SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Brock

Created by: GeneralLandro
Team: 2021-22 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 14, 2022
Published: Jan. 14, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
What is missing?
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Alexeyev, Alexander
  2. 2022 1st round pick (WSH)
WSH
  1. Rakell, Rickard ($1,750,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Any Team
2.
VAN
  1. Andersson, Axel
  2. 2022 1st round pick (WSH)
  3. 2022 5th round pick (TOR)
  4. 2023 2nd round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
Add?
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the NSH
2023
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2024
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$57,562,277$0$3,282,500$23,937,723
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,700,000$1,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,000,000$3,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,500,000$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,037,500$2,037,500
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$874,125$874,125
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$874,125$874,125
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,050,000$2,050,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$809,166$809,166 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,295,000$1,295,000
LW, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$822,500$822,500 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$822,500$822,500 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 14, 2022 at 4:09 p.m.
#1
Tintin over 1122
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 15,932
Likes: 10,168
If it’s no retain can it just be a first
Jan. 14, 2022 at 4:10 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 16,294
Likes: 12,558
Edited Jan. 14, 2022 at 4:18 p.m.
Quoting: capsfan2121
If it’s no retain can it just be a first


Say what

Ahhh wait read it wrong, possibly yeah
Jan. 14, 2022 at 4:23 p.m.
#3
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,810
Likes: 31,488
Alexeyev+1st is a bit much for Rakell. Should be Alexeyev+2nd or a lesser prospect plus 1st.

I like the Boeser idea though. Good target for Ducks. Think they'd have to add a bit though
GeneralLandro liked this.
Jan. 14, 2022 at 4:24 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 16,294
Likes: 12,558
Quoting: justaBoss
Alexeyev+1st is a bit much for Rakell. Should be Alexeyev+2nd or a lesser prospect plus 1st.

I like the Boeser idea though. Good target for Ducks. Think they'd have to add a bit though


Appreciate the input, just did their 1st prospect really

Add what else to Boeser deal though? Like a Sam Steel or Josh Mahura?

I love the idea of Boeser next to Zegras, asked Santa for it wink
Jan. 14, 2022 at 4:26 p.m.
#5
CUP OR BUST
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 755
Likes: 366
we are only trading boeser for a top rhd

we don’t want futures
PeterForsberg21 and theleano1 liked this.
Jan. 14, 2022 at 4:32 p.m.
#6
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,810
Likes: 31,488
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Appreciate the input, just did their 1st prospect really

Add what else to Boeser deal though? Like a Sam Steel or Josh Mahura?

I love the idea of Boeser next to Zegras, asked Santa for it wink


I ain't sure really. I don't think VAN wants to move the guy for only futures, and it seems unlikely Steel and Mahura would have a huge impact in their lineup, they'd want someone with more top-6 impact.

Don't think I'm in favor of it but I wonder if moving Comtois comes into question.
Jan. 14, 2022 at 4:35 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 16,294
Likes: 12,558
Quoting: yeboi6
we are only trading boeser for a top rhd

we don’t want futures



A Kevin Shattenkirk 50% retained move the needle? Or eat your a contract?
Jan. 14, 2022 at 4:38 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 1,091
Canucks need a good RHD or center (ideally right handed) prospect coming back. If at least one of those two isn't in the deal then it doesn't get considered as it doesn't address our needs. I doubt a return based mostly on picks would be interesting unless it was an overpay.

Considering that ANA is a divisional rival means a premium on top of that is likely required too.
PeterForsberg21 and theleano1 liked this.
Jan. 14, 2022 at 4:40 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 16,294
Likes: 12,558
Quoting: Canucks33
Canucks need a good RHD or center (ideally right handed) prospect coming back. If at least one of those two isn't in the deal then it doesn't get considered as it doesn't address our needs. I doubt a return based mostly on picks would be interesting unless it was an overpay.

Considering that ANA is a divisional rival means a premium on top of that is likely required too.


What about eating someone’s contact? That give any value?
Jan. 14, 2022 at 5:53 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 1,091
Quoting: GeneralLandro
What about eating someone’s contact? That give any value?


Eating a contract isn't worth moving a player of Boeser's caliber.

ANA probably isn't a fit unless you're willing to move someone like MacTavish, which is unrealistic.
PeterForsberg21 liked this.
Jan. 14, 2022 at 6:05 p.m.
#11
BIGG PAPI LOCASTA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 355
Likes: 35
Jamie
Trevor
for
Brock
Jan. 14, 2022 at 6:31 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 16,294
Likes: 12,558
Quoting: RIP_RICK_RYPIEN
Jamie
Trevor
for
Brock


Deal. Let me find someone named Jamie Trevor real quick
Jan. 14, 2022 at 6:37 p.m.
#13
BIGG PAPI LOCASTA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 355
Likes: 35
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Deal. Let me find someone named Jamie Trevor real quick


funny lol
Jan. 14, 2022 at 10:01 p.m.
#14
CUP OR BUST
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 755
Likes: 366
Quoting: GeneralLandro
A Kevin Shattenkirk 50% retained move the needle? Or eat your a contract?


hoping for a younger guy that can pair with hughes long term

maybe a three way deal would do it
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll