A contract that can be bought out a easily as Byron isn’t a big problem 😏

A contract that has to be bought out is a problem in itself. Byron's just happens to be more buyout-friendly.

Then why does every Montreal fan on here want it off their team? :P

It's not bad as long as MB buys it out in the offseason, but it's very restricting for this season, and it NEEDS to go in the offseason, so it's pretty bad still.

Having a 500k hit next year, 1.73 the year after than two years of 1.13 still sucks

The fact that he's cleared waivers should tell you that it is that bad

I know that but it’s not bad enough to justify giving a top prospect and i high draft pick. If Steve Mason 4+ millions contract cost Armia and a 4th rounder. That was more the purpose of this then to say that Byron is worth is contract, because he isn’t everyone know that.

keith Yandle cleared waivers at the beginning of the season! That should tell you that you point is irrelevant

Nobody wants that contract either

Nobody have room under the cap. There a difference between not having enough money and not wanting a players. It’s not hard to understant that even making trade this year is hard to achieve due to all those team against the cap.

The point of the initial post is that the contract wasn't bad. If he's not worth acquiring because his cap hit is too high, it's a bad contract.

First of all you got this all wrong. I never sais that Byron contract wasn’t bad i said that it wasn’t that bad. I think i know what i was trying to explain in my own thread. And second of all team are simply not acquiring anybody. That the same around the league. All playoffs or battling playoffs team have almost no cap space so they simply cannot had anyplayers without giving back any salary. Get you fact right body.