SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Today's attempt for the Kings Van Reimsdyk and Phaneuf for Brown

Created by: KingsGKG
Team: 2017-18 Los Angeles Kings
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 27, 2017
Published: Jun. 27, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$850,000
4$1,100,000
4$1,100,000
2$677,000
4$1,100,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,500,000
2$950,000
Trades
1.
LAK
  1. 2018 4th round pick (LAK)
COL
    Not Resigning Iginla
    2.
    LAK
    1. van Riemsdyk, James
    2. 2019 2nd round pick (TOR)
    Additional Details:
    2019 pick is conditional if Van Riemsdyk does NOT resign with the Kings
    3.
    4.
    LAK
    1. Miller, Colin
    2. 2019 5th round pick (MTL)
    VGK
    1. Dowd, Nic
    2. Gravel, Kevin
    3. 2018 6th round pick (LAK)
    5.
    MTL
    1. Clifford, Kyle
    2. 2018 4th round pick (MTL)
    6.
    LAK
    1. 2019 7th round pick (NJD)
    Buyouts
    Recapture Fees
    Termination Fees
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2018
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the NYI
    2019
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the NJD
    2020
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$75,000,000$61,625,864$0$0$13,374,136
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    $4,250,000$4,250,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    $10,000,000$10,000,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    $4,600,000$4,600,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 3
    $3,750,000$3,750,000
    LW
    UFA - 4
    $2,636,364$2,636,364
    RW, C
    UFA - 5
    $1,100,000$1,100,000
    C
    UFA - 2
    $894,167$894,167
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 2
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 3
    $650,000$650,000
    C, LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    $1,100,000$1,100,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    $950,000$950,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    $677,500$677,500
    LW, C
    UFA - 2
    $677,000$677,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    LD
    UFA - 3
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    $2,900,000$2,900,000
    G
    UFA - 6
    $5,250,000$5,250,000
    LD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 4
    $1,100,000$1,100,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    $612,500$612,500
    G
    UFA - 1
    $650,000$650,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    $925,000$925,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    $4,875,000$4,875,000
    RW
    UFA - 4

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jun. 27, 2017 at 8:38 p.m.
    #1
    GM - Canucks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2016
    Posts: 5,192
    Likes: 1,218
    Not trying to be rude, but the Leafs would have to say No to that. Martinez is simply not worth JVR. Martinez+ would be a good start.
    KingsGKG liked this.
    Jun. 27, 2017 at 8:40 p.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    GJWKINGS
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2017
    Posts: 593
    Likes: 98
    Quoting: TMLSage
    Not trying to be rude, but the Leafs would have to say No to that. Martinez is simply not worth JVR. Martinez+ would be a good start.


    Nothing rude about what you said. :-) Would you do Muzzin instead of AMart?
    Jun. 27, 2017 at 8:42 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2016
    Posts: 291
    Likes: 12
    Quoting: KingsGKG
    Quoting: TMLSage
    Not trying to be rude, but the Leafs would have to say No to that. Martinez is simply not worth JVR. Martinez+ would be a good start.


    Nothing rude about what you said. :-) Would you do Muzzin instead of AMart?


    I think I'd take Muzzin over AMart, but at the end of the day our need is for a RHD, and we definitely aren't getting Doughty. But I wouldn't be upset with Muzzin at the end of the day, to be honest
    Jun. 27, 2017 at 8:46 p.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    GJWKINGS
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2017
    Posts: 593
    Likes: 98
    Quoting: BStone67
    Quoting: KingsGKG


    Nothing rude about what you said. :-) Would you do Muzzin instead of AMart?


    I think I'd take Muzzin over AMart, but at the end of the day our need is for a RHD, and we definitely aren't getting Doughty. But I wouldn't be upset with Muzzin at the end of the day, to be honest


    I'd do Muzzin and the condition 2nd for JVR. We all are looking for that RHD. :-)
    Jun. 27, 2017 at 8:47 p.m.
    #5
    GM - Canucks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2016
    Posts: 5,192
    Likes: 1,218
    Muzzin or Martinez plus a solid prospect or a 2nd rounder+lower prospect, like a Chaz Reddekopp or someone. Realistcally, I do not think a trade is realistic, unless you are willing to part with a triple A prospect; which is unlikely since you guys are a cap-strapped team who are in need of a ELC player to get 40points or more


    In addition: Just me talking out-loud here, but I could see JVR+2nd or 3rd rounder for Vilardi
    Jun. 27, 2017 at 9:20 p.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2017
    Posts: 181
    Likes: 14
    Quoting: TMLSage
    Muzzin or Martinez plus a solid prospect or a 2nd rounder+lower prospect, like a Chaz Reddekopp or someone. Realistcally, I do not think a trade is realistic, unless you are willing to part with a triple A prospect; which is unlikely since you guys are a cap-strapped team who are in need of a ELC player to get 40points or more


    In addition: Just me talking out-loud here, but I could see JVR+2nd or 3rd rounder for Vilardi


    Not trying to be rude, but you are kinda contradicting yourself here. You say we need a guy on an ELC to put up 40+points but then talk about us trading away our first 1st round pick in 3 years. Again, not trying to be rude.
    Jun. 27, 2017 at 9:24 p.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 1,170
    Likes: 286
    straight up is great deal for Toronto. JVR is gone at the end of the year.
    Jun. 27, 2017 at 9:29 p.m.
    #8
    GM - Canucks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2016
    Posts: 5,192
    Likes: 1,218
    In regards to what Rmay50 says. The Leafs would want Vilardi. From LA's point of view it wouldn't be a good trade.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll