SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Big move

Created by: Kachowski47
Team: 2024-25 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 5, 2024
Published: Jun. 5, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$3,500,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Demidov, Ivan
3$950,000
Sennecke, Beckett
3$950,000
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. Holtz, Alexander
  2. 2024 1st round pick (NJD)
NJD
  1. Matheson, Michael
  2. Mesar, Filip
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (COL)
  4. 2024 3rd round pick (MIN)
2.
MTL
WSH
  1. Anderson, Josh
  2. 2024 1st round pick (WPG)
  3. 2024 5th round pick (SJS)
  4. 2025 4th round pick (DET)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the WSH
2025
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2026
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$87,700,000$47,703,750$1,022,500$6,680,000$39,996,250
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,875,000$7,875,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Demidov, Ivan
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,362,500$3,362,500
C, RW
RFA - 2
Sennecke, Beckett
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$835,000$835,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,900,000$2,900,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$866,667$866,667 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
LW, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$853,333$853,333 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$812,500$812,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$420,000$420K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,150,000$3,150,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$750,000$750K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$875,000$875,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$890,000$890,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LD/RD
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$766,667$766,667
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 5 at 8:17 p.m.
#1
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 14,226
Likes: 3,911
NJD is not giving up the 2 most valuable pieces in the trade for quantity we don't need.

Now if you want to offer Montembault and Guhle, that's a different discussion
Jun. 5 at 8:18 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 929
Likes: 314
the caps still can make the playoffs if they make the right moves, but this wouldn't be it. This trade would probably better directed at a team who is already in a rebuild that would take on the contract
Jun. 5 at 8:19 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 43,607
Likes: 19,710
Change Matheson to Guhle to begin with…
dgibb10 liked this.
Jun. 5 at 8:20 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2023
Posts: 1,516
Likes: 491
i like that arber contract!
Jun. 5 at 8:20 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 114
Likes: 4
Quoting: BrockChoy
the caps still can make the playoffs if they make the right moves, but this wouldn't be it. This trade would probably better directed at a team who is already in a rebuild that would take on the contract


I feel like the caps chances are done tbh and even if they make it they will be out in the first round so getting picks would be a good move for them plus if they do plan on trying to make the playoffs they could take a chance on anderson he has been so bad in montreal only because he doesnt fit the system at all but he might work better in the caps system
Jun. 5 at 8:21 p.m.
#6
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 14,226
Likes: 3,911
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Change Matheson to Guhle to begin with…


Guhle+Montembault for 10th+Holtz would get me to bite
Jun. 5 at 8:23 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 1,025
Quoting: dgibb10
Guhle+Montembault for 10th+Holtz would get me to bite


Yeah no to that. Not that it’s bad value wise I just wouldn’t do it as the Habs. But I can why NJ wouldn’t do the posted trade above
ShadowBowser and Billy316 liked this.
Jun. 5 at 8:25 p.m.
#8
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 14,226
Likes: 3,911
Quoting: ggha777
Yeah no to that. Not that it’s bad value wise I just wouldn’t do it as the Habs. But I can why NJ wouldn’t do the posted trade above


Understandable.

Guhle and Montembault are studs that MTL should keep imo.

Which is why they'd be worth pieces like Holtz and 10th overall.
Jun. 5 at 8:25 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2024
Posts: 221
Likes: 18
Quoting: ggha777
Yeah no to that. Not that it’s bad value wise I just wouldn’t do it as the Habs. But I can why NJ wouldn’t do the posted trade above


They have Luke,Nemec and hamilton for offensive thats why, plus that dude just loves anything thats mid, he just yaps i wouldnt bite on monty and guhle anyway.
Billy316 liked this.
Jun. 5 at 8:28 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 1,025
Quoting: ShadowBowser
They have Luke,Nemec and hamilton for offensive thats why, plus that dude just loves anything thats mid, he just yaps i wouldnt bite on monty and guhle anyway.


Yeah obviously as Montreal id do that trade. But if I’m NJ I don’t even entertain it. Matheson is a good player but like you said, just doesn’t really fit a need for NJ, so why would they give up Holtz AND the 10th for a player they don’t need
Jun. 5 at 9:20 p.m.
#11
Jesus Christ Is King
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 835
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Change Matheson to Guhle to begin with…


Thats not a "to begin with " conversation , thats basically the deal itself.
Guhle went 9 spots before Holtz and made the NHL as a Regular who's top 3 in minutes in the top 4 since his rookie season 2 years ago
Holtz went ahead of him and is a Winger who develops usually first of all drafted positions and has 4 less games and 6 less points then Guhle
Its a PRETTY BIG GAP between Holtz and Guhle as D like Guhle arent just given away by anyone

Granted the 10th OA is worth more then Mesar, 2nd and a 3rd but more then the gap between Holtz and Guhle
But really i'd say by about as much as MTL's 26th OA pick is from NJD 10th OA

If it was me

Holtz
10th OA in 2024

for
Guhle
26th OA in 2024
57th OA in 2024
78th OA pick in 2024

NJD gets the better player
MTL gets the better pick by giving up 3 for 1 to balance things.
Top pair D are Always worth more then Wingers even when they produce more offensively then a Defensman you're trading for.
The gap between players and picks is about proportionate.

MTL sells a player that the GM said he wont is my only concern.
But hypothetically if this trade for Holtz with a 10th OA for Guhle were to happen
Thats the best i could see us offering as we could put Guhle on RW and still get better production then Holtz will in NJD
No offense to Holtz either its just we put Guhle on 1st 2nd or 3rd Pair LD or RD and he doesnt change his play unlike all our other D.
I have no doubt he could play Wing if he wanted to at the same level or higher then Holtz has shown
Jun. 5 at 9:21 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,641
Likes: 2,070
Quoting: Kachowski47
I feel like the caps chances are done tbh and even if they make it they will be out in the first round so getting picks would be a good move for them plus if they do plan on trying to make the playoffs they could take a chance on anderson he has been so bad in montreal only because he doesnt fit the system at all but he might work better in the caps system


Anderson has had one good year his entire career ... he's not a change of scenery guy
Jun. 5 at 9:23 p.m.
#13
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 14,226
Likes: 3,911
Quoting: Billy316
Thats not a "to begin with " conversation , thats basically the deal itself.
Guhle went 9 spots before Holtz and made the NHL as a Regular who's top 3 in minutes in the top 4 since his rookie season 2 years ago
Holtz went ahead of him and is a Winger who develops usually first of all drafted positions and has 4 less games and 6 less points then Guhle
Its a PRETTY BIG GAP between Holtz and Guhle as D like Guhle arent just given away by anyone

Granted the 10th OA is worth more then Mesar, 2nd and a 3rd but more then the gap between Holtz and Guhle
But really i'd say by about as much as MTL's 26th OA pick is from NJD 10th OA

If it was me

Holtz
10th OA in 2024

for
Guhle
26th OA in 2024
57th OA in 2024
78th OA pick in 2024

NJD gets the better player
MTL gets the better pick by giving up 3 for 1 to balance things.
Top pair D are Always worth more then Wingers even when they produce more offensively then a Defensman you're trading for.
The gap between players and picks is about proportionate.

MTL sells a player that the GM said he wont is my only concern.
But hypothetically if this trade for Holtz with a 10th OA for Guhle were to happen
Thats the best i could see us offering as we could put Guhle on RW and still get better production then Holtz will in NJD
No offense to Holtz either its just we put Guhle on 1st 2nd or 3rd Pair LD or RD and he doesnt change his play unlike all our other D.
I have no doubt he could play Wing if he wanted to at the same level or higher then Holtz has shown


That is a 100% reasonable trade.

Is Mesar more valuable than the 1st in your eyes? because I would much rather have pick 26 than Mesar

Would you swap out 26th, 57th,75th for Montembault instead.

10th+Holtz+Daws (throw in goalie)
Guhle+Montembault
Jun. 5 at 9:32 p.m.
#14
Jesus Christ Is King
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 835
Quoting: ggha777
Yeah no to that. Not that it’s bad value wise I just wouldn’t do it as the Habs. But I can why NJ wouldn’t do the posted trade above


Swap Nemec and Reinbacher in the deal and i'd give up Guhle and Montembault
Having Lane Hutson-Simon Nemec hook up with Caufield , Suzuki and Slafkovsky on PP? I'm Sold.
We'd have 2 top 10 draft picks this year to get some more quality depth

We'd just have to go hard as Markstrom, Ullmark, Demko or someone like that.
I want Markstom ever since i seen this video of him for like a decade ago playing with goalie action figures
"No Marty , you're the better Goalie " in one voice supposed to be Price "No Carey your the best" in another Voice supposed to be Brodeur
"No Jacob you're the better Goalie , You're the better Goalie , You're the better Goalie " in his own voice kinda chant/singing it hahahaha

So clearly you can see why im ok with trading Monty , i am biased for Markstrom without apology hahaahaha
Jun. 5 at 9:35 p.m.
#15
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 14,226
Likes: 3,911
Quoting: Billy316
Swap Nemec and Reinbacher in the deal and i'd give up Guhle and Montembault
Having Lane Hutson-Simon Nemec hook up with Caufield , Suzuki and Slafkovsky on PP? I'm Sold.
We'd have 2 top 10 draft picks this year to get some more quality depth

We'd just have to go hard as Markstrom, Ullmark, Demko or someone like that.
I want Markstom ever since i seen this video of him for like a decade ago playing with goalie action figures
"No Marty , you're the better Goalie " in one voice supposed to be Price "No Carey your the best" in another Voice supposed to be Brodeur
"No Jacob you're the better Goalie , You're the better Goalie , You're the better Goalie " in his own voice kinda chant/singing it hahahaha

So clearly you can see why im ok with trading Monty , i am biased for Markstrom without apology hahaahaha


Nemec for Reinbacher is a very big no from NJD.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll