SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

24-25 Devils

Created by: Devilsforlife
Team: 2024-25 New Jersey Devils
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 16, 2024
Published: Apr. 16, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Accurate/Prorated
LTIR Enabled: Yes
Season Days: 192
Days Remaining: 192
Season Remaining: 100%
Projected Cap Hit Prior To Days Remaining Tooltip : $66,187,500
Description
Moving Jack to wing
Acquiring solid top 6 piece - Lindholm on "prove it" deal for 1 year
Acquiring elite goalie- 1st and Holtz for Ullmark
Improving overall depth- Amadio as 20-30 pt man on bottom 6, Grzelcyk for solid vet on LD, Martinook+Maroon instead of Palat on LW, still bring experience but higher point production and lower cap hit
Mercer bridge deal
Catton seems like he will be a solid pick, would go for Tij Iginla if CGY doesn't take him
Signing most guys to 1 year deals to free cap for Luke signing the season after 24-25
Personally I think we have a solid D-core but in probably 2 years we will have to move out Dougie, he is getting older and his 9 mil cap hit puts a dent in our space to sign guys later. Nico needs resigning in 3 years and Dougie takes up 9m through the year after. I know the cap grows year by year but adding 4-7 mil (probably) contracts for Nemec and Hughes + a possible Ullmark extension(and pay raise) and the extra 1-2 mil for Nico is stolen by an aging early thirties D-man that could be declining in the next couple years. I think what would especially warrant trading him out is another big injury next season, and a trade should be mainly talent for talent (not just Dougie for picks/prospects)
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
3$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
1$6,500,000
2$2,500,000
2$3,250,000
1$2,000,000
1$1,200,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Catton, Berkly
3$950,000
Trades
1.
NJD
  1. Ullmark, Linus
Additional Details:
Have to go with one or the other, seems like they will take Sway
BOS
  1. Holtz, Alexander
  2. 2025 1st round pick (NJD)
Additional Details:
Holtz has shown promise but we have enough wingers to cover our top 6, Mercer has output more so far and shown he can be a point producer, so trade Holtz and sign Mercer to bridge deal.
2.
NJD
  1. 2024 3rd round pick (PIT)
Additional Details:
Can go to any team for 3rd/4th pick
ANA
  1. Palat, Ondrej
Additional Details:
The way I see it, we wanted a veteran player to bolster a young team in the ploffs, so we bought high and paid Palat a lot for a long term. Personally I want out of that contract because it frees up space to sign other guys and we still have room to bring someone else in that has playoff experience.
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the COL
Logo of the NJD
2025
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
2026
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$87,000,000$86,932,230$1,538,897$5,100,000$67,770
Prorated Cap Hit

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$7,875,000$7,875,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$8,800,000$8,800,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
$6,500,000$6,500,000
C, RW
UFA
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RW, C
RFA
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,150,000$3,150,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 2
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$800,000$800,000
C
UFA
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$1,850,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,925,000$1,925,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$3,250,000$3M)
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$800,000$800,000
LD/RD, LW
UFA
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 16 at 3:57 p.m.
#1
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,963
Likes: 3,160
Holy overpay for Ullmark. either Holtz or the 1st. Not both
StutzlesNumber1Fan liked this.
Apr. 16 at 4:04 p.m.
#2
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,218
Likes: 7,008
Quoting: dgibb10
Holy overpay for Ullmark. either Holtz or the 1st. Not both


good news is i doubt boston would have any interest in Holtz. If it's a 2025 first, I think that offer gets beat.
dgibb10 and Newgod77 liked this.
Apr. 16 at 4:04 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 438
Likes: 195
Thinking Lindholm will sign a year "prove it" deal is silly. He will get lots of longer term offers and plenty of money.
Apr. 16 at 4:10 p.m.
#4
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,963
Likes: 3,160
Quoting: Bcarlo25
good news is i doubt boston would have any interest in Holtz. If it's a 2025 first, I think that offer gets beat.


Presumably depending on the market NJD would add sweeteners to be the winning bid.

2025 1st for Ullmark as base. If there is absolutely no market in the low scenario for Boston and they need cap space, they may need to add a sweetener back to NJD (a Lauko type asset or a later pick).
And depending on bidding the sweetener will increase from NJDs side.

But 1st for Ullmark is the main thing. Let the better negotiator win in terms of the minor stuff around it.
Apr. 16 at 4:28 p.m.
#5
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,218
Likes: 7,008
Quoting: dgibb10
Presumably depending on the market NJD would add sweeteners to be the winning bid.

2025 1st for Ullmark as base. If there is absolutely no market in the low scenario for Boston and they need cap space, they may need to add a sweetener back to NJD (a Lauko type asset or a later pick).
And depending on bidding the sweetener will increase from NJDs side.

But 1st for Ullmark is the main thing. Let the better negotiator win in terms of the minor stuff around it.


there's a big difference between a 24 first and a 25 first.
Apr. 16 at 4:33 p.m.
#6
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,963
Likes: 3,160
Quoting: Bcarlo25
there's a big difference between a 24 first and a 25 first.


100%. But I would be shocked if 1 year of Ullmark with a 15 team NTC (that he has been willing to use) demands a top 10 pick.

Here are my goalies in the 2024 1st tier

Askarov
Saros
Shesterkin
Wallstedt
Swayman
Sorokin
Oetter
Helle
Demko

If you aren't one of those goalies, I wouldn't put the 2024 1st on the table
Apr. 16 at 4:50 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,729
Likes: 1,764
ANA isn’t taking Palat + a 1st for future considerations. You’re dreaming my friend, that’s NJD’s contract to deal with
Apr. 16 at 4:53 p.m.
#8
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,963
Likes: 3,160
Quoting: Jded
ANA isn’t taking Palat + a 1st for future considerations. You’re dreaming my friend, that’s NJD’s contract to deal with


Didn't they just give Killorn 6.4x4?
Apr. 16 at 4:55 p.m.
#9
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,218
Likes: 7,008
Quoting: dgibb10
100%. But I would be shocked if 1 year of Ullmark with a 15 team NTC (that he has been willing to use) demands a top 10 pick.

Here are my goalies in the 2024 1st tier

Askarov
Saros
Shesterkin
Wallstedt
Swayman
Sorokin
Oetter
Helle
Demko

If you aren't one of those goalies, I wouldn't put the 2024 1st on the table


i'm not suggesting a top 10 pick.
Apr. 16 at 5:01 p.m.
#10
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,963
Likes: 3,160
Quoting: Bcarlo25
i'm not suggesting a top 10 pick.


I'd expect any trade to occur after the draft. Extension talks can't begin until after the draft, bonuses are due, and the later 1sts aren't gonna be great in a shallow draft.
Apr. 16 at 7:26 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 6,848
Likes: 1,982
Quoting: Bcarlo25
there's a big difference between a 24 first and a 25 first.


Roughly the diff between Sway Ullmark
Apr. 16 at 8:33 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,729
Likes: 1,764
Quoting: dgibb10
Didn't they just give Killorn 6.4x4?


Killorn: Signed for no draft compensation at $6.4M coming off a 27 goal, .78pt/g season

Palat: Asking a 3rd round pick at $6M coming off an 11 goal, .44pt/g season.

Help me understand your point
Apr. 16 at 8:39 p.m.
#13
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,963
Likes: 3,160
Quoting: Jded
Killorn: Signed for no draft compensation at $6.4M coming off a 27 goal, .78pt/g season

Palat: Asking a 3rd round pick at $6M coming off an 11 goal, .44pt/g season.

Help me understand your point


Palat is significantly better in terms of possession, not taking penalties, and defensively. I'd rather have Palat.

With Palat on the ice, NJD has generated 58% of xGoals 5v5 over the last 2 years. He hasn't been below 50% since his 14 games in 2012.

Killorn hasn't been above 50% since 2019.
Apr. 16 at 11:09 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,729
Likes: 1,764
Quoting: dgibb10
Palat is significantly better in terms of possession, not taking penalties, and defensively. I'd rather have Palat.

With Palat on the ice, NJD has generated 58% of xGoals 5v5 over the last 2 years. He hasn't been below 50% since his 14 games in 2012.

Killorn hasn't been above 50% since 2019.


That’s suuuuper awesome, I’m stoked you’re so amped on him because I don’t see any way NJ is able to move that contract.

The key difference here is that everyone in ANA knows we had to overpay Killorn to come in the midst of a rebuild. We knew he wasn’t worth that full price tag even before the down year. I genuinely don’t know what to tell you if you think Palat is worth mote than 75% of his. Not even considering he’ll be like 36 when it ends
Apr. 16 at 11:17 p.m.
#15
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,963
Likes: 3,160
Quoting: Jded
That’s suuuuper awesome, I’m stoked you’re so amped on him because I don’t see any way NJ is able to move that contract.

The key difference here is that everyone in ANA knows we had to overpay Killorn to come in the midst of a rebuild. We knew he wasn’t worth that full price tag even before the down year. I genuinely don’t know what to tell you if you think Palat is worth mote than 75% of his. Not even considering he’ll be like 36 when it ends


So anaheim brought in a bad contract because they needed to get a veteran short term. Palat is nearly 2 years younger than Killorn, better now, and cheaper.

Killorn contract= one anaheim is willing to take on because cup winning leadership
Presumably Palat would fall under the exact same umbrella.

Saying anaheim wouldn't take a free 1st for a virtually identical type of asset they willingly took on in free agency doesn't seem to check out.
Apr. 17 at 2:10 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,729
Likes: 1,764
Quoting: dgibb10
So anaheim brought in a bad contract because they needed to get a veteran short term. Palat is nearly 2 years younger than Killorn, better now, and cheaper.

Killorn contract= one anaheim is willing to take on because cup winning leadership
Presumably Palat would fall under the exact same umbrella.

Saying anaheim wouldn't take a free 1st for a virtually identical type of asset they willingly took on in free agency doesn't seem to check out.


Yes, they decided to overpay one veteran $6.4M who outproduced Palat by 77% at the time on a per game basis, with zero draft compensation going out the door to do so. If they didn’t already fill the shoes of a cup winning veteran, I’m sure a 77% discount for Palat for an equivalent overpayment would’ve been worth considering, which would be in the ballpark of $3.6M, again, for zero draft comp. However they now already have Killorn, and your offer here is Palat for $6M, not $3.6M 🤮

With Zegras, Terry, Gauthier, Vatrano, Killorn, Strome, Colangelo all on the wing, Palat is a $6M fourth line plug for 3 more seasons. Easily going to pass on him even with a late first to sweeten it. I really meant it that I’m glad you enjoy him. You’re going to have 3 more full seasons to enjoy him. Nobody’s touching that contract (just like how we’ll get to enjoy Killer for the remainder of his deal)
Apr. 17 at 7:12 a.m.
#17
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,963
Likes: 3,160
Quoting: Jded
Yes, they decided to overpay one veteran $6.4M who outproduced Palat by 77% at the time on a per game basis, with zero draft compensation going out the door to do so. If they didn’t already fill the shoes of a cup winning veteran, I’m sure a 77% discount for Palat for an equivalent overpayment would’ve been worth considering, which would be in the ballpark of $3.6M, again, for zero draft comp. However they now already have Killorn, and your offer here is Palat for $6M, not $3.6M 🤮

With Zegras, Terry, Gauthier, Vatrano, Killorn, Strome, Colangelo all on the wing, Palat is a $6M fourth line plug for 3 more seasons. Easily going to pass on him even with a late first to sweeten it. I really meant it that I’m glad you enjoy him. You’re going to have 3 more full seasons to enjoy him. Nobody’s touching that contract (just like how we’ll get to enjoy Killer for the remainder of his deal)


If your only evaluation of the game is points sure.

Palat for the last decade has consistently generated more offense for his team than he gives up.

Killorn for the last half decade has consistently given up more chances against than he generates for his own team.
Apr. 17 at 1:51 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,729
Likes: 1,764
Quoting: dgibb10
If your only evaluation of the game is points sure.

Palat for the last decade has consistently generated more offense for his team than he gives up.

Killorn for the last half decade has consistently given up more chances against than he generates for his own team.


Palat - relative corsi +2.9 and fenwick +3.1
Killer - corsi rel +6, fenwick rel +4.7

That looks like production and chances to me
Apr. 17 at 2:26 p.m.
#19
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,963
Likes: 3,160
Quoting: Jded
Palat - relative corsi +2.9 and fenwick +3.1
Killer - corsi rel +6, fenwick rel +4.7

That looks like production and chances to me


Relative expected goals 5v5:

Killorn in the 4 years before Anaheim acquired him:
-2.6%,-6.2%,-4.6%,-3.5%
Palat in the last 4 years:
6.8%,3%,1%,3.9%
Apr. 17 at 3:14 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,729
Likes: 1,764
Quoting: dgibb10
Relative expected goals 5v5:

Killorn in the 4 years before Anaheim acquired him:
-2.6%,-6.2%,-4.6%,-3.5%
Palat in the last 4 years:
6.8%,3%,1%,3.9%


Feels a little cherry picked to ignore the more recent year, no? Fine to include those years in addition, but I wouldn’t cut it out entirely

I think these two comments are true from a statistical pov:
1. Killorn is undoubted a higher point producing player than Palat
2. This past year, Killorn’s team had a better relative performance with him on the ice vs Palat’s team with him, though in previous years, Palat held the vantage.

I wouldn’t anticipate Killorn’s contract to be attractive at all in the open market. With similar cap, that would imply Palat’s would be one that teams would altogether avoid, even with a reasonable sweetener. I’m not sure I have much more to say tbh. Wish you and your devils good luck
Apr. 17 at 3:17 p.m.
#21
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,963
Likes: 3,160
Quoting: Jded
Feels a little cherry picked to ignore the more recent year, no? Fine to include those years in addition, but I wouldn’t cut them out.

I think these two comments are true from a statistical pov:
1. Killorn is u doubted a higher point producing player
2. This past year, Killorn’s team had a better relative performance with him on the ice vs Palat’s team with him

I wouldn’t anticipate Killorn’s contract to be attractive in the open market. That would imply Palat’s to be one that teams would altogether avoid, even with a reasonable sweetener


I didn't include the most recent year because that year had not happened when Anaheim gave 34 year old Killorn 6.4x4.

I agree Palat is a cap dump, but to suggest that Anaheim wouldn't take him+1st for free when they gave 6.4 mill to what is, in my opinion, a worse, older version of Palat.
Apr. 17 at 3:46 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,729
Likes: 1,764
Quoting: dgibb10
I didn't include the most recent year because that year had not happened when Anaheim gave 34 year old Killorn 6.4x4.

I agree Palat is a cap dump, but to suggest that Anaheim wouldn't take him+1st for free when they gave 6.4 mill to what is, in my opinion, a worse, older version of Palat.


I think this is the third time I’m saying it. ANA already paid the $6.4M for a veteran winger. To assume they’d add a second makes no sense when they already have out one rich contract and now have zero spots in their top 9. Even then, if you asked Verbeek how much production he expected to get out of that $6.4M, I can guarantee you it was the over on what we got. With Palat, it’s all but guaranteed to be the under

There’s almost nothing that makes it worthwhile to add Palat in ANA. I genuinely think teams across the league will agree. Its great you guys enjoy him , maybe in 2 years he’ll be movable if the cap goes up enough and one team is itching for leadership like we were
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll