SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Keeping Things Good

Created by: tjmorg0324
Team: 2017-18 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 30, 2016
Published: Dec. 30, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Hate on me all you want. I'd love to explain my reasoning.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
2$925,000
3$925,000
1$925,000
2$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$1,500,000
3$825,000
Trades
1.
CHI
    Vegas Golden Knights
    2.
    CHI
    1. van Riemsdyk, James ($1,000,000 retained)
    2. 2020 6th round pick (TOR)
    TOR
    1. Krüger, Marcus
    2. Schmaltz, Nick
    3. 2019 2nd round pick (CHI)
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2018
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    2019
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    2020
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the CHI
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$74,500,000$69,453,128$3,558,000$290,000$5,046,872

    Roster

    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    $3,250,000$3,250,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    $10,500,000$10,500,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    $778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
    LW, RW
    UFA - 3
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    LW
    UFA - 2
    $4,550,000$4,550,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    $2,625,000$2,625,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    $863,333$863,333
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    $717,500$717,500 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    $5,275,000$5,275,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    $825,000$825,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    $925,000$925,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    $925,000$925,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    $925,000$925,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    $5,538,462$5,538,462
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    $6,875,000$6,875,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    G
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    $872,500$872,500
    LD
    UFA - 2
    $4,100,000$4,100,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    G
    UFA - 4
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    $925,000$925,000
    RD
    RFA - 1
    $925,000$925,000
    LD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Dec. 30, 2016 at 11:11 p.m.
    #1
    GM - Canucks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2016
    Posts: 5,191
    Likes: 1,218
    Please explain why Toronto would give up their 3rd round pick for a 2nd (max a 20 spot improvement).
    JVR for Kruger is horriable even with Schmatlz
    Dec. 30, 2016 at 11:23 p.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2016
    Posts: 14
    Likes: 0
    Quoting: TMLSage
    Please explain why Toronto would give up their 3rd round pick for a 2nd (max a 20 spot improvement).
    JVR for Kruger is horriable even with Schmatlz
    It's a 6th not a 3rd. I think that that trade would benefit both teams, because the Leafs get a defensively styled forward in Kruger, and another depth playmaker in Schmaltz. It allows them to stay good while also tightening up a somewhat lacking defensive group (besides Kadri, they have hardly any two-way forwards). JVR fits well into the Hawks' style, and both teams do well.
    Dec. 30, 2016 at 11:25 p.m.
    #3
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2016
    Posts: 416
    Likes: 12
    Why would Toronto retain salary on a good contract...just to be nice and help out Chicago? Last thing leafs need is more forwards
    Dec. 30, 2016 at 11:26 p.m.
    #4
    GM - Canucks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2016
    Posts: 5,191
    Likes: 1,218
    Toronto would much prefer Alex DeBrincat and Chicagos first round. straight up for JVR
    Dec. 30, 2016 at 11:31 p.m.
    #5
    exo2769
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 16,266
    Likes: 10,816
    Quoting: TMLSage
    Toronto would much prefer Alex DeBrincat and Chicagos first round. straight up for JVR


    Chicago would like Reilly for a 7th
    Dec. 30, 2016 at 11:35 p.m.
    #6
    GM - Canucks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2016
    Posts: 5,191
    Likes: 1,218
    Dude; JVR is only a beauty contract for this season and next. Is a premier power forward in todays League. Debrincat is a solid prospect/2nd round pick. And Chicago's first rounder will probably be a 20-30th range. Its not that much of an ask.
    Dec. 31, 2016 at 12:20 a.m.
    #7
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 61,436
    Likes: 23,664
    Well, I don't think Debrincat is a solid prospect..He's a real wild card like Bracco. Schmaltz you would think has good possibility of being an NHLer....maybe in the Bozak mode.
    The trade. If the Leafs loved Schmaltz it might be a fair deal. But one thing the Leaf don't need is another slight centre (Schmaltz) so if JVR is traded I don't think that is a fit for the Leafs for the Leafs. Kruger the Leafs don't need him...Matthews, Kadri, Gauthier for sure are Leafs centres next year, and if Bozak is around (and I think he is at the start of the season for sure) and maybe Nylander goes to centre. So again Kruger isn't a fit.
    Ideal Leaf return for JVR...Kevin Bieska of eight years ago.
    Dec. 31, 2016 at 12:33 a.m.
    #8
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 61,436
    Likes: 23,664
    Quoting: tjmorg0324
    Quoting: TMLSage
    Please explain why Toronto would give up their 3rd round pick for a 2nd (max a 20 spot improvement).
    JVR for Kruger is horriable even with Schmatlz
    It's a 6th not a 3rd. I think that that trade would benefit both teams, because the Leafs get a defensively styled forward in Kruger, and another depth playmaker in Schmaltz. It allows them to stay good while also tightening up a somewhat lacking defensive group (besides Kadri, they have hardly any two-way forwards). JVR fits well into the Hawks' style, and both teams do well.


    Regarding the Leafs one way forwards....that is hardly true. 6 rookies at forward, and 2 rookie Dmen has made the continuity difficult at times. But all the rookies are willing workers even defensively though Nylander seems to make lapses that the others. The Leafs look very organized defensively and rarely the goalie barraged with multiple shots off one rush. (unlike previous years) No these players don't cherry pick. One reason that I like Komarov and Bozak on the team is that those guys work at their defence also. I'm a Leaf fan but I think a neutral hockey observer, these guys work and like doing it. Maybe something like the the Hawks of 12? years ago, a lot of young guys brought together at the same time, and finally a coach that players will listen too.
    Dec. 31, 2016 at 12:04 p.m.
    #9
    exo2769
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 16,266
    Likes: 10,816
    Debrincat is the real deal. There are 3 players with mutiple 100 point+ seasons for the otters. Mcdavid, strome, Debrincat. His knock before the draft was he played with those two before...let's see him do it without them. Now he's having his best season yet. Personally, that goal scoring winger is needed more for the hawks than a center too. They've been searching for that LW replacement. Maybe Hartman sticks, but having arguably the best player in the OHL is pretty nice too.
    Jan. 15, 2017 at 1:42 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2015
    Posts: 169
    Likes: 5
    I don't think the Leafs would retain that salary. Otherwise, you have some interesting ideas.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll