. so many teams looking for a 1B goalie that he should have plenty of people calling for him.
      Sun. at 6:18 p.m.
      #15
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 39,904
      Likes: 20,525
      Quoting: Howie
      He traded for a player he wanted and extended him not impossible to trade for ehlers for pulock to change up the team. Rather trade ehlers to a team that will give him the first line time he deserves which you don't have here.


      He did trade for a player he wanted, that's not uncommon. What is very uncommon is trading a core player with term for a rental
      Sun. at 6:20 p.m.
      #16
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2021
      Posts: 5,050
      Likes: 3,644
      Canes aren’t going to spend their best trade asset on a goalie. This year is all about seeing if Kochetkov is the guy.

      Winnipeg doesn’t take that for Ehlers, two AHLers and some late in the round picks aren’t what they need. The canes also wouldn’t extend him

      Andersen has positive value, no reason to give up a pick to dump him even if we upgrade in his spot
      Sun. at 6:21 p.m.
      #17
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2022
      Posts: 4,392
      Likes: 1,554
      Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
      He did trade for a player he wanted, that's not uncommon. What is very uncommon is trading a core player with term for a rental


      Not a rental he can extend him 7x7 minutes after the trade and boom problem solved. Wow that was easy.
      Sun. at 6:33 p.m.
      #18
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 39,904
      Likes: 20,525
      Quoting: Howie
      Not a rental he can extend him 7x7 minutes after the trade and boom problem solved. Wow that was easy.


      He can extend him for 8 years at any cap hit after the trade is made, that does not change the fact that he is acquiring a player with 1 year of term left. How is this confusing to you?

      Maybe I'll try a different way of explaining this. If I am getting new tires for my car but I am capable of installing them myself I am not going to pay the seller the installation fee if I am the one putting them on my car
      Sun. at 6:39 p.m.
      #19
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2017
      Posts: 7,578
      Likes: 3,673
      canes reject first two, other teams reject other two.

      Ullmark not worth Necas and no need to sign him to long term extension. Koochie gets his shot this year.

      Freddy isn’t a cap dump and see point 1 above. If they were trying to move him flames don’t make sense

      Why are hawks trading for Guentzel rights and not trying to get an 8 year deal done? They’re not sending a third for that, they can just try to sign him on 7/1.

      Not enough quality for jets to accept. Also ehlers doesn’t make a ton of sense for canes. If they’re not willing to extend Guentzel they won’t be willing to extend Ehlers long term which is what he’ll look for next summer.
      Sun. at 11:12 p.m.
      #20
      Thread Starter
      ChelPenguins
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2022
      Posts: 41
      Likes: 3
      Quoting: Chatfield4MVP
      Dont think any of those trades would happen, but I like your thought process. I really like ehlers and carrier. I also like the idea of a goalie upgrade. Only other change would probably be to trade/buyout KK or Kuzy to get a legit 2c like Stephenson or Monahan.


      Yep. Center depth looks pretty weak. I would definitely try and at least see what the buyout would cost on kk
      Sun. at 11:17 p.m.
      #21
      Thread Starter
      ChelPenguins
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2022
      Posts: 41
      Likes: 3
      Quoting: vikhodush
      canes reject first two, other teams reject other two.

      Ullmark not worth Necas and no need to sign him to long term extension. Koochie gets his shot this year.

      Freddy isn’t a cap dump and see point 1 above. If they were trying to move him flames don’t make sense

      Why are hawks trading for Guentzel rights and not trying to get an 8 year deal done? They’re not sending a third for that, they can just try to sign him on 7/1.

      Not enough quality for jets to accept. Also ehlers doesn’t make a ton of sense for canes. If they’re not willing to extend Guentzel they won’t be willing to extend Ehlers long term which is what he’ll look for next summer.


      - Canes need a goalie. End of discussion. Ullmark & Kuchi could potentially be a nice tandem for years to come.
      - Freddy hasn't worked out, it's time to move on. Flames should at least call on him as he would serve as a nice role model for the rookie wolf in net for at least 1 year.
      - Canes have reportedly shopped Jake's rights for a mid-round pick so I based it off that.
      - Ehlers trade is a long shot, won't happen but thought I'd have some fun.
      -
      Sun. at 11:38 p.m.
      #22
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2020
      Posts: 17,596
      Likes: 7,706
      There's no incentive for Winnipeg to trade Ehlers for a late first and a bunch of nothing.
      Mon. at 12:12 a.m.
      #23
      Sign chatty or riot
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2024
      Posts: 50
      Likes: 4
      Quoting: Windjammer
      There's no incentive for Winnipeg to trade Ehlers for a late first and a bunch of nothing.


      bro if you love the jets so much why don't you marry them
      Mon. at 12:47 a.m.
      #24
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2017
      Posts: 7,578
      Likes: 3,673
      Quoting: ChelPenguins
      - Canes need a goalie. End of discussion. Ullmark & Kuchi could potentially be a nice tandem for years to come.
      - Freddy hasn't worked out, it's time to move on. Flames should at least call on him as he would serve as a nice role model for the rookie wolf in net for at least 1 year.
      - Canes have reportedly shopped Jake's rights for a mid-round pick so I based it off that.
      - Ehlers trade is a long shot, won't happen but thought I'd have some fun.
      -


      Trading Necas for Ullmark is awful. Just awful. Won’t be happening. Kooch is the guy this year. Need to know if he can handle it.

      I’d suggest you worry about pens goaltending.
      Mon. at 2:51 a.m.
      #25
      First round bust
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2023
      Posts: 1,103
      Likes: 485
      Toronto would probably be a good landing spot for Andersen. That said, at that price the Flames can always take him and either flip him or Vladar.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll