SalarySwishSalarySwish

Blackhawks #4 Cup

Created by: BarryCumstien
Team: 2016-17 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 7, 2016
Published: Jun. 7, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Bickell has to get off books no matter what.
Shaw for Fowler seems like a Ducks type deal, but Q may give Fowler the Daley treatment and still don't have a #4 D since TVR is a #5 at best.

Seemed to be the 4D was the biggest thing holding back the team last year.

Still need to do some cap gymnastics if it doesn't go up at all with Rockford shuffle or LTIR. This gives a solid 3 lines and top 5 D. Hopefully some of the kids step up for 4th line role and 6D.

If they could somehow move Seabrook than many more options.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
Overages, Bonus
1$2,575,000
Trades
1.
CHI
    2019 7th round pick
    CAR
    1. Bickell, Bryan
    2. Gustafsson, Erik
    3. Hinostroza, Vinnie
    Additional Details:
    Doesn't really matter what team or what prices, but have to get full 4M off books. If they have 1 way contracts for less than a mil that can be buried in AHL to ease financial impact even better
    2.
    ANA
      Andre shaw RFA. Shaw is a ducks type player and they may prefer to move fowler over Vatanen. Could throw in prospect too if needed.
      Buyouts
      Retained Salary Transactions
      Buried
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      21$73,000,000$66,950,754$3,070,000$4,120,000$6,049,246
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      $10,500,000$10,500,000
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      $812,500$812,500 (Performance Bonus$2,575,000$3M)
      LW
      UFA - 1
      $4,550,000$4,550,000
      C, LW
      NMC
      UFA - 5
      $2,625,000$2,625,000
      RW
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      $925,000$925,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 3
      $2,775,000$2,775,000
      C
      UFA - 3
      $5,275,000$5,275,000
      RW
      NMC
      UFA - 5
      $800,000$800,000
      C
      UFA - 1
      $667,500$667,500 (Performance Bonus$257,500$258K)
      C, LW
      UFA - 1
      $625,000$625,000
      RW
      UFA - 2
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      $5,538,462$5,538,462
      LD
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      $6,875,000$6,875,000
      RD
      NMC
      UFA - 8
      $6,000,000$6,000,000
      G
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 4
      $4,000,000$4,000,000
      LD/RD
      UFA - 2
      $4,100,000$4,100,000
      LD/RD
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 3
      $587,500$587,500
      G
      UFA - 1
      $700,000$700,000 (Performance Bonus$437,500$438K)
      LD
      UFA - 1
      $825,000$825,000
      RD
      UFA - 2
      Overages, Bonus
      $2,575,000$2,575,000

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight

      Top Comments

      Jun. 7, 2016 at 10:18 p.m.
      #1
      LongtimeLeafsufferer
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2015
      Posts: 61,415
      Likes: 23,661
      Despite the trades being fair, getting Fowler still leaves the Hawks in big cap troubles. Hawks likely will have to Gustafson and another cheap Dman on the roster.
      Jun. 7, 2016 at 11:46 p.m.
      #2
      Chicago
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 7,097
      Likes: 2,917
      Quoting: palhal
      Despite the trades being fair, getting Fowler still leaves the Hawks in big cap troubles. Hawks likely will have to Gustafson and another cheap Dman on the roster.

      I disagree, Shaw is worth way less than Fowler.
      Jun. 7, 2016 at 11:54 p.m.
      #3
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2015
      Posts: 19,720
      Likes: 6,857
      Quoting: NickC1988
      Quoting: palhal
      Despite the trades being fair, getting Fowler still leaves the Hawks in big cap troubles. Hawks likely will have to Gustafson and another cheap Dman on the roster.

      I disagree, Shaw is worth way less than Fowler.


      Yup same here. Shaw is a great role player who got lots of dirty goals by playing with star players. Play him on a 3rd line full time with Thompson and Cogliano and watch his production plummet. Not saying the guy sin't good, i'd take Shaw on my team any day but Fowler is just worth more by fact that he is a better overall player and can play big minutes full time. Shaw is a Depth guy, Fowler is a Core guy. Also Shaw is going to get 3m+ in his next contract so that is basically what Fowler makes now so not much of a cap saving to resign Vatanen.
      Jun. 8, 2016 at 12:26 a.m.
      #4
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2016
      Posts: 7
      Likes: 1
      thanks for the feedback. What with shaw would make it work? D prospect, picks.

      In my mind it is asset management. Hawks can't resign and spend 3M+ on 6th Forward when they still need 4D. They can make the cap work for the year and see where it goes from there.

      For Ducks, If they resign Vatanen and limdholm that will be 6 D making 3M+ and 5 at 4+. Seems better to use money on Forwards and trade one. Shaw puts up pts in the playoffs and has cups and grit which is something old school guy like Murray would like. He's considering bring Randy Carlyle back, so you know he isn't an analytics guy. Look at trades for Kesler and Bieska and they are loser Canucks.

      I don't buy the trades with Edm that they think they get RNH for Vatanen.
      graderman liked this.
      Jun. 8, 2016 at 3:12 a.m.
      #5
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 1,729
      Likes: 288
      You seemed to contradict yourself in team explanation. At first you said 4D was their biggest hole, then you suggested trading Seabrook, clearly one of their top 4 dmen. Although I actually agree with both thoughts!

      In hindsight, I would have traded Seabrook to Dallas last year instead of Sharp and kept Johns. Also, whatever the return would have been, re-signing Oduya would have been a must. Yes, there would have been a gaping hole in Seabrook's departure but Johns did look quite comfortable and confident in his late season call up as Oduya's prime partner in Big D. I believe he would have made the Hawks out of camp this past season. Another huge hole with the Hawks was lack of LW depth. Retaining Sharp may have actually given Chicago two scoring lines instead of the one they did have. Bowman never seems to do things easy and simple. He seems to wow us all with his maneuvers when there appears to be more straight forward deals to be had.
      See All