SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

deadline

Created by: TMLBRIAN
Team: 2022-23 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 20, 2022
Published: Oct. 20, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Leafs get a physcial defensive rd man in Roy. Dubas was talking about trying to get a player like this all off season and never did. Horvat would be a nice upgrade. I extended him here also. I would do the trade even if he doesn't. Kerfoot to Calgary has potential. They have a spot for him in their top 9 and if they deem a guy like Kane being too expensive, this could be a good trade for both teams.

I think they Leafs need to get bigger, stronger throughout their line up. These trades do just that. I still think they lack a bit of toughness on D but this is better. Getting a guy like Schenn in the Horvat deal as a 7 guy is also something I would like.

LA gets Chychrun after this trade:

La Gets:
Chychrun
2 x 3rds in 2024

Arizona Gets:
Walker, Sean
Turcotte, Alex
Spence, Jordan
2023 1st round pick (LAK)
2023 1st round pick (TOR

Thoughts?
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Roy, Matt
Additional Details:
LA gets Chychryun - Toronto gets Roy.
LAK
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. 2023 1st round pick (TOR)
  3. 2025 3rd round pick (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Horvat, Bo ($2,750,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Horvat extends 6.5 x 8 after trade is finalized.
VAN
  1. Engvall, Pierre
  2. Niemelä, Topi
  3. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (CGY)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$78,192,913$212,500$0$4,307,087
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,375,000$1,375,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$840,630$840,630
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,800,000$1,800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 20, 2022 at 2:50 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 618
Likes: 104
Calgary doesn't need Kerfoot
Oct. 20, 2022 at 2:51 p.m.
#2
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,880
Likes: 1,875
Only way I see CGY paying a 2nd for Kerfoot is if he comes 50% retained, so if TOR can find and pay a 3rd Team to retain, we'd likely be all over it
Oct. 20, 2022 at 2:52 p.m.
#3
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,880
Likes: 1,875
Quoting: claytron8000
Calgary doesn't need Kerfoot

Would be much better to have Kerfoot at 3LW than Lewis at 3RW, just need his Cap Hit retained & sliced down to 25-50% of his $3.5mil Cap Hit is all
Oct. 20, 2022 at 2:53 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,640
Likes: 4,215
Quoting: claytron8000
Calgary doesn't need Kerfoot, and there probably isn't a team in the league paying a 2nd for him.


Calgary 100% has an open spot in their top 9. Kerfoot would fill that spot quite nicely. I do think target number one for Calgary should be Patrick Kane. But Kerfoot would be a much cheaper option. Calgary has the most complete team in the league in my mind. If they can upgrade that 1 top 9 forward spot, they will be a true cup contender (I think they are regardless but it would help).

At or around the deadline, a guy like Kerfoot could fetch a 2nd round pick EASY at minimum.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Oct. 20, 2022 at 2:53 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,742
Likes: 6,226
Matt Roy is not available. Not even for Chychrun.
Oct. 20, 2022 at 2:57 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,640
Likes: 4,215
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Matt Roy is not available. Not even for Chychrun.


LA fan's have told me many times "Matt Roy is not available, UNLESS it's for a young top 4 left D". I guess not all fans agree on this.

If I am LA I am keeping Durzi and Brandt over Roy, due to their age and years of control and their potential. Doughty is untradeable at his contract. They have the deepest organizational right D in the league. Potential even after trading Roy.
Oct. 20, 2022 at 2:59 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,640
Likes: 4,215
Quoting: KingofRnR
Only way I see CGY paying a 2nd for Kerfoot is if he comes 50% retained, so if TOR can find and pay a 3rd Team to retain, we'd likely be all over it


at or around the Deadline, Calgary should be able to absorb Kerfoots entire cap without the retention. IF you want the retention done by a 3rd team I think Calagary has to throw in a 4th round pick to that team.
Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:03 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,742
Likes: 6,226
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
LA fan's have told me many times "Matt Roy is not available, UNLESS it's for a young top 4 left D". I guess not all fans agree on this.

If I am LA I am keeping Durzi and Brandt over Roy, due to their age and years of control and their potential. Doughty is untradeable at his contract. They have the deepest organizational right D in the league. Potential even after trading Roy.


LA is not trading any of Doughty, Roy, or Clarke. Every other RHD is available, including Walker, Durzi, Spence, and Grans. None of these guys bring what Roy does.

If you think Durzi is an upgrade over Roy, then I'd propose sending him back to Toronto instead of Roy. But you wouldn't do that, right? Because Durzi doesn't bring what Roy does, and that's what Toronto needs. LA needs that too, hence why they won't move him.
Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:03 p.m.
#9
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,381
Likes: 23,177
Seems like a waste extending Horvat....even it was possible. Cap really doesn't work in 23/24 if Bunting, Kempf, maybe Engvall are too extending. And the big hope Muzzin LTIRed also
Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:05 p.m.
#10
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,880
Likes: 1,875
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
at or around the Deadline, Calgary should be able to absorb Kerfoots entire cap without the retention. IF you want the retention done by a 3rd team I think Calagary has to throw in a 4th round pick to that team.

We'll see if he can perform as well as he did last year. Being a contract year for him, he should do well and we did pay a 2nd + 3rd + 7th for Jarnkrok, but that was to get him down to $1mil and I think we expected him to make a much bigger impact with us than he did and re-sign for a Team Friendly deal, but neither of those 2 things happened.

I say either a 2nd and TOR pays for the retention OR CGY offers a 3rd and pays the 3rd & possibly 4th Team for retention themselves

Semantics, but other than wishing Kerfoot was Bigger and Better at Faceoffs, I think he'd be a good fit on the Flames with Backlund & Coleman

CGY likely has other plans for that Deadline Cap Space, hopefully that being of the Patrick Kane variety
Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:07 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,640
Likes: 4,215
Quoting: tkecanuck341
LA is not trading any of Doughty, Roy, or Clarke. Every other RHD is available, including Walker, Durzi, Spence, and Grans. None of these guys bring what Roy does.

If you think Durzi is an upgrade over Roy, then I'd propose sending him back to Toronto instead of Roy. But you wouldn't do that, right? Because Durzi doesn't bring what Roy does, and that's what Toronto needs. LA needs that too, hence why they won't move him.


I never said Durzi was an upgrade over Roy. I said I would keep Durzi over Roy based on his age, years of control and potential. And you are right, I targeted Roy specifically for what he brings. So I get what you are saying.

So what would be a perfect Chychrun trade in your mind?

Chychrun to LA
Durzi, 2023 1st, 2024 3rd, Turcotte to Arizona?
Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:10 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,640
Likes: 4,215
Quoting: KingofRnR
We'll see if he can perform as well as he did last year. Being a contract year for him, he should do well and we did pay a 2nd + 3rd + 7th for Jarnkrok, but that was to get him down to $1mil and I think we expected him to make a much bigger impact with us than he did and re-sign for a Team Friendly deal, but neither of those 2 things happened.

I say either a 2nd and TOR pays for the retention OR CGY offers a 3rd and pays the 3rd & possibly 4th Team for retention themselves

Semantics, but other than wishing Kerfoot was Bigger and Better at Faceoffs, I think he'd be a good fit on the Flames with Backlund & Coleman

CGY likely has other plans for that Deadline Cap Space, hopefully that being of the Patrick Kane variety


Yes for sure! Patrick Kane to Calgary seems like a perfect fit in my mind. If I were Calgary GM, I wouldn't touch their defense at all and I would try and trade picks and prospects for Kane.

Calgary already has a big team, so getting Kerfoot or Kane (clearly different tiers of players but on the smaller side), would be perfectly fine. The Leafs are lacking in the size, physicality side of things, so I would target bigger guys for them and hence me moving out Kerfoot and not going for Kane.
KingofRnR liked this.
Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:14 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,742
Likes: 6,226
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
I never said Durzi was an upgrade over Roy. I said I would keep Durzi over Roy based on his age, years of control and potential. And you are right, I targeted Roy specifically for what he brings. So I get what you are saying.

So what would be a perfect Chychrun trade in your mind?

Chychrun to LA
Durzi, 2023 1st, 2024 3rd, Turcotte to Arizona?


I don't like Chychrun as much as everyone else does, so I wouldn't give up a haul like that.

I'd do a 2023 1st + Turcotte + Walker
or
2023 1st + Durzi + one of Madden or Thomas

If that's not enough, then someone else can have him.
Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:18 p.m.
#14
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
LA isn't dealing Roy.

And Engval-Niemela+2024 1st round pick doesn't get you a sign and trade Bo Horvat. The 2024 1st round pick needs to be the 2023 1st round pick. Anyteam that was going after Bo Horvat would easily blow away your offer for him.
WhereArtTLuongo and OldNYIfan liked this.
Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:28 p.m.
#15
Let Him Cook
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 962
and how do we afford his extension next year? trade makes 0 sense
Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:29 p.m.
#16
Let Him Cook
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 962
Edited Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:45 p.m.
Quoting: KingofRnR
Only way I see CGY paying a 2nd for Kerfoot is if he comes 50% retained, so if TOR can find and pay a 3rd Team to retain, we'd likely be all over it


toronto can easily get that done. kerfoot is only owed 700k salary, so 1.75M ( 50%) is only 350k, that gets done for a 4th, by either buffalo or arizona. toronto would love to get a second imo, dubas likes to draft
KingofRnR liked this.
Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:32 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 91
Likes: 26
Quoting: KingofRnR
Only way I see CGY paying a 2nd for Kerfoot is if he comes 50% retained, so if TOR can find and pay a 3rd Team to retain, we'd likely be all over it


Toronto only has 700k left to pay kerfoot so it's not alot
Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:35 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,742
Likes: 6,226
Quoting: jake4leafs
toronto can easily get that done. kerfoot is only owed 750k salary, so 1.75M ( 50%) is only 350k, that gets done for a 4th, by either buffalo or arizona. toronto would love to get a second imo, dubas likes to draft


You might want to try that math again there, bud.
Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:43 p.m.
#19
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,880
Likes: 1,875
Quoting: jake4leafs
toronto can easily get that done. kerfoot is only owed 750k salary, so 1.75M ( 50%) is only 350k, that gets done for a 4th, by either buffalo or arizona. toronto would love to get a second imo, dubas likes to draft


Quoting: Monke
Toronto only has 700k left to pay kerfoot so it's not alot

Yes it'd be a cheap out of pocket cost/way to buy a Pick for a 3rd & maybe 4th Team IF they have & are willing to give up Cap Space to do so: BUF, ANA, ARI, etc.

To get Kerfoot 75% retained = only a $875k Cap Hit would noice, certainly worth a 2nd/3rd + 4th + 7th imo
Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:45 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 582
If Bo is going to sign for that Canucks would just keep him and sign him themselves
Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:45 p.m.
#21
Let Him Cook
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 962
Quoting: tkecanuck341
You might want to try that math again there, bud.


Quoting: tkecanuck341
You might want to try that math again there, bud.


its 700k, made a mistake whoopsie
Oct. 20, 2022 at 4:04 p.m.
#22
MajorMoose
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 2,602
If Bo wanted 6.5 x 8 he'd have been extended months ago
Oct. 21, 2022 at 12:03 a.m.
#23
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,111
Likes: 25,881
Constructing a realistic trade for Jakob Chychrun now, when teams' rosters are essentially set for the first half of the season, is difficult when cap considerations are properly considered. Something might be more reasonable at the trade deadline, but I still think a middling cap hit (like Sean Walker) would have to go the other way from our side. And incidentally, having traded away our 2022 first, we might be reluctant to miss a first two drafts in a row.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll