SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Mock-Draft

2018 Mock

2018 Mock

Draft Class: 2018
Created By: ruxpin
Published: May 24, 2018 at 10:07 p.m.
ROUND 1TEAMORIGINALPLAYERDETAILS
1Logo of the Buffalo Sabres-You were expecting someone else? He instantly moves Buffalo's blueline light years forward. He and Risto could be a terrific team for years.
2Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes-I have zero reason to believe the Hurricanes take anyone else.
3Logo of the Montreal Canadiens-BPA, you take Zadina here, though Habs really need help at center.
4Logo of the Ottawa Senators-The Senators should consider a defensemanv given Karlsson's situation. But Tkachuk gives them help they need up the middle.
5Logo of the Arizona Coyotes-The Coyotes need a defenseman for similar reasons the Senators do. Who knows what happens with OEL? If Oliver stays, Boqvist will give them a really nice back end. They take Tkachuk if the Sens go defenseman.
6Logo of the Detroit Red Wings-Wings need defense and they'll go with Michigan's very own.
7Logo of the Vancouver Canucks-He potentially gives the Canucks a pretty good 1-2 punch with Horvat.
8Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks-Keith and Seabrook are not getting any younger.
9Logo of the New York Rangers-The Rangers are like a house fire victim: they need everything. I'd like to see them go defense, especially with Ty Smith sitting there, but Veleno's their guy.
10Logo of the Edmonton Oilers-The Oilers really should go defense here., and Ty Smith is really a good fit. If there are plans to move RNH, they might go with a center.
11Logo of the New York Islanders-The Isles need a lot, too. Farabee looks great with Tavares, if he stays.
12Logo of the New York IslandersLogo of the Calgary FlamesOur favorite itinerant team walks away with a forward and a needed defenseman in the first round.
13Logo of the Dallas Stars-Why not? The Stars have Klingberg and...well, Klingberg on the blueline.
14Logo of the Philadelphia FlyersLogo of the St. Louis BluesOne of my favorite players in the draft with a lot of upside but some risk. Given their prospect pool, the Flyers can afford a little bit of a risk. However, expect the Flyers to try to move up to #7 (Vancouver) or #8 (Chicago) with both this and their 19th. They look to lose one of their touted young defensemen in the Seattle expansion draft, so this is their chance to grab a repcement and there will be a couple available at #7 or #8.
15Logo of the Florida Panthers-Exactly Florida's kind of player.
16Logo of the Colorado Avalanche-They may take Addison here, but they could really use some help on LW with Landeskog.
17Logo of the New Jersey Devils-Wouldn't he look good feeding Hirschier and Hall in a couple years?
18Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets-Columbus does not have a lot of depth at center. Hayton helps there and is a decent playmaker who works hard.
19Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers-I'm not expecting the Flyers to use this pick. If they've use #14, it's because they couldn't move up. In that case, look for Hextall to trade back from #19. If not, they grab their defenseman. They likely could get Sandin further back, so...
20Logo of the Los Angeles Kings-
21Logo of the San Jose Sharks-
22Logo of the Ottawa SenatorsLogo of the Pittsburgh PenguinsEspecially if Karlsson stays, he's a good--if unspectacular--stay-at-home defenseman.
23Logo of the Anaheim Ducks-Did Corey Perry turn 50 yet?
24Logo of the Minnesota Wild-Where do you start? This team needs so much work. I'd start at center.
25Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs-I'd prefer more of an offensive defenseman for Toronto, but he'll do at #25. I've seen him as high as #12 in some mocks, which should get a GM fired on the way home.
26Logo of the New York RangersLogo of the Boston BruinsThe Blue Shirts come away with the defenseman they didn't grab at #9. Son of Kjeil Sammelsson, so he's expectedly a big guy. He could be a steal at #26.
27Logo of the Chicago BlackhawksLogo of the Nashville Predators
28Logo of the New York RangersLogo of the Tampa Bay LightningWith three first round picks, the Rangers can maybe afford to take a risk. And make no mistake, this is a risk. Lots of upside offensively, but Merkely is a terrifice mixture of great ability but incredible stupidity and selfishness. If the Rangers can figure out how to teach him that life goes on behind the blueine, this is a good pick. Otherwise, maybe try to convince him to play wing.
29Logo of the St. Louis BluesLogo of the Winnipeg JetsThis is a reach, but man would he look good with Tarasenko.
30Logo of the Washington Capitals-Because why not?
31Logo of the Detroit Red WingsLogo of the Vegas Golden KnightsTallish center who still needs to fill out a bit, but could be a good 2nd or 3rd line center.
May 24, 2018 at 10:29 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 491
I'd love Kravtsov, guy looks like a serious player
ruxpin liked this.
May 24, 2018 at 11:25 p.m.
#2
True Reverse Retro
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 4,636
Likes: 3,047
Highly doubt Dallas goes defense with their 1st round pick. They have an pretty loaded defensive prospect pool. They need to add to their center depth. If Veleno falls to them, that's their pick. Assuming he's gone in the top-10 (which he should be), Kotkaniemi and Kupari (in that order) should be their priority.
May 25, 2018 at 12:17 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,797
Likes: 1,399
Flyers won't draft a centre in round 1. McIsaac is a late 20s pick.
May 25, 2018 at 1:47 a.m.
#4
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
For the last time, despite what capfriendly says, Brady Tkachuk is not a centerman!
Benning_is_a_genius and ruxpin liked this.
May 25, 2018 at 3:53 a.m.
#5
Gammagreen02
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 103
Likes: 11
Detroit takes Bouchard over Hughes
May 25, 2018 at 8:15 a.m.
#6
This is not serious
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 72
Likes: 7
I don't even know what to think about this, so many things I don't agree with. Addison and Sandin in the top 20? Jett woo and vlad kotkov in the 1st round?
May 25, 2018 at 8:53 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
Quoting: Gammagreen02
Detroit takes Bouchard over Hughes


I agree Detroit should take Bouchard over Hughes. I like Bouchard a lot more. That's not against Hughes, but more about Bouchard. I think they go Michigan, though. Very possible you're right, though.
May 25, 2018 at 8:59 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
Quoting: Benning_is_a_genius
I don't even know what to think about this, so many things I don't agree with. Addison and Sandin in the top 20? Jett woo and vlad kotkov in the 1st round?


Kotkov isn't a huge stretch at the end of the first, but I'm not huge on Woo either. I'm a complete amateur at the mock draft thing [pauses for shock to wear off], but I've seen Woo on "professional" mocks go mid and early teens. That is insane. I think it's extremely unlikely that the Flyers draft at #19. I think they trade back if they aren't able to package the two picks to move up. So, it's kind of a throw-away pick for me, but it also is a player that fits and whose development arc would work. They don't need someone that's ready in the next 2 years and likely won't even be in the AHL in the next 2 years, but they need someone who might be able to replace any of Morin, Sanheim, or Myers that they lose to Seattle. But yeah, it's reaching a bit.

If Jersey doesn't pick Addison at #17 and and the Flyers do pick at #19, that's probably the way Philly goes.
May 25, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
Quoting: J_Sand3rs
Highly doubt Dallas goes defense with their 1st round pick. They have an pretty loaded defensive prospect pool. They need to add to their center depth. If Veleno falls to them, that's their pick. Assuming he's gone in the top-10 (which he should be), Kotkaniemi and Kupari (in that order) should be their priority.



Yeah, quite possibly. Though if they're going center, it may be Hayton.
May 25, 2018 at 9:29 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
Quoting: ExpiredmilkYT
Flyers won't draft a centre in round 1. McIsaac is a late 20s pick.


Kupari will likely slide to RW anyway. They're deep at RW too, but in any case Hextall will take BPA. If that's a centre, guarantee they pick a centre.

I've seen mocks where Farabee is still available. As much as I really like Kupari, I may go Farabee if he is. Nearly all positions have good depth right now in the Flyer organization, but LW is probably weakest. But again, they'll go BPA. At the very least, they become trade chips.
Lights liked this.
May 25, 2018 at 9:33 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,797
Likes: 1,399
Quoting: ruxpin
Kupari will likely slide to RW anyway. They're deep at RW too, but in any case Hextall will take BPA. If that's a centre, guarantee they pick a centre.

I've seen mocks where Farabee is still available. As much as I really like Kupari, I may go Farabee if he is. Nearly all positions have good depth right now in the Flyer organization, but LW is probably weakest. But again, they'll go BPA. At the very least, they become trade chips.


BPA is only really needed when drafting in the top 10 IMO. I'm not a big Kupari fan. Would rather take Kravtsov, Berggren, or Farabee (if he's available) at 14.
May 25, 2018 at 9:34 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,797
Likes: 1,399
Quoting: Gammagreen02
Detroit takes Bouchard over Hughes


Hughes is better.
May 25, 2018 at 12:36 p.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Quoting: Gammagreen02
Detroit takes Bouchard over Hughes


Yep the only way DET take Hughes over Bouchard is, If Bouchard is off the board to say ARI, And then it's quite possible but then i'd select Noah Dobson instead.
ruxpin liked this.
May 25, 2018 at 12:36 p.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Quoting: ExpiredmilkYT
Hughes is better.


That's debatable?
Lights liked this.
May 25, 2018 at 12:37 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,797
Likes: 1,399
Quoting: Larkinisking
That's debatable?


Yeah, it is lol. Just my opinion. Hughes just has amazing skating ability, he and Bouchard both have very high ceilings.
ruxpin liked this.
May 25, 2018 at 12:38 p.m.
#16
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Quoting: ruxpin
I agree Detroit should take Bouchard over Hughes. I like Bouchard a lot more. That's not against Hughes, but more about Bouchard. I think they go Michigan, though. Very possible you're right, though.


The only way DET possibly selects Hughes is, If Bouchard is off the board to either OTT or ARI Then yes i could possibly see DET taking Huges or maybe they go Dobson.
ruxpin liked this.
May 25, 2018 at 12:40 p.m.
#17
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Quoting: ExpiredmilkYT
Yeah, it is lol. Just my opinion. Hughes just has amazing skating ability, he and Bouchard both have very high ceilings.


He was solid at the worlds, Starting to turn some heads, I can see ARI selcting Hughes though more so then DET.
May 25, 2018 at 12:42 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,797
Likes: 1,399
Quoting: Larkinisking
He was solid at the worlds, Starting to turn some heads, I can see ARI selcting Hughes though more so then DET.


Would you be happy with Boqvist at 6?
May 25, 2018 at 12:43 p.m.
#19
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Quoting: ExpiredmilkYT
Would you be happy with Boqvist at 6?


Not sure? Those two concussions on Boqvist have me worried, I think if it were me i'd pass.
ruxpin liked this.
Jun. 4, 2018 at 2:18 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
Quoting: Larkinisking
The only way DET possibly selects Hughes is, If Bouchard is off the board to either OTT or ARI Then yes i could possibly see DET taking Huges or maybe they go Dobson.


Yeah, honestly though, if someone takes Bouchard, it probably means Boqvist is still there. I take Boqvist over Hughes in that case. I just read your quote regarding the concussion history with Boqvist, though. I think that's valid and should probably give pause, but I still go that route. In any case, they almost have to go defenseman there, right? The only way I'm Detroit and even consider going forward with that pick is if something utterly bizarre happens and Zabina is still there for some unbelievable reason. Then I might think about it for a minute.
Jun. 4, 2018 at 2:24 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
Quoting: ExpiredmilkYT
BPA is only really needed when drafting in the top 10 IMO. I'm not a big Kupari fan. Would rather take Kravtsov, Berggren, or Farabee (if he's available) at 14.


I would probably ordinarily agree with the BPA/top 10 statement. But Philly is in an odd position where they're fairly deep in prospects at each position--with the exception possibly of left wing. If Farabee is still there, they really have to consider that. I'm a fan of Kravtsov but really think #14 is too high. Berggren is a nice kid, but if they waste a #14 pick on him, someone should be fired. If that's who they decide they really want, they should trade back. That may not be a horrible idea, actually, but I'd be more inclined to use the #19 pick as bait to move back (I may use #14 if I were able to skunk Buffalo's #32 and/or their first round next year--I think they'll still be a lottery pick next year). I'm a huge fan of Kupari, so I'll be giddy if the Flyers pick him. But, if Farabee is there, I'll understand going LW.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll