SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Future promise

Created by: tjmorg0324
Team: 2017-18 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 29, 2016
Published: Dec. 29, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This team I've made allows the Blackhawks to keep some veterans in the lineup, but also allows them to infuse some youthful new faces in the lineup. Darling will most likely be lost to expansion draft, so signing Kuemper gives them another goalie that can backup Crawford. The signing of Purcell gives them a forward who may go cheaply and can score if placed with the right players. RNH has been good, but besides the traded Yakupov, he has been the least productive of their 1st round draft picks. Kruger gives them a defensive center who can play on the PK.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$1,200,000
2$825,000
3$825,000
5$1,200,000
2$825,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,000,000
3$1,300,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Nugent-Hopkins, Ryan ($2,500,000 retained)
  2. 2018 6th round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. Krüger, Marcus
  2. Pokka, Ville
  3. 2020 2nd round pick (CHI)
  4. 2020 4th round pick (CHI)
2.
CHI
    Vegas Golden Knights Expansion
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2018
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the CHI
    2019
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    2020
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$74,000,000$69,359,794$3,558,000$290,000$4,640,206

    Roster

    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    $863,333$863,333
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    $10,500,000$10,500,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    $778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
    LW, RW
    UFA - 3
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    LW
    UFA - 2
    $4,550,000$4,550,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    $2,625,000$2,625,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    $706,666$706,666
    C, LW
    UFA - 3
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 4
    $5,275,000$5,275,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    $925,000$925,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    $717,500$717,500 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RW, LW
    UFA
    $825,000$825,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    $825,000$825,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    $5,538,462$5,538,462
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    $6,875,000$6,875,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    G
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    $872,500$872,500
    LD
    UFA - 2
    $4,100,000$4,100,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    $1,300,000$1,300,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    $1,200,000$1,200,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    $825,000$825,000
    LD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Dec. 29, 2016 at 6:46 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2016
    Posts: 570
    Likes: 71
    Darling is a UFA at seasons end. The Hawks will most likely lose TVR or Pokka
    Dec. 29, 2016 at 6:55 p.m.
    #2
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2016
    Posts: 416
    Likes: 12
    Highly doubt any team is going to retain 2.5 for a term with 4 years left on it.
    Dec. 29, 2016 at 7:12 p.m.
    #3
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2016
    Posts: 14
    Likes: 0
    Quoting: SickFlow
    Highly doubt any team is going to retain 2.5 for a term with 4 years left on it.
    Do you think it would have to be less? I personally think that RNH would fit in well with the Hawks' style of play, but I don't know if they would give him up.
    Dec. 29, 2016 at 7:23 p.m.
    #4
    Bringer_Of_Snow
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2016
    Posts: 1,422
    Likes: 670
    Tell me more about how RNH at $3.5mill is only worth a 4th line centre and some scraps. I'd love to hear it.
    Dec. 29, 2016 at 8:12 p.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2016
    Posts: 14
    Likes: 0
    Quoting: Bringer_Of_Snow
    Tell me more about how RNH at $3.5mill is only worth a 4th line centre and some scraps. I'd love to hear it.
    Ok so here's my reasoning: The Oilers are a good and upcoming team, but their defensive play still is struggling. They have a lot of playmakers and snipers, but they need more defense. When going back to the Hall trade, if Hall had played for a team that had good defense, then the Oilers could have easily gotten someone better for Taylor Hall. However, they settled for Larsson because they will never be able to do anything without a good defense, and Larsson is a good start. With Nurse and Kelfbom, they have some good upcoming defensemen, and they are obviously looking to build on that and eventually make a cup run. With Pokka, they are given another defensemen (who is right handed, I may add) that Edmonton needs, and also one that plays a mostly defensive game, but can shoot the puck when his confidence grows. With Kruger, the Oilers are given a center who plays a defensively styled game, which is (once again) something Edmonton lacks. Everyone knows that offensive wins games, but defense wins championships. With this trade, the Oilers lose a stud, yes. But, they add some talent to a team that lacks the defensive talent required to win the Stanley Cup.
    Dec. 29, 2016 at 8:26 p.m.
    #6
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 61,436
    Likes: 23,664
    Does Pokka really exist? I've seen his name on these posts for years. 22 years old, 3rd year in the AHL. zero NHL games. If the Hawks think he is of trade value, maybe he should play some NHL games.
    Look at the bottom four guys for the current Hawks, if Pokka can't at least some playing in that group, his trading value can't be very high. By retaining 2.5m on RHN you really make Kruger a 5.6m player.
    Oilers would be better to waive RHN successful and sign a player for 5.6m
    Dec. 29, 2016 at 9:20 p.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2016
    Posts: 14
    Likes: 0
    Quoting: palhal
    Does Pokka really exist? I've seen his name on these posts for years. 22 years old, 3rd year in the AHL. zero NHL games. If the Hawks think he is of trade value, maybe he should play some NHL games.
    Look at the bottom four guys for the current Hawks, if Pokka can't at least some playing in that group, his trading value can't be very high. By retaining 2.5m on RHN you really make Kruger a 5.6m player.
    Oilers would be better to waive RHN successful and sign a player for 5.6m
    Pokka does exist, but the Hawks defense has been the same for a long time, and that's why he hasn't been up in the NHL. However, he did play for Finland in the Wold Cup of Hockey, and there's a clip of him batting a puck out of midair to save a goal. The reason he isn't up is because the Hawks have one of the best defensive defensemen in Hjalmarsson, so there's not really a need for that. However, a team like the Oilers does not. He could potentially play 2nd D pairing with Nurse. And you are correct about the 2.5 Million that is being retained. I'm going to change the deal because Purcell is uneeded and, as a Hawks fan, I'd much rather have RNH than Purcell, and retain only 1.5 million.
    Dec. 30, 2016 at 8:54 a.m.
    #8
    exo2769
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 16,265
    Likes: 10,815
    Quoting: tjmorg0324
    Quoting: palhal
    Does Pokka really exist? I've seen his name on these posts for years. 22 years old, 3rd year in the AHL. zero NHL games. If the Hawks think he is of trade value, maybe he should play some NHL games.
    Look at the bottom four guys for the current Hawks, if Pokka can't at least some playing in that group, his trading value can't be very high. By retaining 2.5m on RHN you really make Kruger a 5.6m player.
    Oilers would be better to waive RHN successful and sign a player for 5.6m
    Pokka does exist, but the Hawks defense has been the same for a long time, and that's why he hasn't been up in the NHL. However, he did play for Finland in the Wold Cup of Hockey, and there's a clip of him batting a puck out of midair to save a goal. The reason he isn't up is because the Hawks have one of the best defensive defensemen in Hjalmarsson, so there's not really a need for that. However, a team like the Oilers does not. He could potentially play 2nd D pairing with Nurse. And you are correct about the 2.5 Million that is being retained. I'm going to change the deal because Purcell is uneeded and, as a Hawks fan, I'd much rather have RNH than Purcell, and retain only 1.5 million.


    As a Hawks fan, I'll agree that this year is hard for him to get playing time because signing Campbell and Kempny this past offseason made them really deep. BUT LAST YEAR was a revolving door even @ the #4 slot. TVR eventually won that role. To think that Svedberg and Gustaffson who aren't getting any playing time this year...are still probably ahead of Pokka on the call up list...I'm not sure they think he's very good at all. I did watch a few World Cup games and while I saw a few flashes of talent...he DID NOT impress me overall. Quite frankly, he seems a lot like Kempny. Almost more interested in bring up the puck than playing zone responsible defense. With that said, Dmen take longer to develop. No team should just give up on him.
    Jan. 15, 2017 at 1:49 p.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2015
    Posts: 169
    Likes: 5
    Nugent-Hopkins trade favors the Oilers too much.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll