SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

CF Sellouts - Caps Suck

Created by: FlySharks2006
Team: 2024-25 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 12, 2024
Published: Jun. 12, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
A lot would have to go right for the sharks to pick up both DeMelo and Walker, but that’s why they’re getting extra dollars. Frustrated how much the NHL hates its fans.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,250,000
2$1,250,000
2$1,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$5,500,000
3$3,950,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Mackin
3$950,000
Trades
1.
2.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
2026
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$88,000,000$70,633,000$0$5,065,000$17,367,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C, LW
RFA
Celebrini, Mackin
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,200,000$3M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$941,667$941,667 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$800,000$800,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,350,000$2,350,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LD
RFA - 1
$3,950,000$3,950,000
LD/RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 12 at 7:46 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,197
Likes: 2,687
Easiest no ever from TB if they thought Rutta was worth that contract he'd already be wearing a bolt. Glendening was brought in to do two things. Take right handed defensive zone faceoffs and kill penalties. He did both exceptionally well. The fact he had double digit goals is a massive bonus.
Dan_the_Man liked this.
Jun. 12 at 8:15 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 2,746
Likes: 813
You’re missing quite a bit in the Leafs trade, very very very easy pass lol
Dan_the_Man liked this.
Jun. 12 at 8:25 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 3,186
Likes: 1,106
Please provide a rational explanation with TBs cap situation why the F*** they remotely consider this?
Boltsbeathabs liked this.
Jun. 12 at 11:49 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 23
Likes: 2
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
Easiest no ever from TB if they thought Rutta was worth that contract he'd already be wearing a bolt. Glendening was brought in to do two things. Take right handed defensive zone faceoffs and kill penalties. He did both exceptionally well. The fact he had double digit goals is a massive bonus.


The Bolts have an over population of bottom 6 forwards. They don’t have an overpopulation decent of 5-6D. Which is why they were such an easy out last year. No depth on D.
Jun. 12 at 12:02 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,197
Likes: 2,687
Quoting: FlySharks2006
The Bolts have an over population of bottom 6 forwards. They don’t have an overpopulation decent of 5-6D. Which is why they were such an easy out last year. No depth on D.


TB doesn't have the cap space . Crozier was a salary cap casualty last season to quote Jon Cooper " Max would've been up all year were he not waivers exempt."so Max Crozier making <900k takes that spot over 2.75 million Rutta ZERO CHANCE TB DOES THIS!!
It also takes away the right hand faceoffs guy easy easy no Glendening isn't the guy nor is Rutta at his cap hit.
Jun. 12 at 12:12 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 23
Likes: 2
Quoting: SNipeSHowInc
You’re missing quite a bit in the Leafs trade, very very very easy pass lol


People, particularly Leafs fans, are under this delusion the Leafs have any leverage whatsoever. Management has openly said they don’t want him, he has a NMC, and he has a prohibitively high cap hit for all but a few teams. Treliving will be required to add after trading Marner, so it can’t be a salary for salary swap. No one is giving up a first or any significant other asset for a cap dump who’s going to walk in FA if he stays with the Leafs. Leafs management is in love with Ferraro. They consider him to be a big part of the fix, bringing a multitude of qualities Marner lacks. If Marner goes it’ll be something very commensurate to this trade.
Jun. 12 at 1:04 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 23
Likes: 2
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
TB doesn't have the cap space . Crozier was a salary cap casualty last season to quote Jon Cooper " Max would've been up all year were he not waivers exempt."so Max Crozier making <900k takes that spot over 2.75 million Rutta ZERO CHANCE TB DOES THIS!!
It also takes away the right hand faceoffs guy easy easy no Glendening isn't the guy nor is Rutta at his cap hit.


Waivers exempt does not equal salary cap casualty. If they really wanted the guy up, they would have found a way. Also, there is no way coach and management, with aspirations of another run, are going to trust a new guy with the same responsibilities as a veteran who’s been there before. Sorry to hurt your feelings, but they absolutely will take Rutta over Max ten out of ten times.

You’re putting too much stock into RH faceoff guy.
Jun. 12 at 6:52 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 2,746
Likes: 813
Quoting: FlySharks2006
People, particularly Leafs fans, are under this delusion the Leafs have any leverage whatsoever. Management has openly said they don’t want him, he has a NMC, and he has a prohibitively high cap hit for all but a few teams. Treliving will be required to add after trading Marner, so it can’t be a salary for salary swap. No one is giving up a first or any significant other asset for a cap dump who’s going to walk in FA if he stays with the Leafs. Leafs management is in love with Ferraro. They consider him to be a big part of the fix, bringing a multitude of qualities Marner lacks. If Marner goes it’ll be something very commensurate to this trade.


Management has openly said they don’t want him? What are you talking about lmao

Did you say Marner is a cap dump? My man you really have absolutely no clue
Jun. 13 at 12:17 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,197
Likes: 2,687
Quoting: FlySharks2006
Waivers exempt does not equal salary cap casualty. If they really wanted the guy up, they would have found a way. Also, there is no way coach and management, with aspirations of another run, are going to trust a new guy with the same responsibilities as a veteran who’s been there before. Sorry to hurt your feelings, but they absolutely will take Rutta over Max ten out of ten times.

You’re putting too much stock into RH faceoff guy.


So, do I believe you or Jon Cooper? If you don't think guys sent down because they're waivers exempt you are absolutely delusional. You got two guys you want to keep ,one is waivers exempt, one isn't ,but you can't afford to lose either one who is going down? Salary cap matters
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll