SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

trading necas

Created by: iggy12rocks
Team: 2024-25 Carolina Hurricanes
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 4, 2024
Published: Jun. 4, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$8,000,000
3$3,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$10,000,000
5$7,000,000
1$2,000,000
Trades
1.
CAR
  1. But, Daniil [Reserve List]
  2. McBain, Jack
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (WSH)
  4. 2024 3rd round pick (COL)
  5. 2025 2nd round pick (NYR)
UTA
  1. Necas, Martin [RFA Rights]
2.
CAR
    a 50 dollar Walmart gift card
    CHI
    1. Kotkaniemi, Jesperi
    2. 2025 2nd round pick (NYR)
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the OTT
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the CAR
    2025
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the CAR
    2026
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the CAR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$87,700,000$87,130,832$0$350,000$569,168

    Roster

    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $7,750,000$7,750,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $9,750,000$9,750,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $10,000,000$10,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $2,900,000$2,900,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $3,900,000$3,900,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $8,000,000$8,000,000
    RW
    RFA
    Logo of the Utah Hockey Club
    $1,599,999$1,599,999
    C, LW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    C
    RFA
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $2,400,000$2,400,000
    RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $918,333$918,333
    LW
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $775,000$775,000
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $905,833$905,833
    RW
    RFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    LD
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $5,280,000$5,280,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $3,400,000$3,400,000
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $7,750,000$7,750,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    RD
    UFA
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $5,300,000$5,300,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$350,000$350K)
    RD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $775,000$775,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $810,000$810,000
    LD
    RFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jun. 4 at 8:32 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 5,132
    Likes: 3,705
    Canes would target Crouse or Schmaltz

    If they went the prospect route, they’d want Geekie
    Jun. 4 at 8:33 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2020
    Posts: 9,962
    Likes: 3,102
    But could be a nice piece, everything else is very meh
    Jun. 4 at 8:38 p.m.
    #3
    uWu Garak
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2024
    Posts: 914
    Likes: 1,292
    Take out the $50 gift card and CHI thinks about it. Money is tight right now.
    vikhodush, Snowhawk18, Hockey_Lova and 3 others liked this.
    Jun. 4 at 8:57 p.m.
    #4
    Hockey Lova
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2023
    Posts: 85
    Likes: 24
    Quoting: Bedsy_Burner
    Take out the $50 gift card and CHI thinks about it. Money is tight right now.


    Agreed, and maybe add some more picks going to Chicago.
    Snowhawk18, Bedsy_Burner, LivingAnew and 2 others liked this.
    Jun. 4 at 8:59 p.m.
    #5
    Snowhawk
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2022
    Posts: 3,208
    Likes: 4,891
    Hawks decline, that Kotkaniemi contract is for too long and too much. Chicago would want more then a 2nd round pick to take that deal.

    Honestly if Carolina is ready to move on from KK, just buy him out, it’s only $835,000 per year for 12 years.
    Hockey_Lova, Bedsy_Burner, LivingAnew and 1 other person liked this.
    Jun. 4 at 9:04 p.m.
    #6
    uWu Garak
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2024
    Posts: 914
    Likes: 1,292
    Quoting: Hockey_Lova
    Agreed, and maybe add some more picks going to Chicago.


    Yeah. Like 6 of them.
    Hockey_Lova, LivingAnew, Snowhawk18 and 1 other person liked this.
    Jun. 4 at 9:04 p.m.
    #7
    Hockey Lova
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2023
    Posts: 85
    Likes: 24
    Quoting: Snowhawk18
    Hawks decline, that Kotkaniemi contract is for too long and too much. Chicago would want more then a 2nd round pick to take that deal.

    Honestly if Carolina is ready to move on from KK, just buy him out, it’s only $835,000 per year for 12 years.


    That’s what I’ve been saying, instead of paying Kk for blank amount of years, you pay a near minimum contract price
    Jun. 4 at 9:05 p.m.
    #8
    Hockey Lova
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2023
    Posts: 85
    Likes: 24
    Quoting: Bedsy_Burner
    Yeah. Like 6 of them.


    Might as well add that old 50$ Walmart gift card to Chicago instead as well
    Jun. 4 at 9:17 p.m.
    #9
    uWu Garak
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2024
    Posts: 914
    Likes: 1,292
    Quoting: Hockey_Lova
    Might as well add that old 50$ Walmart gift card to Chicago instead as well


    Yeah. And a boat!
    Hockey_Lova and Snowhawk18 liked this.
    Jun. 4 at 9:20 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 178
    Likes: 267
    Pretty much any 6+ year contract (that hawks can realistically obtain in FA/trade) is off the table for the hawks this offseason
    LivingAnew, SociallyHawkward, Snowhawk18 and 2 others liked this.
    Jun. 5 at 9:06 a.m.
    #11
    mattysmokes
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2023
    Posts: 107
    Likes: 42
    Quoting: tugspiedman
    Pretty much any 6+ year contract (that hawks can realistically obtain in FA/trade) is off the table for the hawks this offseason


    I think the thought process from a canes fan perspective is that the hawks can take a risk on KK while accumulating an asset or 2. If he doesn't work out after 2 years in which the Hawks most likely won't be contending anyways they can buy him out for the cheap price. Best case for ya'll is KK turns out to be an actual player that fits your timeline and will be able to develop without the pressure of winning a cup. Worst case, take the few assets the canes gave you and walk away from his contract after 2 years.
    PaulKorea, tugspiedman, Bedsy_Burner and 1 other person liked this.
    Jun. 5 at 10:28 a.m.
    #12
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 178
    Likes: 267
    Quoting: mskiko
    I think the thought process from a canes fan perspective is that the hawks can take a risk on KK while accumulating an asset or 2. If he doesn't work out after 2 years in which the Hawks most likely won't be contending anyways they can buy him out for the cheap price. Best case for ya'll is KK turns out to be an actual player that fits your timeline and will be able to develop without the pressure of winning a cup. Worst case, take the few assets the canes gave you and walk away from his contract after 2 years.


    Makes sense. KK’s term and low AAV is so unique for a player of his age lol. Not unimaginable that there’s an exception.
    Jun. 5 at 10:45 a.m.
    #13
    uWu Garak
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2024
    Posts: 914
    Likes: 1,292
    Quoting: mskiko
    I think the thought process from a canes fan perspective is that the hawks can take a risk on KK while accumulating an asset or 2. If he doesn't work out after 2 years in which the Hawks most likely won't be contending anyways they can buy him out for the cheap price. Best case for ya'll is KK turns out to be an actual player that fits your timeline and will be able to develop without the pressure of winning a cup. Worst case, take the few assets the canes gave you and walk away from his contract after 2 years.


    I agree with all of this. But they are still pawning all the risk off on another team, and although the U26 buyout is certainly more ideal than over 26, it is not nothing and can still easily complicate a cap situation and cause problems, especially considering the term. Simply put, it's a valid argument but is a bigger possible burden and risk than Caniac's are painting it as. Could definitely be worth while, though.
    Jun. 5 at 11:07 a.m.
    #14
    mattysmokes
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2023
    Posts: 107
    Likes: 42
    Quoting: Bedsy_Burner
    I agree with all of this. But they are still pawning all the risk off on another team, and although the U26 buyout is certainly more ideal than over 26, it is not nothing and can still easily complicate a cap situation and cause problems, especially considering the term. Simply put, it's a valid argument but is a bigger possible burden and risk than Caniac's are painting it as. Could definitely be worth while, though.


    You are right, roughly 1 million in dead cap for 12 years can cause complications, especially when trying to turn a team with a few young potential stars to a contender. I still think there is a world where KK can be a middle of the road 2c or solid 3c, there have been flashes but absolutely no consistency. He is still only 23 and give him 2 years with powerplay time and 2nd line minutes you will know what you have by the time he is 25. Ideally for the Hawks he would have turned himself into a steal of contract while also obtaining assets for him but with the cap rising significantly over the next couple years the $865,000 shouldn't be too much if he doesn't pan out. Whoever and if someone trades for KK will need to weigh the assets coming in for taking his contract on and the chance they think his contract lives up to expectation during their projected cup window. It is a very unique situation like tugspiedman mentioned since no current cup contender would take on his 4.8 but if a rebuilding team thinks he has a chance to live up to his contract in a couple years while also accumulating some draft picks it would be worth it.
    I will always wonder what would've happened in the canes kept trocheck instead of giving KK that money.
    Bedsy_Burner liked this.
    Jun. 5 at 1:35 p.m.
    #15
    uWu Garak
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2024
    Posts: 914
    Likes: 1,292
    Quoting: mskiko
    You are right, roughly 1 million in dead cap for 12 years can cause complications, especially when trying to turn a team with a few young potential stars to a contender. I still think there is a world where KK can be a middle of the road 2c or solid 3c, there have been flashes but absolutely no consistency. He is still only 23 and give him 2 years with powerplay time and 2nd line minutes you will know what you have by the time he is 25. Ideally for the Hawks he would have turned himself into a steal of contract while also obtaining assets for him but with the cap rising significantly over the next couple years the $865,000 shouldn't be too much if he doesn't pan out. Whoever and if someone trades for KK will need to weigh the assets coming in for taking his contract on and the chance they think his contract lives up to expectation during their projected cup window. It is a very unique situation like tugspiedman mentioned since no current cup contender would take on his 4.8 but if a rebuilding team thinks he has a chance to live up to his contract in a couple years while also accumulating some draft picks it would be worth it.
    I will always wonder what would've happened in the canes kept trocheck instead of giving KK that money.


    For sure. They probably should've kept Trocheck, tried to do a bridge with KK or traded him, and maybe not gone after Burns. But, hindsight is always 20/20.
    mskiko liked this.
    Jun. 5 at 1:45 p.m.
    #16
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 7,640
    Likes: 3,682
    Quoting: Bedsy_Burner
    For sure. They probably should've kept Trocheck, tried to do a bridge with KK or traded him, and maybe not gone after Burns. But, hindsight is always 20/20.


    Burns has been a good move. He had a few rough games in rags series and the loud minority of canes fans want him gone and think he sucks. Need to shelter his usage a bit more next year and keep him fresher but still an effective player and no reason to move him for the sake of it next year. I also think it was a good move to let Dougie walk and this has been a good replacement. Def not as good but cheaper and provides more cap flexibility long term which looks great now with Dougie not being able to stay on the ice and honestly probably not exactly built for playoff style hockey after watching him here for a couple of years.

    Troch, yes that was a big miss. At the time I agreed with letting him go and laughed at how the contract would age. I’m now crying instead of laughing since he’s the perfect fit for what we’ve been looking for since he left..even if last couple of years his play falls off it still would’ve been worth it and with cap going up it wouldn’t have been difficult to make work. Them rushing to a KK deal put the writing on the wall though I guess and made it tougher to bring Troch back long term. Hopefully that’s a lesson learned..
    Bedsy_Burner and iggy12rocks liked this.
    Jun. 5 at 1:51 p.m.
    #17
    uWu Garak
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2024
    Posts: 914
    Likes: 1,292
    Quoting: vikhodush
    Burns has been a good move. He had a few rough games in rags series and the loud minority of canes fans want him gone and think he sucks. Need to shelter his usage a bit more next year and keep him fresher but still an effective player and no reason to move him for the sake of it next year. I also think it was a good move to let Dougie walk and this has been a good replacement. Def not as good but cheaper and provides more cap flexibility long term which looks great now with Dougie not being able to stay on the ice and honestly probably not exactly built for playoff style hockey after watching him here for a couple of years.

    Troch, yes that was a big miss. At the time I agreed with letting him go and laughed at how the contract would age. I’m now crying instead of laughing since he’s the perfect fit for what we’ve been looking for since he left..even if last couple of years his play falls off it still would’ve been worth it and with cap going up it wouldn’t have been difficult to make work. Them rushing to a KK deal put the writing on the wall though I guess and made it tougher to bring Troch back long term. Hopefully that’s a lesson learned..


    For sure. I love Burnsy. I just think a strong defensive team like the Canes could've spent that cap elsewhere and still been fine on the backend. Not a bad player or a bad trade though.
    vikhodush liked this.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll