SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

3-Way Shuffle (Edm / Philly / Habs)

Created by: ricochetii
Team: 2016-17 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 27, 2017
Published: Mar. 27, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I mostly wanted to see what this kind of scenario would look like and how to present it in this format. Considered Giroux instead of Couturier, but this was more balanced in terms of salary (taking a raise next year for Galchenyuk into account).
Next time I'll combine the notes for who the team is keeping, in the original transaction details.

How well do you think this works out for all 3 teams involved?
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. Couturier, Sean
  2. Schenn, Brayden
Additional Details:
Philadelphia trade components
PHI
2.
MTL
  1. Eberle, Jordan
  2. Nugent-Hopkins, Ryan
Additional Details:
Edmonton trade components
EDM
3.
MTL
    Return for Nugent-Hopkins and Eberle
    4.
    MTL
      Return for Couturier and Schenn
      5.
      MTL
        Montreal keeps Nugent-Hopkins
        EDM
        6.
        MTL
          Montreal keeps Couturier
          PHI
          Buyouts
          Retained Salary Transactions
          DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
          2017
          Logo of the MTL
          Logo of the MTL
          Logo of the WSH
          Logo of the MTL
          Logo of the MTL
          2018
          Logo of the MTL
          Logo of the MTL
          Logo of the CHI
          Logo of the WSH
          Logo of the MTL
          Logo of the MTL
          Logo of the MTL
          2019
          Logo of the MTL
          Logo of the MTL
          Logo of the MTL
          Logo of the MTL
          Logo of the MTL
          Logo of the MTL
          Logo of the MTL
          ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
          25$73,000,000$72,177,850$0$470,000$822,150
          Left WingCentreRight Wing
          $4,050,000$4,050,000
          LW
          UFA - 3
          $6,000,000$6,000,000
          LW, C
          UFA - 5
          $5,750,000$5,750,000
          RW
          UFA - 1
          $839,166$839,166 (Performance Bonus$257,500$258K)
          LW, RW
          UFA - 3
          $4,333,333$4,333,333
          C
          UFA - 6
          $1,166,667$1,166,667
          LW, RW
          UFA - 3
          $3,900,000$3,900,000
          C, RW
          UFA - 6
          $912,500$912,500
          C
          UFA - 2
          $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
          RW, C
          UFA - 2
          $1,950,000$1,950,000
          LW, RW
          UFA - 1
          $640,000$640,000
          C
          UFA - 1
          $1,200,000$1,200,000
          C, RW
          UFA - 2
          $800,000$800,000
          C, LW
          UFA - 1
          $950,000$950,000
          RW
          UFA - 1
          $3,000,000$3,000,000
          C
          UFA - 2
          Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
          $5,750,000$5,750,000
          LD
          M-NTC
          UFA - 1
          $7,857,143$7,857,143
          RD
          UFA - 10
          $6,500,000$6,500,000
          G
          M-NTC, NMC
          UFA - 2
          $1,000,000$1,000,000
          LD/RD
          UFA - 1
          $5,500,000$5,500,000
          RD
          NMC
          UFA - 5
          $950,000$950,000
          G
          UFA - 1
          $1,425,000$1,425,000
          LD
          UFA - 2
          $1,100,000$1,100,000
          LD/RD
          UFA - 3
          $2,982,375$2,982,375
          LD
          M-NTC
          UFA - 2
          $725,000$725,000
          LD
          UFA - 1

          Embed Code

          • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
          • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

          Text-Embed

          Click to Highlight
          Mar. 27, 2017 at 10:20 p.m.
          #1
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Mar. 2016
          Posts: 597
          Likes: 28
          As an oilers fan I would take this all day. I think Oilers end up with more cap space
          Mar. 27, 2017 at 10:21 p.m.
          #2
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: May 2015
          Posts: 19,588
          Likes: 6,730
          Very interesting!

          I'm just going to go out on a limb and say i get the feeling that Edmonton won't be happy with their return, MTL is somewhat on the fence and Philly is the happiest.

          Once again just a hunch.

          As much as I'm pretty sure my first reaction was to say no, my second thought of reason stepped in and its starting make a lot of sense.

          If everyone was happy with this, I think I could be too.
          Mar. 27, 2017 at 10:22 p.m.
          #3
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: May 2015
          Posts: 19,588
          Likes: 6,730
          Post just to give rating.
          ricochetii liked this.
          Mar. 28, 2017 at 5:56 a.m.
          #4
          Thread Starter
          Go Habs Go
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Mar. 2017
          Posts: 10,667
          Likes: 4,091
          Quoting: F50marco
          Very interesting!

          I'm just going to go out on a limb and say i get the feeling that Edmonton won't be happy with their return, MTL is somewhat on the fence and Philly is the happiest.

          Once again just a hunch.

          As much as I'm pretty sure my first reaction was to say no, my second thought of reason stepped in and its starting make a lot of sense.

          If everyone was happy with this, I think I could be too.


          Thanks. smile

          I think it solves some issue(s) and gives all 3 teams a bit of a different look, while the value is close enough that nobody seems to be getting the best of the trade.
          Mar. 28, 2017 at 6:24 a.m.
          #5
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Dec. 2016
          Posts: 62
          Likes: 4
          Flyers wouldn't be after a RW in Eberle. So I don't think that would work. He'd need 2nd line minutes to be effective... he wouldn't get that here.

          Coots is a center every team has on the cup winning teams - I'm still way to high on him... haha, I"m a little bias.
          Mar. 28, 2017 at 7:39 a.m.
          #6
          Thread Starter
          Go Habs Go
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Mar. 2017
          Posts: 10,667
          Likes: 4,091
          Quoting: ding
          Flyers wouldn't be after a RW in Eberle. So I don't think that would work. He'd need 2nd line minutes to be effective... he wouldn't get that here.

          Coots is a center every team has on the cup winning teams - I'm still way to high on him... haha, I"m a little bias.


          It's a change for all three teams, but I wanted to do a 3-way trade and that seemed to be the best way to break it down. Otherwise Flyers get RNH and Gallagher, Edmonton gets Galchenyuk and Schenn, Montreal gets Eberle and Couturier. I think that's a worse fit.

          Filpulla - Giroux - Voracek
          Simmonds - Galchenyuk - Eberle

          Doesn't work for you? (Looks pretty good to me!)
          Mar. 28, 2017 at 8:01 a.m.
          #7
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Mar. 2017
          Posts: 24,044
          Likes: 7,749
          Why would Montreal give up on Galchenyuk?
          Mar. 28, 2017 at 1:33 p.m.
          #8
          Thread Starter
          Go Habs Go
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Mar. 2017
          Posts: 10,667
          Likes: 4,091
          Quoting: CD282
          Why would Montreal give up on Galchenyuk?


          I don't think they should, myself. If he plays center, he's necessary. If Montreal keeps him at LW, he'll be playing behind Pacioretty, so could be considered in a trade for a top line center however.
          Mar. 28, 2017 at 2:19 p.m.
          #9
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: May 2015
          Posts: 19,588
          Likes: 6,730
          Quoting: CD282
          Why would Montreal give up on Galchenyuk?


          Just because you trade someone does not mean you are giving up on them.
          Mar. 28, 2017 at 2:23 p.m.
          #10
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Mar. 2017
          Posts: 24,044
          Likes: 7,749
          Quoting: F50marco
          Quoting: CD282
          Why would Montreal give up on Galchenyuk?


          Just because you trade someone does not mean you are giving up on them.


          I just didn't see an equal player coming back, so I asked for an explanation. I don't follow the Habs so I wasn't sure what exactly was going on in Montreal.
          Mar. 28, 2017 at 2:23 p.m.
          #11
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Mar. 2017
          Posts: 24,044
          Likes: 7,749
          Quoting: ricochetii
          Quoting: CD282
          Why would Montreal give up on Galchenyuk?


          I don't think they should, myself. If he plays center, he's necessary. If Montreal keeps him at LW, he'll be playing behind Pacioretty, so could be considered in a trade for a top line center however.


          Thanks, appreciate the explanation.
          ricochetii liked this.
          Mar. 28, 2017 at 3:29 p.m.
          #12
          NBABound
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Oct. 2016
          Posts: 5,655
          Likes: 1,392
          Quoting: F50marco
          Very interesting!

          I'm just going to go out on a limb and say i get the feeling that Edmonton won't be happy with their return, MTL is somewhat on the fence and Philly is the happiest.

          Once again just a hunch.

          As much as I'm pretty sure my first reaction was to say no, my second thought of reason stepped in and its starting make a lot of sense.

          If everyone was happy with this, I think I could be too.


          Edmonton would be very very happy with their return. In fact, you can call up Chia and Bergy and get this trade call started. lol
           
          Reply
          To create a post please Login or Register
          Question:
          Options:
          Add Option
          Submit Poll