SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lots of changes

Created by: Smjth
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 18, 2023
Published: Jul. 18, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Flames have a lot of balls up in the air with guys not wanting to extend beyond this season. I still think Lindholm ultimately ends up getting moved too, I just don't know what fair value would be for him.

Columbus gets a goalie if Tarasov isn't ready

Colorado gets a top-4 D man for cheap as a probable rental for a guy that the Flames have under team control for 4 seasons

Boston gets a C who can play top-6 if needed. Better option than Coyle in the top-6

Edmonton gets a better rental D man while dumping Ceci's contract. The cap hit doesn't matter for the Flames in this scenario.

Canucks get a top-4 guy who likes it there, and the Flames get assets for a guy who likely wasn't re signing either. Poolman just helps the cap. Starts on IR anyways
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Girard, Samuel
  2. 2024 1st round pick (COL)
Additional Details:
2024 1st top-10 protected
COL
  1. Hanifin, Noah ($2,475,000 retained)
2.
CGY
  1. 2024 4th round pick (BOS)
  2. 2026 2nd round pick (BOS)
3.
CGY
  1. 2024 3rd round pick (LAK)
4.
CGY
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (EDM)
  3. 2025 3rd round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. Zadorov, Nikita ($1,875,000 retained)
5.
CGY
  1. Poolman, Tucker
  2. 2025 2nd round pick (VAN)
  3. 2025 3rd round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. Tanev, Christopher ($2,250,000 retained)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the COL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$81,264,999$0$1,077,500$2,235,001

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$825,000$825,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,125,000$4,125,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$813,333$813,333 (Performance Bonus$15,000$15K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 18, 2023 at 6:40 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 2,737
Likes: 1,196
Canucks pass. No cap.Tanev is worn out.Injuries have taken a toll on him.Hes not the same player he once was.IMHO.
Smjth liked this.
Jul. 18, 2023 at 6:42 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 217
Likes: 82
Quoting: remowilliams
Canucks pass. No cap.Tanev is worn out.Injuries have taken a toll on him.Hes not the same player he once was.IMHO.


Fair enough
Jul. 18, 2023 at 6:44 p.m.
#3
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,482
L.M.A.O.

4 years of Girard plus a 1st rd pick for one year rental of retained Hanifin?? Keep dreaming brother
TJTwolf, Xqb15a and vikhodush liked this.
Jul. 18, 2023 at 6:49 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 217
Likes: 82
Quoting: McRanteskog
L.M.A.O.

4 years of Girard plus a 1st rd pick for one year rental of retained Hanifin?? Keep dreaming brother


4 years at $5M for this ? Girard plus a top-10 protected first for Hanifin is more than fair
Jul. 18, 2023 at 7:01 p.m.
#5
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,482
Quoting: Smjth
4 years at $5M for this ? Girard plus a top-10 protected first for Hanifin is more than fair


Yup, everyday of the week.

You think Hanifins numbers would look like that stapled to Josh Manson or Erik Johnson as a D partner? Absolutely not.

Girards numbers are a by product of playing on a D core that features Toews, Makar and Byram. He matched Hanifins offensive output with less TOI, less PP time, less games played and stuck with weaker D partners
TJTwolf, Xqb15a, Android_H_Jones and 2 others liked this.
Jul. 18, 2023 at 7:03 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,753
Likes: 615
Edmonton declines, we have enough lefties on the back end
Jul. 18, 2023 at 7:13 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 217
Likes: 82
Quoting: McRanteskog
Yup, everyday of the week.

You think Hanifins numbers would look like that stapled to Josh Manson or Erik Johnson as a D partner? Absolutely not.

Girards numbers are a by product of playing on a D core that features Toews, Makar and Byram. He matched Hanifins offensive output with less TOI, less PP time, less games played and stuck with weaker D partners


This you? If that's what you think Saad is worth, even at 50% retention, you lose all credibility with me
Jul. 18, 2023 at 7:31 p.m.
#8
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,482
Quoting: Smjth
This you? If that's what you think Saad is worth, even at 50% retention, you lose all credibility with me


I assume you admit defeat here seeing as after only one reply you’ve completely shifted the topic of discussion. Must’ve struck a nerve as you felt the need to sift through my past AGMs to pick a new leg to stand on lol XD

As for that AGM, yes that’s me. Title was something along the lines of “What would Saads asking price be?” As I was asking the opposing fans base what the asking price would be.

A 1st and a 3rd rd pick for 3 years of Saad at 50% retained seemed close. The 3rd was for the three years of retained salary (6.75mil total, comparable was the NYI paying a 2026 2nd for 5mil of Bailey to get dumped), and a 1st for Saad himself.

It was an honest attempt at determining his trade value. Bad example to pick to try to discredit me kiddo lol
TJTwolf liked this.
Jul. 18, 2023 at 7:32 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 217
Likes: 82
Quoting: McRanteskog
I assume you admit defeat here seeing as after only one reply you’ve completely shifted the topic of discussion. Must’ve struck a nerve as you felt the need to sift through my past AGMs to pick a new leg to stand on lol XD

As for that AGM, yes that’s me. Title was something along the lines of “What would Saads asking price be?” As I was asking the opposing fans base what the asking price would be.

A 1st and a 3rd rd pick for 3 years of Saad at 50% retained seemed close. The 3rd was for the three years of retained salary (6.75mil total, comparable was the NYI paying a 2026 2nd for 5mil of Bailey to get dumped), and a 1st for Saad himself.

It was an honest attempt at determining his trade value. Bad example to pick to try to discredit me kiddo lol


Enjoy your big dub on the internet today kid, it seems to mean a lot to you
Jul. 18, 2023 at 7:33 p.m.
#10
Big Shoots
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 1,126
Quoting: Smjth
This you? If that's what you think Saad is worth, even at 50% retention, you lose all credibility with me


Did you just go dig up dirt on someone because your argument wasn't feeling as sturdy? tears of joy

Those numbers are comparisons to teammates as well which is difficult when you have 3 of the best dmen in hockey on your team and you don't play with any of them.
McRanteskog, TJTwolf, Xqb15a and 2 others liked this.
Jul. 18, 2023 at 7:49 p.m.
#11
Good nerd
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 963
Likes: 527
Quoting: McRanteskog
4 years of Girard


I don't follow the Avs closely, but I thought you all were trying to get out from under that contract? I'm not saying that the proposed deal was good or commenting on Girard's skill, but if your D is good enough that a guy on your bottom pair is making 5m, that is a luxury that most teams cannot afford for multiple seasons.
Jul. 18, 2023 at 7:50 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,578
Likes: 4,600
No cap room for Boston to do this deal.
Jul. 18, 2023 at 7:51 p.m.
#13
Good nerd
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 963
Likes: 527
34 year olds who are not signed beyond the current season typically are not going to net a 2nd round pick in the offseason. Maybe at the TDL when teams are desperate. Boston is in a dire situation at C, but I wouldn't call them desperate. They can simply embrace having a down year and explore their FA options.
Jul. 18, 2023 at 7:52 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 217
Likes: 82
Quoting: tupty
I don't follow the Avs closely, but I thought you all were trying to get out from under that contract? I'm not saying that the proposed deal was good or commenting on Girard's skill, but if your D is good enough that a guy on your bottom pair is making 5m, that is a luxury that most teams cannot afford for multiple seasons.


There's been talk about Girard being on the block for the longest time, and about the Avs wanting to move that contract, yet suddenly he's untouchable in a deal for a much better D man
Jul. 18, 2023 at 7:59 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 3,595
Quoting: tupty
I don't follow the Avs closely, but I thought you all were trying to get out from under that contract? I'm not saying that the proposed deal was good or commenting on Girard's skill, but if your D is good enough that a guy on your bottom pair is making 5m, that is a luxury that most teams cannot afford for multiple seasons.


Quoting: Smjth
There's been talk about Girard being on the block for the longest time, and about the Avs wanting to move that contract, yet suddenly he's untouchable in a deal for a much better D man


It's a media concoction that has no basis in reality. The team values Girard very highly and does not want to move him. He's not untouchable, but he certainly isn't some cap dump either. His contract is a good one and will look better and better as the years pass.
Xqb15a and McRanteskog liked this.
Jul. 18, 2023 at 8:06 p.m.
#16
Good nerd
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 963
Likes: 527
Quoting: Smjth
There's been talk about Girard being on the block for the longest time, and about the Avs wanting to move that contract, yet suddenly he's untouchable in a deal for a much better D man


And let's be clear -- if it is really the case that Girard is more of a 2nd pairing guy who is only on the 3rd pair because he is behind a bunch of other good defensemen, then the Avs wouldn't trade for Hannafin in the offseason since D isn't an area of need. Maybe at the deadline, depending on how the season shakes out. But they're better off seeing what areas of need pop up in season given that his contract isn't a burden at this moment in time.
vikhodush liked this.
Jul. 18, 2023 at 8:08 p.m.
#17
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,482
Quoting: tupty
I don't follow the Avs closely, but I thought you all were trying to get out from under that contract? I'm not saying that the proposed deal was good or commenting on Girard's skill, but if your D is good enough that a guy on your bottom pair is making 5m, that is a luxury that most teams cannot afford for multiple seasons.


There is nothing wrong with Girard or his contract, he’s just the flavour of the month trade chip COL fanbase uses to find ways to move salary to afford Toews new contract.

He may appear to line up on the “third pairing” but look at his utilization and ice time, he plays second pairing minutes, I believe he had 3rd highest average ice time on the team?
Xqb15a, tupty, Anus_McLeod and 2 others liked this.
Jul. 18, 2023 at 8:37 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 3,595
Quoting: McRanteskog
There is nothing wrong with Girard or his contract, he’s just the flavour of the month trade chip COL fanbase uses to find ways to move salary to afford Toews new contract.

He may appear to line up on the “third pairing” but look at his utilization and ice time, he plays second pairing minutes, I believe he had 3rd highest average ice time on the team?


I have pointed this out ad nauseum so I know by heart that he's actually 4th behind Makar, Toews, and just barely Byram. He's waaaay ahead of Manson though, which places him firmly in the top 4, regardless of how lineups are posted.

As a bone to the op, all else equal Hanifin is preferable to Girard. But all else ain't equal, and the difference is significant.
Jul. 18, 2023 at 8:39 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 516
Likes: 555
Quoting: tupty
I don't follow the Avs closely, but I thought you all were trying to get out from under that contract? I'm not saying that the proposed deal was good or commenting on Girard's skill, but if your D is good enough that a guy on your bottom pair is making 5m, that is a luxury that most teams cannot afford for multiple seasons.


People on the internet want to move on from Girard. The Avs front office loves Girard. They won't move him unless they get an offer they feel is fair.
Anus_McLeod and Will27 liked this.
Jul. 18, 2023 at 8:41 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 516
Likes: 555
Quoting: McRanteskog
There is nothing wrong with Girard or his contract, he’s just the flavour of the month trade chip COL fanbase uses to find ways to move salary to afford Toews new contract.

He may appear to line up on the “third pairing” but look at his utilization and ice time, he plays second pairing minutes, I believe he had 3rd highest average ice time on the team?


Most fanbases act as if pairings are locked in stone. Avs fans know Bednar changes his defensive pairings all game long. Girard dressing on the third pair means almost nothing.
McRanteskog liked this.
Jul. 18, 2023 at 11:43 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 39,966
Likes: 20,544
Quoting: remowilliams
Canucks pass. No cap.Tanev is worn out.Injuries have taken a toll on him.Hes not the same player he once was.IMHO.


Are you living under a rock by chance? Tanev has been the best shutdown defenseman in the league over the last 3 years
Jul. 18, 2023 at 11:49 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 2,737
Likes: 1,196
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Are you living under a rock by chance? Tanev has been the best shutdown defenseman in the league over the last 3 years


Hes 33 lost a couple of steps.He has a Documented injury history.What rock did you crawl out from.Its MY opinion.
McRanteskog liked this.
Jul. 18, 2023 at 11:57 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 39,966
Likes: 20,544
Quoting: remowilliams
Hes 33 lost a couple of steps.He has a Documented injury history.What rock did you crawl out from.Its MY opinion.


Injury history yes. That does not chance the fact that he has been undeniably elite defensively the last 3 years.
Jul. 19, 2023 at 12:18 a.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 2,737
Likes: 1,196
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Injury history yes. That does not chance the fact that he has been undeniably elite defensively the last 3 years.


Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Injury history yes. That does not chance the fact that he has been undeniably elite defensively the last 3 years.


Yep thats the past had some great years for the Nucks too.Hes not a fit for us.Im not sure how much longer his body will hold out.Hes just not worth Poolman(ltir) a 2nd and a 3rd come on really.
Jul. 19, 2023 at 8:21 a.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 39,966
Likes: 20,544
Quoting: remowilliams
Yep thats the past had some great years for the Nucks too.Hes not a fit for us.Im not sure how much longer his body will hold out.Hes just not worth Poolman(ltir) a 2nd and a 3rd come on really.


Lol, no **** the last 3 years is the past. Thats how time works. The problem is you said he's not the same player he once was, and injuries have taken a toll on him. Which makes no sense because clearly his performance hasn't dropped from those injuries as he hasn't fallen off at all. Unless you know about some secret hockey league thats taken place in the last 3 months since the season ended there hasn't been any fall off in terms of performance
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll