SalarySwishSalarySwish

TML-LIKELY

Created by: Tornayle
Team: 2016-17 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 15, 2016
Published: Jun. 15, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Trades:

Bozak to DET for Datsyuk and a 2016 2nd Rd pick
-Detroit needs a C and Toronto needs a roster spot. 2nd is a throw in for taking the contract

Holland, Corrado and Bibeau for Wedgewood and 2016 3rd Rd pick
-Sparks or Bibeau isn't cutting it as a future starter. Wedgewood has a higher upside.

Lupul and a 2016 4th Rd. pick for Wisniewski and a 2016 5th Rd. pick
-Bad contract for bad contract. IF Lupul can play next season this is the type of trade I can see him in
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,200,000
2$750,000
1$700,000
2$1,250,000
2$1,250,000
2$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
Matthews, Auston
3$925,000
2$700,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Datsyuk, Pavel
Additional Details:
2016 2nd round pick
2.
TOR
  1. Wedgewood, Scott
Additional Details:
2016 3rd round pick
3.
TOR
  1. Wisniewski, James
Additional Details:
2016 5th round pick
CAR
  1. Lupul, Joffrey
Additional Details:
2016 4th round pick
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$73,000,000$62,869,500$512,000$2,915,000$10,130,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
UFA - 6
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$2,950,000$2,950,000
RW, LW, C
UFA - 2
Matthews, Auston
$925,000$925,000
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 3
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 2
$686,667$686,667 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$2,650,000$2,650,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$575,000$575,000
C
UFA - 1
$736,666$736,666 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
RW
UFA - 2
$7,500,000$7,500,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 6
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD
UFA - 2
$4,150,000$4,150,000
G
UFA - 1
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LD
UFA - 3
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 1
$1,200,000$1,200,000
RD
UFA - 2
$587,500$587,500
G
UFA - 1
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jun. 15, 2016 at 10:46 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 3,304
Likes: 1,514
Reasonable thought process. I would imagine we could get more out of a Bozak trade considering the Datsyuk contract coming back. Bozak should be able to land a 2nd (or at worst, 3rd) on his own. Wedgewood deal makes sense to me. I think there will be a lot of goalies available and not a whole lot of buyers in the next 1-2 years...leafs aren't giving up much here and NJ getting some cost effective players. Not sure they'd feel compelled to make the deal but I think the valuation is accurate.

I thought a Lupul for Wisniewski deal made sense too but someone pointed out to me that Wisniewski's actual salary is lower than his cap hit which may make him more attractive to keep for Columbus depending on their cap strategy.
Jun. 15, 2016 at 11:34 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 64
Likes: 3
Bozak for Datsyuk should get us a 2nd and our 3rd back for helping them get Datsyuk contract if not a 2nd tier prospect as well. Lupul might be traded but it will be to a team probably not in cap hell right now not a bad offer though if they can get Columbus to do it.
Jun. 15, 2016 at 11:36 a.m.
#3
leafs1967again
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 21
Likely? You mean unlikely. DET doesn't want Bozak long-term. They would rather each Datsyuk for 1 year. TML would also get a 2nd alone for Bozak so it doesn't make sense for them to take Datsyuk.

The NJ probably won't happen. TOR gives up nothing to get an OK goalie prospect. NJ likely will just keep wedgewood instead of giving up a 3rd and taking on 3 fringe players.

CAR says no.
Jun. 15, 2016 at 11:41 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Quoting: leafs1967again
Likely? You mean unlikely. DET doesn't want Bozak long-term. They would rather each Datsyuk for 1 year. TML would also get a 2nd alone for Bozak so it doesn't make sense for them to take Datsyuk.

The NJ probably won't happen. TOR gives up nothing to get an OK goalie prospect. NJ likely will just keep wedgewood instead of giving up a 3rd and taking on 3 fringe players.

CAR says no.


LOL Do you ever agree with anyone on here?
Jun. 15, 2016 at 11:47 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Quoting: leafs1967again
Likely? You mean unlikely. DET doesn't want Bozak long-term. They would rather each Datsyuk for 1 year. TML would also get a 2nd alone for Bozak so it doesn't make sense for them to take Datsyuk.

The NJ probably won't happen. TOR gives up nothing to get an OK goalie prospect. NJ likely will just keep wedgewood instead of giving up a 3rd and taking on 3 fringe players.

CAR says no.


Bozak is NOT a long term solution...2years is not exactly "long term"

Corrado is still a projectible, serviceable D. Holland is a decent 3rd/4th line scorer and NJ already has Blackwood as the heir apparent to Schneider. This is not a bad deal. Regardless of your apparent disdain for any trades not first thought up by you.

Any reason CAR says no? Or is it just you wanting to furiously type the word "no" and beat your record for the amount of "cap friendly" trades you say no to?
See All