SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Spend that money

Created by: bf_hockey8
Team: 2024-25 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 13, 2024
Published: Jun. 13, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Obviously the length of the Kadri deal is risky but I imagine Calgary would jump at the opportunity (maybe it doesn’t even take a 2nd)
I think this is a better route for the B’s than overpaying Lindholm
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
1$800,000
8$7,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$5,000,000
2$2,500,000
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. 2025 2nd round pick (WPG)
2.
CGY
  1. 2025 2nd round pick (WPG)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2026
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$88,000,000$85,015,834$50,000$330,000$2,984,166
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$11,250,000$11,250,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$870,000$870,000 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
C
RFA - 2
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000$250K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$787,500$787,500
LW, RW
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 13 at 1:20 p.m.
#1
LBS
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 624
Kadri had 75 points last year, why would Calgary trade him for only a 2nd?
Jun. 13 at 1:26 p.m.
#2
must have cap space
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2024
Posts: 287
Likes: 116
Quoting: lowblocksniper
Kadri had 75 points last year, why would Calgary trade him for only a 2nd?


This actually makes some sense this trade. It completely clears Calgary of Nazem Kadri’s cap hit. If the goal is to completely strip the team down and rebuild, this is a good trade.

Calgary can use that $7M to take on bad contracts for high draft picks and prospects. They could load up on draft picks like Arizona/Utah did. Utah has 10 2nd round picks in the next three years. Those can be consolidated into first round picks or traded for players.

The most important thing Calgary would gain is cap space which they could weaponize in other ways.
Jun. 13 at 1:27 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 570
Likes: 191
CGY has no reason to trade him they aren't going to compete for a bit
They don't need to be clearing salary and Kadri is a decent C to play with their young wing prospects
Jun. 13 at 1:29 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 570
Likes: 191
Quoting: NJTM
This actually makes some sense this trade. It completely clears Calgary of Nazem Kadri’s cap hit. If the goal is to completely strip the team down and rebuild, this is a good trade.

Calgary can use that $7M to take on bad contracts for high draft picks and prospects. They could load up on draft picks like Arizona/Utah did. Utah has 10 2nd round picks in the next three years. Those can be consolidated into first round picks or traded for players.

The most important thing Calgary would gain is cap space which they could weaponize in other ways.


Can't really see CGY ownership approving a complete tear down and rebuild
Jun. 13 at 1:32 p.m.
#5
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 22,924
Likes: 7,466
lol please spend that money more intelligently than this don.
Jun. 13 at 1:32 p.m.
#6
must have cap space
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2024
Posts: 287
Likes: 116
Quoting: Quaider11
Can't really see CGY ownership approving a complete tear down and rebuild


That would be the only kicker here. The idea is good in theory, but ownership probably won’t allow it. I do think a complete tear down is necessary in Calgary. Players that have left in the past few years include Hanifin, Zadorov, Tanev, Gaudreau, Tkachuk, Toffoli, Monahan etc.

They may as well fully commit to it, a lot of the really good players they had are gone already.
Quaider11 liked this.
Jun. 13 at 1:33 p.m.
#7
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 22,924
Likes: 7,466
Quoting: lowblocksniper
Kadri had 75 points last year, why would Calgary trade him for only a 2nd?


if i was the GM of a bad team with a guy about to turn 34 with seven years left on his deal, i'd be thrilled to get a trade offer for him.
bf_hockey8 liked this.
Jun. 13 at 1:35 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 570
Likes: 191
Quoting: NJTM
That would be the only kicker here. The idea is good in theory, but ownership probably won’t allow it. I do think a complete tear down is necessary in Calgary. Players that have left in the past few years include Hanifin, Zadorov, Tanev, Gaudreau, Tkachuk, Toffoli, Monahan etc.

They may as well fully commit to it, a lot of the really good players they had are gone already.


They certainly should but similarly to the Jacobs family I think CGY's ownership is hyperfixated on revenue
Jun. 13 at 1:44 p.m.
#9
LBS
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 624
Quoting: NJTM
This actually makes some sense this trade. It completely clears Calgary of Nazem Kadri’s cap hit. If the goal is to completely strip the team down and rebuild, this is a good trade.

Calgary can use that $7M to take on bad contracts for high draft picks and prospects. They could load up on draft picks like Arizona/Utah did. Utah has 10 2nd round picks in the next three years. Those can be consolidated into first round picks or traded for players.

The most important thing Calgary would gain is cap space which they could weaponize in other ways.


Calgary has 20mil in capspace with only Pelletier, Wolf and Kylington to resign shouldn't take more than 7mil total and Markstrom likely to be traded, leaving them with about 19mil in capspace.

getting a 2nd for Kadri doesn't help them
Jun. 13 at 1:48 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 420
Likes: 176
Calgary is not moving Kadri for only a late 2nd round pick. He'd actually be a really good fit for Boston though, but that offer is brutal!

He's fair value at $7M for the next couple years at least and we still need to hit the cap floor / have good veteran mentors for a rebuilding effort. My guess is he's only moved on the back end of the 5 remaining years on his deal.
Jun. 13 at 2:35 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2024
Posts: 30
Likes: 4
Hell no to Kadri but I wouldn't mind seeing Toffoli for a year or two.
Jun. 13 at 5:24 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 40,005
Likes: 20,550
Quoting: NJTM
This actually makes some sense this trade. It completely clears Calgary of Nazem Kadri’s cap hit. If the goal is to completely strip the team down and rebuild, this is a good trade.

Calgary can use that $7M to take on bad contracts for high draft picks and prospects. They could load up on draft picks like Arizona/Utah did. Utah has 10 2nd round picks in the next three years. Those can be consolidated into first round picks or traded for players.

The most important thing Calgary would gain is cap space which they could weaponize in other ways.


Calgary is going to be barely above the cap floor next season. Kadri's cap hit is not remotely an issue, its just his term
Jun. 13 at 8:38 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 219
Likes: 22
Quoting: CN10
Calgary is not moving Kadri for only a late 2nd round pick. He'd actually be a really good fit for Boston though, but that offer is brutal!

He's fair value at $7M for the next couple years at least and we still need to hit the cap floor / have good veteran mentors for a rebuilding effort. My guess is he's only moved on the back end of the 5 remaining years on his deal.


My point is that if Calgary waits 2 years to trade Kadri, it could get to the point where they need to give up assets to get someone to take on his contract. Having to give up assets wouldn’t be ideal in a time when they’d be trying to turn the corner competitively
Jun. 14 at 4:32 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 420
Likes: 176
Quoting: bf_hockey8
My point is that if Calgary waits 2 years to trade Kadri, it could get to the point where they need to give up assets to get someone to take on his contract. Having to give up assets wouldn’t be ideal in a time when they’d be trying to turn the corner competitively


I think retention is an option or a buy-out if he becomes a complete boat anchor those last couple years (he's not bonus based like Huberdeau's deal). It would be a nice problem to have if it only takes Conroy two years to turn this thing around. I'm expecting the Flames will be bad for a couple more years and then having star players on ELC's allows them to pay Kadri $7M to play 3rd line minutes and PP2.

I get your point, that the Flames may want to not have an expensive veteran on the books coming out of a rebuild, and there's a good fit for him in Boston, but the value back isn't there for Calgary with just the 2nd.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll