Yes. For Swayman.

Doubtful...certainly not for a rental goalie and bunch of extras

I think it would depend on extension options with Ullmark.

--

I generally figure wherever Ullmark ends up an extension will either have been pre agreed upon or will be agreed upon before the season starts. so he wouldn't just be a rental.

IMO it's a good deal for the Devils even without an extension to Ullmark. Devils would have an extra 3.3m in cap space, and in 25/26, 8.8m in cap space without Meier

It would not really matter. Swayman would have to be in the package to get Meier

Devils aren't trading their only power forward for a soon to be 31 year old goalie regardless of extension

Teams win all the time with no power forward. Teams very rarely win with below average goal tending. I won't pretend know exactly what they value, but I'm almost certain you don't know either. Quality goal tending is infinitely more important than a physical top 6 winger.

penguins should trade crosby for a 2nd I won't pretend know exactly what they value, but I'm almost certain you don't know either.

Crosby has a full NMC so not possible. If you're trying to create a false equivalency between the two deals, the obvious difference is Meier and Ullmark have very comparable value whereas Crosby and a 2nd do not.

I won't pretend know exactly what they value, but I'm almost certain you don't know either.

I'm certain Crosby has a full NMC even if your illiteracy doesn't afford you that knowledge.

I'm literally quoting you don't tell me that I don't know what my team values but you know what your team does

I don't know what either team values. Neither do you. I know for a fact Crosby has a full NMC and neither Meier nor Ullmark do right now. Maybe try learning basic facts like NMCs in future analysis.