Winnipeg isn't giving up that pick and retaining to move Schmidt.
Cheaper than a buyout (for two years).
It has often taken a 1st to move a year of ~$6m (Marleau, Monahan, etc). And 2nd plus for cap hits closer to $5m (Stralman, Zaitsev, Ladd, Johnson, Nemeth, etc).
It has often taken a 1st to move a year of ~$6m (Marleau, Monahan, etc). And 2nd plus for cap hits closer to $5m (Stralman, Zaitsev, Ladd, Johnson, Nemeth, etc).
Not really. All 2nds aren't created equal and this one is basically a first. Way too much for $4.5 of cap for a year and then the Jets don't draft until the 4th round.
Nah. This is exactly the STL 2nd for Foote beyond the trade you had right before this one. Like maybe one page later. Go back to that one, this one is asking too much. And even if it's how you described, you left that 2x1.75 retention out of the equation. The Blues are NOT paying for Foote. Serves no purpose whatsoever. You keep adding and adding and adding. That's not gonna work.
He’s getting rid of Hayes and paying a 2nd and 3rd to move up to 10 overall….again - who cares about Foote
Dude. The AGM he had right before this one was exactly this trade minus an extra 24 2nd for Foote added on. We are not paying anything for Foote, let alone a 24 2nd we still need.
Dude. The AGM he had right before this one was exactly this trade minus an extra 24 2nd for Foote added on. We are not paying anything for Foote, let alone a 24 2nd we still need.
Nah. This is exactly the STL 2nd for Foote beyond the trade you had right before this one. Like maybe one page later. Go back to that one, this one is asking too much. And even if it's how you described, you left that 2x1.75 retention out of the equation. The Blues are NOT paying for Foote. Serves no purpose whatsoever. You keep adding and adding and adding. That's not gonna work.
It’s just for variety…don’t want to send same trade each time. I think I have done #10/#16+2nd and #10/#16+2025 2nd+4th before too.
Will never be “that guy” who posts exact same ACGM over and over.
I get that, but those that annoy generally are the wholly unrealistic trades that get posted ad nauseum despite all criticism. If you have one everybody agrees on, I'd just run with it.
But anyway... yeah, I think it's safe to remove Foote for a 2nd from any future iterations.
CF18GM liked this.
Reply
Holtz,
CapFriendly
CapFriendly