SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

We Suck So Bad - Blow it Up

Created by: Jrader17
Team: 2020-21 Arizona Coyotes
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 15, 2021
Published: Mar. 16, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
2$750,000
Trades
1.
ARI
  1. Berglund, Victor
  2. Moore, John
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (BOS)
  4. 2022 1st round pick (BOS)
BOS
  1. Ekman-Larsson, Oliver ($2,250,000 retained)
2.
ARI
  1. Barron, Justin [Reserve List]
  2. Jost, Tyson
  3. 2021 1st round pick (COL)
3.
ARI
  1. Gustafsson, Erik
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (PHI)
4.
ARI
  1. 2021 4th round pick (VGK)
5.
FLA
  1. 2021 2nd round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the COL
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
2022
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
2023
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$67,050,242$196,951$850,000$14,449,758
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$7,150,000$7,150,000
LW, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$5,850,000$5,850,000
RW, C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$775,000$775,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,533,333$1,533,333
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$874,125$874,125
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$6,800,000$6,800,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$700,000$700,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,600,000$4,600,000
LD/RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$3,937,500$3,937,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$5,275,000$5,275,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
C
RFA
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$809,167$809,167 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$737,500$737,500 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 16, 2021 at 9:37 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
1...Avs don’t need kuemper and 2....that’s a massive over payment for a goalie, you will get half that value
kobeottosen19 and TJTwolf liked this.
Mar. 16, 2021 at 9:39 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 465
Even though the value is fair for the OEL deal, the Bruins decline as they don't have the resources to take on his contract, even with $2.25 retained.
Jrader17 liked this.
Mar. 16, 2021 at 9:41 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,586
Likes: 5,457
Quoting: coga16
1...Avs don’t need kuemper and 2....that’s a massive over payment for a goalie, you will get half that value


What's Barron's value?
Mar. 16, 2021 at 9:46 a.m.
#4
DwightSchrute
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 96
Likes: 12
At least you're not Buffalo's Bad so I see this as a win
Mr_Canoehead liked this.
Mar. 16, 2021 at 10:01 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: bhavikp27
What's Barron's value?


hes an avs top prospect...teams moving goalies never get top prospects or 1st back, and considering Kuemper is 32 at the time of his contract is up, you arent giving up high assets to goalies to make the trade worth it, extending going into their mid 30s.

Kuemper is more a 2nd and a low-mid prospect, thats just the goalie market in general
TJTwolf liked this.
Mar. 16, 2021 at 10:12 a.m.
#6
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
avs accept
Jrader17 liked this.
Mar. 16, 2021 at 10:20 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,586
Likes: 5,457
Quoting: coga16
hes an avs top prospect...teams moving goalies never get top prospects or 1st back, and considering Kuemper is 32 at the time of his contract is up, you arent giving up high assets to goalies to make the trade worth it, extending going into their mid 30s.

Kuemper is more a 2nd and a low-mid prospect, thats just the goalie market in general


Difference is that Kuemper is a top8 G. Most available goaltenders on the "goalie market" are usually backups or 1B. There's a certain gap here. If Barron is projected to be a top4 D, it's a bit too much but I would think this is close to what ARI could get if they move Kuemper right now.
Jrader17 and DirtyDangle liked this.
Mar. 16, 2021 at 10:29 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: bhavikp27
Difference is that Kuemper is a top8 G. Most available goaltenders on the "goalie market" are usually backups or 1B. There's a certain gap here. If Barron is projected to be a top4 D, it's a bit too much but I would think this is close to what ARI could get if they move Kuemper right now.


Barron is projtected as a Top 4 D talent, he was a recent fist round pick, played at WJC for Canada, lighting it up against in the Q. Hes a smooth skating puck moving Dman, easy top 4 talent.

When you look at all the stats, SV% GAA% GSAx Grubi is better than Kuemper, that is the point of all this. Why are you giving up a 1st and Barron for not even upgrading your goaltending position?
Kuemper is fine but hes not at this elite level he was last year, he is coming down to earth more this season, his numbers arent as strong
kobeottosen19 and TJTwolf liked this.
Mar. 16, 2021 at 10:41 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,586
Likes: 5,457
Quoting: coga16
Barron is projtected as a Top 4 D talent, he was a recent fist round pick, played at WJC for Canada, lighting it up against in the Q. Hes a smooth skating puck moving Dman, easy top 4 talent.

When you look at all the stats, SV% GAA% GSAx Grubi is better than Kuemper, that is the point of all this. Why are you giving up a 1st and Barron for not even upgrading your goaltending position?
Kuemper is fine but hes not at this elite level he was last year, he is coming down to earth more this season, his numbers arent as strong


Not saying Colorado should do it. It was just about Kuemper's value. Avs should add a 3rd G imo
kobeottosen19 and DirtyDangle liked this.
Mar. 16, 2021 at 10:42 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: bhavikp27
Not saying Colorado should do it. It was just about Kuemper's value. Avs should add a 3G imo


Its still not as much as you would assume. Goalies never, ever, get good returns. I am not saying he is worthless, far from it, but hes not getting a 1st rounder no matter what. Goalies dont get 1sts back
GMs, kobeottosen19 and TJTwolf liked this.
Mar. 16, 2021 at 11:06 a.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 230
Likes: 45
Quoting: coga16
1...Avs don’t need kuemper and 2....that’s a massive over payment for a goalie, you will get half that value


I think for any Kuemper trade you need to use the Ryan Miller trade as an analog, Miller was actually 2 years older at 33 at the time but he was traded to St. Louis by Buffalo with Steve Ott for Jaroslav Halak, Chris Stewart, William Carrier, St. Louis' 1st round pick. Also Miller was a rental - Kuemper has another year at 4.5 so you're actually getting him for 2 playoff runs not just one. So if Miller fetched a young roster player in Stewart, a decent prospect at the time in Carrier (#57 overall pick) and a 1st... what would Kuemper get? Which is a long way of saying this is appropriate value for him. Also yes the Avs do need another goalie, Grubauer's stat's may look good but he's playing behind a juggernaut and the Avs of all teams should know what Kuemps can do. He's playing behind an absolute dog doo doo roster this year and is still top 6 in xGSVA.
DirtyDangle liked this.
Mar. 16, 2021 at 11:10 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: Jrader17
I think for any Kuemper trade you need to use the Ryan Miller trade as an analog, Miller was actually 2 years older at 33 at the time but he was traded to St. Louis by Buffalo with Steve Ott for Jaroslav Halak, Chris Stewart, William Carrier, St. Louis' 1st round pick. Also Miller was a rental - Kuemper has another year at 4.5 so you're actually getting him for 2 playoff runs not just one. So if Miller fetched a young roster player in Stewart, a decent prospect at the time in Carrier (#57 overall pick) and a 1st... what would Kuemper get? Which is a long way of saying this is appropriate value for him. Also yes the Avs do need another goalie, Grubauer's stat's may look good but he's playing behind a juggernaut and the Avs of all teams should know what Kuemps can do. He's playing behind an absolute dog doo doo roster this year and is still top 6 in xGSVA.


A trade from 2014 does not set the market in 2021, a trade that completly blew up in the blues face and didnt work and probably a reason why teams do not pay up for goalies..especially in season trade for one

Sorry but you aren't even close to being realistic here
kobeottosen19 and TJTwolf liked this.
Mar. 16, 2021 at 1:10 p.m.
#13
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: coga16
Its still not as much as you would assume. Goalies never, ever, get good returns. I am not saying he is worthless, far from it, but hes not getting a 1st rounder no matter what. Goalies dont get 1sts back


varlamov
Mar. 16, 2021 at 1:36 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: DirtyDangle
varlamov


Again you have 0 comprehension of conversations, those are not the same things....Varly was traded as a 22 year old as an RFA 10 yeras ago during the offesason. That has nothing to do about a soon to be expiring contract 31 year old goal midseason at the trade deadline

I know its tough but try to be relevant in todays Era, and not chime in with trades that are not even part of the conversation, not relatable, and area 2 CBAs ago.
TJTwolf liked this.
Mar. 16, 2021 at 2:51 p.m.
#15
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: coga16
Again you have 0 comprehension of conversations, those are not the same things....Varly was traded as a 22 year old as an RFA 10 yeras ago during the offesason. That has nothing to do about a soon to be expiring contract 31 year old goal midseason at the trade deadline

I know its tough but try to be relevant in todays Era, and not chime in with trades that are not even part of the conversation, not relatable, and area 2 CBAs ago.


k. you did say never ever.

andersen
Mar. 16, 2021 at 3:40 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: DirtyDangle
k. you did say never ever.

andersen


again a 26 year old RFA traded 6 years ago...thank you for proving my point of you unable to show compression of a conversation and just chime in on one thing mentioned instead of fully reading and coming up with a well thought out rebuttal

there is a reason why you get ignored
Mar. 16, 2021 at 4:09 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,619
Likes: 4,591
Quoting: DirtyDangle
avs accept


No, they really don't.
Mar. 16, 2021 at 5:17 p.m.
#18
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: coga16
again a 26 year old RFA traded 6 years ago...thank you for proving my point of you unable to show compression of a conversation and just chime in on one thing mentioned instead of fully reading and coming up with a well thought out rebuttal

there is a reason why you get ignored


k
Mar. 16, 2021 at 5:23 p.m.
#19
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: TJTwolf
No, they really don't.


it's steep but i'd be willing to do it but i think kuemper is the most underrated goalie in the league. i also don't put much value on a 2021 1st since there's not much scouting being done. i like jost but i think he's replaceable. the only real loss to me barron but i'm comfortable enough with the avs defense to sacrifice a prospect.
Jrader17 liked this.
Mar. 16, 2021 at 5:28 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 230
Likes: 45
Quoting: DirtyDangle
it's steep but i'd be willing to do it but i think kuemper is the most underrated goalie in the league. i also don't put much value on a 2021 1st since there's not much scouting being done. i like jost but i think he's replaceable. the only real loss to me barron but i'm comfortable enough with the avs defense to sacrifice a prospect.


Exactly. The 1st rounder is essentially a 2nd given the Avs aims. Jost has what 4 points this year on this juggernaut team, could use a bigger role in Arizona. Also with Barron he's a good prospect but is he even one of the Avs top 4? He's behind Newhook, Byram, Timmins, and maybe Beaucage.
Mar. 16, 2021 at 5:33 p.m.
#21
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: Jrader17
Exactly. The 1st rounder is essentially a 2nd given the Avs aims. Jost has what 4 points this year on this juggernaut team, could use a bigger role in Arizona. Also with Barron he's a good prospect but is he even one of the Avs top 4? He's behind Newhook, Byram, Timmins, and maybe Beaucage.


behind both newhook and byram for sure. i'd put him behind timmins too but i wouldn't fault anyone for putting him ahead given timmins injury history. i'd put barron ahead of beaucage and bowers and roughly on par, or maybe slightly behind kaut. he's having a very stong year in the q so i'm eager to see how that ends.
Mar. 16, 2021 at 7:13 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,619
Likes: 4,591
Quoting: DirtyDangle
it's steep but i'd be willing to do it but i think kuemper is the most underrated goalie in the league. i also don't put much value on a 2021 1st since there's not much scouting being done. i like jost but i think he's replaceable. the only real loss to me barron but i'm comfortable enough with the avs defense to sacrifice a prospect.


Quoting: Jrader17
Exactly. The 1st rounder is essentially a 2nd given the Avs aims. Jost has what 4 points this year on this juggernaut team, could use a bigger role in Arizona. Also with Barron he's a good prospect but is he even one of the Avs top 4? He's behind Newhook, Byram, Timmins, and maybe Beaucage.


Quoting: DirtyDangle
behind both newhook and byram for sure. i'd put him behind timmins too but i wouldn't fault anyone for putting him ahead given timmins injury history. i'd put barron ahead of beaucage and bowers and roughly on par, or maybe slightly behind kaut. he's having a very stong year in the q so i'm eager to see how that ends.


Byram & Timmins can't really be considered prospects in the same manner any more, and if we do then most people seem to consider Barron's ceiling higher than Timmins' now, only Byram would be higher as a D prospect if we're still calling him that. Newhook is their top true prospect but Barron is probably not far behind. Likely a top 4 Dman. Jost has been very effective in his role this year, and then there's a first. Whatever you consider it, it's a first. So nope, not a move I'd make and thankfully I don't think it's one Sakic would make either.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll