SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Heavy lifting for tre

Created by: TOR
Team: 2024-25 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 20, 2024
Published: Jun. 20, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,000,000
3$2,000,000
3$2,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$5,000,000
3$3,000,000
2$1,500,000
2$900,000
3$4,000,000
5$5,750,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. 2024 3rd round pick (CAR)
2.
TOR
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (VGK)
WSH
  1. Robertson, Nicholas
  2. 2024 4th round pick (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Gustavsson, Filip
Additional Details:
Wild retain 30% Gustavsson contract
MIN
  1. Järnkrok, Calle
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (VGK)
4.
TOR
  1. 2024 6th round pick (CHI)
CHI
  1. Timmins, Conor
  2. 2024 7th round pick (TOR)
5.
TOR
    Retain 20% of Tanev contract
    ANA
    1. Niemelä, Topi
    2. 2024 5th round pick (NSH)
    3. 2024 5th round pick (VAN)
    Buyouts
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the OTT
    2025
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    2026
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    21$88,000,000$89,969,667$0$0-$1,969,667
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $13,250,000$13,250,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $10,903,000$10,903,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $925,000$925,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,000,000$11,000,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,500,000$11,500,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    LW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,400,000$2,400,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,350,000$1,350,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LW, C
    RFA
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $800,000$800,000
    C, LW
    RFA - 1
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $7,500,000$7,500,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    $5,750,000$5,750,000
    RD
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $766,667$766,667
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $3,750,000$3,750,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,350,000$1,350,000
    LD
    UFA - 3
    $900,000$900,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $875,000$875,000
    LD
    RFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jun. 20 at 11:52 a.m.
    #26
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 7,619
    Likes: 3,678
    Quoting: TOR
    Morrow not ready yet. Maybe season after this one


    Sure, will take your word for it. Not canes mgmt and folks who actually follow it closely, or even myself who follows it closely and has actually watched a ton of his college games and the nhl games he did get into.

    RBA and Tulsky should call you to see how they should build their team.
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    Jun. 20 at 12:13 p.m.
    #27
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 17,305
    Likes: 13,281
    Quoting: TOR
    Signed him to a 3 year contract. 3 X 4M. 20 percent of 4M is only 800,000 which is most definitely doable for Anaheim and they’re getting an offensive minded young right shot d man and a few late draft picks.


    There’s no way that is legal

    And no we aren’t using a retention slot for you for that long
    vikhodush liked this.
    Jun. 20 at 12:31 p.m.
    #28
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2024
    Posts: 267
    Likes: 12
    Quoting: svfsdv
    I understand that. I dont see the Leafs paying it. And as I said, teams only get 2 retention spots. Locking one up for 3 years is not a good idea from ANA perspective.


    I think it definitely works. For what they’re getting in return it does. Anaheim isn’t going to be good for a long time to come .
    Jun. 20 at 12:34 p.m.
    #29
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2024
    Posts: 267
    Likes: 12
    Quoting: PaulKorea
    A clown is someone who thinks Timmins has any value at all.



    Who’s your 3rd pairing right now? That’s all I need to know.
    Jun. 20 at 12:36 p.m.
    #30
    uWu Garak
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2024
    Posts: 861
    Likes: 1,243
    Say whatever you want, but CHI isn't doing that. Go find a cap strapped team that needs affordable depth if you want positive value for Timmins. Otherwise, if CHI has any interest in him, they'll just wait for him to hit waivers.
    PaulKorea liked this.
    Jun. 20 at 12:53 p.m.
    #31
    Goggles86
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2023
    Posts: 1,162
    Likes: 177
    Quoting: TOR
    I think it definitely works. For what they’re getting in return it does. Anaheim isn’t going to be good for a long time to come .


    They have a few year yet to go. I agree. Which follows what I am saying. If you lock up a retention spot for multiple years, you cant make that move again.
    If you use your retention slots only on guys on the last year of their deals, you get to make a new deal every year. I think they would rather make 3 separate trades, and get triple the value from that spot. Than 1 trade and now have it locked up for 3 years.
    Jun. 20 at 4:28 p.m.
    #32
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2024
    Posts: 267
    Likes: 12
    Quoting: Bedsy_Burner
    Say whatever you want, but CHI isn't doing that. Go find a cap strapped team that needs affordable depth if you want positive value for Timmins. Otherwise, if CHI has any interest in him, they'll just wait for him to hit waivers.



    Hit waivers? Buddy he’s signed next season. Which team do you manage? All you guys commenting like you know anything about what the blackhawks GM wants. Who’s your 3rd D pairing btw?
    Jun. 20 at 4:29 p.m.
    #33
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2024
    Posts: 267
    Likes: 12
    Quoting: svfsdv
    They have a few year yet to go. I agree. Which follows what I am saying. If you lock up a retention spot for multiple years, you cant make that move again.
    If you use your retention slots only on guys on the last year of their deals, you get to make a new deal every year. I think they would rather make 3 separate trades, and get triple the value from that spot. Than 1 trade and now have it locked up for 3 years.



    It is a possibility
    Jun. 20 at 4:46 p.m.
    #34
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2023
    Posts: 1,818
    Likes: 3,091
    Quoting: TOR
    Hit waivers? Buddy he’s signed next season. Which team do you manage? All you guys commenting like you know anything about what the blackhawks GM wants. Who’s your 3rd D pairing btw?


    All this coming from the guy trying to tell Hawks' fans what their team needs/wants.

    Since you don't seem to understand it, even though Timmins is signed next year, he can be put on waivers. If your GM is competent at all, he'll bring in an upgrade and put Timmins on waivers and send him to the AHL.

    To answer your question though, it'll likely be Crevier and before you ask, yes I'd rather have him over Timmins any day of the week.
    vikhodush liked this.
    Jun. 20 at 6:36 p.m.
    #35
    uWu Garak
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2024
    Posts: 861
    Likes: 1,243
    Quoting: TOR
    Hit waivers? Buddy he’s signed next season. Which team do you manage? All you guys commenting like you know anything about what the blackhawks GM wants. Who’s your 3rd D pairing btw?


    Yeah... He is signed next season... And he is no longer waiver exempt... Buddy. We know exactly what KD wants because he is clear about what he is trying to build and what his motivations are going into next season. He isn't looking for scratched and dented reclamation projects that will more than likely lead to nothing. He has clearly stated he is trying to avoid a repeat of last season where we had to ice mostly AHL level talent because of the mountain of injuries we had for half the season. So, tell me why KD would pay anything at all for an injury prone bust who is likely going to hit waivers before the season starts?
    PaulKorea liked this.
    Jun. 21 at 9:23 a.m.
    #36
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2024
    Posts: 267
    Likes: 12
    Quoting: PaulKorea
    All this coming from the guy trying to tell Hawks' fans what their team needs/wants.

    Since you don't seem to understand it, even though Timmins is signed next year, he can be put on waivers. If your GM is competent at all, he'll bring in an upgrade and put Timmins on waivers and send him to the AHL.

    To answer your question though, it'll likely be Crevier and before you ask, yes I'd rather have him over Timmins any day of the week.


    It seems like you’re a fan of Timmins. You sure know a lot about a guy that’s “garbage”. I made a team that’s all I did. I made fair trades. Chicago needs a 3rd pairing guy that can still play. Nobody knows Timmins potential because he’s been injury prone. He was also drafted 32nd overall which means that he has potential to be an average NHL defenceman.
    Jun. 21 at 9:53 a.m.
    #37
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2023
    Posts: 1,818
    Likes: 3,091
    Quoting: TOR
    It seems like you’re a fan of Timmins. You sure know a lot about a guy that’s “garbage”. I made a team that’s all I did. I made fair trades. Chicago needs a 3rd pairing guy that can still play. Nobody knows Timmins potential because he’s been injury prone. He was also drafted 32nd overall which means that he has potential to be an average NHL defenceman.

    A fair trade is Timmins for FC and even then Chicago declines. Timmins will be out of the league after his contract is up because nobody wants a f**king AHL tweener 3rd pairing guy that cant stay healthy. If hes got so much potential then the Leafs should keep him. Cost effective players are what they need with all the wasted cash in their forward group.

    Another thing.....nobody gives a f**k about where he was drafted 7 years ago. It doesnt f**king matter anymore.

    You Leafs fans need to get one thing through your heads. These bums you keep trying to pawn off in every single ACGM dont have the value you think they do. Nobody wants your garbage. Nobody is paying for your garbage. Nobody wants your garbage for free.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll