SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

No bitten bullets

Created by: mokumboi
Team: 2024-25 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 12, 2024
Published: Apr. 15, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Wait a little longer to offload Krug and/or Schenn. Hopefully, they can manage some semblence of bouncebacks before the full NTCs drop to 15-teamers. If the team is doing well and requires it in season, a 2C solution can be found then.

Not sure how many of these could actually fly from both sides, but all of these trades are in the area of trades agreed on in precious AGMs, if not damn near exactly those trades. The Buffalo one is the one that strays the most, and I'm actually not sure if they still want to offload Greenway's contract (which is how I'm treating it here), so it could be wacky nonsense.

And I think Leddy can still carry a bit of top pairing load, so Hague doesn't need to jump straight up to 23 minutes a night. And Krug could actually be the one dropped to 3rd pairing, but it's worth it to see if having Jokiharju next to him can allow Krug to focus more on what he does well. If not, Leddy can slide up to 2nd no problem.

Perunovich I'm hanging onto in case a Krug dump opportunity presents itself. Injuries happen, so I'll overpay Scotty a little to convince him to give us a little more time to jettison Krug. And let's face it, Kessel could easily end up the 7th Dman in this scenario, with Perunovich a regular. It's how it should be, but until we get a real coach, this one somehow imagines Kessel is amazing.

LTIR = Prospects most likely to take the pregame rookie lap during the season (kinda ranked from most to least likely, but things can change fast, so don't take it as etched in stone).
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
3$800,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$775,000
3$775,000
3$775,000
2$775,000
1$1,500,000
3$1,000,000
2$4,000,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Dickinson, Sam
3$950,000
Trades
1.
VGK
  1. Tucker, Tyler
  2. 2024 4th round pick (STL)
2.
STL
BUF
  1. Dickinson, Tanner
Additional Details:
Was supposed to be included in the previous trade.
3.
PIT
  1. Hayes, Kevin
  2. 2025 4th round pick (STL)
4.
STL
  1. 2024 1st round pick (NJD)
Additional Details:
Likely going to be #15 or 16 for #11.
NJD
  1. 2024 1st round pick (STL)
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (TOR)
5.
STL
  1. 2024 1st round pick (ARI)
Additional Details:
Theoretically #10 or 11 for #5 or 6. Blues draft Dickinson.
ARI
  1. Robertsson, Simon [Reserve List]
  2. 2024 1st round pick (NJD)
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (STL)
  4. 2024 3rd round pick (NYR)
6.
STL
  1. Woo, Jett [RFA Rights]
7.
BUF
  1. Faulk, Justin ($1,500,000 retained)
  2. 2025 2nd round pick (STL)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYI
2025
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
2026
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$87,500,000$79,770,816$0$412,500$7,729,184
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$835,833$835,833
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,125,000$8,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,800,000$5,800,000
LW, RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$412,500$412K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,125,000$8,125,000
RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$852,500$852,500
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$2,294,150$2,294,150
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$800,000$800,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD
RFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$950,000$950,000
RW, C
RFA
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
C
RFA
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$846,667$846,667
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$800,000$800K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD
RFA - 2
Dickinson, Sam
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$800,000$800,000
C
RFA
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$950,000$950,000
LD
RFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 15 at 1:56 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,830
Likes: 14,541
Buffalo is not interested
Apr. 15 at 1:58 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,313
Likes: 11,371
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Buffalo is not interested


Can you be more specific?
Apr. 15 at 2:00 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 190
Likes: 60
Quoting: mokumboi
Can you be more specific?


The trades don’t seem awful but that’s a pretty rough middle six we are left with. If you could sign Stephenson as a ufa that might help
Apr. 15 at 2:03 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,830
Likes: 14,541
Quoting: mokumboi
Can you be more specific?


We don't want faulk, we like novikov, jokiharju has actual value. Greenway is fine for us
Apr. 15 at 2:06 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,313
Likes: 11,371
Quoting: Tsmash
The trades don’t seem awful but that’s a pretty rough middle six we are left with. If you could sign Stephenson as a ufa that might help


Not sure how you figure that middle 6 is weak, but just to be clear, this is not the complete retool finished. In this scenario, finishing the retool must wait until later in the season, or more likely the summer of 25. It's not feasible to move every mountain in one offseason.

And like I said, if a 2C is required for early competing, that can be handled in season. Guys like Nelson, Sharangovich and Granlund could be impending UFAs on struggling teams (you do see the available cap space, yes? cool ). As of now, I'd prefer to season Dean and others who'll join us during the season (such as Snuggerud). What I do not want to do is block them, as much as I would love to have Stephenson. If Schenn somehow goes, I will be the first in line to grab Stephenson, trust me.
Apr. 15 at 2:08 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,313
Likes: 11,371
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
We don't want faulk, we like novikov, jokiharju has actual value. Greenway is fine for us


Okay, lemme go one at a time.

1 - Haven't you posted multiple AGMs with Faulk trades?
2 - Yes, we all like him, but you also have 327 young LDs. It's called dealing from surplus.
3 - Who said he didn't?
4 - Fair enough. Last I heard everyone wanted to dump him, so as I said in the description, I was not sure where he stands there.
BDHockey liked this.
Apr. 15 at 2:21 p.m.
#7
Get Jake Back
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 550
Likes: 133
I will take hayes any day, especially with a 4th
Apr. 15 at 2:39 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 2,111
I won't comment on the value, I dont watch enough of Faulk. But the Sabres are already committed long term to 3 blue liners, and Id guess barring a really bad 24-25 season, Byram will get a long term deal as well.

Even with the retention, it doesn't really work with the internal cap the Sabres have. That's why they've been so reluctant to deal prospects, even lower end ones, during Adams' tenure. He's not dumb (speaking in relative terms here lol) he knows he quite literally can't afford to deal the guys on ELC's unless its an absolute home run because they need a steady pipeline of ELC's coming through to sustain whatever they build.
BUF10 and mokumboi liked this.
Apr. 15 at 2:54 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,593
Likes: 6,733
I can only speak for myself obviously but if I have a 3-12 pick this year, the price for a team to move from 15-16 into the top 12 is going to hurt a lot more than evolving wilds draft pick valuation for example. Thusly, I don't think quantity of picks will be enough for any team to give up 5/6 Ov. If its essentially STL 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd and Robertsson for 5/6th Ov, I would decline without a seconds notice. None of those teams 1-8 need more picks at the cost of 1 excellent one. You'll need to add 1 better piece at the cost of at the very least the extra 2nd, 3rd and Robertsson.

Again, that's me. Maybe someone else goes "More darts at the dart board! Weeeeeeee!".
Apr. 15 at 3:14 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,313
Likes: 11,371
Quoting: F50marco
I can only speak for myself obviously but if I have a 3-12 pick this year, the price for a team to move from 15-16 into the top 12 is going to hurt a lot more than evolving wilds draft pick valuation for example. Thusly, I don't think quantity of picks will be enough for any team to give up 5/6 Ov. If its essentially STL 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd and Robertsson for 5/6th Ov, I would decline without a seconds notice. None of those teams 1-8 need more picks at the cost of 1 excellent one. You'll need to add 1 better piece at the cost of at the very least the extra 2nd, 3rd and Robertsson.

Again, that's me. Maybe someone else goes "More darts at the dart board! Weeeeeeee!".


Right off the top, it's not the STL 1st. It's New Jersey's 1st, which will probably be 9-11. You read it wrong.

Also, I do not look at EH unless pointed toward it. And I'm fairly sure that if I did check EH for the price of that package it would be a not insignificant overpay.
Apr. 15 at 3:26 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 2,249
Unless Iginla is gone and there is no real player Fitz likes I don't know if moving down 5 makes much sense for the Devils.
mokumboi liked this.
Apr. 15 at 3:50 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,593
Likes: 6,733
Quoting: mokumboi
Right off the top, it's not the STL 1st. It's New Jersey's 1st, which will probably be 9-11. You read it wrong.

Also, I do not look at EH unless pointed toward it. And I'm fairly sure that if I did check EH for the price of that package it would be a not insignificant overpay.


I understood fine, it was the sum of parts leading to the 5-6 Ov at the end. Which went through NJ's pick at 10th then to the 5th-6th. So i just combined it all to simplify.

Either way you look at it, my opinion remains. Outside 14ish getting into top 10 is going to hurt. i;e more than what you showed here. At least IMO.
Apr. 15 at 4:09 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,313
Likes: 11,371
Quoting: NJDevils1317
Unless Iginla is gone and there is no real player Fitz likes I don't know if moving down 5 makes much sense for the Devils.


Fair enough, but multiple NJ fans have suggested this swap, or right near it.
Apr. 15 at 4:11 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,313
Likes: 11,371
Quoting: F50marco
I understood fine, it was the sum of parts leading to the 5-6 Ov at the end. Which went through NJ's pick at 10th then to the 5th-6th. So i just combined it all to simplify.

Either way you look at it, my opinion remains. Outside 14ish getting into top 10 is going to hurt. i;e more than what you showed here. At least IMO.


Like I said, this NJ swap idea was suggested by NJ fans, not me. So maybe take that up with them. The Arizotah swap is mine, but again, by historical comps it's a small overpay. Taking them as one move doesn't make much sense when it's two moves with two teams.
Apr. 15 at 4:22 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 2,249
Quoting: mokumboi
Fair enough, but multiple NJ fans have suggested this swap, or right near it.


Some fans just have an addiction to making trades on here even if they don't make sense for their own team. They get off on the responses.
Apr. 15 at 4:30 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,313
Likes: 11,371
Quoting: NJDevils1317
Some fans just have an addiction to making trades on here even if they don't make sense for their own team. They get off on the responses.


Umm okay. It's not an insane notion, the difference in quality between the players rated 10-11 and 15-16 is minimal, and the Devils prospect pool has definitely thinned out over the last few seasons.
Apr. 15 at 5:33 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 374
Likes: 168
Personally, I like to see NJ move this pick for a player as opposed to more futures. We have enough of those at the moment and glaring needs on D and G that this pick could be used for. If we're using the draft asset calculator, the offer here is coming in a bit short. The 2nd rd pick would need to be in the 37-39OA. Close, but I'm not sure this package gets it done.
Apr. 15 at 7:02 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,313
Likes: 11,371
Quoting: DevilsFanInTX
Personally, I like to see NJ move this pick for a player as opposed to more futures. We have enough of those at the moment and glaring needs on D and G that this pick could be used for. If we're using the draft asset calculator, the offer here is coming in a bit short. The 2nd rd pick would need to be in the 37-39OA. Close, but I'm not sure this package gets it done.


You could be right, I don't know. But I don't use the draft calculator. Goalie I can't help you with. What kind of D are they looking for?
Apr. 15 at 8:32 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,287
Likes: 18,388
Quoting: mokumboi
Fair enough, but multiple NJ fans have suggested this swap, or right near it.


I personally think it would make some sense. We are probably targeting guys like Greentree, MBN, Boisvert, who will probably be available at 15 or 16.
Apr. 15 at 9:09 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 374
Likes: 168
Quoting: mokumboi
You could be right, I don't know. But I don't use the draft calculator. Goalie I can't help you with. What kind of D are they looking for?


LD/G - think we’re bad D/G trade partners for a 10 overall. There was an old post Buch and StL 1st for NJ 1st that was pretty intriguing, but I think the gap on the difference between those 1st has since closed.
Apr. 15 at 10:27 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,313
Likes: 11,371
Quoting: DevilsFanInTX
LD/G - think we’re bad D/G trade partners for a 10 overall. There was an old post Buch and StL 1st for NJ 1st that was pretty intriguing, but I think the gap on the difference between those 1st has since closed.


Bud, Buch is worth way more than moving up 5-6 spots.
Apr. 15 at 11:08 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 374
Likes: 168
Quoting: mokumboi
Bud, Buch is worth way more than moving up 5-6 spots.


Guy, that’s what I said
Apr. 15 at 11:27 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,313
Likes: 11,371
Quoting: DevilsFanInTX
Guy, that’s what I said


Umm okay. The wording is a bit tricky. So what type of LD exactly? What traits?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll