SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Voracek, Josi, & Spurgeon come on board the Shark train in fair deals.

Created by: CheechYou
Team: 2015-16 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 21, 2015
Published: Jul. 21, 2015
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,350,000
1$1,250,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Josi, Roman
Additional Details:
2016 2nd round pick
2.
3.
SJS
  1. Spurgeon, Jared
Additional Details:
Conditional 2017 3rd if Spurgeon does not resign with Sharks at season's end.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$71,400,000$65,195,835$0$740,000$6,204,165
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 1
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
$4,250,000$4,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$6,666,667$6,666,667
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 2
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$3,275,000$3,275,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$759,167$759,167 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$711,667$711,667 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
C
UFA - 2
$1,650,000$1,650,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
$1,350,000$1,350,000
C
UFA
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C
UFA
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$626,667$626,667
C, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 3
$3,800,000$3,800,000
RD
UFA - 5
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 3
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 5
$2,666,667$2,666,667
RD
UFA - 1
$1,600,000$1,600,000
G
UFA - 1
$4,850,000$4,850,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$625,000$625,000
RD
UFA - 1
$633,333$633,333 (Performance Bonus$50,000$50K)
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 22, 2015 at 12:36 a.m.
#1
#1 C Sean Couturier
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
I like Burns but I don't see the Flyers making that deal. A 'retooling' (or whatever this team can be called) team isn't going to trade a 25 year old top line RW for a top d-man who is 5 years older and a solid 2nd/3rd liner. That first line would be filthy though.
Jul. 22, 2015 at 12:48 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Free Palestine
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 756
Quoting: Timonens
I like Burns but I don't see the Flyers making that deal. A 'retooling' (or whatever this team can be called) team isn't going to trade a 25 year old top line RW for a top d-man who is 5 years older and a solid 2nd/3rd liner. That first line would be filthy though.

The good thing with Burns going to the Flyers (other than him being the quintessential Flyer in my view, as a Sharks fan I concede,) is that he can play as an elite power forward in the league, or if the prospects aren't quite getting the job done, can play at defense.

He's an absolute wrecking ball at forward and his 5-on-5 even strength play since 2013 / 60 minutes is 6th best in the entire league.
Jul. 22, 2015 at 1:33 a.m.
#3
#1 C Sean Couturier
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Quoting: CheechYou
Quoting: Timonens
I like Burns but I don't see the Flyers making that deal. A 'retooling' (or whatever this team can be called) team isn't going to trade a 25 year old top line RW for a top d-man who is 5 years older and a solid 2nd/3rd liner. That first line would be filthy though.

The good thing with Burns going to the Flyers (other than him being the quintessential Flyer in my view, as a Sharks fan I concede,) is that he can play as an elite power forward in the league, or if the prospects aren't quite getting the job done, can play at defense.

He's an absolute wrecking ball at forward and his 5-on-5 even strength play since 2013 / 60 minutes is 6th best in the entire league.

As someone who primarily watches Eastern games, I wasn't aware of his #'s (looking it up kind of surprised me tbh). It's definitely a fair deal value-wise which is what you said in the title, I just don't feel like it fits the direction of the Flyers. We should (hopefully) be good in 4-5 years when Provorov/Sanheim/Ghost/Morin/Hagg are all hitting their primes and while Voracek would be 29/30, Burns would be 35 and on the decline. I tired making a counter point with both 5v5 & powerplay stats but every stat I tried to use Burns ended up beating Jake in anyway neutral
Jul. 22, 2015 at 3:22 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Free Palestine
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 756
I definitely respect that. Voracek's just one of my favorite players.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll